lkdtm/heap: Note conditions for SLAB_LINEAR_OVERFLOW

It wasn't clear when SLAB_LINEAR_OVERFLOW would be expected to trip.
Explicitly describe it and include the CONFIGs in the kselftest.

Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kees Cook 2022-02-16 10:20:47 -08:00
parent 4a9800c81d
commit 42db2594e4
2 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ static volatile int __offset = 1;
/*
* If there aren't guard pages, it's likely that a consecutive allocation will
* let us overflow into the second allocation without overwriting something real.
*
* This should always be caught because there is an unconditional unmapped
* page after vmap allocations.
*/
void lkdtm_VMALLOC_LINEAR_OVERFLOW(void)
{
@ -41,6 +44,9 @@ void lkdtm_VMALLOC_LINEAR_OVERFLOW(void)
* This tries to stay within the next largest power-of-2 kmalloc cache
* to avoid actually overwriting anything important if it's not detected
* correctly.
*
* This should get caught by either memory tagging, KASan, or by using
* CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y and slub_debug=ZF (or CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y).
*/
void lkdtm_SLAB_LINEAR_OVERFLOW(void)
{

View file

@ -9,3 +9,5 @@ CONFIG_UBSAN=y
CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS=y
CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP=y
CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y