linux/mm/folio-compat.c

143 lines
3.3 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

mm/util: Add folio_mapping() and folio_file_mapping() These are the folio equivalent of page_mapping() and page_file_mapping(). Add an out-of-line page_mapping() wrapper around folio_mapping() in order to prevent the page_folio() call from bloating every caller of page_mapping(). Adjust page_file_mapping() and page_mapping_file() to use folios internally. Rename __page_file_mapping() to swapcache_mapping() and change it to take a folio. This ends up saving 122 bytes of text overall. folio_mapping() is 45 bytes shorter than page_mapping() was, but the new page_mapping() wrapper is 30 bytes. The major reduction is a few bytes less in dozens of nfs functions (which call page_file_mapping()). Most of these appear to be a slight change in gcc's register allocation decisions, which allow: 48 8b 56 08 mov 0x8(%rsi),%rdx 48 8d 42 ff lea -0x1(%rdx),%rax 83 e2 01 and $0x1,%edx 48 0f 44 c6 cmove %rsi,%rax to become: 48 8b 46 08 mov 0x8(%rsi),%rax 48 8d 78 ff lea -0x1(%rax),%rdi a8 01 test $0x1,%al 48 0f 44 fe cmove %rsi,%rdi for a reduction of a single byte. Once the NFS client is converted to use folios, this entire sequence will disappear. Also add folio_mapping() documentation. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-12-10 15:55:05 +00:00
/*
* Compatibility functions which bloat the callers too much to make inline.
* All of the callers of these functions should be converted to use folios
* eventually.
*/
#include <linux/migrate.h>
mm/util: Add folio_mapping() and folio_file_mapping() These are the folio equivalent of page_mapping() and page_file_mapping(). Add an out-of-line page_mapping() wrapper around folio_mapping() in order to prevent the page_folio() call from bloating every caller of page_mapping(). Adjust page_file_mapping() and page_mapping_file() to use folios internally. Rename __page_file_mapping() to swapcache_mapping() and change it to take a folio. This ends up saving 122 bytes of text overall. folio_mapping() is 45 bytes shorter than page_mapping() was, but the new page_mapping() wrapper is 30 bytes. The major reduction is a few bytes less in dozens of nfs functions (which call page_file_mapping()). Most of these appear to be a slight change in gcc's register allocation decisions, which allow: 48 8b 56 08 mov 0x8(%rsi),%rdx 48 8d 42 ff lea -0x1(%rdx),%rax 83 e2 01 and $0x1,%edx 48 0f 44 c6 cmove %rsi,%rax to become: 48 8b 46 08 mov 0x8(%rsi),%rax 48 8d 78 ff lea -0x1(%rax),%rdi a8 01 test $0x1,%al 48 0f 44 fe cmove %rsi,%rdi for a reduction of a single byte. Once the NFS client is converted to use folios, this entire sequence will disappear. Also add folio_mapping() documentation. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-12-10 15:55:05 +00:00
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
#include <linux/rmap.h>
#include <linux/swap.h>
#include "internal.h"
mm/util: Add folio_mapping() and folio_file_mapping() These are the folio equivalent of page_mapping() and page_file_mapping(). Add an out-of-line page_mapping() wrapper around folio_mapping() in order to prevent the page_folio() call from bloating every caller of page_mapping(). Adjust page_file_mapping() and page_mapping_file() to use folios internally. Rename __page_file_mapping() to swapcache_mapping() and change it to take a folio. This ends up saving 122 bytes of text overall. folio_mapping() is 45 bytes shorter than page_mapping() was, but the new page_mapping() wrapper is 30 bytes. The major reduction is a few bytes less in dozens of nfs functions (which call page_file_mapping()). Most of these appear to be a slight change in gcc's register allocation decisions, which allow: 48 8b 56 08 mov 0x8(%rsi),%rdx 48 8d 42 ff lea -0x1(%rdx),%rax 83 e2 01 and $0x1,%edx 48 0f 44 c6 cmove %rsi,%rax to become: 48 8b 46 08 mov 0x8(%rsi),%rax 48 8d 78 ff lea -0x1(%rax),%rdi a8 01 test $0x1,%al 48 0f 44 fe cmove %rsi,%rdi for a reduction of a single byte. Once the NFS client is converted to use folios, this entire sequence will disappear. Also add folio_mapping() documentation. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-12-10 15:55:05 +00:00
struct address_space *page_mapping(struct page *page)
{
return folio_mapping(page_folio(page));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_mapping);
void unlock_page(struct page *page)
{
return folio_unlock(page_folio(page));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_page);
void end_page_writeback(struct page *page)
{
return folio_end_writeback(page_folio(page));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(end_page_writeback);
void wait_on_page_writeback(struct page *page)
{
return folio_wait_writeback(page_folio(page));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wait_on_page_writeback);
void wait_for_stable_page(struct page *page)
{
return folio_wait_stable(page_folio(page));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wait_for_stable_page);
void mark_page_accessed(struct page *page)
{
folio_mark_accessed(page_folio(page));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mark_page_accessed);
bool set_page_writeback(struct page *page)
{
return folio_start_writeback(page_folio(page));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_page_writeback);
bool set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
{
return folio_mark_dirty(page_folio(page));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_page_dirty);
int __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *page)
{
return filemap_dirty_folio(page_mapping(page), page_folio(page));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__set_page_dirty_nobuffers);
bool clear_page_dirty_for_io(struct page *page)
{
return folio_clear_dirty_for_io(page_folio(page));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(clear_page_dirty_for_io);
bool redirty_page_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc,
struct page *page)
{
return folio_redirty_for_writepage(wbc, page_folio(page));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(redirty_page_for_writepage);
void lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable(struct page *page,
struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
folio_add_lru_vma(page_folio(page), vma);
}
int add_to_page_cache_lru(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping,
pgoff_t index, gfp_t gfp)
{
return filemap_add_folio(mapping, page_folio(page), index, gfp);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_to_page_cache_lru);
noinline
struct page *pagecache_get_page(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
int fgp_flags, gfp_t gfp)
{
struct folio *folio;
folio = __filemap_get_folio(mapping, index, fgp_flags, gfp);
if (!folio || xa_is_value(folio))
return &folio->page;
return folio_file_page(folio, index);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pagecache_get_page);
struct page *grab_cache_page_write_begin(struct address_space *mapping,
pgoff_t index)
{
unsigned fgp_flags = FGP_LOCK | FGP_WRITE | FGP_CREAT | FGP_STABLE;
return pagecache_get_page(mapping, index, fgp_flags,
mapping_gfp_mask(mapping));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(grab_cache_page_write_begin);
int isolate_lru_page(struct page *page)
{
mm: change to return bool for folio_isolate_lru() Patch series "Change the return value for page isolation functions", v3. Now the page isolation functions did not return a boolean to indicate success or not, instead it will return a negative error when failed to isolate a page. So below code used in most places seem a boolean success/failure thing, which can confuse people whether the isolation is successful. if (folio_isolate_lru(folio)) continue; Moreover the page isolation functions only return 0 or -EBUSY, and most users did not care about the negative error except for few users, thus we can convert all page isolation functions to return a boolean value, which can remove the confusion to make code more clear. No functional changes intended in this patch series. This patch (of 4): Now the folio_isolate_lru() did not return a boolean value to indicate isolation success or not, however below code checking the return value can make people think that it was a boolean success/failure thing, which makes people easy to make mistakes (see the fix patch[1]). if (folio_isolate_lru(folio)) continue; Thus it's better to check the negative error value expilictly returned by folio_isolate_lru(), which makes code more clear per Linus's suggestion[2]. Moreover Matthew suggested we can convert the isolation functions to return a boolean[3], since most users did not care about the negative error value, and can also remove the confusing of checking return value. So this patch converts the folio_isolate_lru() to return a boolean value, which means return 'true' to indicate the folio isolation is successful, and 'false' means a failure to isolation. Meanwhile changing all users' logic of checking the isolation state. No functional changes intended. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230131063206.28820-1-Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com/T/#u [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wiBrY+O-4=2mrbVyxR+hOqfdJ=Do6xoucfJ9_5az01L4Q@mail.gmail.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y+sTFqwMNAjDvxw3@casper.infradead.org/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1676424378.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8a4e3679ed4196168efadf7ea36c038f2f7d5aa9.1676424378.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-02-15 10:39:34 +00:00
bool ret;
if (WARN_RATELIMIT(PageTail(page), "trying to isolate tail page"))
return -EBUSY;
mm: change to return bool for folio_isolate_lru() Patch series "Change the return value for page isolation functions", v3. Now the page isolation functions did not return a boolean to indicate success or not, instead it will return a negative error when failed to isolate a page. So below code used in most places seem a boolean success/failure thing, which can confuse people whether the isolation is successful. if (folio_isolate_lru(folio)) continue; Moreover the page isolation functions only return 0 or -EBUSY, and most users did not care about the negative error except for few users, thus we can convert all page isolation functions to return a boolean value, which can remove the confusion to make code more clear. No functional changes intended in this patch series. This patch (of 4): Now the folio_isolate_lru() did not return a boolean value to indicate isolation success or not, however below code checking the return value can make people think that it was a boolean success/failure thing, which makes people easy to make mistakes (see the fix patch[1]). if (folio_isolate_lru(folio)) continue; Thus it's better to check the negative error value expilictly returned by folio_isolate_lru(), which makes code more clear per Linus's suggestion[2]. Moreover Matthew suggested we can convert the isolation functions to return a boolean[3], since most users did not care about the negative error value, and can also remove the confusing of checking return value. So this patch converts the folio_isolate_lru() to return a boolean value, which means return 'true' to indicate the folio isolation is successful, and 'false' means a failure to isolation. Meanwhile changing all users' logic of checking the isolation state. No functional changes intended. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230131063206.28820-1-Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com/T/#u [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wiBrY+O-4=2mrbVyxR+hOqfdJ=Do6xoucfJ9_5az01L4Q@mail.gmail.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y+sTFqwMNAjDvxw3@casper.infradead.org/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1676424378.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8a4e3679ed4196168efadf7ea36c038f2f7d5aa9.1676424378.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-02-15 10:39:34 +00:00
ret = folio_isolate_lru((struct folio *)page);
if (ret)
return 0;
return -EBUSY;
}
void putback_lru_page(struct page *page)
{
folio_putback_lru(page_folio(page));
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
void page_add_new_anon_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long address)
{
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail(page), page);
return folio_add_new_anon_rmap((struct folio *)page, vma, address);
}
#endif