linux/mm/mlock.c

778 lines
19 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 14:07:57 +00:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* linux/mm/mlock.c
*
* (C) Copyright 1995 Linus Torvalds
* (C) Copyright 2002 Christoph Hellwig
*/
#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/mman.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/sched/user.h>
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
#include <linux/swap.h>
#include <linux/swapops.h>
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
2013-09-11 21:22:29 +00:00
#include <linux/pagevec.h>
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
#include <linux/pagewalk.h>
#include <linux/mempolicy.h>
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
#include <linux/rmap.h>
#include <linux/mmzone.h>
#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
2013-09-11 21:22:29 +00:00
#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
#include <linux/mm_inline.h>
mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas Introduce "memfd_secret" system call with the ability to create memory areas visible only in the context of the owning process and not mapped not only to other processes but in the kernel page tables as well. The secretmem feature is off by default and the user must explicitly enable it at the boot time. Once secretmem is enabled, the user will be able to create a file descriptor using the memfd_secret() system call. The memory areas created by mmap() calls from this file descriptor will be unmapped from the kernel direct map and they will be only mapped in the page table of the processes that have access to the file descriptor. Secretmem is designed to provide the following protections: * Enhanced protection (in conjunction with all the other in-kernel attack prevention systems) against ROP attacks. Seceretmem makes "simple" ROP insufficient to perform exfiltration, which increases the required complexity of the attack. Along with other protections like the kernel stack size limit and address space layout randomization which make finding gadgets is really hard, absence of any in-kernel primitive for accessing secret memory means the one gadget ROP attack can't work. Since the only way to access secret memory is to reconstruct the missing mapping entry, the attacker has to recover the physical page and insert a PTE pointing to it in the kernel and then retrieve the contents. That takes at least three gadgets which is a level of difficulty beyond most standard attacks. * Prevent cross-process secret userspace memory exposures. Once the secret memory is allocated, the user can't accidentally pass it into the kernel to be transmitted somewhere. The secreremem pages cannot be accessed via the direct map and they are disallowed in GUP. * Harden against exploited kernel flaws. In order to access secretmem, a kernel-side attack would need to either walk the page tables and create new ones, or spawn a new privileged uiserspace process to perform secrets exfiltration using ptrace. The file descriptor based memory has several advantages over the "traditional" mm interfaces, such as mlock(), mprotect(), madvise(). File descriptor approach allows explicit and controlled sharing of the memory areas, it allows to seal the operations. Besides, file descriptor based memory paves the way for VMMs to remove the secret memory range from the userspace hipervisor process, for instance QEMU. Andy Lutomirski says: "Getting fd-backed memory into a guest will take some possibly major work in the kernel, but getting vma-backed memory into a guest without mapping it in the host user address space seems much, much worse." memfd_secret() is made a dedicated system call rather than an extension to memfd_create() because it's purpose is to allow the user to create more secure memory mappings rather than to simply allow file based access to the memory. Nowadays a new system call cost is negligible while it is way simpler for userspace to deal with a clear-cut system calls than with a multiplexer or an overloaded syscall. Moreover, the initial implementation of memfd_secret() is completely distinct from memfd_create() so there is no much sense in overloading memfd_create() to begin with. If there will be a need for code sharing between these implementation it can be easily achieved without a need to adjust user visible APIs. The secret memory remains accessible in the process context using uaccess primitives, but it is not exposed to the kernel otherwise; secret memory areas are removed from the direct map and functions in the follow_page()/get_user_page() family will refuse to return a page that belongs to the secret memory area. Once there will be a use case that will require exposing secretmem to the kernel it will be an opt-in request in the system call flags so that user would have to decide what data can be exposed to the kernel. Removing of the pages from the direct map may cause its fragmentation on architectures that use large pages to map the physical memory which affects the system performance. However, the original Kconfig text for CONFIG_DIRECT_GBPAGES said that gigabyte pages in the direct map "... can improve the kernel's performance a tiny bit ..." (commit 00d1c5e05736 ("x86: add gbpages switches")) and the recent report [1] showed that "... although 1G mappings are a good default choice, there is no compelling evidence that it must be the only choice". Hence, it is sufficient to have secretmem disabled by default with the ability of a system administrator to enable it at boot time. Pages in the secretmem regions are unevictable and unmovable to avoid accidental exposure of the sensitive data via swap or during page migration. Since the secretmem mappings are locked in memory they cannot exceed RLIMIT_MEMLOCK. Since these mappings are already locked independently from mlock(), an attempt to mlock()/munlock() secretmem range would fail and mlockall()/munlockall() will ignore secretmem mappings. However, unlike mlock()ed memory, secretmem currently behaves more like long-term GUP: secretmem mappings are unmovable mappings directly consumed by user space. With default limits, there is no excessive use of secretmem and it poses no real problem in combination with ZONE_MOVABLE/CMA, but in the future this should be addressed to allow balanced use of large amounts of secretmem along with ZONE_MOVABLE/CMA. A page that was a part of the secret memory area is cleared when it is freed to ensure the data is not exposed to the next user of that page. The following example demonstrates creation of a secret mapping (error handling is omitted): fd = memfd_secret(0); ftruncate(fd, MAP_SIZE); ptr = mmap(NULL, MAP_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/213b4567-46ce-f116-9cdf-bbd0c884eb3c@linux.intel.com/ [akpm@linux-foundation.org: suppress Kconfig whine] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210518072034.31572-5-rppt@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Acked-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-08 01:08:03 +00:00
#include <linux/secretmem.h>
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
#include "internal.h"
struct mlock_pvec {
local_lock_t lock;
struct pagevec vec;
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mlock_pvec, mlock_pvec) = {
.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
};
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
bool can_do_mlock(void)
{
if (rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) != 0)
return true;
if (capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
return true;
return false;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(can_do_mlock);
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
/*
* Mlocked pages are marked with PageMlocked() flag for efficient testing
* in vmscan and, possibly, the fault path; and to support semi-accurate
* statistics.
*
* An mlocked page [PageMlocked(page)] is unevictable. As such, it will
* be placed on the LRU "unevictable" list, rather than the [in]active lists.
* The unevictable list is an LRU sibling list to the [in]active lists.
* PageUnevictable is set to indicate the unevictable state.
*/
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
static struct lruvec *__mlock_page(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
{
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
/* There is nothing more we can do while it's off LRU */
if (!TestClearPageLRU(page))
return lruvec;
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
lruvec = folio_lruvec_relock_irq(page_folio(page), lruvec);
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
if (unlikely(page_evictable(page))) {
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
/*
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
* This is a little surprising, but quite possible:
* PageMlocked must have got cleared already by another CPU.
* Could this page be on the Unevictable LRU? I'm not sure,
* but move it now if so.
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
*/
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
if (PageUnevictable(page)) {
del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec);
ClearPageUnevictable(page);
add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec);
__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGRESCUED,
thp_nr_pages(page));
}
goto out;
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
}
mm/munlock: maintain page->mlock_count while unevictable Previous patches have been preparatory: now implement page->mlock_count. The ordering of the "Unevictable LRU" is of no significance, and there is no point holding unevictable pages on a list: place page->mlock_count to overlay page->lru.prev (since page->lru.next is overlaid by compound_head, which needs to be even so as not to satisfy PageTail - though 2 could be added instead of 1 for each mlock, if that's ever an improvement). But it's only safe to rely on or modify page->mlock_count while lruvec lock is held and page is on unevictable "LRU" - we can save lots of edits by continuing to pretend that there's an imaginary LRU here (there is an unevictable count which still needs to be maintained, but not a list). The mlock_count technique suffers from an unreliability much like with page_mlock(): while someone else has the page off LRU, not much can be done. As before, err on the safe side (behave as if mlock_count 0), and let try_to_unlock_one() move the page to unevictable if reclaim finds out later on - a few misplaced pages don't matter, what we want to avoid is imbalancing reclaim by flooding evictable lists with unevictable pages. I am not a fan of "if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) putback_lru_page(page);": if we have taken lruvec lock to get the page off its present list, then we save everyone trouble (and however many extra atomic ops) by putting it on its destination list immediately. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:29:54 +00:00
if (PageUnevictable(page)) {
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
if (PageMlocked(page))
page->mlock_count++;
mm/munlock: maintain page->mlock_count while unevictable Previous patches have been preparatory: now implement page->mlock_count. The ordering of the "Unevictable LRU" is of no significance, and there is no point holding unevictable pages on a list: place page->mlock_count to overlay page->lru.prev (since page->lru.next is overlaid by compound_head, which needs to be even so as not to satisfy PageTail - though 2 could be added instead of 1 for each mlock, if that's ever an improvement). But it's only safe to rely on or modify page->mlock_count while lruvec lock is held and page is on unevictable "LRU" - we can save lots of edits by continuing to pretend that there's an imaginary LRU here (there is an unevictable count which still needs to be maintained, but not a list). The mlock_count technique suffers from an unreliability much like with page_mlock(): while someone else has the page off LRU, not much can be done. As before, err on the safe side (behave as if mlock_count 0), and let try_to_unlock_one() move the page to unevictable if reclaim finds out later on - a few misplaced pages don't matter, what we want to avoid is imbalancing reclaim by flooding evictable lists with unevictable pages. I am not a fan of "if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) putback_lru_page(page);": if we have taken lruvec lock to get the page off its present list, then we save everyone trouble (and however many extra atomic ops) by putting it on its destination list immediately. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:29:54 +00:00
goto out;
}
mm/munlock: maintain page->mlock_count while unevictable Previous patches have been preparatory: now implement page->mlock_count. The ordering of the "Unevictable LRU" is of no significance, and there is no point holding unevictable pages on a list: place page->mlock_count to overlay page->lru.prev (since page->lru.next is overlaid by compound_head, which needs to be even so as not to satisfy PageTail - though 2 could be added instead of 1 for each mlock, if that's ever an improvement). But it's only safe to rely on or modify page->mlock_count while lruvec lock is held and page is on unevictable "LRU" - we can save lots of edits by continuing to pretend that there's an imaginary LRU here (there is an unevictable count which still needs to be maintained, but not a list). The mlock_count technique suffers from an unreliability much like with page_mlock(): while someone else has the page off LRU, not much can be done. As before, err on the safe side (behave as if mlock_count 0), and let try_to_unlock_one() move the page to unevictable if reclaim finds out later on - a few misplaced pages don't matter, what we want to avoid is imbalancing reclaim by flooding evictable lists with unevictable pages. I am not a fan of "if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) putback_lru_page(page);": if we have taken lruvec lock to get the page off its present list, then we save everyone trouble (and however many extra atomic ops) by putting it on its destination list immediately. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:29:54 +00:00
del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec);
ClearPageActive(page);
SetPageUnevictable(page);
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
page->mlock_count = !!PageMlocked(page);
mm/munlock: maintain page->mlock_count while unevictable Previous patches have been preparatory: now implement page->mlock_count. The ordering of the "Unevictable LRU" is of no significance, and there is no point holding unevictable pages on a list: place page->mlock_count to overlay page->lru.prev (since page->lru.next is overlaid by compound_head, which needs to be even so as not to satisfy PageTail - though 2 could be added instead of 1 for each mlock, if that's ever an improvement). But it's only safe to rely on or modify page->mlock_count while lruvec lock is held and page is on unevictable "LRU" - we can save lots of edits by continuing to pretend that there's an imaginary LRU here (there is an unevictable count which still needs to be maintained, but not a list). The mlock_count technique suffers from an unreliability much like with page_mlock(): while someone else has the page off LRU, not much can be done. As before, err on the safe side (behave as if mlock_count 0), and let try_to_unlock_one() move the page to unevictable if reclaim finds out later on - a few misplaced pages don't matter, what we want to avoid is imbalancing reclaim by flooding evictable lists with unevictable pages. I am not a fan of "if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) putback_lru_page(page);": if we have taken lruvec lock to get the page off its present list, then we save everyone trouble (and however many extra atomic ops) by putting it on its destination list immediately. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:29:54 +00:00
add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec);
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGCULLED, thp_nr_pages(page));
mm/munlock: maintain page->mlock_count while unevictable Previous patches have been preparatory: now implement page->mlock_count. The ordering of the "Unevictable LRU" is of no significance, and there is no point holding unevictable pages on a list: place page->mlock_count to overlay page->lru.prev (since page->lru.next is overlaid by compound_head, which needs to be even so as not to satisfy PageTail - though 2 could be added instead of 1 for each mlock, if that's ever an improvement). But it's only safe to rely on or modify page->mlock_count while lruvec lock is held and page is on unevictable "LRU" - we can save lots of edits by continuing to pretend that there's an imaginary LRU here (there is an unevictable count which still needs to be maintained, but not a list). The mlock_count technique suffers from an unreliability much like with page_mlock(): while someone else has the page off LRU, not much can be done. As before, err on the safe side (behave as if mlock_count 0), and let try_to_unlock_one() move the page to unevictable if reclaim finds out later on - a few misplaced pages don't matter, what we want to avoid is imbalancing reclaim by flooding evictable lists with unevictable pages. I am not a fan of "if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) putback_lru_page(page);": if we have taken lruvec lock to get the page off its present list, then we save everyone trouble (and however many extra atomic ops) by putting it on its destination list immediately. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:29:54 +00:00
out:
SetPageLRU(page);
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
return lruvec;
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
}
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
static struct lruvec *__mlock_new_page(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
{
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page), page);
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
lruvec = folio_lruvec_relock_irq(page_folio(page), lruvec);
thp: allow mlocked THP again Before THP refcounting rework, THP was not allowed to cross VMA boundary. So, if we have THP and we split it, PG_mlocked can be safely transferred to small pages. With new THP refcounting and naive approach to mlocking we can end up with this scenario: 1. we have a mlocked THP, which belong to one VM_LOCKED VMA. 2. the process does munlock() on the *part* of the THP: - the VMA is split into two, one of them VM_LOCKED; - huge PMD split into PTE table; - THP is still mlocked; 3. split_huge_page(): - it transfers PG_mlocked to *all* small pages regrardless if it blong to any VM_LOCKED VMA. We probably could munlock() all small pages on split_huge_page(), but I think we have accounting issue already on step two. Instead of forbidding mlocked pages altogether, we just avoid mlocking PTE-mapped THPs and munlock THPs on split_huge_pmd(). This means PTE-mapped THPs will be on normal lru lists and will be split under memory pressure by vmscan. After the split vmscan will detect unevictable small pages and mlock them. With this approach we shouldn't hit situation like described above. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-01-16 00:54:33 +00:00
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
/* As above, this is a little surprising, but possible */
if (unlikely(page_evictable(page)))
goto out;
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
SetPageUnevictable(page);
page->mlock_count = !!PageMlocked(page);
__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGCULLED, thp_nr_pages(page));
out:
add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec);
SetPageLRU(page);
return lruvec;
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
}
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
static struct lruvec *__munlock_page(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec)
2013-09-11 21:22:29 +00:00
{
mm/munlock: maintain page->mlock_count while unevictable Previous patches have been preparatory: now implement page->mlock_count. The ordering of the "Unevictable LRU" is of no significance, and there is no point holding unevictable pages on a list: place page->mlock_count to overlay page->lru.prev (since page->lru.next is overlaid by compound_head, which needs to be even so as not to satisfy PageTail - though 2 could be added instead of 1 for each mlock, if that's ever an improvement). But it's only safe to rely on or modify page->mlock_count while lruvec lock is held and page is on unevictable "LRU" - we can save lots of edits by continuing to pretend that there's an imaginary LRU here (there is an unevictable count which still needs to be maintained, but not a list). The mlock_count technique suffers from an unreliability much like with page_mlock(): while someone else has the page off LRU, not much can be done. As before, err on the safe side (behave as if mlock_count 0), and let try_to_unlock_one() move the page to unevictable if reclaim finds out later on - a few misplaced pages don't matter, what we want to avoid is imbalancing reclaim by flooding evictable lists with unevictable pages. I am not a fan of "if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) putback_lru_page(page);": if we have taken lruvec lock to get the page off its present list, then we save everyone trouble (and however many extra atomic ops) by putting it on its destination list immediately. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:29:54 +00:00
int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
bool isolated = false;
if (!TestClearPageLRU(page))
goto munlock;
2013-09-11 21:22:29 +00:00
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
isolated = true;
lruvec = folio_lruvec_relock_irq(page_folio(page), lruvec);
2013-09-11 21:22:29 +00:00
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
if (PageUnevictable(page)) {
mm/munlock: maintain page->mlock_count while unevictable Previous patches have been preparatory: now implement page->mlock_count. The ordering of the "Unevictable LRU" is of no significance, and there is no point holding unevictable pages on a list: place page->mlock_count to overlay page->lru.prev (since page->lru.next is overlaid by compound_head, which needs to be even so as not to satisfy PageTail - though 2 could be added instead of 1 for each mlock, if that's ever an improvement). But it's only safe to rely on or modify page->mlock_count while lruvec lock is held and page is on unevictable "LRU" - we can save lots of edits by continuing to pretend that there's an imaginary LRU here (there is an unevictable count which still needs to be maintained, but not a list). The mlock_count technique suffers from an unreliability much like with page_mlock(): while someone else has the page off LRU, not much can be done. As before, err on the safe side (behave as if mlock_count 0), and let try_to_unlock_one() move the page to unevictable if reclaim finds out later on - a few misplaced pages don't matter, what we want to avoid is imbalancing reclaim by flooding evictable lists with unevictable pages. I am not a fan of "if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) putback_lru_page(page);": if we have taken lruvec lock to get the page off its present list, then we save everyone trouble (and however many extra atomic ops) by putting it on its destination list immediately. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:29:54 +00:00
/* Then mlock_count is maintained, but might undercount */
if (page->mlock_count)
page->mlock_count--;
if (page->mlock_count)
goto out;
}
/* else assume that was the last mlock: reclaim will fix it if not */
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
munlock:
mm/munlock: delete page_mlock() and all its works We have recommended some applications to mlock their userspace, but that turns out to be counter-productive: when many processes mlock the same file, contention on rmap's i_mmap_rwsem can become intolerable at exit: it is needed for write, to remove any vma mapping that file from rmap's tree; but hogged for read by those with mlocks calling page_mlock() (formerly known as try_to_munlock()) on *each* page mapped from the file (the purpose being to find out whether another process has the page mlocked, so therefore it should not be unmlocked yet). Several optimizations have been made in the past: one is to skip page_mlock() when mapcount tells that nothing else has this page mapped; but that doesn't help at all when others do have it mapped. This time around, I initially intended to add a preliminary search of the rmap tree for overlapping VM_LOCKED ranges; but that gets messy with locking order, when in doubt whether a page is actually present; and risks adding even more contention on the i_mmap_rwsem. A solution would be much easier, if only there were space in struct page for an mlock_count... but actually, most of the time, there is space for it - an mlocked page spends most of its life on an unevictable LRU, but since 3.18 removed the scan_unevictable_pages sysctl, that "LRU" has been redundant. Let's try to reuse its page->lru. But leave that until a later patch: in this patch, clear the ground by removing page_mlock(), and all the infrastructure that has gathered around it - which mostly hinders understanding, and will make reviewing new additions harder. Don't mind those old comments about THPs, they date from before 4.5's refcounting rework: splitting is not a risk here. Just keep a minimal version of munlock_vma_page(), as reminder of what it should attend to (in particular, the odd way PGSTRANDED is counted out of PGMUNLOCKED), and likewise a stub for munlock_vma_pages_range(). Move unchanged __mlock_posix_error_return() out of the way, down to above its caller: this series then makes no further change after mlock_fixup(). After this and each following commit, the kernel builds, boots and runs; but with deficiencies which may show up in testing of mlock and munlock. The system calls succeed or fail as before, and mlock remains effective in preventing page reclaim; but meminfo's Unevictable and Mlocked amounts may be shown too low after mlock, grow, then stay too high after munlock: with previously mlocked pages remaining unevictable for too long, until finally unmapped and freed and counts corrected. Normal service will be resumed in "mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking". Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:20:24 +00:00
if (TestClearPageMlocked(page)) {
mm/munlock: maintain page->mlock_count while unevictable Previous patches have been preparatory: now implement page->mlock_count. The ordering of the "Unevictable LRU" is of no significance, and there is no point holding unevictable pages on a list: place page->mlock_count to overlay page->lru.prev (since page->lru.next is overlaid by compound_head, which needs to be even so as not to satisfy PageTail - though 2 could be added instead of 1 for each mlock, if that's ever an improvement). But it's only safe to rely on or modify page->mlock_count while lruvec lock is held and page is on unevictable "LRU" - we can save lots of edits by continuing to pretend that there's an imaginary LRU here (there is an unevictable count which still needs to be maintained, but not a list). The mlock_count technique suffers from an unreliability much like with page_mlock(): while someone else has the page off LRU, not much can be done. As before, err on the safe side (behave as if mlock_count 0), and let try_to_unlock_one() move the page to unevictable if reclaim finds out later on - a few misplaced pages don't matter, what we want to avoid is imbalancing reclaim by flooding evictable lists with unevictable pages. I am not a fan of "if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) putback_lru_page(page);": if we have taken lruvec lock to get the page off its present list, then we save everyone trouble (and however many extra atomic ops) by putting it on its destination list immediately. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:29:54 +00:00
__mod_zone_page_state(page_zone(page), NR_MLOCK, -nr_pages);
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
if (isolated || !PageUnevictable(page))
mm/munlock: maintain page->mlock_count while unevictable Previous patches have been preparatory: now implement page->mlock_count. The ordering of the "Unevictable LRU" is of no significance, and there is no point holding unevictable pages on a list: place page->mlock_count to overlay page->lru.prev (since page->lru.next is overlaid by compound_head, which needs to be even so as not to satisfy PageTail - though 2 could be added instead of 1 for each mlock, if that's ever an improvement). But it's only safe to rely on or modify page->mlock_count while lruvec lock is held and page is on unevictable "LRU" - we can save lots of edits by continuing to pretend that there's an imaginary LRU here (there is an unevictable count which still needs to be maintained, but not a list). The mlock_count technique suffers from an unreliability much like with page_mlock(): while someone else has the page off LRU, not much can be done. As before, err on the safe side (behave as if mlock_count 0), and let try_to_unlock_one() move the page to unevictable if reclaim finds out later on - a few misplaced pages don't matter, what we want to avoid is imbalancing reclaim by flooding evictable lists with unevictable pages. I am not a fan of "if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) putback_lru_page(page);": if we have taken lruvec lock to get the page off its present list, then we save everyone trouble (and however many extra atomic ops) by putting it on its destination list immediately. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:29:54 +00:00
__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGMUNLOCKED, nr_pages);
else
__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGSTRANDED, nr_pages);
}
/* page_evictable() has to be checked *after* clearing Mlocked */
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
if (isolated && PageUnevictable(page) && page_evictable(page)) {
mm/munlock: maintain page->mlock_count while unevictable Previous patches have been preparatory: now implement page->mlock_count. The ordering of the "Unevictable LRU" is of no significance, and there is no point holding unevictable pages on a list: place page->mlock_count to overlay page->lru.prev (since page->lru.next is overlaid by compound_head, which needs to be even so as not to satisfy PageTail - though 2 could be added instead of 1 for each mlock, if that's ever an improvement). But it's only safe to rely on or modify page->mlock_count while lruvec lock is held and page is on unevictable "LRU" - we can save lots of edits by continuing to pretend that there's an imaginary LRU here (there is an unevictable count which still needs to be maintained, but not a list). The mlock_count technique suffers from an unreliability much like with page_mlock(): while someone else has the page off LRU, not much can be done. As before, err on the safe side (behave as if mlock_count 0), and let try_to_unlock_one() move the page to unevictable if reclaim finds out later on - a few misplaced pages don't matter, what we want to avoid is imbalancing reclaim by flooding evictable lists with unevictable pages. I am not a fan of "if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) putback_lru_page(page);": if we have taken lruvec lock to get the page off its present list, then we save everyone trouble (and however many extra atomic ops) by putting it on its destination list immediately. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:29:54 +00:00
del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec);
ClearPageUnevictable(page);
add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec);
__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGRESCUED, nr_pages);
2013-09-11 21:22:29 +00:00
}
mm/munlock: maintain page->mlock_count while unevictable Previous patches have been preparatory: now implement page->mlock_count. The ordering of the "Unevictable LRU" is of no significance, and there is no point holding unevictable pages on a list: place page->mlock_count to overlay page->lru.prev (since page->lru.next is overlaid by compound_head, which needs to be even so as not to satisfy PageTail - though 2 could be added instead of 1 for each mlock, if that's ever an improvement). But it's only safe to rely on or modify page->mlock_count while lruvec lock is held and page is on unevictable "LRU" - we can save lots of edits by continuing to pretend that there's an imaginary LRU here (there is an unevictable count which still needs to be maintained, but not a list). The mlock_count technique suffers from an unreliability much like with page_mlock(): while someone else has the page off LRU, not much can be done. As before, err on the safe side (behave as if mlock_count 0), and let try_to_unlock_one() move the page to unevictable if reclaim finds out later on - a few misplaced pages don't matter, what we want to avoid is imbalancing reclaim by flooding evictable lists with unevictable pages. I am not a fan of "if (!isolate_lru_page(page)) putback_lru_page(page);": if we have taken lruvec lock to get the page off its present list, then we save everyone trouble (and however many extra atomic ops) by putting it on its destination list immediately. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:29:54 +00:00
out:
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
if (isolated)
SetPageLRU(page);
return lruvec;
2013-09-11 21:22:29 +00:00
}
/*
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
* Flags held in the low bits of a struct page pointer on the mlock_pvec.
2013-09-11 21:22:29 +00:00
*/
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
#define LRU_PAGE 0x1
#define NEW_PAGE 0x2
static inline struct page *mlock_lru(struct page *page)
2013-09-11 21:22:29 +00:00
{
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
return (struct page *)((unsigned long)page + LRU_PAGE);
}
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
static inline struct page *mlock_new(struct page *page)
{
return (struct page *)((unsigned long)page + NEW_PAGE);
2013-09-11 21:22:29 +00:00
}
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
/*
* mlock_pagevec() is derived from pagevec_lru_move_fn():
* perhaps that can make use of such page pointer flags in future,
* but for now just keep it for mlock. We could use three separate
* pagevecs instead, but one feels better (munlocking a full pagevec
* does not need to drain mlocking pagevecs first).
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
*/
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
static void mlock_pagevec(struct pagevec *pvec)
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
{
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
struct lruvec *lruvec = NULL;
unsigned long mlock;
struct page *page;
int i;
thp: allow mlocked THP again Before THP refcounting rework, THP was not allowed to cross VMA boundary. So, if we have THP and we split it, PG_mlocked can be safely transferred to small pages. With new THP refcounting and naive approach to mlocking we can end up with this scenario: 1. we have a mlocked THP, which belong to one VM_LOCKED VMA. 2. the process does munlock() on the *part* of the THP: - the VMA is split into two, one of them VM_LOCKED; - huge PMD split into PTE table; - THP is still mlocked; 3. split_huge_page(): - it transfers PG_mlocked to *all* small pages regrardless if it blong to any VM_LOCKED VMA. We probably could munlock() all small pages on split_huge_page(), but I think we have accounting issue already on step two. Instead of forbidding mlocked pages altogether, we just avoid mlocking PTE-mapped THPs and munlock THPs on split_huge_pmd(). This means PTE-mapped THPs will be on normal lru lists and will be split under memory pressure by vmscan. After the split vmscan will detect unevictable small pages and mlock them. With this approach we shouldn't hit situation like described above. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-01-16 00:54:33 +00:00
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) {
page = pvec->pages[i];
mlock = (unsigned long)page & (LRU_PAGE | NEW_PAGE);
page = (struct page *)((unsigned long)page - mlock);
pvec->pages[i] = page;
if (mlock & LRU_PAGE)
lruvec = __mlock_page(page, lruvec);
else if (mlock & NEW_PAGE)
lruvec = __mlock_new_page(page, lruvec);
else
lruvec = __munlock_page(page, lruvec);
}
mm: munlock: fix potential race with THP page split Since commit ff6a6da60b89 ("mm: accelerate munlock() treatment of THP pages") munlock skips tail pages of a munlocked THP page. There is some attempt to prevent bad consequences of racing with a THP page split, but code inspection indicates that there are two problems that may lead to a non-fatal, yet wrong outcome. First, __split_huge_page_refcount() copies flags including PageMlocked from the head page to the tail pages. Clearing PageMlocked by munlock_vma_page() in the middle of this operation might result in part of tail pages left with PageMlocked flag. As the head page still appears to be a THP page until all tail pages are processed, munlock_vma_page() might think it munlocked the whole THP page and skip all the former tail pages. Before ff6a6da60, those pages would be cleared in further iterations of munlock_vma_pages_range(), but NR_MLOCK would still become undercounted (related the next point). Second, NR_MLOCK accounting is based on call to hpage_nr_pages() after the PageMlocked is cleared. The accounting might also become inconsistent due to race with __split_huge_page_refcount() - undercount when HUGE_PMD_NR is subtracted, but some tail pages are left with PageMlocked set and counted again (only possible before ff6a6da60) - overcount when hpage_nr_pages() sees a normal page (split has already finished), but the parallel split has meanwhile cleared PageMlocked from additional tail pages This patch prevents both problems via extending the scope of lru_lock in munlock_vma_page(). This is convenient because: - __split_huge_page_refcount() takes lru_lock for its whole operation - munlock_vma_page() typically takes lru_lock anyway for page isolation As this becomes a second function where page isolation is done with lru_lock already held, factor this out to a new __munlock_isolate_lru_page() function and clean up the code around. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: avoid a coding-style ugly] Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-01-23 23:52:50 +00:00
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
if (lruvec)
unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
release_pages(pvec->pages, pvec->nr);
pagevec_reinit(pvec);
}
mm: munlock: fix potential race with THP page split Since commit ff6a6da60b89 ("mm: accelerate munlock() treatment of THP pages") munlock skips tail pages of a munlocked THP page. There is some attempt to prevent bad consequences of racing with a THP page split, but code inspection indicates that there are two problems that may lead to a non-fatal, yet wrong outcome. First, __split_huge_page_refcount() copies flags including PageMlocked from the head page to the tail pages. Clearing PageMlocked by munlock_vma_page() in the middle of this operation might result in part of tail pages left with PageMlocked flag. As the head page still appears to be a THP page until all tail pages are processed, munlock_vma_page() might think it munlocked the whole THP page and skip all the former tail pages. Before ff6a6da60, those pages would be cleared in further iterations of munlock_vma_pages_range(), but NR_MLOCK would still become undercounted (related the next point). Second, NR_MLOCK accounting is based on call to hpage_nr_pages() after the PageMlocked is cleared. The accounting might also become inconsistent due to race with __split_huge_page_refcount() - undercount when HUGE_PMD_NR is subtracted, but some tail pages are left with PageMlocked set and counted again (only possible before ff6a6da60) - overcount when hpage_nr_pages() sees a normal page (split has already finished), but the parallel split has meanwhile cleared PageMlocked from additional tail pages This patch prevents both problems via extending the scope of lru_lock in munlock_vma_page(). This is convenient because: - __split_huge_page_refcount() takes lru_lock for its whole operation - munlock_vma_page() typically takes lru_lock anyway for page isolation As this becomes a second function where page isolation is done with lru_lock already held, factor this out to a new __munlock_isolate_lru_page() function and clean up the code around. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: avoid a coding-style ugly] Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-01-23 23:52:50 +00:00
void mlock_page_drain_local(void)
{
struct pagevec *pvec;
local_lock(&mlock_pvec.lock);
pvec = this_cpu_ptr(&mlock_pvec.vec);
if (pagevec_count(pvec))
mlock_pagevec(pvec);
local_unlock(&mlock_pvec.lock);
}
void mlock_page_drain_remote(int cpu)
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
{
struct pagevec *pvec;
mm: munlock: fix potential race with THP page split Since commit ff6a6da60b89 ("mm: accelerate munlock() treatment of THP pages") munlock skips tail pages of a munlocked THP page. There is some attempt to prevent bad consequences of racing with a THP page split, but code inspection indicates that there are two problems that may lead to a non-fatal, yet wrong outcome. First, __split_huge_page_refcount() copies flags including PageMlocked from the head page to the tail pages. Clearing PageMlocked by munlock_vma_page() in the middle of this operation might result in part of tail pages left with PageMlocked flag. As the head page still appears to be a THP page until all tail pages are processed, munlock_vma_page() might think it munlocked the whole THP page and skip all the former tail pages. Before ff6a6da60, those pages would be cleared in further iterations of munlock_vma_pages_range(), but NR_MLOCK would still become undercounted (related the next point). Second, NR_MLOCK accounting is based on call to hpage_nr_pages() after the PageMlocked is cleared. The accounting might also become inconsistent due to race with __split_huge_page_refcount() - undercount when HUGE_PMD_NR is subtracted, but some tail pages are left with PageMlocked set and counted again (only possible before ff6a6da60) - overcount when hpage_nr_pages() sees a normal page (split has already finished), but the parallel split has meanwhile cleared PageMlocked from additional tail pages This patch prevents both problems via extending the scope of lru_lock in munlock_vma_page(). This is convenient because: - __split_huge_page_refcount() takes lru_lock for its whole operation - munlock_vma_page() typically takes lru_lock anyway for page isolation As this becomes a second function where page isolation is done with lru_lock already held, factor this out to a new __munlock_isolate_lru_page() function and clean up the code around. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: avoid a coding-style ugly] Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-01-23 23:52:50 +00:00
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(cpu));
pvec = &per_cpu(mlock_pvec.vec, cpu);
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
if (pagevec_count(pvec))
mlock_pagevec(pvec);
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
}
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
bool need_mlock_page_drain(int cpu)
{
return pagevec_count(&per_cpu(mlock_pvec.vec, cpu));
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
}
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
/**
* mlock_folio - mlock a folio already on (or temporarily off) LRU
* @folio: folio to be mlocked.
*/
void mlock_folio(struct folio *folio)
{
struct pagevec *pvec;
local_lock(&mlock_pvec.lock);
pvec = this_cpu_ptr(&mlock_pvec.vec);
if (!folio_test_set_mlocked(folio)) {
int nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
zone_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_MLOCK, nr_pages);
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGMLOCKED, nr_pages);
}
folio_get(folio);
if (!pagevec_add(pvec, mlock_lru(&folio->page)) ||
folio_test_large(folio) || lru_cache_disabled())
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
mlock_pagevec(pvec);
local_unlock(&mlock_pvec.lock);
}
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
/**
* mlock_new_page - mlock a newly allocated page not yet on LRU
* @page: page to be mlocked, either a normal page or a THP head.
*/
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
void mlock_new_page(struct page *page)
{
struct pagevec *pvec;
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
local_lock(&mlock_pvec.lock);
pvec = this_cpu_ptr(&mlock_pvec.vec);
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
SetPageMlocked(page);
mod_zone_page_state(page_zone(page), NR_MLOCK, nr_pages);
__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGMLOCKED, nr_pages);
get_page(page);
if (!pagevec_add(pvec, mlock_new(page)) ||
PageHead(page) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_pagevec(pvec);
local_unlock(&mlock_pvec.lock);
}
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
/**
* munlock_page - munlock a page
* @page: page to be munlocked, either a normal page or a THP head.
2013-09-11 21:22:29 +00:00
*/
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
void munlock_page(struct page *page)
2013-09-11 21:22:29 +00:00
{
struct pagevec *pvec;
local_lock(&mlock_pvec.lock);
pvec = this_cpu_ptr(&mlock_pvec.vec);
/*
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
* TestClearPageMlocked(page) must be left to __munlock_page(),
* which will check whether the page is multiply mlocked.
*/
mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec A weakness of the page->mlock_count approach is the need for lruvec lock while holding page table lock. That is not an overhead we would allow on normal pages, but I think acceptable just for pages in an mlocked area. But let's try to amortize the extra cost by gathering on per-cpu pagevec before acquiring the lruvec lock. I have an unverified conjecture that the mlock pagevec might work out well for delaying the mlock processing of new file pages until they have got off lru_cache_add()'s pagevec and on to LRU. The initialization of page->mlock_count is subject to races and awkward: 0 or !!PageMlocked or 1? Was it wrong even in the implementation before this commit, which just widens the window? I haven't gone back to think it through. Maybe someone can point out a better way to initialize it. Bringing lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable()'s mlock initialization into mm/mlock.c has helped: mlock_new_page(), using the mlock pagevec, rather than lru_cache_add()'s pagevec. Experimented with various orderings: the right thing seems to be for mlock_page() and mlock_new_page() to TestSetPageMlocked before adding to pagevec, but munlock_page() to leave TestClearPageMlocked to the later pagevec processing. Dropped the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail)s this time around: they have made their point, and the thp_nr_page()s already contain a VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS() for that. This still leaves acquiring lruvec locks under page table lock each time the pagevec fills (or a THP is added): which I suppose is rather silly, since they sit on pagevec waiting to be processed long after page table lock has been dropped; but I'm disinclined to uglify the calling sequence until some load shows an actual problem with it (nothing wrong with taking lruvec lock under page table lock, just "nicer" to do it less). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:37:29 +00:00
get_page(page);
if (!pagevec_add(pvec, page) ||
PageHead(page) || lru_cache_disabled())
mlock_pagevec(pvec);
local_unlock(&mlock_pvec.lock);
}
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
static int mlock_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk)
{
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
struct vm_area_struct *vma = walk->vma;
spinlock_t *ptl;
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
pte_t *start_pte, *pte;
struct page *page;
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
if (ptl) {
if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
goto out;
if (is_huge_zero_pmd(*pmd))
goto out;
page = pmd_page(*pmd);
if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
mlock_folio(page_folio(page));
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
else
munlock_page(page);
goto out;
}
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
start_pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
for (pte = start_pte; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
if (!pte_present(*pte))
continue;
page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, *pte);
if (!page || is_zone_device_page(page))
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
continue;
thp: allow mlocked THP again Before THP refcounting rework, THP was not allowed to cross VMA boundary. So, if we have THP and we split it, PG_mlocked can be safely transferred to small pages. With new THP refcounting and naive approach to mlocking we can end up with this scenario: 1. we have a mlocked THP, which belong to one VM_LOCKED VMA. 2. the process does munlock() on the *part* of the THP: - the VMA is split into two, one of them VM_LOCKED; - huge PMD split into PTE table; - THP is still mlocked; 3. split_huge_page(): - it transfers PG_mlocked to *all* small pages regrardless if it blong to any VM_LOCKED VMA. We probably could munlock() all small pages on split_huge_page(), but I think we have accounting issue already on step two. Instead of forbidding mlocked pages altogether, we just avoid mlocking PTE-mapped THPs and munlock THPs on split_huge_pmd(). This means PTE-mapped THPs will be on normal lru lists and will be split under memory pressure by vmscan. After the split vmscan will detect unevictable small pages and mlock them. With this approach we shouldn't hit situation like described above. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-01-16 00:54:33 +00:00
if (PageTransCompound(page))
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
continue;
if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
mlock_folio(page_folio(page));
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
else
munlock_page(page);
}
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
pte_unmap(start_pte);
out:
spin_unlock(ptl);
cond_resched();
return 0;
2013-09-11 21:22:29 +00:00
}
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
/*
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
* mlock_vma_pages_range() - mlock any pages already in the range,
* or munlock all pages in the range.
* @vma - vma containing range to be mlock()ed or munlock()ed
* @start - start address in @vma of the range
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
* @end - end of range in @vma
* @newflags - the new set of flags for @vma.
*
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
* Called for mlock(), mlock2() and mlockall(), to set @vma VM_LOCKED;
* called for munlock() and munlockall(), to clear VM_LOCKED from @vma.
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
*/
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
static void mlock_vma_pages_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end, vm_flags_t newflags)
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
{
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
static const struct mm_walk_ops mlock_walk_ops = {
.pmd_entry = mlock_pte_range,
};
mm: munlock use follow_page Hiroaki Wakabayashi points out that when mlock() has been interrupted by SIGKILL, the subsequent munlock() takes unnecessarily long because its use of __get_user_pages() insists on faulting in all the pages which mlock() never reached. It's worse than slowness if mlock() is terminated by Out Of Memory kill: the munlock_vma_pages_all() in exit_mmap() insists on faulting in all the pages which mlock() could not find memory for; so innocent bystanders are killed too, and perhaps the system hangs. __get_user_pages() does a lot that's silly for munlock(): so remove the munlock option from __mlock_vma_pages_range(), and use a simple loop of follow_page()s in munlock_vma_pages_range() instead; ignoring absent pages, and not marking present pages as accessed or dirty. (Change munlock() to only go so far as mlock() reached? That does not work out, given the convention that mlock() claims complete success even when it has to give up early - in part so that an underlying file can be extended later, and those pages locked which earlier would give SIGBUS.) Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Reviewed-by: Hiroaki Wakabayashi <primulaelatior@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-09-22 00:03:23 +00:00
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
/*
* There is a slight chance that concurrent page migration,
* or page reclaim finding a page of this now-VM_LOCKED vma,
* will call mlock_vma_page() and raise page's mlock_count:
* double counting, leaving the page unevictable indefinitely.
* Communicate this danger to mlock_vma_page() with VM_IO,
* which is a VM_SPECIAL flag not allowed on VM_LOCKED vmas.
* mmap_lock is held in write mode here, so this weird
* combination should not be visible to other mmap_lock users;
* but WRITE_ONCE so rmap walkers must see VM_IO if VM_LOCKED.
*/
if (newflags & VM_LOCKED)
newflags |= VM_IO;
WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_flags, newflags);
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
lru_add_drain();
walk_page_range(vma->vm_mm, start, end, &mlock_walk_ops, NULL);
lru_add_drain();
mm: munlock use follow_page Hiroaki Wakabayashi points out that when mlock() has been interrupted by SIGKILL, the subsequent munlock() takes unnecessarily long because its use of __get_user_pages() insists on faulting in all the pages which mlock() never reached. It's worse than slowness if mlock() is terminated by Out Of Memory kill: the munlock_vma_pages_all() in exit_mmap() insists on faulting in all the pages which mlock() could not find memory for; so innocent bystanders are killed too, and perhaps the system hangs. __get_user_pages() does a lot that's silly for munlock(): so remove the munlock option from __mlock_vma_pages_range(), and use a simple loop of follow_page()s in munlock_vma_pages_range() instead; ignoring absent pages, and not marking present pages as accessed or dirty. (Change munlock() to only go so far as mlock() reached? That does not work out, given the convention that mlock() claims complete success even when it has to give up early - in part so that an underlying file can be extended later, and those pages locked which earlier would give SIGBUS.) Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Reviewed-by: Hiroaki Wakabayashi <primulaelatior@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-09-22 00:03:23 +00:00
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
if (newflags & VM_IO) {
newflags &= ~VM_IO;
WRITE_ONCE(vma->vm_flags, newflags);
mm: munlock use follow_page Hiroaki Wakabayashi points out that when mlock() has been interrupted by SIGKILL, the subsequent munlock() takes unnecessarily long because its use of __get_user_pages() insists on faulting in all the pages which mlock() never reached. It's worse than slowness if mlock() is terminated by Out Of Memory kill: the munlock_vma_pages_all() in exit_mmap() insists on faulting in all the pages which mlock() could not find memory for; so innocent bystanders are killed too, and perhaps the system hangs. __get_user_pages() does a lot that's silly for munlock(): so remove the munlock option from __mlock_vma_pages_range(), and use a simple loop of follow_page()s in munlock_vma_pages_range() instead; ignoring absent pages, and not marking present pages as accessed or dirty. (Change munlock() to only go so far as mlock() reached? That does not work out, given the convention that mlock() claims complete success even when it has to give up early - in part so that an underlying file can be extended later, and those pages locked which earlier would give SIGBUS.) Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Reviewed-by: Hiroaki Wakabayashi <primulaelatior@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-09-22 00:03:23 +00:00
}
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
}
/*
* mlock_fixup - handle mlock[all]/munlock[all] requests.
*
* Filters out "special" vmas -- VM_LOCKED never gets set for these, and
* munlock is a no-op. However, for some special vmas, we go ahead and
* populate the ptes.
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
*
* For vmas that pass the filters, merge/split as appropriate.
*/
static int mlock_fixup(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct **prev,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end, vm_flags_t newflags)
{
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
pgoff_t pgoff;
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
int nr_pages;
int ret = 0;
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
vm_flags_t oldflags = vma->vm_flags;
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
if (newflags == oldflags || (oldflags & VM_SPECIAL) ||
dax: remove VM_MIXEDMAP for fsdax and device dax This patch is reworked from an earlier patch that Dan has posted: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10131727/ VM_MIXEDMAP is used by dax to direct mm paths like vm_normal_page() that the memory page it is dealing with is not typical memory from the linear map. The get_user_pages_fast() path, since it does not resolve the vma, is already using {pte,pmd}_devmap() as a stand-in for VM_MIXEDMAP, so we use that as a VM_MIXEDMAP replacement in some locations. In the cases where there is no pte to consult we fallback to using vma_is_dax() to detect the VM_MIXEDMAP special case. Now that we have explicit driver pfn_t-flag opt-in/opt-out for get_user_pages() support for DAX we can stop setting VM_MIXEDMAP. This also means we no longer need to worry about safely manipulating vm_flags in a future where we support dynamically changing the dax mode of a file. DAX should also now be supported with madvise_behavior(), vma_merge(), and copy_page_range(). This patch has been tested against ndctl unit test. It has also been tested against xfstests commit: 625515d using fake pmem created by memmap and no additional issues have been observed. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/152847720311.55924.16999195879201817653.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-17 22:43:40 +00:00
is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) || vma == get_gate_vma(current->mm) ||
mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas Introduce "memfd_secret" system call with the ability to create memory areas visible only in the context of the owning process and not mapped not only to other processes but in the kernel page tables as well. The secretmem feature is off by default and the user must explicitly enable it at the boot time. Once secretmem is enabled, the user will be able to create a file descriptor using the memfd_secret() system call. The memory areas created by mmap() calls from this file descriptor will be unmapped from the kernel direct map and they will be only mapped in the page table of the processes that have access to the file descriptor. Secretmem is designed to provide the following protections: * Enhanced protection (in conjunction with all the other in-kernel attack prevention systems) against ROP attacks. Seceretmem makes "simple" ROP insufficient to perform exfiltration, which increases the required complexity of the attack. Along with other protections like the kernel stack size limit and address space layout randomization which make finding gadgets is really hard, absence of any in-kernel primitive for accessing secret memory means the one gadget ROP attack can't work. Since the only way to access secret memory is to reconstruct the missing mapping entry, the attacker has to recover the physical page and insert a PTE pointing to it in the kernel and then retrieve the contents. That takes at least three gadgets which is a level of difficulty beyond most standard attacks. * Prevent cross-process secret userspace memory exposures. Once the secret memory is allocated, the user can't accidentally pass it into the kernel to be transmitted somewhere. The secreremem pages cannot be accessed via the direct map and they are disallowed in GUP. * Harden against exploited kernel flaws. In order to access secretmem, a kernel-side attack would need to either walk the page tables and create new ones, or spawn a new privileged uiserspace process to perform secrets exfiltration using ptrace. The file descriptor based memory has several advantages over the "traditional" mm interfaces, such as mlock(), mprotect(), madvise(). File descriptor approach allows explicit and controlled sharing of the memory areas, it allows to seal the operations. Besides, file descriptor based memory paves the way for VMMs to remove the secret memory range from the userspace hipervisor process, for instance QEMU. Andy Lutomirski says: "Getting fd-backed memory into a guest will take some possibly major work in the kernel, but getting vma-backed memory into a guest without mapping it in the host user address space seems much, much worse." memfd_secret() is made a dedicated system call rather than an extension to memfd_create() because it's purpose is to allow the user to create more secure memory mappings rather than to simply allow file based access to the memory. Nowadays a new system call cost is negligible while it is way simpler for userspace to deal with a clear-cut system calls than with a multiplexer or an overloaded syscall. Moreover, the initial implementation of memfd_secret() is completely distinct from memfd_create() so there is no much sense in overloading memfd_create() to begin with. If there will be a need for code sharing between these implementation it can be easily achieved without a need to adjust user visible APIs. The secret memory remains accessible in the process context using uaccess primitives, but it is not exposed to the kernel otherwise; secret memory areas are removed from the direct map and functions in the follow_page()/get_user_page() family will refuse to return a page that belongs to the secret memory area. Once there will be a use case that will require exposing secretmem to the kernel it will be an opt-in request in the system call flags so that user would have to decide what data can be exposed to the kernel. Removing of the pages from the direct map may cause its fragmentation on architectures that use large pages to map the physical memory which affects the system performance. However, the original Kconfig text for CONFIG_DIRECT_GBPAGES said that gigabyte pages in the direct map "... can improve the kernel's performance a tiny bit ..." (commit 00d1c5e05736 ("x86: add gbpages switches")) and the recent report [1] showed that "... although 1G mappings are a good default choice, there is no compelling evidence that it must be the only choice". Hence, it is sufficient to have secretmem disabled by default with the ability of a system administrator to enable it at boot time. Pages in the secretmem regions are unevictable and unmovable to avoid accidental exposure of the sensitive data via swap or during page migration. Since the secretmem mappings are locked in memory they cannot exceed RLIMIT_MEMLOCK. Since these mappings are already locked independently from mlock(), an attempt to mlock()/munlock() secretmem range would fail and mlockall()/munlockall() will ignore secretmem mappings. However, unlike mlock()ed memory, secretmem currently behaves more like long-term GUP: secretmem mappings are unmovable mappings directly consumed by user space. With default limits, there is no excessive use of secretmem and it poses no real problem in combination with ZONE_MOVABLE/CMA, but in the future this should be addressed to allow balanced use of large amounts of secretmem along with ZONE_MOVABLE/CMA. A page that was a part of the secret memory area is cleared when it is freed to ensure the data is not exposed to the next user of that page. The following example demonstrates creation of a secret mapping (error handling is omitted): fd = memfd_secret(0); ftruncate(fd, MAP_SIZE); ptr = mmap(NULL, MAP_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/213b4567-46ce-f116-9cdf-bbd0c884eb3c@linux.intel.com/ [akpm@linux-foundation.org: suppress Kconfig whine] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210518072034.31572-5-rppt@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Acked-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-08 01:08:03 +00:00
vma_is_dax(vma) || vma_is_secretmem(vma))
mm: mlock: add mlock flags to enable VM_LOCKONFAULT usage The previous patch introduced a flag that specified pages in a VMA should be placed on the unevictable LRU, but they should not be made present when the area is created. This patch adds the ability to set this state via the new mlock system calls. We add MLOCK_ONFAULT for mlock2 and MCL_ONFAULT for mlockall. MLOCK_ONFAULT will set the VM_LOCKONFAULT modifier for VM_LOCKED. MCL_ONFAULT should be used as a modifier to the two other mlockall flags. When used with MCL_CURRENT, all current mappings will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with MCL_FUTURE, the mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with both MCL_CURRENT and MCL_FUTURE, all current mappings and mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. Prior to this patch, mlockall() will unconditionally clear the mm->def_flags any time it is called without MCL_FUTURE. This behavior is maintained after adding MCL_ONFAULT. If a call to mlockall(MCL_FUTURE) is followed by mlockall(MCL_CURRENT), the mm->def_flags will be cleared and new VMAs will be unlocked. This remains true with or without MCL_ONFAULT in either mlockall() invocation. munlock() will unconditionally clear both vma flags. munlockall() unconditionally clears for VMA flags on all VMAs and in the mm->def_flags field. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:39 +00:00
/* don't set VM_LOCKED or VM_LOCKONFAULT and don't count */
goto out;
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
pgoff = vma->vm_pgoff + ((start - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
*prev = vma_merge(mm, *prev, start, end, newflags, vma->anon_vma,
vma->vm_file, pgoff, vma_policy(vma),
2022-03-05 04:28:51 +00:00
vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx, anon_vma_name(vma));
if (*prev) {
vma = *prev;
goto success;
}
if (start != vma->vm_start) {
ret = split_vma(mm, vma, start, 1);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
if (end != vma->vm_end) {
ret = split_vma(mm, vma, end, 0);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
success:
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
/*
* Keep track of amount of locked VM.
*/
nr_pages = (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
if (!(newflags & VM_LOCKED))
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
nr_pages = -nr_pages;
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
else if (oldflags & VM_LOCKED)
mm: mlock: avoid increase mm->locked_vm on mlock() when already mlock2(,MLOCK_ONFAULT) When one vma was with flag VM_LOCKED|VM_LOCKONFAULT (by invoking mlock2(,MLOCK_ONFAULT)), it can again be populated with mlock() with VM_LOCKED flag only. There is a hole in mlock_fixup() which increase mm->locked_vm twice even the two operations are on the same vma and both with VM_LOCKED flags. The issue can be reproduced by following code: mlock2(p, 1024 * 64, MLOCK_ONFAULT); //VM_LOCKED|VM_LOCKONFAULT mlock(p, 1024 * 64); //VM_LOCKED Then check the increase VmLck field in /proc/pid/status(to 128k). When vma is set with different vm_flags, and the new vm_flags is with VM_LOCKED, it is not necessarily be a "new locked" vma. This patch corrects this bug by prevent mm->locked_vm from increment when old vm_flags is already VM_LOCKED. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472554781-9835-3-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-10-07 23:59:40 +00:00
nr_pages = 0;
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
mm->locked_vm += nr_pages;
/*
* vm_flags is protected by the mmap_lock held in write mode.
* It's okay if try_to_unmap_one unmaps a page just after we
* set VM_LOCKED, populate_vma_page_range will bring it back.
*/
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
if ((newflags & VM_LOCKED) && (oldflags & VM_LOCKED)) {
/* No work to do, and mlocking twice would be wrong */
mm: munlock use follow_page Hiroaki Wakabayashi points out that when mlock() has been interrupted by SIGKILL, the subsequent munlock() takes unnecessarily long because its use of __get_user_pages() insists on faulting in all the pages which mlock() never reached. It's worse than slowness if mlock() is terminated by Out Of Memory kill: the munlock_vma_pages_all() in exit_mmap() insists on faulting in all the pages which mlock() could not find memory for; so innocent bystanders are killed too, and perhaps the system hangs. __get_user_pages() does a lot that's silly for munlock(): so remove the munlock option from __mlock_vma_pages_range(), and use a simple loop of follow_page()s in munlock_vma_pages_range() instead; ignoring absent pages, and not marking present pages as accessed or dirty. (Change munlock() to only go so far as mlock() reached? That does not work out, given the convention that mlock() claims complete success even when it has to give up early - in part so that an underlying file can be extended later, and those pages locked which earlier would give SIGBUS.) Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Reviewed-by: Hiroaki Wakabayashi <primulaelatior@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-09-22 00:03:23 +00:00
vma->vm_flags = newflags;
mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking Fill in missing pieces: reimplementation of munlock_vma_pages_range(), required to lower the mlock_counts when munlocking without munmapping; and its complement, implementation of mlock_vma_pages_range(), required to raise the mlock_counts on pages already there when a range is mlocked. Combine them into just the one function mlock_vma_pages_range(), using walk_page_range() to run mlock_pte_range(). This approach fixes the "Very slow unlockall()" of unpopulated PROT_NONE areas, reported in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/70885d37-62b7-748b-29df-9e94f3291736@gmail.com/ Munlock clears VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing truncate or holepunch (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will not try to munlock the page: leaving release_pages() to correct it when the last reference to the page is gone - that's okay, a page is not evictable anyway while it is held by an extra reference. Mlock sets VM_LOCKED at the start, under exclusive mmap_lock; but if a racing remove_migration_pte() or try_to_unmap_one() (depending on i_mmap_rwsem) gets to the pte first, it will try to mlock the page, then mlock_pte_range() mlock it a second time. This is harder to reproduce, but a more serious race because it could leave the page unevictable indefinitely though the area is munlocked afterwards. Guard against it by setting the (inappropriate) VM_IO flag, and modifying mlock_vma_page() to decline such vmas. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:31:48 +00:00
} else {
mlock_vma_pages_range(vma, start, end, newflags);
}
out:
mlock: mlocked pages are unevictable Make sure that mlocked pages also live on the unevictable LRU, so kswapd will not scan them over and over again. This is achieved through various strategies: 1) add yet another page flag--PG_mlocked--to indicate that the page is locked for efficient testing in vmscan and, optionally, fault path. This allows early culling of unevictable pages, preventing them from getting to page_referenced()/try_to_unmap(). Also allows separate accounting of mlock'd pages, as Nick's original patch did. Note: Nick's original mlock patch used a PG_mlocked flag. I had removed this in favor of the PG_unevictable flag + an mlock_count [new page struct member]. I restored the PG_mlocked flag to eliminate the new count field. 2) add the mlock/unevictable infrastructure to mm/mlock.c, with internal APIs in mm/internal.h. This is a rework of Nick's original patch to these files, taking into account that mlocked pages are now kept on unevictable LRU list. 3) update vmscan.c:page_evictable() to check PageMlocked() and, if vma passed in, the vm_flags. Note that the vma will only be passed in for new pages in the fault path; and then only if the "cull unevictable pages in fault path" patch is included. 4) add try_to_unlock() to rmap.c to walk a page's rmap and ClearPageMlocked() if no other vmas have it mlocked. Reuses as much of try_to_unmap() as possible. This effectively replaces the use of one of the lru list links as an mlock count. If this mechanism let's pages in mlocked vmas leak through w/o PG_mlocked set [I don't know that it does], we should catch them later in try_to_unmap(). One hopes this will be rare, as it will be relatively expensive. Original mm/internal.h, mm/rmap.c and mm/mlock.c changes: Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages(): New munlock processing need to GUP_FLAGS_IGNORE_VMA_PERMISSIONS. because current get_user_pages() can't grab PROT_NONE pages theresore it cause PROT_NONE pages can't munlock. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix this for pagemap-pass-mm-into-pagewalkers.patch] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: untangle patch interdependencies] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix things after out-of-order merging] [hugh@veritas.com: fix page-flags mess] [lee.schermerhorn@hp.com: fix munlock page table walk - now requires 'mm'] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: build fix] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix truncate race and sevaral comments] [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: splitlru: introduce __get_user_pages()] Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-19 03:26:44 +00:00
*prev = vma;
return ret;
}
mm: mlock: refactor mlock, munlock, and munlockall code mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it is allocated. For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary this is not ideal. Instead of forcing all locked pages to be present when they are allocated, this set creates a middle ground. Pages are marked to be placed on the unevictable LRU (locked) when they are first used, but they are not faulted in by the mlock call. This series introduces a new mlock() system call that takes a flags argument along with the start address and size. This flags argument gives the caller the ability to request memory be locked in the traditional way, or to be locked after the page is faulted in. A new MCL flag is added to mirror the lock on fault behavior from mlock() in mlockall(). There are two main use cases that this set covers. The first is the security focussed mlock case. A buffer is needed that cannot be written to swap. The maximum size is known, but on average the memory used is significantly less than this maximum. With lock on fault, the buffer is guaranteed to never be paged out without consuming the maximum size every time such a buffer is created. The second use case is focussed on performance. Portions of a large file are needed and we want to keep the used portions in memory once accessed. This is the case for large graphical models where the path through the graph is not known until run time. The entire graph is unlikely to be used in a given invocation, but once a node has been used it needs to stay resident for further processing. Given these constraints we have a number of options. We can potentially waste a large amount of memory by mlocking the entire region (this can also cause a significant stall at startup as the entire file is read in). We can mlock every page as we access them without tracking if the page is already resident but this introduces large overhead for each access. The third option is mapping the entire region with PROT_NONE and using a signal handler for SIGSEGV to mprotect(PROT_READ) and mlock() the needed page. Doing this page at a time adds a significant performance penalty. Batching can be used to mitigate this overhead, but in order to safely avoid trying to mprotect pages outside of the mapping, the boundaries of each mapping to be used in this way must be tracked and available to the signal handler. This is precisely what the mm system in the kernel should already be doing. For mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) the user is charged against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK as if mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) or mmap(MAP_LOCKED) was used, so when the VMA is created not when the pages are faulted in. For mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT) the user is charged as if MCL_FUTURE was used. This decision was made to keep the accounting checks out of the page fault path. To illustrate the benefit of this set I wrote a test program that mmaps a 5 GB file filled with random data and then makes 15,000,000 accesses to random addresses in that mapping. The test program was run 20 times for each setup. Results are reported for two program portions, setup and execution. The setup phase is calling mmap and optionally mlock on the entire region. For most experiments this is trivial, but it highlights the cost of faulting in the entire region. Results are averages across the 20 runs in milliseconds. mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) on entire range: Setup avg: 8228.666 Processing avg: 8274.257 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) before each access: Setup avg: 0.113 Processing avg: 90993.552 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 1 page: With the default value in max_map_count, this gets ENOMEM as I attempt to change the permissions, after upping the sysctl significantly I get: Setup avg: 0.058 Processing avg: 69488.073 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 8 pages: Setup avg: 0.068 Processing avg: 38204.116 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 16 pages: Setup avg: 0.044 Processing avg: 29671.180 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) on entire range: Setup avg: 0.189 Processing avg: 17904.899 The signal handler in the batch cases faulted in memory in two steps to avoid having to know the start and end of the faulting mapping. The first step covers the page that caused the fault as we know that it will be possible to lock. The second step speculatively tries to mlock and mprotect the batch size - 1 pages that follow. There may be a clever way to avoid this without having the program track each mapping to be covered by this handeler in a globally accessible structure, but I could not find it. It should be noted that with a large enough batch size this two step fault handler can still cause the program to crash if it reaches far beyond the end of the mapping. These results show that if the developer knows that a majority of the mapping will be used, it is better to try and fault it in at once, otherwise mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) is significantly faster. The performance cost of these patches are minimal on the two benchmarks I have tested (stream and kernbench). The following are the average values across 20 runs of stream and 10 runs of kernbench after a warmup run whose results were discarded. Avg throughput in MB/s from stream using 1000000 element arrays Test 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Copy: 10,566.5 10,421 Scale: 10,685 10,503.5 Add: 12,044.1 11,814.2 Triad: 12,064.8 11,846.3 Kernbench optimal load 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Elapsed Time 78.453 78.991 User Time 64.2395 65.2355 System Time 9.7335 9.7085 Context Switches 22211.5 22412.1 Sleeps 14965.3 14956.1 This patch (of 6): Extending the mlock system call is very difficult because it currently does not take a flags argument. A later patch in this set will extend mlock to support a middle ground between pages that are locked and faulted in immediately and unlocked pages. To pave the way for the new system call, the code needs some reorganization so that all the actual entry point handles is checking input and translating to VMA flags. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:29 +00:00
static int apply_vma_lock_flags(unsigned long start, size_t len,
vm_flags_t flags)
{
unsigned long nstart, end, tmp;
mm/mempool: minor coding style tweaks Various coding style tweaks to various files under mm/ [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/swapfile: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614223624-16055-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/sparse: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614227288-19363-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/vmscan: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614227649-19853-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/compaction: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614228218-20770-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/oom_kill: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614228360-21168-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/shmem: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614228504-21491-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/page_alloc: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614228613-21754-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/filemap: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614228936-22337-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/mlock: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1613956588-2453-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/frontswap: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1613962668-15045-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/vmalloc: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1613963379-15988-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/memory_hotplug: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1613971784-24878-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/mempolicy: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1613972228-25501-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614222374-13805-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn Signed-off-by: Zhiyuan Dai <daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05 01:40:12 +00:00
struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev;
int error;
MA_STATE(mas, &current->mm->mm_mt, start, start);
VM_BUG_ON(offset_in_page(start));
mlock: only hold mmap_sem in shared mode when faulting in pages Currently mlock() holds mmap_sem in exclusive mode while the pages get faulted in. In the case of a large mlock, this can potentially take a very long time, during which various commands such as 'ps auxw' will block. This makes sysadmins unhappy: real 14m36.232s user 0m0.003s sys 0m0.015s (output from 'time ps auxw' while a 20GB file was being mlocked without being previously preloaded into page cache) I propose that mlock() could release mmap_sem after the VM_LOCKED bits have been set in all appropriate VMAs. Then a second pass could be done to actually mlock the pages, in small batches, releasing mmap_sem when we block on disk access or when we detect some contention. This patch: Before this change, mlock() holds mmap_sem in exclusive mode while the pages get faulted in. In the case of a large mlock, this can potentially take a very long time. Various things will block while mmap_sem is held, including 'ps auxw'. This can make sysadmins angry. I propose that mlock() could release mmap_sem after the VM_LOCKED bits have been set in all appropriate VMAs. Then a second pass could be done to actually mlock the pages with mmap_sem held for reads only. We need to recheck the vma flags after we re-acquire mmap_sem, but this is easy. In the case where a vma has been munlocked before mlock completes, pages that were already marked as PageMlocked() are handled by the munlock() call, and mlock() is careful to not mark new page batches as PageMlocked() after the munlock() call has cleared the VM_LOCKED vma flags. So, the end result will be identical to what'd happen if munlock() had executed after the mlock() call. In a later change, I will allow the second pass to release mmap_sem when blocking on disk accesses or when it is otherwise contended, so that it won't be held for long periods of time even in shared mode. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Tested-by: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-01-13 23:46:10 +00:00
VM_BUG_ON(len != PAGE_ALIGN(len));
end = start + len;
if (end < start)
return -EINVAL;
if (end == start)
return 0;
vma = mas_walk(&mas);
if (!vma)
return -ENOMEM;
if (start > vma->vm_start)
prev = vma;
else
prev = mas_prev(&mas, 0);
for (nstart = start ; ; ) {
mm: mlock: add mlock flags to enable VM_LOCKONFAULT usage The previous patch introduced a flag that specified pages in a VMA should be placed on the unevictable LRU, but they should not be made present when the area is created. This patch adds the ability to set this state via the new mlock system calls. We add MLOCK_ONFAULT for mlock2 and MCL_ONFAULT for mlockall. MLOCK_ONFAULT will set the VM_LOCKONFAULT modifier for VM_LOCKED. MCL_ONFAULT should be used as a modifier to the two other mlockall flags. When used with MCL_CURRENT, all current mappings will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with MCL_FUTURE, the mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with both MCL_CURRENT and MCL_FUTURE, all current mappings and mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. Prior to this patch, mlockall() will unconditionally clear the mm->def_flags any time it is called without MCL_FUTURE. This behavior is maintained after adding MCL_ONFAULT. If a call to mlockall(MCL_FUTURE) is followed by mlockall(MCL_CURRENT), the mm->def_flags will be cleared and new VMAs will be unlocked. This remains true with or without MCL_ONFAULT in either mlockall() invocation. munlock() will unconditionally clear both vma flags. munlockall() unconditionally clears for VMA flags on all VMAs and in the mm->def_flags field. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:39 +00:00
vm_flags_t newflags = vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED_CLEAR_MASK;
mm: mlock: refactor mlock, munlock, and munlockall code mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it is allocated. For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary this is not ideal. Instead of forcing all locked pages to be present when they are allocated, this set creates a middle ground. Pages are marked to be placed on the unevictable LRU (locked) when they are first used, but they are not faulted in by the mlock call. This series introduces a new mlock() system call that takes a flags argument along with the start address and size. This flags argument gives the caller the ability to request memory be locked in the traditional way, or to be locked after the page is faulted in. A new MCL flag is added to mirror the lock on fault behavior from mlock() in mlockall(). There are two main use cases that this set covers. The first is the security focussed mlock case. A buffer is needed that cannot be written to swap. The maximum size is known, but on average the memory used is significantly less than this maximum. With lock on fault, the buffer is guaranteed to never be paged out without consuming the maximum size every time such a buffer is created. The second use case is focussed on performance. Portions of a large file are needed and we want to keep the used portions in memory once accessed. This is the case for large graphical models where the path through the graph is not known until run time. The entire graph is unlikely to be used in a given invocation, but once a node has been used it needs to stay resident for further processing. Given these constraints we have a number of options. We can potentially waste a large amount of memory by mlocking the entire region (this can also cause a significant stall at startup as the entire file is read in). We can mlock every page as we access them without tracking if the page is already resident but this introduces large overhead for each access. The third option is mapping the entire region with PROT_NONE and using a signal handler for SIGSEGV to mprotect(PROT_READ) and mlock() the needed page. Doing this page at a time adds a significant performance penalty. Batching can be used to mitigate this overhead, but in order to safely avoid trying to mprotect pages outside of the mapping, the boundaries of each mapping to be used in this way must be tracked and available to the signal handler. This is precisely what the mm system in the kernel should already be doing. For mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) the user is charged against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK as if mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) or mmap(MAP_LOCKED) was used, so when the VMA is created not when the pages are faulted in. For mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT) the user is charged as if MCL_FUTURE was used. This decision was made to keep the accounting checks out of the page fault path. To illustrate the benefit of this set I wrote a test program that mmaps a 5 GB file filled with random data and then makes 15,000,000 accesses to random addresses in that mapping. The test program was run 20 times for each setup. Results are reported for two program portions, setup and execution. The setup phase is calling mmap and optionally mlock on the entire region. For most experiments this is trivial, but it highlights the cost of faulting in the entire region. Results are averages across the 20 runs in milliseconds. mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) on entire range: Setup avg: 8228.666 Processing avg: 8274.257 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) before each access: Setup avg: 0.113 Processing avg: 90993.552 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 1 page: With the default value in max_map_count, this gets ENOMEM as I attempt to change the permissions, after upping the sysctl significantly I get: Setup avg: 0.058 Processing avg: 69488.073 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 8 pages: Setup avg: 0.068 Processing avg: 38204.116 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 16 pages: Setup avg: 0.044 Processing avg: 29671.180 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) on entire range: Setup avg: 0.189 Processing avg: 17904.899 The signal handler in the batch cases faulted in memory in two steps to avoid having to know the start and end of the faulting mapping. The first step covers the page that caused the fault as we know that it will be possible to lock. The second step speculatively tries to mlock and mprotect the batch size - 1 pages that follow. There may be a clever way to avoid this without having the program track each mapping to be covered by this handeler in a globally accessible structure, but I could not find it. It should be noted that with a large enough batch size this two step fault handler can still cause the program to crash if it reaches far beyond the end of the mapping. These results show that if the developer knows that a majority of the mapping will be used, it is better to try and fault it in at once, otherwise mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) is significantly faster. The performance cost of these patches are minimal on the two benchmarks I have tested (stream and kernbench). The following are the average values across 20 runs of stream and 10 runs of kernbench after a warmup run whose results were discarded. Avg throughput in MB/s from stream using 1000000 element arrays Test 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Copy: 10,566.5 10,421 Scale: 10,685 10,503.5 Add: 12,044.1 11,814.2 Triad: 12,064.8 11,846.3 Kernbench optimal load 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Elapsed Time 78.453 78.991 User Time 64.2395 65.2355 System Time 9.7335 9.7085 Context Switches 22211.5 22412.1 Sleeps 14965.3 14956.1 This patch (of 6): Extending the mlock system call is very difficult because it currently does not take a flags argument. A later patch in this set will extend mlock to support a middle ground between pages that are locked and faulted in immediately and unlocked pages. To pave the way for the new system call, the code needs some reorganization so that all the actual entry point handles is checking input and translating to VMA flags. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:29 +00:00
newflags |= flags;
mm: mlock: refactor mlock, munlock, and munlockall code mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it is allocated. For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary this is not ideal. Instead of forcing all locked pages to be present when they are allocated, this set creates a middle ground. Pages are marked to be placed on the unevictable LRU (locked) when they are first used, but they are not faulted in by the mlock call. This series introduces a new mlock() system call that takes a flags argument along with the start address and size. This flags argument gives the caller the ability to request memory be locked in the traditional way, or to be locked after the page is faulted in. A new MCL flag is added to mirror the lock on fault behavior from mlock() in mlockall(). There are two main use cases that this set covers. The first is the security focussed mlock case. A buffer is needed that cannot be written to swap. The maximum size is known, but on average the memory used is significantly less than this maximum. With lock on fault, the buffer is guaranteed to never be paged out without consuming the maximum size every time such a buffer is created. The second use case is focussed on performance. Portions of a large file are needed and we want to keep the used portions in memory once accessed. This is the case for large graphical models where the path through the graph is not known until run time. The entire graph is unlikely to be used in a given invocation, but once a node has been used it needs to stay resident for further processing. Given these constraints we have a number of options. We can potentially waste a large amount of memory by mlocking the entire region (this can also cause a significant stall at startup as the entire file is read in). We can mlock every page as we access them without tracking if the page is already resident but this introduces large overhead for each access. The third option is mapping the entire region with PROT_NONE and using a signal handler for SIGSEGV to mprotect(PROT_READ) and mlock() the needed page. Doing this page at a time adds a significant performance penalty. Batching can be used to mitigate this overhead, but in order to safely avoid trying to mprotect pages outside of the mapping, the boundaries of each mapping to be used in this way must be tracked and available to the signal handler. This is precisely what the mm system in the kernel should already be doing. For mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) the user is charged against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK as if mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) or mmap(MAP_LOCKED) was used, so when the VMA is created not when the pages are faulted in. For mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT) the user is charged as if MCL_FUTURE was used. This decision was made to keep the accounting checks out of the page fault path. To illustrate the benefit of this set I wrote a test program that mmaps a 5 GB file filled with random data and then makes 15,000,000 accesses to random addresses in that mapping. The test program was run 20 times for each setup. Results are reported for two program portions, setup and execution. The setup phase is calling mmap and optionally mlock on the entire region. For most experiments this is trivial, but it highlights the cost of faulting in the entire region. Results are averages across the 20 runs in milliseconds. mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) on entire range: Setup avg: 8228.666 Processing avg: 8274.257 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) before each access: Setup avg: 0.113 Processing avg: 90993.552 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 1 page: With the default value in max_map_count, this gets ENOMEM as I attempt to change the permissions, after upping the sysctl significantly I get: Setup avg: 0.058 Processing avg: 69488.073 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 8 pages: Setup avg: 0.068 Processing avg: 38204.116 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 16 pages: Setup avg: 0.044 Processing avg: 29671.180 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) on entire range: Setup avg: 0.189 Processing avg: 17904.899 The signal handler in the batch cases faulted in memory in two steps to avoid having to know the start and end of the faulting mapping. The first step covers the page that caused the fault as we know that it will be possible to lock. The second step speculatively tries to mlock and mprotect the batch size - 1 pages that follow. There may be a clever way to avoid this without having the program track each mapping to be covered by this handeler in a globally accessible structure, but I could not find it. It should be noted that with a large enough batch size this two step fault handler can still cause the program to crash if it reaches far beyond the end of the mapping. These results show that if the developer knows that a majority of the mapping will be used, it is better to try and fault it in at once, otherwise mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) is significantly faster. The performance cost of these patches are minimal on the two benchmarks I have tested (stream and kernbench). The following are the average values across 20 runs of stream and 10 runs of kernbench after a warmup run whose results were discarded. Avg throughput in MB/s from stream using 1000000 element arrays Test 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Copy: 10,566.5 10,421 Scale: 10,685 10,503.5 Add: 12,044.1 11,814.2 Triad: 12,064.8 11,846.3 Kernbench optimal load 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Elapsed Time 78.453 78.991 User Time 64.2395 65.2355 System Time 9.7335 9.7085 Context Switches 22211.5 22412.1 Sleeps 14965.3 14956.1 This patch (of 6): Extending the mlock system call is very difficult because it currently does not take a flags argument. A later patch in this set will extend mlock to support a middle ground between pages that are locked and faulted in immediately and unlocked pages. To pave the way for the new system call, the code needs some reorganization so that all the actual entry point handles is checking input and translating to VMA flags. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:29 +00:00
/* Here we know that vma->vm_start <= nstart < vma->vm_end. */
tmp = vma->vm_end;
if (tmp > end)
tmp = end;
error = mlock_fixup(vma, &prev, nstart, tmp, newflags);
if (error)
break;
nstart = tmp;
if (nstart < prev->vm_end)
nstart = prev->vm_end;
if (nstart >= end)
break;
vma = find_vma(prev->vm_mm, prev->vm_end);
if (!vma || vma->vm_start != nstart) {
error = -ENOMEM;
break;
}
}
return error;
}
mm: mlock: check against vma for actual mlock() size In do_mlock(), the check against locked memory limitation has a hole which will fail following cases at step 3): 1) User has a memory chunk from addressA with 50k, and user mem lock rlimit is 64k. 2) mlock(addressA, 30k) 3) mlock(addressA, 40k) The 3rd step should have been allowed since the 40k request is intersected with the previous 30k at step 2), and the 3rd step is actually for mlock on the extra 10k memory. This patch checks vma to caculate the actual "new" mlock size, if necessary, and ajust the logic to fix this issue. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: clean up comment layout] [wei.guo.simon@gmail.com: correct a typo in count_mm_mlocked_page_nr()] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473325970-11393-2-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472554781-9835-2-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-10-07 23:59:36 +00:00
/*
* Go through vma areas and sum size of mlocked
* vma pages, as return value.
* Note deferred memory locking case(mlock2(,,MLOCK_ONFAULT)
* is also counted.
* Return value: previously mlocked page counts
*/
static unsigned long count_mm_mlocked_page_nr(struct mm_struct *mm,
mm: mlock: check against vma for actual mlock() size In do_mlock(), the check against locked memory limitation has a hole which will fail following cases at step 3): 1) User has a memory chunk from addressA with 50k, and user mem lock rlimit is 64k. 2) mlock(addressA, 30k) 3) mlock(addressA, 40k) The 3rd step should have been allowed since the 40k request is intersected with the previous 30k at step 2), and the 3rd step is actually for mlock on the extra 10k memory. This patch checks vma to caculate the actual "new" mlock size, if necessary, and ajust the logic to fix this issue. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: clean up comment layout] [wei.guo.simon@gmail.com: correct a typo in count_mm_mlocked_page_nr()] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473325970-11393-2-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472554781-9835-2-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-10-07 23:59:36 +00:00
unsigned long start, size_t len)
{
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
unsigned long count = 0;
unsigned long end;
VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, mm, start);
mm: mlock: check against vma for actual mlock() size In do_mlock(), the check against locked memory limitation has a hole which will fail following cases at step 3): 1) User has a memory chunk from addressA with 50k, and user mem lock rlimit is 64k. 2) mlock(addressA, 30k) 3) mlock(addressA, 40k) The 3rd step should have been allowed since the 40k request is intersected with the previous 30k at step 2), and the 3rd step is actually for mlock on the extra 10k memory. This patch checks vma to caculate the actual "new" mlock size, if necessary, and ajust the logic to fix this issue. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: clean up comment layout] [wei.guo.simon@gmail.com: correct a typo in count_mm_mlocked_page_nr()] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473325970-11393-2-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472554781-9835-2-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-10-07 23:59:36 +00:00
/* Don't overflow past ULONG_MAX */
if (unlikely(ULONG_MAX - len < start))
end = ULONG_MAX;
else
end = start + len;
for_each_vma_range(vmi, vma, end) {
mm: mlock: check against vma for actual mlock() size In do_mlock(), the check against locked memory limitation has a hole which will fail following cases at step 3): 1) User has a memory chunk from addressA with 50k, and user mem lock rlimit is 64k. 2) mlock(addressA, 30k) 3) mlock(addressA, 40k) The 3rd step should have been allowed since the 40k request is intersected with the previous 30k at step 2), and the 3rd step is actually for mlock on the extra 10k memory. This patch checks vma to caculate the actual "new" mlock size, if necessary, and ajust the logic to fix this issue. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: clean up comment layout] [wei.guo.simon@gmail.com: correct a typo in count_mm_mlocked_page_nr()] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473325970-11393-2-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472554781-9835-2-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-10-07 23:59:36 +00:00
if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
if (start > vma->vm_start)
count -= (start - vma->vm_start);
if (end < vma->vm_end) {
count += end - vma->vm_start;
mm: mlock: check against vma for actual mlock() size In do_mlock(), the check against locked memory limitation has a hole which will fail following cases at step 3): 1) User has a memory chunk from addressA with 50k, and user mem lock rlimit is 64k. 2) mlock(addressA, 30k) 3) mlock(addressA, 40k) The 3rd step should have been allowed since the 40k request is intersected with the previous 30k at step 2), and the 3rd step is actually for mlock on the extra 10k memory. This patch checks vma to caculate the actual "new" mlock size, if necessary, and ajust the logic to fix this issue. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: clean up comment layout] [wei.guo.simon@gmail.com: correct a typo in count_mm_mlocked_page_nr()] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473325970-11393-2-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472554781-9835-2-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-10-07 23:59:36 +00:00
break;
}
count += vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
}
}
return count >> PAGE_SHIFT;
}
mm/munlock: delete page_mlock() and all its works We have recommended some applications to mlock their userspace, but that turns out to be counter-productive: when many processes mlock the same file, contention on rmap's i_mmap_rwsem can become intolerable at exit: it is needed for write, to remove any vma mapping that file from rmap's tree; but hogged for read by those with mlocks calling page_mlock() (formerly known as try_to_munlock()) on *each* page mapped from the file (the purpose being to find out whether another process has the page mlocked, so therefore it should not be unmlocked yet). Several optimizations have been made in the past: one is to skip page_mlock() when mapcount tells that nothing else has this page mapped; but that doesn't help at all when others do have it mapped. This time around, I initially intended to add a preliminary search of the rmap tree for overlapping VM_LOCKED ranges; but that gets messy with locking order, when in doubt whether a page is actually present; and risks adding even more contention on the i_mmap_rwsem. A solution would be much easier, if only there were space in struct page for an mlock_count... but actually, most of the time, there is space for it - an mlocked page spends most of its life on an unevictable LRU, but since 3.18 removed the scan_unevictable_pages sysctl, that "LRU" has been redundant. Let's try to reuse its page->lru. But leave that until a later patch: in this patch, clear the ground by removing page_mlock(), and all the infrastructure that has gathered around it - which mostly hinders understanding, and will make reviewing new additions harder. Don't mind those old comments about THPs, they date from before 4.5's refcounting rework: splitting is not a risk here. Just keep a minimal version of munlock_vma_page(), as reminder of what it should attend to (in particular, the odd way PGSTRANDED is counted out of PGMUNLOCKED), and likewise a stub for munlock_vma_pages_range(). Move unchanged __mlock_posix_error_return() out of the way, down to above its caller: this series then makes no further change after mlock_fixup(). After this and each following commit, the kernel builds, boots and runs; but with deficiencies which may show up in testing of mlock and munlock. The system calls succeed or fail as before, and mlock remains effective in preventing page reclaim; but meminfo's Unevictable and Mlocked amounts may be shown too low after mlock, grow, then stay too high after munlock: with previously mlocked pages remaining unevictable for too long, until finally unmapped and freed and counts corrected. Normal service will be resumed in "mm/munlock: mlock_pte_range() when mlocking or munlocking". Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 02:20:24 +00:00
/*
* convert get_user_pages() return value to posix mlock() error
*/
static int __mlock_posix_error_return(long retval)
{
if (retval == -EFAULT)
retval = -ENOMEM;
else if (retval == -ENOMEM)
retval = -EAGAIN;
return retval;
}
mm: make mmap_sem for write waits killable for mm syscalls This is a follow up work for oom_reaper [1]. As the async OOM killing depends on oom_sem for read we would really appreciate if a holder for write didn't stood in the way. This patchset is changing many of down_write calls to be killable to help those cases when the writer is blocked and waiting for readers to release the lock and so help __oom_reap_task to process the oom victim. Most of the patches are really trivial because the lock is help from a shallow syscall paths where we can return EINTR trivially and allow the current task to die (note that EINTR will never get to the userspace as the task has fatal signal pending). Others seem to be easy as well as the callers are already handling fatal errors and bail and return to userspace which should be sufficient to handle the failure gracefully. I am not familiar with all those code paths so a deeper review is really appreciated. As this work is touching more areas which are not directly connected I have tried to keep the CC list as small as possible and people who I believed would be familiar are CCed only to the specific patches (all should have received the cover though). This patchset is based on linux-next and it depends on down_write_killable for rw_semaphores which got merged into tip locking/rwsem branch and it is merged into this next tree. I guess it would be easiest to route these patches via mmotm because of the dependency on the tip tree but if respective maintainers prefer other way I have no objections. I haven't covered all the mmap_write(mm->mmap_sem) instances here $ git grep "down_write(.*\<mmap_sem\>)" next/master | wc -l 98 $ git grep "down_write(.*\<mmap_sem\>)" | wc -l 62 I have tried to cover those which should be relatively easy to review in this series because this alone should be a nice improvement. Other places can be changed on top. [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456752417-9626-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1452094975-551-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456750705-7141-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org This patch (of 18): This is the first step in making mmap_sem write waiters killable. It focuses on the trivial ones which are taking the lock early after entering the syscall and they are not changing state before. Therefore it is very easy to change them to use down_write_killable and immediately return with -EINTR. This will allow the waiter to pass away without blocking the mmap_sem which might be required to make a forward progress. E.g. the oom reaper will need the lock for reading to dismantle the OOM victim address space. The only tricky function in this patch is vm_mmap_pgoff which has many call sites via vm_mmap. To reduce the risk keep vm_mmap with the original non-killable semantic for now. vm_munmap callers do not bother checking the return value so open code it into the munmap syscall path for now for simplicity. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-23 23:25:27 +00:00
static __must_check int do_mlock(unsigned long start, size_t len, vm_flags_t flags)
{
unsigned long locked;
unsigned long lock_limit;
int error = -ENOMEM;
start = untagged_addr(start);
if (!can_do_mlock())
return -EPERM;
len = PAGE_ALIGN(len + (offset_in_page(start)));
start &= PAGE_MASK;
lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK);
lock_limit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
locked = len >> PAGE_SHIFT;
mmap locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sites This change converts the existing mmap_sem rwsem calls to use the new mmap locking API instead. The change is generated using coccinelle with the following rule: // spatch --sp-file mmap_lock_api.cocci --in-place --include-headers --dir . @@ expression mm; @@ ( -init_rwsem +mmap_init_lock | -down_write +mmap_write_lock | -down_write_killable +mmap_write_lock_killable | -down_write_trylock +mmap_write_trylock | -up_write +mmap_write_unlock | -downgrade_write +mmap_write_downgrade | -down_read +mmap_read_lock | -down_read_killable +mmap_read_lock_killable | -down_read_trylock +mmap_read_trylock | -up_read +mmap_read_unlock ) -(&mm->mmap_sem) +(mm) Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-5-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:25 +00:00
if (mmap_write_lock_killable(current->mm))
mm: make mmap_sem for write waits killable for mm syscalls This is a follow up work for oom_reaper [1]. As the async OOM killing depends on oom_sem for read we would really appreciate if a holder for write didn't stood in the way. This patchset is changing many of down_write calls to be killable to help those cases when the writer is blocked and waiting for readers to release the lock and so help __oom_reap_task to process the oom victim. Most of the patches are really trivial because the lock is help from a shallow syscall paths where we can return EINTR trivially and allow the current task to die (note that EINTR will never get to the userspace as the task has fatal signal pending). Others seem to be easy as well as the callers are already handling fatal errors and bail and return to userspace which should be sufficient to handle the failure gracefully. I am not familiar with all those code paths so a deeper review is really appreciated. As this work is touching more areas which are not directly connected I have tried to keep the CC list as small as possible and people who I believed would be familiar are CCed only to the specific patches (all should have received the cover though). This patchset is based on linux-next and it depends on down_write_killable for rw_semaphores which got merged into tip locking/rwsem branch and it is merged into this next tree. I guess it would be easiest to route these patches via mmotm because of the dependency on the tip tree but if respective maintainers prefer other way I have no objections. I haven't covered all the mmap_write(mm->mmap_sem) instances here $ git grep "down_write(.*\<mmap_sem\>)" next/master | wc -l 98 $ git grep "down_write(.*\<mmap_sem\>)" | wc -l 62 I have tried to cover those which should be relatively easy to review in this series because this alone should be a nice improvement. Other places can be changed on top. [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456752417-9626-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1452094975-551-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456750705-7141-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org This patch (of 18): This is the first step in making mmap_sem write waiters killable. It focuses on the trivial ones which are taking the lock early after entering the syscall and they are not changing state before. Therefore it is very easy to change them to use down_write_killable and immediately return with -EINTR. This will allow the waiter to pass away without blocking the mmap_sem which might be required to make a forward progress. E.g. the oom reaper will need the lock for reading to dismantle the OOM victim address space. The only tricky function in this patch is vm_mmap_pgoff which has many call sites via vm_mmap. To reduce the risk keep vm_mmap with the original non-killable semantic for now. vm_munmap callers do not bother checking the return value so open code it into the munmap syscall path for now for simplicity. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-23 23:25:27 +00:00
return -EINTR;
locked += current->mm->locked_vm;
mm: mlock: check against vma for actual mlock() size In do_mlock(), the check against locked memory limitation has a hole which will fail following cases at step 3): 1) User has a memory chunk from addressA with 50k, and user mem lock rlimit is 64k. 2) mlock(addressA, 30k) 3) mlock(addressA, 40k) The 3rd step should have been allowed since the 40k request is intersected with the previous 30k at step 2), and the 3rd step is actually for mlock on the extra 10k memory. This patch checks vma to caculate the actual "new" mlock size, if necessary, and ajust the logic to fix this issue. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: clean up comment layout] [wei.guo.simon@gmail.com: correct a typo in count_mm_mlocked_page_nr()] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473325970-11393-2-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472554781-9835-2-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-10-07 23:59:36 +00:00
if ((locked > lock_limit) && (!capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))) {
/*
* It is possible that the regions requested intersect with
* previously mlocked areas, that part area in "mm->locked_vm"
* should not be counted to new mlock increment count. So check
* and adjust locked count if necessary.
*/
locked -= count_mm_mlocked_page_nr(current->mm,
start, len);
}
/* check against resource limits */
if ((locked <= lock_limit) || capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
mm: mlock: refactor mlock, munlock, and munlockall code mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it is allocated. For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary this is not ideal. Instead of forcing all locked pages to be present when they are allocated, this set creates a middle ground. Pages are marked to be placed on the unevictable LRU (locked) when they are first used, but they are not faulted in by the mlock call. This series introduces a new mlock() system call that takes a flags argument along with the start address and size. This flags argument gives the caller the ability to request memory be locked in the traditional way, or to be locked after the page is faulted in. A new MCL flag is added to mirror the lock on fault behavior from mlock() in mlockall(). There are two main use cases that this set covers. The first is the security focussed mlock case. A buffer is needed that cannot be written to swap. The maximum size is known, but on average the memory used is significantly less than this maximum. With lock on fault, the buffer is guaranteed to never be paged out without consuming the maximum size every time such a buffer is created. The second use case is focussed on performance. Portions of a large file are needed and we want to keep the used portions in memory once accessed. This is the case for large graphical models where the path through the graph is not known until run time. The entire graph is unlikely to be used in a given invocation, but once a node has been used it needs to stay resident for further processing. Given these constraints we have a number of options. We can potentially waste a large amount of memory by mlocking the entire region (this can also cause a significant stall at startup as the entire file is read in). We can mlock every page as we access them without tracking if the page is already resident but this introduces large overhead for each access. The third option is mapping the entire region with PROT_NONE and using a signal handler for SIGSEGV to mprotect(PROT_READ) and mlock() the needed page. Doing this page at a time adds a significant performance penalty. Batching can be used to mitigate this overhead, but in order to safely avoid trying to mprotect pages outside of the mapping, the boundaries of each mapping to be used in this way must be tracked and available to the signal handler. This is precisely what the mm system in the kernel should already be doing. For mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) the user is charged against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK as if mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) or mmap(MAP_LOCKED) was used, so when the VMA is created not when the pages are faulted in. For mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT) the user is charged as if MCL_FUTURE was used. This decision was made to keep the accounting checks out of the page fault path. To illustrate the benefit of this set I wrote a test program that mmaps a 5 GB file filled with random data and then makes 15,000,000 accesses to random addresses in that mapping. The test program was run 20 times for each setup. Results are reported for two program portions, setup and execution. The setup phase is calling mmap and optionally mlock on the entire region. For most experiments this is trivial, but it highlights the cost of faulting in the entire region. Results are averages across the 20 runs in milliseconds. mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) on entire range: Setup avg: 8228.666 Processing avg: 8274.257 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) before each access: Setup avg: 0.113 Processing avg: 90993.552 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 1 page: With the default value in max_map_count, this gets ENOMEM as I attempt to change the permissions, after upping the sysctl significantly I get: Setup avg: 0.058 Processing avg: 69488.073 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 8 pages: Setup avg: 0.068 Processing avg: 38204.116 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 16 pages: Setup avg: 0.044 Processing avg: 29671.180 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) on entire range: Setup avg: 0.189 Processing avg: 17904.899 The signal handler in the batch cases faulted in memory in two steps to avoid having to know the start and end of the faulting mapping. The first step covers the page that caused the fault as we know that it will be possible to lock. The second step speculatively tries to mlock and mprotect the batch size - 1 pages that follow. There may be a clever way to avoid this without having the program track each mapping to be covered by this handeler in a globally accessible structure, but I could not find it. It should be noted that with a large enough batch size this two step fault handler can still cause the program to crash if it reaches far beyond the end of the mapping. These results show that if the developer knows that a majority of the mapping will be used, it is better to try and fault it in at once, otherwise mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) is significantly faster. The performance cost of these patches are minimal on the two benchmarks I have tested (stream and kernbench). The following are the average values across 20 runs of stream and 10 runs of kernbench after a warmup run whose results were discarded. Avg throughput in MB/s from stream using 1000000 element arrays Test 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Copy: 10,566.5 10,421 Scale: 10,685 10,503.5 Add: 12,044.1 11,814.2 Triad: 12,064.8 11,846.3 Kernbench optimal load 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Elapsed Time 78.453 78.991 User Time 64.2395 65.2355 System Time 9.7335 9.7085 Context Switches 22211.5 22412.1 Sleeps 14965.3 14956.1 This patch (of 6): Extending the mlock system call is very difficult because it currently does not take a flags argument. A later patch in this set will extend mlock to support a middle ground between pages that are locked and faulted in immediately and unlocked pages. To pave the way for the new system call, the code needs some reorganization so that all the actual entry point handles is checking input and translating to VMA flags. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:29 +00:00
error = apply_vma_lock_flags(start, len, flags);
mmap locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sites This change converts the existing mmap_sem rwsem calls to use the new mmap locking API instead. The change is generated using coccinelle with the following rule: // spatch --sp-file mmap_lock_api.cocci --in-place --include-headers --dir . @@ expression mm; @@ ( -init_rwsem +mmap_init_lock | -down_write +mmap_write_lock | -down_write_killable +mmap_write_lock_killable | -down_write_trylock +mmap_write_trylock | -up_write +mmap_write_unlock | -downgrade_write +mmap_write_downgrade | -down_read +mmap_read_lock | -down_read_killable +mmap_read_lock_killable | -down_read_trylock +mmap_read_trylock | -up_read +mmap_read_unlock ) -(&mm->mmap_sem) +(mm) Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-5-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:25 +00:00
mmap_write_unlock(current->mm);
if (error)
return error;
error = __mm_populate(start, len, 0);
if (error)
return __mlock_posix_error_return(error);
return 0;
}
mm: mlock: refactor mlock, munlock, and munlockall code mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it is allocated. For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary this is not ideal. Instead of forcing all locked pages to be present when they are allocated, this set creates a middle ground. Pages are marked to be placed on the unevictable LRU (locked) when they are first used, but they are not faulted in by the mlock call. This series introduces a new mlock() system call that takes a flags argument along with the start address and size. This flags argument gives the caller the ability to request memory be locked in the traditional way, or to be locked after the page is faulted in. A new MCL flag is added to mirror the lock on fault behavior from mlock() in mlockall(). There are two main use cases that this set covers. The first is the security focussed mlock case. A buffer is needed that cannot be written to swap. The maximum size is known, but on average the memory used is significantly less than this maximum. With lock on fault, the buffer is guaranteed to never be paged out without consuming the maximum size every time such a buffer is created. The second use case is focussed on performance. Portions of a large file are needed and we want to keep the used portions in memory once accessed. This is the case for large graphical models where the path through the graph is not known until run time. The entire graph is unlikely to be used in a given invocation, but once a node has been used it needs to stay resident for further processing. Given these constraints we have a number of options. We can potentially waste a large amount of memory by mlocking the entire region (this can also cause a significant stall at startup as the entire file is read in). We can mlock every page as we access them without tracking if the page is already resident but this introduces large overhead for each access. The third option is mapping the entire region with PROT_NONE and using a signal handler for SIGSEGV to mprotect(PROT_READ) and mlock() the needed page. Doing this page at a time adds a significant performance penalty. Batching can be used to mitigate this overhead, but in order to safely avoid trying to mprotect pages outside of the mapping, the boundaries of each mapping to be used in this way must be tracked and available to the signal handler. This is precisely what the mm system in the kernel should already be doing. For mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) the user is charged against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK as if mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) or mmap(MAP_LOCKED) was used, so when the VMA is created not when the pages are faulted in. For mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT) the user is charged as if MCL_FUTURE was used. This decision was made to keep the accounting checks out of the page fault path. To illustrate the benefit of this set I wrote a test program that mmaps a 5 GB file filled with random data and then makes 15,000,000 accesses to random addresses in that mapping. The test program was run 20 times for each setup. Results are reported for two program portions, setup and execution. The setup phase is calling mmap and optionally mlock on the entire region. For most experiments this is trivial, but it highlights the cost of faulting in the entire region. Results are averages across the 20 runs in milliseconds. mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) on entire range: Setup avg: 8228.666 Processing avg: 8274.257 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) before each access: Setup avg: 0.113 Processing avg: 90993.552 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 1 page: With the default value in max_map_count, this gets ENOMEM as I attempt to change the permissions, after upping the sysctl significantly I get: Setup avg: 0.058 Processing avg: 69488.073 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 8 pages: Setup avg: 0.068 Processing avg: 38204.116 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 16 pages: Setup avg: 0.044 Processing avg: 29671.180 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) on entire range: Setup avg: 0.189 Processing avg: 17904.899 The signal handler in the batch cases faulted in memory in two steps to avoid having to know the start and end of the faulting mapping. The first step covers the page that caused the fault as we know that it will be possible to lock. The second step speculatively tries to mlock and mprotect the batch size - 1 pages that follow. There may be a clever way to avoid this without having the program track each mapping to be covered by this handeler in a globally accessible structure, but I could not find it. It should be noted that with a large enough batch size this two step fault handler can still cause the program to crash if it reaches far beyond the end of the mapping. These results show that if the developer knows that a majority of the mapping will be used, it is better to try and fault it in at once, otherwise mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) is significantly faster. The performance cost of these patches are minimal on the two benchmarks I have tested (stream and kernbench). The following are the average values across 20 runs of stream and 10 runs of kernbench after a warmup run whose results were discarded. Avg throughput in MB/s from stream using 1000000 element arrays Test 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Copy: 10,566.5 10,421 Scale: 10,685 10,503.5 Add: 12,044.1 11,814.2 Triad: 12,064.8 11,846.3 Kernbench optimal load 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Elapsed Time 78.453 78.991 User Time 64.2395 65.2355 System Time 9.7335 9.7085 Context Switches 22211.5 22412.1 Sleeps 14965.3 14956.1 This patch (of 6): Extending the mlock system call is very difficult because it currently does not take a flags argument. A later patch in this set will extend mlock to support a middle ground between pages that are locked and faulted in immediately and unlocked pages. To pave the way for the new system call, the code needs some reorganization so that all the actual entry point handles is checking input and translating to VMA flags. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:29 +00:00
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(mlock, unsigned long, start, size_t, len)
{
return do_mlock(start, len, VM_LOCKED);
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mlock2, unsigned long, start, size_t, len, int, flags)
{
mm: mlock: add mlock flags to enable VM_LOCKONFAULT usage The previous patch introduced a flag that specified pages in a VMA should be placed on the unevictable LRU, but they should not be made present when the area is created. This patch adds the ability to set this state via the new mlock system calls. We add MLOCK_ONFAULT for mlock2 and MCL_ONFAULT for mlockall. MLOCK_ONFAULT will set the VM_LOCKONFAULT modifier for VM_LOCKED. MCL_ONFAULT should be used as a modifier to the two other mlockall flags. When used with MCL_CURRENT, all current mappings will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with MCL_FUTURE, the mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with both MCL_CURRENT and MCL_FUTURE, all current mappings and mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. Prior to this patch, mlockall() will unconditionally clear the mm->def_flags any time it is called without MCL_FUTURE. This behavior is maintained after adding MCL_ONFAULT. If a call to mlockall(MCL_FUTURE) is followed by mlockall(MCL_CURRENT), the mm->def_flags will be cleared and new VMAs will be unlocked. This remains true with or without MCL_ONFAULT in either mlockall() invocation. munlock() will unconditionally clear both vma flags. munlockall() unconditionally clears for VMA flags on all VMAs and in the mm->def_flags field. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:39 +00:00
vm_flags_t vm_flags = VM_LOCKED;
if (flags & ~MLOCK_ONFAULT)
return -EINVAL;
mm: mlock: add mlock flags to enable VM_LOCKONFAULT usage The previous patch introduced a flag that specified pages in a VMA should be placed on the unevictable LRU, but they should not be made present when the area is created. This patch adds the ability to set this state via the new mlock system calls. We add MLOCK_ONFAULT for mlock2 and MCL_ONFAULT for mlockall. MLOCK_ONFAULT will set the VM_LOCKONFAULT modifier for VM_LOCKED. MCL_ONFAULT should be used as a modifier to the two other mlockall flags. When used with MCL_CURRENT, all current mappings will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with MCL_FUTURE, the mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with both MCL_CURRENT and MCL_FUTURE, all current mappings and mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. Prior to this patch, mlockall() will unconditionally clear the mm->def_flags any time it is called without MCL_FUTURE. This behavior is maintained after adding MCL_ONFAULT. If a call to mlockall(MCL_FUTURE) is followed by mlockall(MCL_CURRENT), the mm->def_flags will be cleared and new VMAs will be unlocked. This remains true with or without MCL_ONFAULT in either mlockall() invocation. munlock() will unconditionally clear both vma flags. munlockall() unconditionally clears for VMA flags on all VMAs and in the mm->def_flags field. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:39 +00:00
if (flags & MLOCK_ONFAULT)
vm_flags |= VM_LOCKONFAULT;
return do_mlock(start, len, vm_flags);
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(munlock, unsigned long, start, size_t, len)
{
int ret;
start = untagged_addr(start);
len = PAGE_ALIGN(len + (offset_in_page(start)));
start &= PAGE_MASK;
mmap locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sites This change converts the existing mmap_sem rwsem calls to use the new mmap locking API instead. The change is generated using coccinelle with the following rule: // spatch --sp-file mmap_lock_api.cocci --in-place --include-headers --dir . @@ expression mm; @@ ( -init_rwsem +mmap_init_lock | -down_write +mmap_write_lock | -down_write_killable +mmap_write_lock_killable | -down_write_trylock +mmap_write_trylock | -up_write +mmap_write_unlock | -downgrade_write +mmap_write_downgrade | -down_read +mmap_read_lock | -down_read_killable +mmap_read_lock_killable | -down_read_trylock +mmap_read_trylock | -up_read +mmap_read_unlock ) -(&mm->mmap_sem) +(mm) Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-5-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:25 +00:00
if (mmap_write_lock_killable(current->mm))
mm: make mmap_sem for write waits killable for mm syscalls This is a follow up work for oom_reaper [1]. As the async OOM killing depends on oom_sem for read we would really appreciate if a holder for write didn't stood in the way. This patchset is changing many of down_write calls to be killable to help those cases when the writer is blocked and waiting for readers to release the lock and so help __oom_reap_task to process the oom victim. Most of the patches are really trivial because the lock is help from a shallow syscall paths where we can return EINTR trivially and allow the current task to die (note that EINTR will never get to the userspace as the task has fatal signal pending). Others seem to be easy as well as the callers are already handling fatal errors and bail and return to userspace which should be sufficient to handle the failure gracefully. I am not familiar with all those code paths so a deeper review is really appreciated. As this work is touching more areas which are not directly connected I have tried to keep the CC list as small as possible and people who I believed would be familiar are CCed only to the specific patches (all should have received the cover though). This patchset is based on linux-next and it depends on down_write_killable for rw_semaphores which got merged into tip locking/rwsem branch and it is merged into this next tree. I guess it would be easiest to route these patches via mmotm because of the dependency on the tip tree but if respective maintainers prefer other way I have no objections. I haven't covered all the mmap_write(mm->mmap_sem) instances here $ git grep "down_write(.*\<mmap_sem\>)" next/master | wc -l 98 $ git grep "down_write(.*\<mmap_sem\>)" | wc -l 62 I have tried to cover those which should be relatively easy to review in this series because this alone should be a nice improvement. Other places can be changed on top. [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456752417-9626-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1452094975-551-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456750705-7141-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org This patch (of 18): This is the first step in making mmap_sem write waiters killable. It focuses on the trivial ones which are taking the lock early after entering the syscall and they are not changing state before. Therefore it is very easy to change them to use down_write_killable and immediately return with -EINTR. This will allow the waiter to pass away without blocking the mmap_sem which might be required to make a forward progress. E.g. the oom reaper will need the lock for reading to dismantle the OOM victim address space. The only tricky function in this patch is vm_mmap_pgoff which has many call sites via vm_mmap. To reduce the risk keep vm_mmap with the original non-killable semantic for now. vm_munmap callers do not bother checking the return value so open code it into the munmap syscall path for now for simplicity. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-23 23:25:27 +00:00
return -EINTR;
mm: mlock: refactor mlock, munlock, and munlockall code mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it is allocated. For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary this is not ideal. Instead of forcing all locked pages to be present when they are allocated, this set creates a middle ground. Pages are marked to be placed on the unevictable LRU (locked) when they are first used, but they are not faulted in by the mlock call. This series introduces a new mlock() system call that takes a flags argument along with the start address and size. This flags argument gives the caller the ability to request memory be locked in the traditional way, or to be locked after the page is faulted in. A new MCL flag is added to mirror the lock on fault behavior from mlock() in mlockall(). There are two main use cases that this set covers. The first is the security focussed mlock case. A buffer is needed that cannot be written to swap. The maximum size is known, but on average the memory used is significantly less than this maximum. With lock on fault, the buffer is guaranteed to never be paged out without consuming the maximum size every time such a buffer is created. The second use case is focussed on performance. Portions of a large file are needed and we want to keep the used portions in memory once accessed. This is the case for large graphical models where the path through the graph is not known until run time. The entire graph is unlikely to be used in a given invocation, but once a node has been used it needs to stay resident for further processing. Given these constraints we have a number of options. We can potentially waste a large amount of memory by mlocking the entire region (this can also cause a significant stall at startup as the entire file is read in). We can mlock every page as we access them without tracking if the page is already resident but this introduces large overhead for each access. The third option is mapping the entire region with PROT_NONE and using a signal handler for SIGSEGV to mprotect(PROT_READ) and mlock() the needed page. Doing this page at a time adds a significant performance penalty. Batching can be used to mitigate this overhead, but in order to safely avoid trying to mprotect pages outside of the mapping, the boundaries of each mapping to be used in this way must be tracked and available to the signal handler. This is precisely what the mm system in the kernel should already be doing. For mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) the user is charged against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK as if mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) or mmap(MAP_LOCKED) was used, so when the VMA is created not when the pages are faulted in. For mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT) the user is charged as if MCL_FUTURE was used. This decision was made to keep the accounting checks out of the page fault path. To illustrate the benefit of this set I wrote a test program that mmaps a 5 GB file filled with random data and then makes 15,000,000 accesses to random addresses in that mapping. The test program was run 20 times for each setup. Results are reported for two program portions, setup and execution. The setup phase is calling mmap and optionally mlock on the entire region. For most experiments this is trivial, but it highlights the cost of faulting in the entire region. Results are averages across the 20 runs in milliseconds. mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) on entire range: Setup avg: 8228.666 Processing avg: 8274.257 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) before each access: Setup avg: 0.113 Processing avg: 90993.552 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 1 page: With the default value in max_map_count, this gets ENOMEM as I attempt to change the permissions, after upping the sysctl significantly I get: Setup avg: 0.058 Processing avg: 69488.073 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 8 pages: Setup avg: 0.068 Processing avg: 38204.116 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 16 pages: Setup avg: 0.044 Processing avg: 29671.180 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) on entire range: Setup avg: 0.189 Processing avg: 17904.899 The signal handler in the batch cases faulted in memory in two steps to avoid having to know the start and end of the faulting mapping. The first step covers the page that caused the fault as we know that it will be possible to lock. The second step speculatively tries to mlock and mprotect the batch size - 1 pages that follow. There may be a clever way to avoid this without having the program track each mapping to be covered by this handeler in a globally accessible structure, but I could not find it. It should be noted that with a large enough batch size this two step fault handler can still cause the program to crash if it reaches far beyond the end of the mapping. These results show that if the developer knows that a majority of the mapping will be used, it is better to try and fault it in at once, otherwise mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) is significantly faster. The performance cost of these patches are minimal on the two benchmarks I have tested (stream and kernbench). The following are the average values across 20 runs of stream and 10 runs of kernbench after a warmup run whose results were discarded. Avg throughput in MB/s from stream using 1000000 element arrays Test 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Copy: 10,566.5 10,421 Scale: 10,685 10,503.5 Add: 12,044.1 11,814.2 Triad: 12,064.8 11,846.3 Kernbench optimal load 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Elapsed Time 78.453 78.991 User Time 64.2395 65.2355 System Time 9.7335 9.7085 Context Switches 22211.5 22412.1 Sleeps 14965.3 14956.1 This patch (of 6): Extending the mlock system call is very difficult because it currently does not take a flags argument. A later patch in this set will extend mlock to support a middle ground between pages that are locked and faulted in immediately and unlocked pages. To pave the way for the new system call, the code needs some reorganization so that all the actual entry point handles is checking input and translating to VMA flags. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:29 +00:00
ret = apply_vma_lock_flags(start, len, 0);
mmap locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sites This change converts the existing mmap_sem rwsem calls to use the new mmap locking API instead. The change is generated using coccinelle with the following rule: // spatch --sp-file mmap_lock_api.cocci --in-place --include-headers --dir . @@ expression mm; @@ ( -init_rwsem +mmap_init_lock | -down_write +mmap_write_lock | -down_write_killable +mmap_write_lock_killable | -down_write_trylock +mmap_write_trylock | -up_write +mmap_write_unlock | -downgrade_write +mmap_write_downgrade | -down_read +mmap_read_lock | -down_read_killable +mmap_read_lock_killable | -down_read_trylock +mmap_read_trylock | -up_read +mmap_read_unlock ) -(&mm->mmap_sem) +(mm) Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-5-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:25 +00:00
mmap_write_unlock(current->mm);
return ret;
}
mm: mlock: add mlock flags to enable VM_LOCKONFAULT usage The previous patch introduced a flag that specified pages in a VMA should be placed on the unevictable LRU, but they should not be made present when the area is created. This patch adds the ability to set this state via the new mlock system calls. We add MLOCK_ONFAULT for mlock2 and MCL_ONFAULT for mlockall. MLOCK_ONFAULT will set the VM_LOCKONFAULT modifier for VM_LOCKED. MCL_ONFAULT should be used as a modifier to the two other mlockall flags. When used with MCL_CURRENT, all current mappings will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with MCL_FUTURE, the mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with both MCL_CURRENT and MCL_FUTURE, all current mappings and mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. Prior to this patch, mlockall() will unconditionally clear the mm->def_flags any time it is called without MCL_FUTURE. This behavior is maintained after adding MCL_ONFAULT. If a call to mlockall(MCL_FUTURE) is followed by mlockall(MCL_CURRENT), the mm->def_flags will be cleared and new VMAs will be unlocked. This remains true with or without MCL_ONFAULT in either mlockall() invocation. munlock() will unconditionally clear both vma flags. munlockall() unconditionally clears for VMA flags on all VMAs and in the mm->def_flags field. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:39 +00:00
/*
* Take the MCL_* flags passed into mlockall (or 0 if called from munlockall)
* and translate into the appropriate modifications to mm->def_flags and/or the
* flags for all current VMAs.
*
* There are a couple of subtleties with this. If mlockall() is called multiple
* times with different flags, the values do not necessarily stack. If mlockall
* is called once including the MCL_FUTURE flag and then a second time without
* it, VM_LOCKED and VM_LOCKONFAULT will be cleared from mm->def_flags.
*/
mm: mlock: refactor mlock, munlock, and munlockall code mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it is allocated. For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary this is not ideal. Instead of forcing all locked pages to be present when they are allocated, this set creates a middle ground. Pages are marked to be placed on the unevictable LRU (locked) when they are first used, but they are not faulted in by the mlock call. This series introduces a new mlock() system call that takes a flags argument along with the start address and size. This flags argument gives the caller the ability to request memory be locked in the traditional way, or to be locked after the page is faulted in. A new MCL flag is added to mirror the lock on fault behavior from mlock() in mlockall(). There are two main use cases that this set covers. The first is the security focussed mlock case. A buffer is needed that cannot be written to swap. The maximum size is known, but on average the memory used is significantly less than this maximum. With lock on fault, the buffer is guaranteed to never be paged out without consuming the maximum size every time such a buffer is created. The second use case is focussed on performance. Portions of a large file are needed and we want to keep the used portions in memory once accessed. This is the case for large graphical models where the path through the graph is not known until run time. The entire graph is unlikely to be used in a given invocation, but once a node has been used it needs to stay resident for further processing. Given these constraints we have a number of options. We can potentially waste a large amount of memory by mlocking the entire region (this can also cause a significant stall at startup as the entire file is read in). We can mlock every page as we access them without tracking if the page is already resident but this introduces large overhead for each access. The third option is mapping the entire region with PROT_NONE and using a signal handler for SIGSEGV to mprotect(PROT_READ) and mlock() the needed page. Doing this page at a time adds a significant performance penalty. Batching can be used to mitigate this overhead, but in order to safely avoid trying to mprotect pages outside of the mapping, the boundaries of each mapping to be used in this way must be tracked and available to the signal handler. This is precisely what the mm system in the kernel should already be doing. For mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) the user is charged against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK as if mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) or mmap(MAP_LOCKED) was used, so when the VMA is created not when the pages are faulted in. For mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT) the user is charged as if MCL_FUTURE was used. This decision was made to keep the accounting checks out of the page fault path. To illustrate the benefit of this set I wrote a test program that mmaps a 5 GB file filled with random data and then makes 15,000,000 accesses to random addresses in that mapping. The test program was run 20 times for each setup. Results are reported for two program portions, setup and execution. The setup phase is calling mmap and optionally mlock on the entire region. For most experiments this is trivial, but it highlights the cost of faulting in the entire region. Results are averages across the 20 runs in milliseconds. mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) on entire range: Setup avg: 8228.666 Processing avg: 8274.257 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) before each access: Setup avg: 0.113 Processing avg: 90993.552 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 1 page: With the default value in max_map_count, this gets ENOMEM as I attempt to change the permissions, after upping the sysctl significantly I get: Setup avg: 0.058 Processing avg: 69488.073 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 8 pages: Setup avg: 0.068 Processing avg: 38204.116 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 16 pages: Setup avg: 0.044 Processing avg: 29671.180 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) on entire range: Setup avg: 0.189 Processing avg: 17904.899 The signal handler in the batch cases faulted in memory in two steps to avoid having to know the start and end of the faulting mapping. The first step covers the page that caused the fault as we know that it will be possible to lock. The second step speculatively tries to mlock and mprotect the batch size - 1 pages that follow. There may be a clever way to avoid this without having the program track each mapping to be covered by this handeler in a globally accessible structure, but I could not find it. It should be noted that with a large enough batch size this two step fault handler can still cause the program to crash if it reaches far beyond the end of the mapping. These results show that if the developer knows that a majority of the mapping will be used, it is better to try and fault it in at once, otherwise mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) is significantly faster. The performance cost of these patches are minimal on the two benchmarks I have tested (stream and kernbench). The following are the average values across 20 runs of stream and 10 runs of kernbench after a warmup run whose results were discarded. Avg throughput in MB/s from stream using 1000000 element arrays Test 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Copy: 10,566.5 10,421 Scale: 10,685 10,503.5 Add: 12,044.1 11,814.2 Triad: 12,064.8 11,846.3 Kernbench optimal load 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Elapsed Time 78.453 78.991 User Time 64.2395 65.2355 System Time 9.7335 9.7085 Context Switches 22211.5 22412.1 Sleeps 14965.3 14956.1 This patch (of 6): Extending the mlock system call is very difficult because it currently does not take a flags argument. A later patch in this set will extend mlock to support a middle ground between pages that are locked and faulted in immediately and unlocked pages. To pave the way for the new system call, the code needs some reorganization so that all the actual entry point handles is checking input and translating to VMA flags. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:29 +00:00
static int apply_mlockall_flags(int flags)
{
MA_STATE(mas, &current->mm->mm_mt, 0, 0);
mm/mempool: minor coding style tweaks Various coding style tweaks to various files under mm/ [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/swapfile: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614223624-16055-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/sparse: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614227288-19363-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/vmscan: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614227649-19853-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/compaction: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614228218-20770-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/oom_kill: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614228360-21168-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/shmem: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614228504-21491-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/page_alloc: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614228613-21754-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/filemap: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614228936-22337-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/mlock: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1613956588-2453-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/frontswap: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1613962668-15045-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/vmalloc: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1613963379-15988-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/memory_hotplug: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1613971784-24878-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn [daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn: mm/mempolicy: minor coding style tweaks] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1613972228-25501-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614222374-13805-1-git-send-email-daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn Signed-off-by: Zhiyuan Dai <daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05 01:40:12 +00:00
struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev = NULL;
mm: mlock: add mlock flags to enable VM_LOCKONFAULT usage The previous patch introduced a flag that specified pages in a VMA should be placed on the unevictable LRU, but they should not be made present when the area is created. This patch adds the ability to set this state via the new mlock system calls. We add MLOCK_ONFAULT for mlock2 and MCL_ONFAULT for mlockall. MLOCK_ONFAULT will set the VM_LOCKONFAULT modifier for VM_LOCKED. MCL_ONFAULT should be used as a modifier to the two other mlockall flags. When used with MCL_CURRENT, all current mappings will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with MCL_FUTURE, the mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with both MCL_CURRENT and MCL_FUTURE, all current mappings and mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. Prior to this patch, mlockall() will unconditionally clear the mm->def_flags any time it is called without MCL_FUTURE. This behavior is maintained after adding MCL_ONFAULT. If a call to mlockall(MCL_FUTURE) is followed by mlockall(MCL_CURRENT), the mm->def_flags will be cleared and new VMAs will be unlocked. This remains true with or without MCL_ONFAULT in either mlockall() invocation. munlock() will unconditionally clear both vma flags. munlockall() unconditionally clears for VMA flags on all VMAs and in the mm->def_flags field. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:39 +00:00
vm_flags_t to_add = 0;
mm: mlock: add mlock flags to enable VM_LOCKONFAULT usage The previous patch introduced a flag that specified pages in a VMA should be placed on the unevictable LRU, but they should not be made present when the area is created. This patch adds the ability to set this state via the new mlock system calls. We add MLOCK_ONFAULT for mlock2 and MCL_ONFAULT for mlockall. MLOCK_ONFAULT will set the VM_LOCKONFAULT modifier for VM_LOCKED. MCL_ONFAULT should be used as a modifier to the two other mlockall flags. When used with MCL_CURRENT, all current mappings will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with MCL_FUTURE, the mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with both MCL_CURRENT and MCL_FUTURE, all current mappings and mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. Prior to this patch, mlockall() will unconditionally clear the mm->def_flags any time it is called without MCL_FUTURE. This behavior is maintained after adding MCL_ONFAULT. If a call to mlockall(MCL_FUTURE) is followed by mlockall(MCL_CURRENT), the mm->def_flags will be cleared and new VMAs will be unlocked. This remains true with or without MCL_ONFAULT in either mlockall() invocation. munlock() will unconditionally clear both vma flags. munlockall() unconditionally clears for VMA flags on all VMAs and in the mm->def_flags field. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:39 +00:00
current->mm->def_flags &= VM_LOCKED_CLEAR_MASK;
if (flags & MCL_FUTURE) {
current->mm->def_flags |= VM_LOCKED;
mm: mlock: refactor mlock, munlock, and munlockall code mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it is allocated. For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary this is not ideal. Instead of forcing all locked pages to be present when they are allocated, this set creates a middle ground. Pages are marked to be placed on the unevictable LRU (locked) when they are first used, but they are not faulted in by the mlock call. This series introduces a new mlock() system call that takes a flags argument along with the start address and size. This flags argument gives the caller the ability to request memory be locked in the traditional way, or to be locked after the page is faulted in. A new MCL flag is added to mirror the lock on fault behavior from mlock() in mlockall(). There are two main use cases that this set covers. The first is the security focussed mlock case. A buffer is needed that cannot be written to swap. The maximum size is known, but on average the memory used is significantly less than this maximum. With lock on fault, the buffer is guaranteed to never be paged out without consuming the maximum size every time such a buffer is created. The second use case is focussed on performance. Portions of a large file are needed and we want to keep the used portions in memory once accessed. This is the case for large graphical models where the path through the graph is not known until run time. The entire graph is unlikely to be used in a given invocation, but once a node has been used it needs to stay resident for further processing. Given these constraints we have a number of options. We can potentially waste a large amount of memory by mlocking the entire region (this can also cause a significant stall at startup as the entire file is read in). We can mlock every page as we access them without tracking if the page is already resident but this introduces large overhead for each access. The third option is mapping the entire region with PROT_NONE and using a signal handler for SIGSEGV to mprotect(PROT_READ) and mlock() the needed page. Doing this page at a time adds a significant performance penalty. Batching can be used to mitigate this overhead, but in order to safely avoid trying to mprotect pages outside of the mapping, the boundaries of each mapping to be used in this way must be tracked and available to the signal handler. This is precisely what the mm system in the kernel should already be doing. For mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) the user is charged against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK as if mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) or mmap(MAP_LOCKED) was used, so when the VMA is created not when the pages are faulted in. For mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT) the user is charged as if MCL_FUTURE was used. This decision was made to keep the accounting checks out of the page fault path. To illustrate the benefit of this set I wrote a test program that mmaps a 5 GB file filled with random data and then makes 15,000,000 accesses to random addresses in that mapping. The test program was run 20 times for each setup. Results are reported for two program portions, setup and execution. The setup phase is calling mmap and optionally mlock on the entire region. For most experiments this is trivial, but it highlights the cost of faulting in the entire region. Results are averages across the 20 runs in milliseconds. mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) on entire range: Setup avg: 8228.666 Processing avg: 8274.257 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) before each access: Setup avg: 0.113 Processing avg: 90993.552 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 1 page: With the default value in max_map_count, this gets ENOMEM as I attempt to change the permissions, after upping the sysctl significantly I get: Setup avg: 0.058 Processing avg: 69488.073 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 8 pages: Setup avg: 0.068 Processing avg: 38204.116 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 16 pages: Setup avg: 0.044 Processing avg: 29671.180 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) on entire range: Setup avg: 0.189 Processing avg: 17904.899 The signal handler in the batch cases faulted in memory in two steps to avoid having to know the start and end of the faulting mapping. The first step covers the page that caused the fault as we know that it will be possible to lock. The second step speculatively tries to mlock and mprotect the batch size - 1 pages that follow. There may be a clever way to avoid this without having the program track each mapping to be covered by this handeler in a globally accessible structure, but I could not find it. It should be noted that with a large enough batch size this two step fault handler can still cause the program to crash if it reaches far beyond the end of the mapping. These results show that if the developer knows that a majority of the mapping will be used, it is better to try and fault it in at once, otherwise mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) is significantly faster. The performance cost of these patches are minimal on the two benchmarks I have tested (stream and kernbench). The following are the average values across 20 runs of stream and 10 runs of kernbench after a warmup run whose results were discarded. Avg throughput in MB/s from stream using 1000000 element arrays Test 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Copy: 10,566.5 10,421 Scale: 10,685 10,503.5 Add: 12,044.1 11,814.2 Triad: 12,064.8 11,846.3 Kernbench optimal load 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Elapsed Time 78.453 78.991 User Time 64.2395 65.2355 System Time 9.7335 9.7085 Context Switches 22211.5 22412.1 Sleeps 14965.3 14956.1 This patch (of 6): Extending the mlock system call is very difficult because it currently does not take a flags argument. A later patch in this set will extend mlock to support a middle ground between pages that are locked and faulted in immediately and unlocked pages. To pave the way for the new system call, the code needs some reorganization so that all the actual entry point handles is checking input and translating to VMA flags. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:29 +00:00
mm: mlock: add mlock flags to enable VM_LOCKONFAULT usage The previous patch introduced a flag that specified pages in a VMA should be placed on the unevictable LRU, but they should not be made present when the area is created. This patch adds the ability to set this state via the new mlock system calls. We add MLOCK_ONFAULT for mlock2 and MCL_ONFAULT for mlockall. MLOCK_ONFAULT will set the VM_LOCKONFAULT modifier for VM_LOCKED. MCL_ONFAULT should be used as a modifier to the two other mlockall flags. When used with MCL_CURRENT, all current mappings will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with MCL_FUTURE, the mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with both MCL_CURRENT and MCL_FUTURE, all current mappings and mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. Prior to this patch, mlockall() will unconditionally clear the mm->def_flags any time it is called without MCL_FUTURE. This behavior is maintained after adding MCL_ONFAULT. If a call to mlockall(MCL_FUTURE) is followed by mlockall(MCL_CURRENT), the mm->def_flags will be cleared and new VMAs will be unlocked. This remains true with or without MCL_ONFAULT in either mlockall() invocation. munlock() will unconditionally clear both vma flags. munlockall() unconditionally clears for VMA flags on all VMAs and in the mm->def_flags field. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:39 +00:00
if (flags & MCL_ONFAULT)
current->mm->def_flags |= VM_LOCKONFAULT;
if (!(flags & MCL_CURRENT))
goto out;
}
if (flags & MCL_CURRENT) {
to_add |= VM_LOCKED;
if (flags & MCL_ONFAULT)
to_add |= VM_LOCKONFAULT;
}
mas_for_each(&mas, vma, ULONG_MAX) {
vm_flags_t newflags;
mm: mlock: add mlock flags to enable VM_LOCKONFAULT usage The previous patch introduced a flag that specified pages in a VMA should be placed on the unevictable LRU, but they should not be made present when the area is created. This patch adds the ability to set this state via the new mlock system calls. We add MLOCK_ONFAULT for mlock2 and MCL_ONFAULT for mlockall. MLOCK_ONFAULT will set the VM_LOCKONFAULT modifier for VM_LOCKED. MCL_ONFAULT should be used as a modifier to the two other mlockall flags. When used with MCL_CURRENT, all current mappings will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with MCL_FUTURE, the mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. When used with both MCL_CURRENT and MCL_FUTURE, all current mappings and mm->def_flags will be marked with VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT. Prior to this patch, mlockall() will unconditionally clear the mm->def_flags any time it is called without MCL_FUTURE. This behavior is maintained after adding MCL_ONFAULT. If a call to mlockall(MCL_FUTURE) is followed by mlockall(MCL_CURRENT), the mm->def_flags will be cleared and new VMAs will be unlocked. This remains true with or without MCL_ONFAULT in either mlockall() invocation. munlock() will unconditionally clear both vma flags. munlockall() unconditionally clears for VMA flags on all VMAs and in the mm->def_flags field. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:39 +00:00
newflags = vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED_CLEAR_MASK;
newflags |= to_add;
/* Ignore errors */
mlock_fixup(vma, &prev, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, newflags);
mas_pause(&mas);
cond_resched();
}
out:
return 0;
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE1(mlockall, int, flags)
{
unsigned long lock_limit;
int ret;
if (!flags || (flags & ~(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE | MCL_ONFAULT)) ||
flags == MCL_ONFAULT)
return -EINVAL;
if (!can_do_mlock())
return -EPERM;
lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK);
lock_limit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
mmap locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sites This change converts the existing mmap_sem rwsem calls to use the new mmap locking API instead. The change is generated using coccinelle with the following rule: // spatch --sp-file mmap_lock_api.cocci --in-place --include-headers --dir . @@ expression mm; @@ ( -init_rwsem +mmap_init_lock | -down_write +mmap_write_lock | -down_write_killable +mmap_write_lock_killable | -down_write_trylock +mmap_write_trylock | -up_write +mmap_write_unlock | -downgrade_write +mmap_write_downgrade | -down_read +mmap_read_lock | -down_read_killable +mmap_read_lock_killable | -down_read_trylock +mmap_read_trylock | -up_read +mmap_read_unlock ) -(&mm->mmap_sem) +(mm) Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-5-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:25 +00:00
if (mmap_write_lock_killable(current->mm))
mm: make mmap_sem for write waits killable for mm syscalls This is a follow up work for oom_reaper [1]. As the async OOM killing depends on oom_sem for read we would really appreciate if a holder for write didn't stood in the way. This patchset is changing many of down_write calls to be killable to help those cases when the writer is blocked and waiting for readers to release the lock and so help __oom_reap_task to process the oom victim. Most of the patches are really trivial because the lock is help from a shallow syscall paths where we can return EINTR trivially and allow the current task to die (note that EINTR will never get to the userspace as the task has fatal signal pending). Others seem to be easy as well as the callers are already handling fatal errors and bail and return to userspace which should be sufficient to handle the failure gracefully. I am not familiar with all those code paths so a deeper review is really appreciated. As this work is touching more areas which are not directly connected I have tried to keep the CC list as small as possible and people who I believed would be familiar are CCed only to the specific patches (all should have received the cover though). This patchset is based on linux-next and it depends on down_write_killable for rw_semaphores which got merged into tip locking/rwsem branch and it is merged into this next tree. I guess it would be easiest to route these patches via mmotm because of the dependency on the tip tree but if respective maintainers prefer other way I have no objections. I haven't covered all the mmap_write(mm->mmap_sem) instances here $ git grep "down_write(.*\<mmap_sem\>)" next/master | wc -l 98 $ git grep "down_write(.*\<mmap_sem\>)" | wc -l 62 I have tried to cover those which should be relatively easy to review in this series because this alone should be a nice improvement. Other places can be changed on top. [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456752417-9626-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1452094975-551-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456750705-7141-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org This patch (of 18): This is the first step in making mmap_sem write waiters killable. It focuses on the trivial ones which are taking the lock early after entering the syscall and they are not changing state before. Therefore it is very easy to change them to use down_write_killable and immediately return with -EINTR. This will allow the waiter to pass away without blocking the mmap_sem which might be required to make a forward progress. E.g. the oom reaper will need the lock for reading to dismantle the OOM victim address space. The only tricky function in this patch is vm_mmap_pgoff which has many call sites via vm_mmap. To reduce the risk keep vm_mmap with the original non-killable semantic for now. vm_munmap callers do not bother checking the return value so open code it into the munmap syscall path for now for simplicity. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-23 23:25:27 +00:00
return -EINTR;
mm: make mmap_sem for write waits killable for mm syscalls This is a follow up work for oom_reaper [1]. As the async OOM killing depends on oom_sem for read we would really appreciate if a holder for write didn't stood in the way. This patchset is changing many of down_write calls to be killable to help those cases when the writer is blocked and waiting for readers to release the lock and so help __oom_reap_task to process the oom victim. Most of the patches are really trivial because the lock is help from a shallow syscall paths where we can return EINTR trivially and allow the current task to die (note that EINTR will never get to the userspace as the task has fatal signal pending). Others seem to be easy as well as the callers are already handling fatal errors and bail and return to userspace which should be sufficient to handle the failure gracefully. I am not familiar with all those code paths so a deeper review is really appreciated. As this work is touching more areas which are not directly connected I have tried to keep the CC list as small as possible and people who I believed would be familiar are CCed only to the specific patches (all should have received the cover though). This patchset is based on linux-next and it depends on down_write_killable for rw_semaphores which got merged into tip locking/rwsem branch and it is merged into this next tree. I guess it would be easiest to route these patches via mmotm because of the dependency on the tip tree but if respective maintainers prefer other way I have no objections. I haven't covered all the mmap_write(mm->mmap_sem) instances here $ git grep "down_write(.*\<mmap_sem\>)" next/master | wc -l 98 $ git grep "down_write(.*\<mmap_sem\>)" | wc -l 62 I have tried to cover those which should be relatively easy to review in this series because this alone should be a nice improvement. Other places can be changed on top. [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456752417-9626-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1452094975-551-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456750705-7141-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org This patch (of 18): This is the first step in making mmap_sem write waiters killable. It focuses on the trivial ones which are taking the lock early after entering the syscall and they are not changing state before. Therefore it is very easy to change them to use down_write_killable and immediately return with -EINTR. This will allow the waiter to pass away without blocking the mmap_sem which might be required to make a forward progress. E.g. the oom reaper will need the lock for reading to dismantle the OOM victim address space. The only tricky function in this patch is vm_mmap_pgoff which has many call sites via vm_mmap. To reduce the risk keep vm_mmap with the original non-killable semantic for now. vm_munmap callers do not bother checking the return value so open code it into the munmap syscall path for now for simplicity. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-23 23:25:27 +00:00
ret = -ENOMEM;
if (!(flags & MCL_CURRENT) || (current->mm->total_vm <= lock_limit) ||
capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
mm: mlock: refactor mlock, munlock, and munlockall code mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it is allocated. For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary this is not ideal. Instead of forcing all locked pages to be present when they are allocated, this set creates a middle ground. Pages are marked to be placed on the unevictable LRU (locked) when they are first used, but they are not faulted in by the mlock call. This series introduces a new mlock() system call that takes a flags argument along with the start address and size. This flags argument gives the caller the ability to request memory be locked in the traditional way, or to be locked after the page is faulted in. A new MCL flag is added to mirror the lock on fault behavior from mlock() in mlockall(). There are two main use cases that this set covers. The first is the security focussed mlock case. A buffer is needed that cannot be written to swap. The maximum size is known, but on average the memory used is significantly less than this maximum. With lock on fault, the buffer is guaranteed to never be paged out without consuming the maximum size every time such a buffer is created. The second use case is focussed on performance. Portions of a large file are needed and we want to keep the used portions in memory once accessed. This is the case for large graphical models where the path through the graph is not known until run time. The entire graph is unlikely to be used in a given invocation, but once a node has been used it needs to stay resident for further processing. Given these constraints we have a number of options. We can potentially waste a large amount of memory by mlocking the entire region (this can also cause a significant stall at startup as the entire file is read in). We can mlock every page as we access them without tracking if the page is already resident but this introduces large overhead for each access. The third option is mapping the entire region with PROT_NONE and using a signal handler for SIGSEGV to mprotect(PROT_READ) and mlock() the needed page. Doing this page at a time adds a significant performance penalty. Batching can be used to mitigate this overhead, but in order to safely avoid trying to mprotect pages outside of the mapping, the boundaries of each mapping to be used in this way must be tracked and available to the signal handler. This is precisely what the mm system in the kernel should already be doing. For mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) the user is charged against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK as if mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) or mmap(MAP_LOCKED) was used, so when the VMA is created not when the pages are faulted in. For mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT) the user is charged as if MCL_FUTURE was used. This decision was made to keep the accounting checks out of the page fault path. To illustrate the benefit of this set I wrote a test program that mmaps a 5 GB file filled with random data and then makes 15,000,000 accesses to random addresses in that mapping. The test program was run 20 times for each setup. Results are reported for two program portions, setup and execution. The setup phase is calling mmap and optionally mlock on the entire region. For most experiments this is trivial, but it highlights the cost of faulting in the entire region. Results are averages across the 20 runs in milliseconds. mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) on entire range: Setup avg: 8228.666 Processing avg: 8274.257 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) before each access: Setup avg: 0.113 Processing avg: 90993.552 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 1 page: With the default value in max_map_count, this gets ENOMEM as I attempt to change the permissions, after upping the sysctl significantly I get: Setup avg: 0.058 Processing avg: 69488.073 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 8 pages: Setup avg: 0.068 Processing avg: 38204.116 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 16 pages: Setup avg: 0.044 Processing avg: 29671.180 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) on entire range: Setup avg: 0.189 Processing avg: 17904.899 The signal handler in the batch cases faulted in memory in two steps to avoid having to know the start and end of the faulting mapping. The first step covers the page that caused the fault as we know that it will be possible to lock. The second step speculatively tries to mlock and mprotect the batch size - 1 pages that follow. There may be a clever way to avoid this without having the program track each mapping to be covered by this handeler in a globally accessible structure, but I could not find it. It should be noted that with a large enough batch size this two step fault handler can still cause the program to crash if it reaches far beyond the end of the mapping. These results show that if the developer knows that a majority of the mapping will be used, it is better to try and fault it in at once, otherwise mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) is significantly faster. The performance cost of these patches are minimal on the two benchmarks I have tested (stream and kernbench). The following are the average values across 20 runs of stream and 10 runs of kernbench after a warmup run whose results were discarded. Avg throughput in MB/s from stream using 1000000 element arrays Test 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Copy: 10,566.5 10,421 Scale: 10,685 10,503.5 Add: 12,044.1 11,814.2 Triad: 12,064.8 11,846.3 Kernbench optimal load 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Elapsed Time 78.453 78.991 User Time 64.2395 65.2355 System Time 9.7335 9.7085 Context Switches 22211.5 22412.1 Sleeps 14965.3 14956.1 This patch (of 6): Extending the mlock system call is very difficult because it currently does not take a flags argument. A later patch in this set will extend mlock to support a middle ground between pages that are locked and faulted in immediately and unlocked pages. To pave the way for the new system call, the code needs some reorganization so that all the actual entry point handles is checking input and translating to VMA flags. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:29 +00:00
ret = apply_mlockall_flags(flags);
mmap locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sites This change converts the existing mmap_sem rwsem calls to use the new mmap locking API instead. The change is generated using coccinelle with the following rule: // spatch --sp-file mmap_lock_api.cocci --in-place --include-headers --dir . @@ expression mm; @@ ( -init_rwsem +mmap_init_lock | -down_write +mmap_write_lock | -down_write_killable +mmap_write_lock_killable | -down_write_trylock +mmap_write_trylock | -up_write +mmap_write_unlock | -downgrade_write +mmap_write_downgrade | -down_read +mmap_read_lock | -down_read_killable +mmap_read_lock_killable | -down_read_trylock +mmap_read_trylock | -up_read +mmap_read_unlock ) -(&mm->mmap_sem) +(mm) Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-5-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:25 +00:00
mmap_write_unlock(current->mm);
if (!ret && (flags & MCL_CURRENT))
mm_populate(0, TASK_SIZE);
return ret;
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE0(munlockall)
{
int ret;
mmap locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sites This change converts the existing mmap_sem rwsem calls to use the new mmap locking API instead. The change is generated using coccinelle with the following rule: // spatch --sp-file mmap_lock_api.cocci --in-place --include-headers --dir . @@ expression mm; @@ ( -init_rwsem +mmap_init_lock | -down_write +mmap_write_lock | -down_write_killable +mmap_write_lock_killable | -down_write_trylock +mmap_write_trylock | -up_write +mmap_write_unlock | -downgrade_write +mmap_write_downgrade | -down_read +mmap_read_lock | -down_read_killable +mmap_read_lock_killable | -down_read_trylock +mmap_read_trylock | -up_read +mmap_read_unlock ) -(&mm->mmap_sem) +(mm) Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-5-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:25 +00:00
if (mmap_write_lock_killable(current->mm))
mm: make mmap_sem for write waits killable for mm syscalls This is a follow up work for oom_reaper [1]. As the async OOM killing depends on oom_sem for read we would really appreciate if a holder for write didn't stood in the way. This patchset is changing many of down_write calls to be killable to help those cases when the writer is blocked and waiting for readers to release the lock and so help __oom_reap_task to process the oom victim. Most of the patches are really trivial because the lock is help from a shallow syscall paths where we can return EINTR trivially and allow the current task to die (note that EINTR will never get to the userspace as the task has fatal signal pending). Others seem to be easy as well as the callers are already handling fatal errors and bail and return to userspace which should be sufficient to handle the failure gracefully. I am not familiar with all those code paths so a deeper review is really appreciated. As this work is touching more areas which are not directly connected I have tried to keep the CC list as small as possible and people who I believed would be familiar are CCed only to the specific patches (all should have received the cover though). This patchset is based on linux-next and it depends on down_write_killable for rw_semaphores which got merged into tip locking/rwsem branch and it is merged into this next tree. I guess it would be easiest to route these patches via mmotm because of the dependency on the tip tree but if respective maintainers prefer other way I have no objections. I haven't covered all the mmap_write(mm->mmap_sem) instances here $ git grep "down_write(.*\<mmap_sem\>)" next/master | wc -l 98 $ git grep "down_write(.*\<mmap_sem\>)" | wc -l 62 I have tried to cover those which should be relatively easy to review in this series because this alone should be a nice improvement. Other places can be changed on top. [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456752417-9626-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1452094975-551-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456750705-7141-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org This patch (of 18): This is the first step in making mmap_sem write waiters killable. It focuses on the trivial ones which are taking the lock early after entering the syscall and they are not changing state before. Therefore it is very easy to change them to use down_write_killable and immediately return with -EINTR. This will allow the waiter to pass away without blocking the mmap_sem which might be required to make a forward progress. E.g. the oom reaper will need the lock for reading to dismantle the OOM victim address space. The only tricky function in this patch is vm_mmap_pgoff which has many call sites via vm_mmap. To reduce the risk keep vm_mmap with the original non-killable semantic for now. vm_munmap callers do not bother checking the return value so open code it into the munmap syscall path for now for simplicity. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-23 23:25:27 +00:00
return -EINTR;
mm: mlock: refactor mlock, munlock, and munlockall code mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it is allocated. For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary this is not ideal. Instead of forcing all locked pages to be present when they are allocated, this set creates a middle ground. Pages are marked to be placed on the unevictable LRU (locked) when they are first used, but they are not faulted in by the mlock call. This series introduces a new mlock() system call that takes a flags argument along with the start address and size. This flags argument gives the caller the ability to request memory be locked in the traditional way, or to be locked after the page is faulted in. A new MCL flag is added to mirror the lock on fault behavior from mlock() in mlockall(). There are two main use cases that this set covers. The first is the security focussed mlock case. A buffer is needed that cannot be written to swap. The maximum size is known, but on average the memory used is significantly less than this maximum. With lock on fault, the buffer is guaranteed to never be paged out without consuming the maximum size every time such a buffer is created. The second use case is focussed on performance. Portions of a large file are needed and we want to keep the used portions in memory once accessed. This is the case for large graphical models where the path through the graph is not known until run time. The entire graph is unlikely to be used in a given invocation, but once a node has been used it needs to stay resident for further processing. Given these constraints we have a number of options. We can potentially waste a large amount of memory by mlocking the entire region (this can also cause a significant stall at startup as the entire file is read in). We can mlock every page as we access them without tracking if the page is already resident but this introduces large overhead for each access. The third option is mapping the entire region with PROT_NONE and using a signal handler for SIGSEGV to mprotect(PROT_READ) and mlock() the needed page. Doing this page at a time adds a significant performance penalty. Batching can be used to mitigate this overhead, but in order to safely avoid trying to mprotect pages outside of the mapping, the boundaries of each mapping to be used in this way must be tracked and available to the signal handler. This is precisely what the mm system in the kernel should already be doing. For mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) the user is charged against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK as if mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) or mmap(MAP_LOCKED) was used, so when the VMA is created not when the pages are faulted in. For mlockall(MCL_ONFAULT) the user is charged as if MCL_FUTURE was used. This decision was made to keep the accounting checks out of the page fault path. To illustrate the benefit of this set I wrote a test program that mmaps a 5 GB file filled with random data and then makes 15,000,000 accesses to random addresses in that mapping. The test program was run 20 times for each setup. Results are reported for two program portions, setup and execution. The setup phase is calling mmap and optionally mlock on the entire region. For most experiments this is trivial, but it highlights the cost of faulting in the entire region. Results are averages across the 20 runs in milliseconds. mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) on entire range: Setup avg: 8228.666 Processing avg: 8274.257 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_LOCKED) before each access: Setup avg: 0.113 Processing avg: 90993.552 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 1 page: With the default value in max_map_count, this gets ENOMEM as I attempt to change the permissions, after upping the sysctl significantly I get: Setup avg: 0.058 Processing avg: 69488.073 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 8 pages: Setup avg: 0.068 Processing avg: 38204.116 mmap with PROT_NONE and signal handler and batch size of 16 pages: Setup avg: 0.044 Processing avg: 29671.180 mmap with mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) on entire range: Setup avg: 0.189 Processing avg: 17904.899 The signal handler in the batch cases faulted in memory in two steps to avoid having to know the start and end of the faulting mapping. The first step covers the page that caused the fault as we know that it will be possible to lock. The second step speculatively tries to mlock and mprotect the batch size - 1 pages that follow. There may be a clever way to avoid this without having the program track each mapping to be covered by this handeler in a globally accessible structure, but I could not find it. It should be noted that with a large enough batch size this two step fault handler can still cause the program to crash if it reaches far beyond the end of the mapping. These results show that if the developer knows that a majority of the mapping will be used, it is better to try and fault it in at once, otherwise mlock(MLOCK_ONFAULT) is significantly faster. The performance cost of these patches are minimal on the two benchmarks I have tested (stream and kernbench). The following are the average values across 20 runs of stream and 10 runs of kernbench after a warmup run whose results were discarded. Avg throughput in MB/s from stream using 1000000 element arrays Test 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Copy: 10,566.5 10,421 Scale: 10,685 10,503.5 Add: 12,044.1 11,814.2 Triad: 12,064.8 11,846.3 Kernbench optimal load 4.2-rc1 4.2-rc1+lock-on-fault Elapsed Time 78.453 78.991 User Time 64.2395 65.2355 System Time 9.7335 9.7085 Context Switches 22211.5 22412.1 Sleeps 14965.3 14956.1 This patch (of 6): Extending the mlock system call is very difficult because it currently does not take a flags argument. A later patch in this set will extend mlock to support a middle ground between pages that are locked and faulted in immediately and unlocked pages. To pave the way for the new system call, the code needs some reorganization so that all the actual entry point handles is checking input and translating to VMA flags. Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-06 02:51:29 +00:00
ret = apply_mlockall_flags(0);
mmap locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sites This change converts the existing mmap_sem rwsem calls to use the new mmap locking API instead. The change is generated using coccinelle with the following rule: // spatch --sp-file mmap_lock_api.cocci --in-place --include-headers --dir . @@ expression mm; @@ ( -init_rwsem +mmap_init_lock | -down_write +mmap_write_lock | -down_write_killable +mmap_write_lock_killable | -down_write_trylock +mmap_write_trylock | -up_write +mmap_write_unlock | -downgrade_write +mmap_write_downgrade | -down_read +mmap_read_lock | -down_read_killable +mmap_read_lock_killable | -down_read_trylock +mmap_read_trylock | -up_read +mmap_read_unlock ) -(&mm->mmap_sem) +(mm) Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-5-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:25 +00:00
mmap_write_unlock(current->mm);
return ret;
}
/*
* Objects with different lifetime than processes (SHM_LOCK and SHM_HUGETLB
* shm segments) get accounted against the user_struct instead.
*/
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(shmlock_user_lock);
int user_shm_lock(size_t size, struct ucounts *ucounts)
{
unsigned long lock_limit, locked;
long memlock;
int allowed = 0;
locked = (size + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK);
if (lock_limit != RLIM_INFINITY)
lock_limit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
spin_lock(&shmlock_user_lock);
memlock = inc_rlimit_ucounts(ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, locked);
if ((memlock == LONG_MAX || memlock > lock_limit) && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
dec_rlimit_ucounts(ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, locked);
goto out;
}
if (!get_ucounts(ucounts)) {
dec_rlimit_ucounts(ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, locked);
allowed = 0;
goto out;
}
allowed = 1;
out:
spin_unlock(&shmlock_user_lock);
return allowed;
}
void user_shm_unlock(size_t size, struct ucounts *ucounts)
{
spin_lock(&shmlock_user_lock);
dec_rlimit_ucounts(ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, (size + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
spin_unlock(&shmlock_user_lock);
put_ucounts(ucounts);
}