gigaset: asyncdata: mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the
" --v-- fall through --v-- " comment with a proper
"fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364476 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364477 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Gustavo A. R. Silva 2018-10-05 15:29:09 +02:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent a657dbf617
commit 2b9156129f

View file

@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static unsigned cmd_loop(unsigned numbytes, struct inbuf_t *inbuf)
cs->respdata[0] = 0;
break;
}
/* --v-- fall through --v-- */
/* fall through */
case '\r':
/* end of message line, pass to response handler */
if (cbytes >= MAX_RESP_SIZE) {
@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static unsigned cmd_loop(unsigned numbytes, struct inbuf_t *inbuf)
goto exit;
}
/* quoted or not in DLE mode: treat as regular data */
/* --v-- fall through --v-- */
/* fall through */
default:
/* append to line buffer if possible */
if (cbytes < MAX_RESP_SIZE)