system/linux
system/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux synced 2024-11-05 18:23:50 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

udf: Do not decrement i_blocks when freeing indirect extent block

Browse source 
Indirect extent block is not accounted in i_blocks during allocation
thus we should not decrement i_blocks when we are freeing such block
during truncation.

Reported-by: Steve Nickel <snickel58@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
This commit is contained in:
Jan Kara 2012-07-09 13:24:21 +02:00
parent bff943af6f
commit 17dc59ba41
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
fs/udf/truncate.c
View file

@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ void udf_truncate_extents(struct inode *inode)
/* We managed to free all extents in the
* indirect extent - free it too */
BUG_ON(!epos.bh);
udf_free_blocks(sb, inode, &epos.block,
udf_free_blocks(sb, NULL, &epos.block,
0, indirect_ext_len);
} else if (!epos.bh) {
iinfo->i_lenAlloc = lenalloc;
@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ void udf_truncate_extents(struct inode *inode)
if (indirect_ext_len) {
BUG_ON(!epos.bh);
udf_free_blocks(sb, inode, &epos.block, 0, indirect_ext_len);
udf_free_blocks(sb, NULL, &epos.block, 0, indirect_ext_len);
} else if (!epos.bh) {
iinfo->i_lenAlloc = lenalloc;
mark_inode_dirty(inode);