system/linux
system/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux synced 2024-09-20 11:07:02 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

ASoC: twl6040: No need to change delay during HF ramp

Browse source 
The Handsfree gain have 2dB steps all the way, so there is no
reason to have different delays as we approaching to the
end of the scale.
The comment was also wrong, since we have 0dB at 0x3 raw, at 16 the gain
is -26dB.

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Ujfalusi 2011-09-26 16:26:31 +03:00 committed by Mark Brown
parent 8ff1e17098
commit 4d64bdca44
1 changed files with 2 additions and 10 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c
View file

@ -526,7 +526,6 @@ static void twl6040_pga_hf_work(struct work_struct *work)
container_of(work, struct twl6040_data, handsfree.work.work);
struct snd_soc_codec *codec = priv->codec;
struct twl6040_output *handsfree = &priv->handsfree;
unsigned int delay = handsfree->step_delay;
int i, handsfree_complete;
/* do we need to ramp at all ? */
@ -543,15 +542,8 @@ static void twl6040_pga_hf_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (handsfree_complete)
break;
/*
* TODO: tune: delay is longer over 0dB
* as increases are larger.
*/
if (i >= 16)
schedule_timeout_interruptible(msecs_to_jiffies(delay +
(delay >> 1)));
else
schedule_timeout_interruptible(msecs_to_jiffies(delay));
schedule_timeout_interruptible(
msecs_to_jiffies(handsfree->step_delay));
}