From 133e267ef4a26d19c93996a874714e9f3f8c70aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:27:17 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] time: test: Fix incorrect format specifier

'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier.

This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's
__printf attribute.

Fixes: 276010551664 ("time: Improve performance of time64_to_tm()")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/time/time_test.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/time_test.c b/kernel/time/time_test.c
index ca058c8af6ba..3e5d422dd15c 100644
--- a/kernel/time/time_test.c
+++ b/kernel/time/time_test.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static void time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test)
 
 		days = div_s64(secs, 86400);
 
-		#define FAIL_MSG "%05ld/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %ld", \
+		#define FAIL_MSG "%05ld/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %lld", \
 			year, month, mdday, yday, days
 
 		KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, year - 1900, result.tm_year, FAIL_MSG);