fs: return EPERM on immutable inode

In most cases, EPERM is returned on immutable inode, and there're only a
few places returning EACCES. I noticed this when running LTP on
overlayfs, setxattr03 failed due to unexpected EACCES on immutable
inode.

So converting all EACCES to EPERM on immutable inode.

Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Eryu Guan 2016-08-02 19:58:28 +08:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent fe64f3283f
commit 337684a174
4 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -1800,7 +1800,7 @@ int gfs2_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
}
if ((mask & MAY_WRITE) && IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
error = -EACCES;
error = -EPERM;
else
error = generic_permission(inode, mask);
if (gfs2_holder_initialized(&i_gh))

View file

@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ int __inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
* Nobody gets write access to an immutable file.
*/
if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
return -EACCES;
return -EPERM;
/*
* Updating mtime will likely cause i_uid and i_gid to be

View file

@ -92,10 +92,11 @@ static int utimes_common(struct path *path, struct timespec *times)
* then we need to check permissions, because
* inode_change_ok() won't do it.
*/
error = -EACCES;
error = -EPERM;
if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
goto mnt_drop_write_and_out;
error = -EACCES;
if (!inode_owner_or_capable(inode)) {
error = inode_permission(inode, MAY_WRITE);
if (error)

View file

@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ xfs_open_by_handle(
}
if ((fmode & FMODE_WRITE) && IS_IMMUTABLE(inode)) {
error = -EACCES;
error = -EPERM;
goto out_dput;
}