power: supply: max1721x: Use strscpy() is more robust and safer

The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.

That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
This commit is contained in:
Minghao Chi 2022-09-19 02:49:19 +00:00 committed by Sebastian Reichel
parent 3639dbd74e
commit 301cfbc124

View file

@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static int devm_w1_max1721x_add_device(struct w1_slave *sl)
}
if (!info->ManufacturerName[0])
strncpy(info->ManufacturerName, DEF_MFG_NAME,
strscpy(info->ManufacturerName, DEF_MFG_NAME,
2 * MAX1721X_REG_MFG_NUMB);
if (get_string(info, MAX1721X_REG_DEV_STR,
@ -403,15 +403,15 @@ static int devm_w1_max1721x_add_device(struct w1_slave *sl)
switch (dev_name & MAX172XX_DEV_MASK) {
case MAX172X1_DEV:
strncpy(info->DeviceName, DEF_DEV_NAME_MAX17211,
strscpy(info->DeviceName, DEF_DEV_NAME_MAX17211,
2 * MAX1721X_REG_DEV_NUMB);
break;
case MAX172X5_DEV:
strncpy(info->DeviceName, DEF_DEV_NAME_MAX17215,
strscpy(info->DeviceName, DEF_DEV_NAME_MAX17215,
2 * MAX1721X_REG_DEV_NUMB);
break;
default:
strncpy(info->DeviceName, DEF_DEV_NAME_UNKNOWN,
strscpy(info->DeviceName, DEF_DEV_NAME_UNKNOWN,
2 * MAX1721X_REG_DEV_NUMB);
}
}