linux/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c

1293 lines
33 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* edac_mc kernel module
* (C) 2005, 2006 Linux Networx (http://lnxi.com)
* This file may be distributed under the terms of the
* GNU General Public License.
*
* Written by Thayne Harbaugh
* Based on work by Dan Hollis <goemon at anime dot net> and others.
* http://www.anime.net/~goemon/linux-ecc/
*
* Modified by Dave Peterson and Doug Thompson
*
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/sysctl.h>
#include <linux/highmem.h>
#include <linux/timer.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/ctype.h>
#include <linux/edac.h>
RAS: Add a tracepoint for reporting memory controller events Add a new tracepoint-based hardware events report method for reporting Memory Controller events. Part of the description bellow is shamelessly copied from Tony Luck's notes about the Hardware Error BoF during LPC 2010 [1]. Tony, thanks for your notes and discussions to generate the h/w error reporting requirements. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/416669/ We have several subsystems & methods for reporting hardware errors: 1) EDAC ("Error Detection and Correction"). In its original form this consisted of a platform specific driver that read topology information and error counts from chipset registers and reported the results via a sysfs interface. 2) mcelog - x86 specific decoding of machine check bank registers reporting in binary form via /dev/mcelog. Recent additions make use of the APEI extensions that were documented in version 4.0a of the ACPI specification to acquire more information about errors without having to rely reading chipset registers directly. A user level programs decodes into somewhat human readable format. 3) drivers/edac/mce_amd.c - this driver hooks into the mcelog path and decodes errors reported via machine check bank registers in AMD processors to the console log using printk(); Each of these mechanisms has a band of followers ... and none of them appear to meet all the needs of all users. As part of a RAS subsystem, let's encapsulate the memory error hardware events into a trace facility. The tracepoint printk will be displayed like: mc_event: [quant] (Corrected|Uncorrected|Fatal) error:[error msg] on [label] ([location] [edac_mc detail] [driver_detail] Where: [quant] is the quantity of errors [error msg] is the driver-specific error message (e. g. "memory read", "bus error", ...); [location] is the location in terms of memory controller and branch/channel/slot, channel/slot or csrow/channel; [label] is the memory stick label; [edac_mc detail] describes the address location of the error and the syndrome; [driver detail] is driver-specifig error message details, when needed/provided (e. g. "area:DMA", ...) For example: mc_event: 1 Corrected error:memory read on memory stick DIMM_1A (mc:0 location:0:0:0 page:0x586b6e offset:0xa66 grain:32 syndrome:0x0 area:DMA) Of course, any userspace tools meant to handle errors should not parse the above data. They should, instead, use the binary fields provided by the tracepoint, mapping them directly into their Management Information Base. NOTE: The original patch was providing an additional mechanism for MCA-based trace events that also contained MCA error register data. However, as no agreement was reached so far for the MCA-based trace events, for now, let's add events only for memory errors. A latter patch is planned to change the tracepoint, for those types of event. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-23 11:10:34 +00:00
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <asm/edac.h>
#include "edac_core.h"
#include "edac_module.h"
RAS: Add a tracepoint for reporting memory controller events Add a new tracepoint-based hardware events report method for reporting Memory Controller events. Part of the description bellow is shamelessly copied from Tony Luck's notes about the Hardware Error BoF during LPC 2010 [1]. Tony, thanks for your notes and discussions to generate the h/w error reporting requirements. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/416669/ We have several subsystems & methods for reporting hardware errors: 1) EDAC ("Error Detection and Correction"). In its original form this consisted of a platform specific driver that read topology information and error counts from chipset registers and reported the results via a sysfs interface. 2) mcelog - x86 specific decoding of machine check bank registers reporting in binary form via /dev/mcelog. Recent additions make use of the APEI extensions that were documented in version 4.0a of the ACPI specification to acquire more information about errors without having to rely reading chipset registers directly. A user level programs decodes into somewhat human readable format. 3) drivers/edac/mce_amd.c - this driver hooks into the mcelog path and decodes errors reported via machine check bank registers in AMD processors to the console log using printk(); Each of these mechanisms has a band of followers ... and none of them appear to meet all the needs of all users. As part of a RAS subsystem, let's encapsulate the memory error hardware events into a trace facility. The tracepoint printk will be displayed like: mc_event: [quant] (Corrected|Uncorrected|Fatal) error:[error msg] on [label] ([location] [edac_mc detail] [driver_detail] Where: [quant] is the quantity of errors [error msg] is the driver-specific error message (e. g. "memory read", "bus error", ...); [location] is the location in terms of memory controller and branch/channel/slot, channel/slot or csrow/channel; [label] is the memory stick label; [edac_mc detail] describes the address location of the error and the syndrome; [driver detail] is driver-specifig error message details, when needed/provided (e. g. "area:DMA", ...) For example: mc_event: 1 Corrected error:memory read on memory stick DIMM_1A (mc:0 location:0:0:0 page:0x586b6e offset:0xa66 grain:32 syndrome:0x0 area:DMA) Of course, any userspace tools meant to handle errors should not parse the above data. They should, instead, use the binary fields provided by the tracepoint, mapping them directly into their Management Information Base. NOTE: The original patch was providing an additional mechanism for MCA-based trace events that also contained MCA error register data. However, as no agreement was reached so far for the MCA-based trace events, for now, let's add events only for memory errors. A latter patch is planned to change the tracepoint, for those types of event. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-23 11:10:34 +00:00
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH ../../include/ras
#include <ras/ras_event.h>
/* lock to memory controller's control array */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(mem_ctls_mutex);
static LIST_HEAD(mc_devices);
/*
* Used to lock EDAC MC to just one module, avoiding two drivers e. g.
* apei/ghes and i7core_edac to be used at the same time.
*/
static void const *edac_mc_owner;
edac_mc: Cleanup per-dimm_info debug messages The edac_mc_alloc() routine allocates one dimm_info device for all possible memories, including the non-filled ones. The debug messages there are somewhat confusing. So, cleans them, by moving the code that prints the memory location to edac_mc, and using it on both edac_mc_sysfs and edac_mc. Also, only dumps information when DIMM/ranks are actually filled. After this patch, a dimm-based memory controller will print the debug info as: [ 1011.380027] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->csrow_idx = 0 [ 1011.380029] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380031] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->first_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380032] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->last_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380034] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->page_mask = 0x0 [ 1011.380035] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->nr_channels = 3 [ 1011.380037] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->channels = ffff8801149c2840 [ 1011.380039] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->mci = ffff880117426000 [ 1011.380041] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->chan_idx = 0 [ 1011.380042] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel = ffff8801149c2860 [ 1011.380044] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380046] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->dimm = ffff88010fe90400 ... [ 1011.380095] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm0: channel 0 slot 0 mapped as virtual row 0, chan 0 [ 1011.380097] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm = ffff88010fe90400 [ 1011.380099] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->label = 'CPU#0Channel#0_DIMM#0' [ 1011.380101] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 [ 1011.380103] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->grain = 8 [ 1011.380104] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 ... (a rank-based memory controller would print, instead of "dimm?", "rank?" on the above debug info) Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-30 13:24:43 +00:00
unsigned edac_dimm_info_location(struct dimm_info *dimm, char *buf,
unsigned len)
{
struct mem_ctl_info *mci = dimm->mci;
int i, n, count = 0;
char *p = buf;
for (i = 0; i < mci->n_layers; i++) {
n = snprintf(p, len, "%s %d ",
edac_layer_name[mci->layers[i].type],
dimm->location[i]);
p += n;
len -= n;
count += n;
if (!len)
break;
}
return count;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG
edac: rename channel_info to rank_info What it is pointed by a csrow/channel vector is a rank information, and not a channel information. On a traditional architecture, the memory controller directly access the memory ranks, via chip select rows. Different ranks at the same DIMM is selected via different chip select rows. So, typically, one csrow/channel pair means one different DIMM. On FB-DIMMs, there's a microcontroller chip at the DIMM, called Advanced Memory Buffer (AMB) that serves as the interface between the memory controller and the memory chips. The AMB selection is via the DIMM slot, and not via a csrow. It is up to the AMB to talk with the csrows of the DRAM chips. So, the FB-DIMM memory controllers see the DIMM slot, and not the DIMM rank. RAMBUS is similar. Newer memory controllers, like the ones found on Intel Sandy Bridge and Nehalem, even working with normal DDR3 DIMM's, don't use the usual channel A/channel B interleaving schema to provide 128 bits data access. Instead, they have more channels (3 or 4 channels), and they can use several interleaving schemas. Such memory controllers see the DIMMs directly on their registers, instead of the ranks, which is better for the driver, as its main usageis to point to a broken DIMM stick (the Field Repleceable Unit), and not to point to a broken DRAM chip. The drivers that support such such newer memory architecture models currently need to fake information and to abuse on EDAC structures, as the subsystem was conceived with the idea that the csrow would always be visible by the CPU. To make things a little worse, those drivers don't currently fake csrows/channels on a consistent way, as the concepts there don't apply to the memory controllers they're talking with. So, each driver author interpreted the concepts using a different logic. In order to fix it, let's rename the data structure that points into a DIMM rank to "rank_info", in order to be clearer about what's stored there. Latter patches will provide a better way to represent the memory hierarchy for the other types of memory controller. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-27 13:26:13 +00:00
static void edac_mc_dump_channel(struct rank_info *chan)
{
edac_mc: Cleanup per-dimm_info debug messages The edac_mc_alloc() routine allocates one dimm_info device for all possible memories, including the non-filled ones. The debug messages there are somewhat confusing. So, cleans them, by moving the code that prints the memory location to edac_mc, and using it on both edac_mc_sysfs and edac_mc. Also, only dumps information when DIMM/ranks are actually filled. After this patch, a dimm-based memory controller will print the debug info as: [ 1011.380027] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->csrow_idx = 0 [ 1011.380029] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380031] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->first_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380032] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->last_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380034] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->page_mask = 0x0 [ 1011.380035] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->nr_channels = 3 [ 1011.380037] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->channels = ffff8801149c2840 [ 1011.380039] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->mci = ffff880117426000 [ 1011.380041] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->chan_idx = 0 [ 1011.380042] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel = ffff8801149c2860 [ 1011.380044] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380046] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->dimm = ffff88010fe90400 ... [ 1011.380095] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm0: channel 0 slot 0 mapped as virtual row 0, chan 0 [ 1011.380097] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm = ffff88010fe90400 [ 1011.380099] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->label = 'CPU#0Channel#0_DIMM#0' [ 1011.380101] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 [ 1011.380103] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->grain = 8 [ 1011.380104] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 ... (a rank-based memory controller would print, instead of "dimm?", "rank?" on the above debug info) Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-30 13:24:43 +00:00
edac_dbg(4, " channel->chan_idx = %d\n", chan->chan_idx);
edac_dbg(4, " channel = %p\n", chan);
edac_dbg(4, " channel->csrow = %p\n", chan->csrow);
edac_dbg(4, " channel->dimm = %p\n", chan->dimm);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
}
edac_mc: Cleanup per-dimm_info debug messages The edac_mc_alloc() routine allocates one dimm_info device for all possible memories, including the non-filled ones. The debug messages there are somewhat confusing. So, cleans them, by moving the code that prints the memory location to edac_mc, and using it on both edac_mc_sysfs and edac_mc. Also, only dumps information when DIMM/ranks are actually filled. After this patch, a dimm-based memory controller will print the debug info as: [ 1011.380027] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->csrow_idx = 0 [ 1011.380029] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380031] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->first_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380032] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->last_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380034] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->page_mask = 0x0 [ 1011.380035] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->nr_channels = 3 [ 1011.380037] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->channels = ffff8801149c2840 [ 1011.380039] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->mci = ffff880117426000 [ 1011.380041] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->chan_idx = 0 [ 1011.380042] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel = ffff8801149c2860 [ 1011.380044] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380046] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->dimm = ffff88010fe90400 ... [ 1011.380095] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm0: channel 0 slot 0 mapped as virtual row 0, chan 0 [ 1011.380097] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm = ffff88010fe90400 [ 1011.380099] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->label = 'CPU#0Channel#0_DIMM#0' [ 1011.380101] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 [ 1011.380103] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->grain = 8 [ 1011.380104] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 ... (a rank-based memory controller would print, instead of "dimm?", "rank?" on the above debug info) Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-30 13:24:43 +00:00
static void edac_mc_dump_dimm(struct dimm_info *dimm, int number)
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
{
edac_mc: Cleanup per-dimm_info debug messages The edac_mc_alloc() routine allocates one dimm_info device for all possible memories, including the non-filled ones. The debug messages there are somewhat confusing. So, cleans them, by moving the code that prints the memory location to edac_mc, and using it on both edac_mc_sysfs and edac_mc. Also, only dumps information when DIMM/ranks are actually filled. After this patch, a dimm-based memory controller will print the debug info as: [ 1011.380027] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->csrow_idx = 0 [ 1011.380029] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380031] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->first_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380032] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->last_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380034] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->page_mask = 0x0 [ 1011.380035] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->nr_channels = 3 [ 1011.380037] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->channels = ffff8801149c2840 [ 1011.380039] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->mci = ffff880117426000 [ 1011.380041] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->chan_idx = 0 [ 1011.380042] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel = ffff8801149c2860 [ 1011.380044] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380046] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->dimm = ffff88010fe90400 ... [ 1011.380095] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm0: channel 0 slot 0 mapped as virtual row 0, chan 0 [ 1011.380097] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm = ffff88010fe90400 [ 1011.380099] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->label = 'CPU#0Channel#0_DIMM#0' [ 1011.380101] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 [ 1011.380103] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->grain = 8 [ 1011.380104] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 ... (a rank-based memory controller would print, instead of "dimm?", "rank?" on the above debug info) Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-30 13:24:43 +00:00
char location[80];
edac_dimm_info_location(dimm, location, sizeof(location));
edac_dbg(4, "%s%i: %smapped as virtual row %d, chan %d\n",
dimm->mci->csbased ? "rank" : "dimm",
edac_mc: Cleanup per-dimm_info debug messages The edac_mc_alloc() routine allocates one dimm_info device for all possible memories, including the non-filled ones. The debug messages there are somewhat confusing. So, cleans them, by moving the code that prints the memory location to edac_mc, and using it on both edac_mc_sysfs and edac_mc. Also, only dumps information when DIMM/ranks are actually filled. After this patch, a dimm-based memory controller will print the debug info as: [ 1011.380027] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->csrow_idx = 0 [ 1011.380029] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380031] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->first_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380032] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->last_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380034] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->page_mask = 0x0 [ 1011.380035] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->nr_channels = 3 [ 1011.380037] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->channels = ffff8801149c2840 [ 1011.380039] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->mci = ffff880117426000 [ 1011.380041] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->chan_idx = 0 [ 1011.380042] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel = ffff8801149c2860 [ 1011.380044] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380046] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->dimm = ffff88010fe90400 ... [ 1011.380095] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm0: channel 0 slot 0 mapped as virtual row 0, chan 0 [ 1011.380097] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm = ffff88010fe90400 [ 1011.380099] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->label = 'CPU#0Channel#0_DIMM#0' [ 1011.380101] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 [ 1011.380103] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->grain = 8 [ 1011.380104] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 ... (a rank-based memory controller would print, instead of "dimm?", "rank?" on the above debug info) Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-30 13:24:43 +00:00
number, location, dimm->csrow, dimm->cschannel);
edac_dbg(4, " dimm = %p\n", dimm);
edac_dbg(4, " dimm->label = '%s'\n", dimm->label);
edac_dbg(4, " dimm->nr_pages = 0x%x\n", dimm->nr_pages);
edac_dbg(4, " dimm->grain = %d\n", dimm->grain);
edac_dbg(4, " dimm->nr_pages = 0x%x\n", dimm->nr_pages);
}
static void edac_mc_dump_csrow(struct csrow_info *csrow)
{
edac_mc: Cleanup per-dimm_info debug messages The edac_mc_alloc() routine allocates one dimm_info device for all possible memories, including the non-filled ones. The debug messages there are somewhat confusing. So, cleans them, by moving the code that prints the memory location to edac_mc, and using it on both edac_mc_sysfs and edac_mc. Also, only dumps information when DIMM/ranks are actually filled. After this patch, a dimm-based memory controller will print the debug info as: [ 1011.380027] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->csrow_idx = 0 [ 1011.380029] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380031] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->first_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380032] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->last_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380034] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->page_mask = 0x0 [ 1011.380035] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->nr_channels = 3 [ 1011.380037] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->channels = ffff8801149c2840 [ 1011.380039] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->mci = ffff880117426000 [ 1011.380041] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->chan_idx = 0 [ 1011.380042] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel = ffff8801149c2860 [ 1011.380044] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380046] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->dimm = ffff88010fe90400 ... [ 1011.380095] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm0: channel 0 slot 0 mapped as virtual row 0, chan 0 [ 1011.380097] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm = ffff88010fe90400 [ 1011.380099] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->label = 'CPU#0Channel#0_DIMM#0' [ 1011.380101] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 [ 1011.380103] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->grain = 8 [ 1011.380104] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 ... (a rank-based memory controller would print, instead of "dimm?", "rank?" on the above debug info) Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-30 13:24:43 +00:00
edac_dbg(4, "csrow->csrow_idx = %d\n", csrow->csrow_idx);
edac_dbg(4, " csrow = %p\n", csrow);
edac_dbg(4, " csrow->first_page = 0x%lx\n", csrow->first_page);
edac_dbg(4, " csrow->last_page = 0x%lx\n", csrow->last_page);
edac_dbg(4, " csrow->page_mask = 0x%lx\n", csrow->page_mask);
edac_dbg(4, " csrow->nr_channels = %d\n", csrow->nr_channels);
edac_dbg(4, " csrow->channels = %p\n", csrow->channels);
edac_dbg(4, " csrow->mci = %p\n", csrow->mci);
}
static void edac_mc_dump_mci(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
edac_dbg(3, "\tmci = %p\n", mci);
edac_dbg(3, "\tmci->mtype_cap = %lx\n", mci->mtype_cap);
edac_dbg(3, "\tmci->edac_ctl_cap = %lx\n", mci->edac_ctl_cap);
edac_dbg(3, "\tmci->edac_cap = %lx\n", mci->edac_cap);
edac_dbg(4, "\tmci->edac_check = %p\n", mci->edac_check);
edac_dbg(3, "\tmci->nr_csrows = %d, csrows = %p\n",
mci->nr_csrows, mci->csrows);
edac_dbg(3, "\tmci->nr_dimms = %d, dimms = %p\n",
mci->tot_dimms, mci->dimms);
edac_dbg(3, "\tdev = %p\n", mci->pdev);
edac_dbg(3, "\tmod_name:ctl_name = %s:%s\n",
mci->mod_name, mci->ctl_name);
edac_dbg(3, "\tpvt_info = %p\n\n", mci->pvt_info);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG */
/*
* keep those in sync with the enum mem_type
*/
const char *edac_mem_types[] = {
"Empty csrow",
"Reserved csrow type",
"Unknown csrow type",
"Fast page mode RAM",
"Extended data out RAM",
"Burst Extended data out RAM",
"Single data rate SDRAM",
"Registered single data rate SDRAM",
"Double data rate SDRAM",
"Registered Double data rate SDRAM",
"Rambus DRAM",
"Unbuffered DDR2 RAM",
"Fully buffered DDR2",
"Registered DDR2 RAM",
"Rambus XDR",
"Unbuffered DDR3 RAM",
"Registered DDR3 RAM",
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mem_types);
/**
* edac_align_ptr - Prepares the pointer offsets for a single-shot allocation
* @p: pointer to a pointer with the memory offset to be used. At
* return, this will be incremented to point to the next offset
* @size: Size of the data structure to be reserved
* @n_elems: Number of elements that should be reserved
*
* If 'size' is a constant, the compiler will optimize this whole function
* down to either a no-op or the addition of a constant to the value of '*p'.
*
* The 'p' pointer is absolutely needed to keep the proper advancing
* further in memory to the proper offsets when allocating the struct along
* with its embedded structs, as edac_device_alloc_ctl_info() does it
* above, for example.
*
* At return, the pointer 'p' will be incremented to be used on a next call
* to this function.
*/
void *edac_align_ptr(void **p, unsigned size, int n_elems)
{
unsigned align, r;
void *ptr = *p;
*p += size * n_elems;
/*
* 'p' can possibly be an unaligned item X such that sizeof(X) is
* 'size'. Adjust 'p' so that its alignment is at least as
* stringent as what the compiler would provide for X and return
* the aligned result.
* Here we assume that the alignment of a "long long" is the most
* stringent alignment that the compiler will ever provide by default.
* As far as I know, this is a reasonable assumption.
*/
if (size > sizeof(long))
align = sizeof(long long);
else if (size > sizeof(int))
align = sizeof(long);
else if (size > sizeof(short))
align = sizeof(int);
else if (size > sizeof(char))
align = sizeof(short);
else
return (char *)ptr;
r = (unsigned long)p % align;
if (r == 0)
return (char *)ptr;
*p += align - r;
return (void *)(((unsigned long)ptr) + align - r);
}
static void _edac_mc_free(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
int i, chn, row;
struct csrow_info *csr;
const unsigned int tot_dimms = mci->tot_dimms;
const unsigned int tot_channels = mci->num_cschannel;
const unsigned int tot_csrows = mci->nr_csrows;
if (mci->dimms) {
for (i = 0; i < tot_dimms; i++)
kfree(mci->dimms[i]);
kfree(mci->dimms);
}
if (mci->csrows) {
for (row = 0; row < tot_csrows; row++) {
csr = mci->csrows[row];
if (csr) {
if (csr->channels) {
for (chn = 0; chn < tot_channels; chn++)
kfree(csr->channels[chn]);
kfree(csr->channels);
}
kfree(csr);
}
}
kfree(mci->csrows);
}
kfree(mci);
}
/**
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
* edac_mc_alloc: Allocate and partially fill a struct mem_ctl_info structure
* @mc_num: Memory controller number
* @n_layers: Number of MC hierarchy layers
* layers: Describes each layer as seen by the Memory Controller
* @size_pvt: size of private storage needed
*
*
* Everything is kmalloc'ed as one big chunk - more efficient.
* Only can be used if all structures have the same lifetime - otherwise
* you have to allocate and initialize your own structures.
*
* Use edac_mc_free() to free mc structures allocated by this function.
*
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
* NOTE: drivers handle multi-rank memories in different ways: in some
* drivers, one multi-rank memory stick is mapped as one entry, while, in
* others, a single multi-rank memory stick would be mapped into several
* entries. Currently, this function will allocate multiple struct dimm_info
* on such scenarios, as grouping the multiple ranks require drivers change.
*
* Returns:
* On failure: NULL
* On success: struct mem_ctl_info pointer
*/
struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned mc_num,
unsigned n_layers,
struct edac_mc_layer *layers,
unsigned sz_pvt)
{
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
struct edac_mc_layer *layer;
struct csrow_info *csr;
struct rank_info *chan;
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-27 17:12:32 +00:00
struct dimm_info *dimm;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
u32 *ce_per_layer[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS], *ue_per_layer[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS];
unsigned pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS];
unsigned size, tot_dimms = 1, count = 1;
unsigned tot_csrows = 1, tot_channels = 1, tot_errcount = 0;
edac: Initialize the dimm label with the known information While userspace doesn't fill the dimm labels, add there the dimm location, as described by the used memory model. This could eventually match what is described at the dmidecode, making easier for people to identify the memory. For example, on an Intel motherboard where the DMI table is reliable, the first memory stick is described as: Memory Device Array Handle: 0x0029 Error Information Handle: Not Provided Total Width: 64 bits Data Width: 64 bits Size: 2048 MB Form Factor: DIMM Set: 1 Locator: A1_DIMM0 Bank Locator: A1_Node0_Channel0_Dimm0 Type: <OUT OF SPEC> Type Detail: Synchronous Speed: 800 MHz Manufacturer: A1_Manufacturer0 Serial Number: A1_SerNum0 Asset Tag: A1_AssetTagNum0 Part Number: A1_PartNum0 The memory named as "A1_DIMM0" is physically located at the first memory controller (node 0), at channel 0, dimm slot 0. After this patch, the memory label will be filled with: /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/csrow0/ch0_dimm_label:mc#0channel#0slot#0 And (after the new EDAC API patches) as: /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/dimm0/dimm_label:mc#0channel#0slot#0 So, even if the memory label is not initialized on userspace, an useful information with the error location is filled there, expecially since several systems/motherboards are provided with enough info to map from channel/slot (or branch/channel/slot) into the DIMM label. So, letting the EDAC core fill it by default is a good thing. It should noticed that, as the label filling happens at the edac_mc_alloc(), drivers can override it to better describe the memories (and some actually do it). Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-09 14:05:20 +00:00
void *pvt, *p, *ptr = NULL;
int i, j, row, chn, n, len, off;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
bool per_rank = false;
BUG_ON(n_layers > EDAC_MAX_LAYERS || n_layers == 0);
/*
* Calculate the total amount of dimms and csrows/cschannels while
* in the old API emulation mode
*/
for (i = 0; i < n_layers; i++) {
tot_dimms *= layers[i].size;
if (layers[i].is_virt_csrow)
tot_csrows *= layers[i].size;
else
tot_channels *= layers[i].size;
if (layers[i].type == EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT)
per_rank = true;
}
/* Figure out the offsets of the various items from the start of an mc
* structure. We want the alignment of each item to be at least as
* stringent as what the compiler would provide if we could simply
* hardcode everything into a single struct.
*/
mci = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*mci), 1);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
layer = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*layer), n_layers);
for (i = 0; i < n_layers; i++) {
count *= layers[i].size;
edac_dbg(4, "errcount layer %d size %d\n", i, count);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
ce_per_layer[i] = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(u32), count);
ue_per_layer[i] = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(u32), count);
tot_errcount += 2 * count;
}
edac_dbg(4, "allocating %d error counters\n", tot_errcount);
pvt = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sz_pvt, 1);
size = ((unsigned long)pvt) + sz_pvt;
edac_dbg(1, "allocating %u bytes for mci data (%d %s, %d csrows/channels)\n",
size,
tot_dimms,
per_rank ? "ranks" : "dimms",
tot_csrows * tot_channels);
mci = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (mci == NULL)
return NULL;
/* Adjust pointers so they point within the memory we just allocated
* rather than an imaginary chunk of memory located at address 0.
*/
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
layer = (struct edac_mc_layer *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)layer));
for (i = 0; i < n_layers; i++) {
mci->ce_per_layer[i] = (u32 *)((char *)mci + ((unsigned long)ce_per_layer[i]));
mci->ue_per_layer[i] = (u32 *)((char *)mci + ((unsigned long)ue_per_layer[i]));
}
pvt = sz_pvt ? (((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)pvt)) : NULL;
/* setup index and various internal pointers */
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
mci->mc_idx = mc_num;
mci->tot_dimms = tot_dimms;
mci->pvt_info = pvt;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
mci->n_layers = n_layers;
mci->layers = layer;
memcpy(mci->layers, layers, sizeof(*layer) * n_layers);
mci->nr_csrows = tot_csrows;
mci->num_cschannel = tot_channels;
mci->csbased = per_rank;
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-27 17:12:32 +00:00
/*
* Alocate and fill the csrow/channels structs
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-27 17:12:32 +00:00
*/
mci->csrows = kcalloc(tot_csrows, sizeof(*mci->csrows), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!mci->csrows)
goto error;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
for (row = 0; row < tot_csrows; row++) {
csr = kzalloc(sizeof(**mci->csrows), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!csr)
goto error;
mci->csrows[row] = csr;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
csr->csrow_idx = row;
csr->mci = mci;
csr->nr_channels = tot_channels;
csr->channels = kcalloc(tot_channels, sizeof(*csr->channels),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!csr->channels)
goto error;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
for (chn = 0; chn < tot_channels; chn++) {
chan = kzalloc(sizeof(**csr->channels), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!chan)
goto error;
csr->channels[chn] = chan;
chan->chan_idx = chn;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
chan->csrow = csr;
}
}
/*
* Allocate and fill the dimm structs
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
*/
mci->dimms = kcalloc(tot_dimms, sizeof(*mci->dimms), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!mci->dimms)
goto error;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
memset(&pos, 0, sizeof(pos));
row = 0;
chn = 0;
for (i = 0; i < tot_dimms; i++) {
chan = mci->csrows[row]->channels[chn];
off = EDAC_DIMM_OFF(layer, n_layers, pos[0], pos[1], pos[2]);
if (off < 0 || off >= tot_dimms) {
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR, "EDAC core bug: EDAC_DIMM_OFF is trying to do an illegal data access\n");
goto error;
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
dimm = kzalloc(sizeof(**mci->dimms), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dimm)
goto error;
mci->dimms[off] = dimm;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
dimm->mci = mci;
edac: Initialize the dimm label with the known information While userspace doesn't fill the dimm labels, add there the dimm location, as described by the used memory model. This could eventually match what is described at the dmidecode, making easier for people to identify the memory. For example, on an Intel motherboard where the DMI table is reliable, the first memory stick is described as: Memory Device Array Handle: 0x0029 Error Information Handle: Not Provided Total Width: 64 bits Data Width: 64 bits Size: 2048 MB Form Factor: DIMM Set: 1 Locator: A1_DIMM0 Bank Locator: A1_Node0_Channel0_Dimm0 Type: <OUT OF SPEC> Type Detail: Synchronous Speed: 800 MHz Manufacturer: A1_Manufacturer0 Serial Number: A1_SerNum0 Asset Tag: A1_AssetTagNum0 Part Number: A1_PartNum0 The memory named as "A1_DIMM0" is physically located at the first memory controller (node 0), at channel 0, dimm slot 0. After this patch, the memory label will be filled with: /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/csrow0/ch0_dimm_label:mc#0channel#0slot#0 And (after the new EDAC API patches) as: /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/dimm0/dimm_label:mc#0channel#0slot#0 So, even if the memory label is not initialized on userspace, an useful information with the error location is filled there, expecially since several systems/motherboards are provided with enough info to map from channel/slot (or branch/channel/slot) into the DIMM label. So, letting the EDAC core fill it by default is a good thing. It should noticed that, as the label filling happens at the edac_mc_alloc(), drivers can override it to better describe the memories (and some actually do it). Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-09 14:05:20 +00:00
/*
* Copy DIMM location and initialize it.
*/
len = sizeof(dimm->label);
p = dimm->label;
n = snprintf(p, len, "mc#%u", mc_num);
p += n;
len -= n;
for (j = 0; j < n_layers; j++) {
n = snprintf(p, len, "%s#%u",
edac_layer_name[layers[j].type],
pos[j]);
p += n;
len -= n;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
dimm->location[j] = pos[j];
edac: Initialize the dimm label with the known information While userspace doesn't fill the dimm labels, add there the dimm location, as described by the used memory model. This could eventually match what is described at the dmidecode, making easier for people to identify the memory. For example, on an Intel motherboard where the DMI table is reliable, the first memory stick is described as: Memory Device Array Handle: 0x0029 Error Information Handle: Not Provided Total Width: 64 bits Data Width: 64 bits Size: 2048 MB Form Factor: DIMM Set: 1 Locator: A1_DIMM0 Bank Locator: A1_Node0_Channel0_Dimm0 Type: <OUT OF SPEC> Type Detail: Synchronous Speed: 800 MHz Manufacturer: A1_Manufacturer0 Serial Number: A1_SerNum0 Asset Tag: A1_AssetTagNum0 Part Number: A1_PartNum0 The memory named as "A1_DIMM0" is physically located at the first memory controller (node 0), at channel 0, dimm slot 0. After this patch, the memory label will be filled with: /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/csrow0/ch0_dimm_label:mc#0channel#0slot#0 And (after the new EDAC API patches) as: /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/dimm0/dimm_label:mc#0channel#0slot#0 So, even if the memory label is not initialized on userspace, an useful information with the error location is filled there, expecially since several systems/motherboards are provided with enough info to map from channel/slot (or branch/channel/slot) into the DIMM label. So, letting the EDAC core fill it by default is a good thing. It should noticed that, as the label filling happens at the edac_mc_alloc(), drivers can override it to better describe the memories (and some actually do it). Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-09 14:05:20 +00:00
if (len <= 0)
break;
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
/* Link it to the csrows old API data */
chan->dimm = dimm;
dimm->csrow = row;
dimm->cschannel = chn;
/* Increment csrow location */
edac: Fix the dimm filling for csrows-based layouts The driver is currently filling data in a wrong way, on drivers for csrows-based memory controller, when the first layer is a csrow. This is not easily to notice, as, in general, memories are filed in dual, interleaved, symetric mode, as very few memory controllers support asymetric modes. While digging into a bug for i82795_edac driver, the asymetric mode there is now working, allowing us to fill the machine with 4x1GB ranks at channel 0, and 2x512GB at channel 1: Channel 0 ranks: EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A0: from page 0x00000000 to 0x0003ffff (size: 0x00040000 pages) EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A1: from page 0x00040000 to 0x0007ffff (size: 0x00040000 pages) EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A2: from page 0x00080000 to 0x000bffff (size: 0x00040000 pages) EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A3: from page 0x000c0000 to 0x000fffff (size: 0x00040000 pages) Channel 1 ranks: EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM B0: from page 0x00100000 to 0x0011ffff (size: 0x00020000 pages) EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM B1: from page 0x00120000 to 0x0013ffff (size: 0x00020000 pages) Instead of properly showing the memories as such, before this patch, it shows the memory layout as: +-----------------------------------+ | mc0 | | csrow0 | csrow1 | csrow2 | ----------+-----------------------------------+ channel1: | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 512 MB | channel0: | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 512 MB | ----------+-----------------------------------+ as if both channels were symetric, grouping the DIMMs on a wrong layout. After this patch, the memory is correctly represented. So, for csrows at layers[0], it shows: +-----------------------------------------------+ | mc0 | | csrow0 | csrow1 | csrow2 | csrow3 | ----------+-----------------------------------------------+ channel1: | 512 MB | 512 MB | 0 MB | 0 MB | channel0: | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | ----------+-----------------------------------------------+ For csrows at layers[1], it shows: +-----------------------+ | mc0 | | channel0 | channel1 | --------+-----------------------+ csrow3: | 1024 MB | 0 MB | csrow2: | 1024 MB | 0 MB | --------+-----------------------+ csrow1: | 1024 MB | 512 MB | csrow0: | 1024 MB | 512 MB | --------+-----------------------+ So, no matter of what comes first, the information between channel and csrow will be properly represented. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-10-24 12:30:01 +00:00
if (layers[0].is_virt_csrow) {
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
chn++;
edac: Fix the dimm filling for csrows-based layouts The driver is currently filling data in a wrong way, on drivers for csrows-based memory controller, when the first layer is a csrow. This is not easily to notice, as, in general, memories are filed in dual, interleaved, symetric mode, as very few memory controllers support asymetric modes. While digging into a bug for i82795_edac driver, the asymetric mode there is now working, allowing us to fill the machine with 4x1GB ranks at channel 0, and 2x512GB at channel 1: Channel 0 ranks: EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A0: from page 0x00000000 to 0x0003ffff (size: 0x00040000 pages) EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A1: from page 0x00040000 to 0x0007ffff (size: 0x00040000 pages) EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A2: from page 0x00080000 to 0x000bffff (size: 0x00040000 pages) EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A3: from page 0x000c0000 to 0x000fffff (size: 0x00040000 pages) Channel 1 ranks: EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM B0: from page 0x00100000 to 0x0011ffff (size: 0x00020000 pages) EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM B1: from page 0x00120000 to 0x0013ffff (size: 0x00020000 pages) Instead of properly showing the memories as such, before this patch, it shows the memory layout as: +-----------------------------------+ | mc0 | | csrow0 | csrow1 | csrow2 | ----------+-----------------------------------+ channel1: | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 512 MB | channel0: | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 512 MB | ----------+-----------------------------------+ as if both channels were symetric, grouping the DIMMs on a wrong layout. After this patch, the memory is correctly represented. So, for csrows at layers[0], it shows: +-----------------------------------------------+ | mc0 | | csrow0 | csrow1 | csrow2 | csrow3 | ----------+-----------------------------------------------+ channel1: | 512 MB | 512 MB | 0 MB | 0 MB | channel0: | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | ----------+-----------------------------------------------+ For csrows at layers[1], it shows: +-----------------------+ | mc0 | | channel0 | channel1 | --------+-----------------------+ csrow3: | 1024 MB | 0 MB | csrow2: | 1024 MB | 0 MB | --------+-----------------------+ csrow1: | 1024 MB | 512 MB | csrow0: | 1024 MB | 512 MB | --------+-----------------------+ So, no matter of what comes first, the information between channel and csrow will be properly represented. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-10-24 12:30:01 +00:00
if (chn == tot_channels) {
chn = 0;
row++;
}
} else {
row++;
if (row == tot_csrows) {
row = 0;
chn++;
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
}
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-27 17:12:32 +00:00
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
/* Increment dimm location */
for (j = n_layers - 1; j >= 0; j--) {
pos[j]++;
if (pos[j] < layers[j].size)
break;
pos[j] = 0;
}
}
mci->op_state = OP_ALLOC;
return mci;
error:
_edac_mc_free(mci);
return NULL;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_alloc);
/**
* edac_mc_free
* 'Free' a previously allocated 'mci' structure
* @mci: pointer to a struct mem_ctl_info structure
*/
void edac_mc_free(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
edac_dbg(1, "\n");
/* If we're not yet registered with sysfs free only what was allocated
* in edac_mc_alloc().
*/
if (!device_is_registered(&mci->dev)) {
_edac_mc_free(mci);
return;
}
/* the mci instance is freed here, when the sysfs object is dropped */
edac: rewrite the sysfs code to use struct device The EDAC subsystem uses the old struct sysdev approach, creating all nodes using the raw sysfs API. This is bad, as the API is deprecated. As we'll be changing the EDAC API, let's first port the existing code to struct device. There's one drawback on this patch: driver-specific sysfs nodes, used by mpc85xx_edac, amd64_edac and i7core_edac won't be created anymore. While it would be possible to also port the device-specific code, that would mix kobj with struct device, with is not recommended. Also, it is easier and nicer to move the code to the drivers, instead, as the core can get rid of some complex logic that just emulates what the device_add() and device_create_file() already does. The next patches will convert the driver-specific code to use the device-specific calls. Then, the remaining bits of the old sysfs API will be removed. NOTE: a per-MC bus is required, otherwise devices with more than one memory controller will hit a bug like the one below: [ 819.094946] EDAC DEBUG: find_mci_by_dev: find_mci_by_dev() [ 819.094948] EDAC DEBUG: edac_create_sysfs_mci_device: edac_create_sysfs_mci_device() idx=1 [ 819.094952] EDAC DEBUG: edac_create_sysfs_mci_device: edac_create_sysfs_mci_device(): creating device mc1 [ 819.094967] EDAC DEBUG: edac_create_sysfs_mci_device: edac_create_sysfs_mci_device creating dimm0, located at channel 0 slot 0 [ 819.094984] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 819.100142] WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:481 sysfs_add_one+0xc1/0xf0() [ 819.107282] Hardware name: S2600CP [ 819.111078] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/bus/edac/devices/dimm0' [ 819.119062] Modules linked in: sb_edac(+) edac_core ip6table_filter ip6_tables ebtable_nat ebtables ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack ipt_REJECT xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle iptable_filter ip_tables bridge stp llc sunrpc binfmt_misc dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log vhost_net macvtap macvlan tun kvm microcode pcspkr iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support igb i2c_i801 i2c_core sg ioatdma dca sr_mod cdrom sd_mod crc_t10dif ahci libahci isci libsas libata scsi_transport_sas scsi_mod wmi dm_mod [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 819.175748] Pid: 10902, comm: modprobe Not tainted 3.3.0-0.11.el7.v12.2.x86_64 #1 [ 819.184113] Call Trace: [ 819.186868] [<ffffffff8105adaf>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 819.193573] [<ffffffff8105aea6>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50 [ 819.200000] [<ffffffff811f53d1>] sysfs_add_one+0xc1/0xf0 [ 819.206025] [<ffffffff811f5cf5>] sysfs_do_create_link+0x135/0x220 [ 819.212944] [<ffffffff811f7023>] ? sysfs_create_group+0x13/0x20 [ 819.219656] [<ffffffff811f5df3>] sysfs_create_link+0x13/0x20 [ 819.226109] [<ffffffff813b04f6>] bus_add_device+0xe6/0x1b0 [ 819.232350] [<ffffffff813ae7cb>] device_add+0x2db/0x460 [ 819.238300] [<ffffffffa0325634>] edac_create_dimm_object+0x84/0xf0 [edac_core] [ 819.246460] [<ffffffffa0325e18>] edac_create_sysfs_mci_device+0xe8/0x290 [edac_core] [ 819.255215] [<ffffffffa0322e2a>] edac_mc_add_mc+0x5a/0x2c0 [edac_core] [ 819.262611] [<ffffffffa03412df>] sbridge_register_mci+0x1bc/0x279 [sb_edac] [ 819.270493] [<ffffffffa03417a3>] sbridge_probe+0xef/0x175 [sb_edac] [ 819.277630] [<ffffffff813ba4e8>] ? pm_runtime_enable+0x58/0x90 [ 819.284268] [<ffffffff812f430c>] local_pci_probe+0x5c/0xd0 [ 819.290508] [<ffffffff812f5ba1>] __pci_device_probe+0xf1/0x100 [ 819.297117] [<ffffffff812f5bea>] pci_device_probe+0x3a/0x60 [ 819.303457] [<ffffffff813b1003>] really_probe+0x73/0x270 [ 819.309496] [<ffffffff813b138e>] driver_probe_device+0x4e/0xb0 [ 819.316104] [<ffffffff813b149b>] __driver_attach+0xab/0xb0 [ 819.322337] [<ffffffff813b13f0>] ? driver_probe_device+0xb0/0xb0 [ 819.329151] [<ffffffff813af5d6>] bus_for_each_dev+0x56/0x90 [ 819.335489] [<ffffffff813b0d7e>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20 [ 819.341534] [<ffffffff813b0980>] bus_add_driver+0x1b0/0x2a0 [ 819.347884] [<ffffffffa0347000>] ? 0xffffffffa0346fff [ 819.353641] [<ffffffff813b19f6>] driver_register+0x76/0x140 [ 819.359980] [<ffffffff8159f18b>] ? printk+0x51/0x53 [ 819.365524] [<ffffffffa0347000>] ? 0xffffffffa0346fff [ 819.371291] [<ffffffff812f5896>] __pci_register_driver+0x56/0xd0 [ 819.378096] [<ffffffffa0347054>] sbridge_init+0x54/0x1000 [sb_edac] [ 819.385231] [<ffffffff8100203f>] do_one_initcall+0x3f/0x170 [ 819.391577] [<ffffffff810bcd2e>] sys_init_module+0xbe/0x230 [ 819.397926] [<ffffffff815bb529>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 819.404633] ---[ end trace 1654fdd39556689f ]--- This happens because the bus is not being properly initialized. Instead of putting the memory sub-devices inside the memory controller, it is putting everything under the same directory: $ tree /sys/bus/edac/ /sys/bus/edac/ ├── devices │ ├── all_channel_counts -> ../../../devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/all_channel_counts │ ├── csrow0 -> ../../../devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/csrow0 │ ├── csrow1 -> ../../../devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/csrow1 │ ├── csrow2 -> ../../../devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/csrow2 │ ├── dimm0 -> ../../../devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/dimm0 │ ├── dimm1 -> ../../../devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/dimm1 │ ├── dimm3 -> ../../../devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/dimm3 │ ├── dimm6 -> ../../../devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/dimm6 │ ├── inject_addrmatch -> ../../../devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/inject_addrmatch │ ├── mc -> ../../../devices/system/edac/mc │ └── mc0 -> ../../../devices/system/edac/mc/mc0 ├── drivers ├── drivers_autoprobe ├── drivers_probe └── uevent On a multi-memory controller system, the names "csrow%d" and "dimm%d" should be under "mc%d", and not at the main hierarchy level. So, we need to create a per-MC bus, in order to have its own namespace. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Greg K H <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-16 19:41:11 +00:00
edac_unregister_sysfs(mci);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_free);
/**
* find_mci_by_dev
*
* scan list of controllers looking for the one that manages
* the 'dev' device
* @dev: pointer to a struct device related with the MCI
*/
struct mem_ctl_info *find_mci_by_dev(struct device *dev)
{
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
struct list_head *item;
edac_dbg(3, "\n");
list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) {
mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link);
if (mci->pdev == dev)
return mci;
}
return NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(find_mci_by_dev);
/*
* handler for EDAC to check if NMI type handler has asserted interrupt
*/
static int edac_mc_assert_error_check_and_clear(void)
{
int old_state;
if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_POLL)
return 1;
old_state = edac_err_assert;
edac_err_assert = 0;
return old_state;
}
/*
* edac_mc_workq_function
* performs the operation scheduled by a workq request
*/
static void edac_mc_workq_function(struct work_struct *work_req)
{
struct delayed_work *d_work = to_delayed_work(work_req);
struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_edac_mem_ctl_work(d_work);
mutex_lock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
/* if this control struct has movd to offline state, we are done */
if (mci->op_state == OP_OFFLINE) {
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
return;
}
/* Only poll controllers that are running polled and have a check */
if (edac_mc_assert_error_check_and_clear() && (mci->edac_check != NULL))
mci->edac_check(mci);
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
/* Reschedule */
queue_delayed_work(edac_workqueue, &mci->work,
msecs_to_jiffies(edac_mc_get_poll_msec()));
}
/*
* edac_mc_workq_setup
* initialize a workq item for this mci
* passing in the new delay period in msec
*
* locking model:
*
* called with the mem_ctls_mutex held
*/
static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec)
{
edac_dbg(0, "\n");
/* if this instance is not in the POLL state, then simply return */
if (mci->op_state != OP_RUNNING_POLL)
return;
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function);
workqueue: use mod_delayed_work() instead of cancel + queue Convert delayed_work users doing cancel_delayed_work() followed by queue_delayed_work() to mod_delayed_work(). Most conversions are straight-forward. Ones worth mentioning are, * drivers/edac/edac_mc.c: edac_mc_workq_setup() converted to always use mod_delayed_work() and cancel loop in edac_mc_reset_delay_period() is dropped. * drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c: No need to remember whether watchdog is active or not. @fan_watchdog_active and related code dropped. * drivers/power/charger-manager.c: Seemingly a lot of delayed_work_pending() abuse going on here. [delayed_]work_pending() are unsynchronized and racy when used like this. I converted one instance in fullbatt_handler(). Please conver the rest so that it invokes workqueue APIs for the intended target state rather than trying to game work item pending state transitions. e.g. if timer should be modified - call mod_delayed_work(), canceled - call cancel_delayed_work[_sync](). * drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.c: thermal_zone_device_set_polling() simplified. Note that round_jiffies() calls in this function are meaningless. round_jiffies() work on absolute jiffies not delta delay used by delayed_work. v2: Tomi pointed out that __cancel_delayed_work() users can't be safely converted to mod_delayed_work(). They could be calling it from irq context and if that happens while delayed_work_timer_fn() is running, it could deadlock. __cancel_delayed_work() users are dropped. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org> Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
2012-08-03 17:30:47 +00:00
mod_delayed_work(edac_workqueue, &mci->work, msecs_to_jiffies(msec));
}
/*
* edac_mc_workq_teardown
* stop the workq processing on this mci
*
* locking model:
*
* called WITHOUT lock held
*/
static void edac_mc_workq_teardown(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
int status;
if (mci->op_state != OP_RUNNING_POLL)
return;
status = cancel_delayed_work(&mci->work);
if (status == 0) {
edac_dbg(0, "not canceled, flush the queue\n");
/* workq instance might be running, wait for it */
flush_workqueue(edac_workqueue);
}
}
/*
* edac_mc_reset_delay_period(unsigned long value)
*
* user space has updated our poll period value, need to
* reset our workq delays
*/
void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(int value)
{
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
struct list_head *item;
mutex_lock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) {
mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link);
edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, (unsigned long) value);
}
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
}
/* Return 0 on success, 1 on failure.
* Before calling this function, caller must
* assign a unique value to mci->mc_idx.
*
* locking model:
*
* called with the mem_ctls_mutex lock held
*/
static int add_mc_to_global_list(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
struct list_head *item, *insert_before;
struct mem_ctl_info *p;
insert_before = &mc_devices;
p = find_mci_by_dev(mci->pdev);
if (unlikely(p != NULL))
goto fail0;
list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) {
p = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link);
if (p->mc_idx >= mci->mc_idx) {
if (unlikely(p->mc_idx == mci->mc_idx))
goto fail1;
insert_before = item;
break;
}
}
list_add_tail_rcu(&mci->link, insert_before);
atomic_inc(&edac_handlers);
return 0;
fail0:
edac_printk(KERN_WARNING, EDAC_MC,
"%s (%s) %s %s already assigned %d\n", dev_name(p->pdev),
edac_dev_name(mci), p->mod_name, p->ctl_name, p->mc_idx);
return 1;
fail1:
edac_printk(KERN_WARNING, EDAC_MC,
"bug in low-level driver: attempt to assign\n"
" duplicate mc_idx %d in %s()\n", p->mc_idx, __func__);
return 1;
}
static int del_mc_from_global_list(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
int handlers = atomic_dec_return(&edac_handlers);
list_del_rcu(&mci->link);
/* these are for safe removal of devices from global list while
* NMI handlers may be traversing list
*/
synchronize_rcu();
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mci->link);
return handlers;
}
/**
* edac_mc_find: Search for a mem_ctl_info structure whose index is 'idx'.
*
* If found, return a pointer to the structure.
* Else return NULL.
*
* Caller must hold mem_ctls_mutex.
*/
struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_find(int idx)
{
struct list_head *item;
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) {
mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link);
if (mci->mc_idx >= idx) {
if (mci->mc_idx == idx)
return mci;
break;
}
}
return NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(edac_mc_find);
/**
* edac_mc_add_mc: Insert the 'mci' structure into the mci global list and
* create sysfs entries associated with mci structure
* @mci: pointer to the mci structure to be added to the list
*
* Return:
* 0 Success
* !0 Failure
*/
/* FIXME - should a warning be printed if no error detection? correction? */
int edac_mc_add_mc(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
int ret = -EINVAL;
edac_dbg(0, "\n");
#ifdef CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG
if (edac_debug_level >= 3)
edac_mc_dump_mci(mci);
if (edac_debug_level >= 4) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < mci->nr_csrows; i++) {
edac_mc: Cleanup per-dimm_info debug messages The edac_mc_alloc() routine allocates one dimm_info device for all possible memories, including the non-filled ones. The debug messages there are somewhat confusing. So, cleans them, by moving the code that prints the memory location to edac_mc, and using it on both edac_mc_sysfs and edac_mc. Also, only dumps information when DIMM/ranks are actually filled. After this patch, a dimm-based memory controller will print the debug info as: [ 1011.380027] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->csrow_idx = 0 [ 1011.380029] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380031] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->first_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380032] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->last_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380034] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->page_mask = 0x0 [ 1011.380035] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->nr_channels = 3 [ 1011.380037] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->channels = ffff8801149c2840 [ 1011.380039] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->mci = ffff880117426000 [ 1011.380041] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->chan_idx = 0 [ 1011.380042] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel = ffff8801149c2860 [ 1011.380044] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380046] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->dimm = ffff88010fe90400 ... [ 1011.380095] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm0: channel 0 slot 0 mapped as virtual row 0, chan 0 [ 1011.380097] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm = ffff88010fe90400 [ 1011.380099] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->label = 'CPU#0Channel#0_DIMM#0' [ 1011.380101] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 [ 1011.380103] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->grain = 8 [ 1011.380104] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 ... (a rank-based memory controller would print, instead of "dimm?", "rank?" on the above debug info) Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-30 13:24:43 +00:00
struct csrow_info *csrow = mci->csrows[i];
u32 nr_pages = 0;
int j;
edac_mc: Cleanup per-dimm_info debug messages The edac_mc_alloc() routine allocates one dimm_info device for all possible memories, including the non-filled ones. The debug messages there are somewhat confusing. So, cleans them, by moving the code that prints the memory location to edac_mc, and using it on both edac_mc_sysfs and edac_mc. Also, only dumps information when DIMM/ranks are actually filled. After this patch, a dimm-based memory controller will print the debug info as: [ 1011.380027] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->csrow_idx = 0 [ 1011.380029] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380031] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->first_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380032] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->last_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380034] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->page_mask = 0x0 [ 1011.380035] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->nr_channels = 3 [ 1011.380037] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->channels = ffff8801149c2840 [ 1011.380039] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->mci = ffff880117426000 [ 1011.380041] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->chan_idx = 0 [ 1011.380042] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel = ffff8801149c2860 [ 1011.380044] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380046] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->dimm = ffff88010fe90400 ... [ 1011.380095] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm0: channel 0 slot 0 mapped as virtual row 0, chan 0 [ 1011.380097] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm = ffff88010fe90400 [ 1011.380099] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->label = 'CPU#0Channel#0_DIMM#0' [ 1011.380101] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 [ 1011.380103] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->grain = 8 [ 1011.380104] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 ... (a rank-based memory controller would print, instead of "dimm?", "rank?" on the above debug info) Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-30 13:24:43 +00:00
for (j = 0; j < csrow->nr_channels; j++)
nr_pages += csrow->channels[j]->dimm->nr_pages;
if (!nr_pages)
continue;
edac_mc_dump_csrow(csrow);
for (j = 0; j < csrow->nr_channels; j++)
if (csrow->channels[j]->dimm->nr_pages)
edac_mc_dump_channel(csrow->channels[j]);
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < mci->tot_dimms; i++)
edac_mc: Cleanup per-dimm_info debug messages The edac_mc_alloc() routine allocates one dimm_info device for all possible memories, including the non-filled ones. The debug messages there are somewhat confusing. So, cleans them, by moving the code that prints the memory location to edac_mc, and using it on both edac_mc_sysfs and edac_mc. Also, only dumps information when DIMM/ranks are actually filled. After this patch, a dimm-based memory controller will print the debug info as: [ 1011.380027] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->csrow_idx = 0 [ 1011.380029] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380031] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->first_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380032] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->last_page = 0x0 [ 1011.380034] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->page_mask = 0x0 [ 1011.380035] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->nr_channels = 3 [ 1011.380037] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->channels = ffff8801149c2840 [ 1011.380039] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_csrow: csrow->mci = ffff880117426000 [ 1011.380041] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->chan_idx = 0 [ 1011.380042] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel = ffff8801149c2860 [ 1011.380044] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->csrow = ffff8801169be000 [ 1011.380046] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_channel: channel->dimm = ffff88010fe90400 ... [ 1011.380095] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm0: channel 0 slot 0 mapped as virtual row 0, chan 0 [ 1011.380097] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm = ffff88010fe90400 [ 1011.380099] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->label = 'CPU#0Channel#0_DIMM#0' [ 1011.380101] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 [ 1011.380103] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->grain = 8 [ 1011.380104] EDAC DEBUG: edac_mc_dump_dimm: dimm->nr_pages = 0x40000 ... (a rank-based memory controller would print, instead of "dimm?", "rank?" on the above debug info) Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-30 13:24:43 +00:00
if (mci->dimms[i]->nr_pages)
edac_mc_dump_dimm(mci->dimms[i], i);
}
#endif
mutex_lock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
if (edac_mc_owner && edac_mc_owner != mci->mod_name) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto fail0;
}
if (add_mc_to_global_list(mci))
goto fail0;
/* set load time so that error rate can be tracked */
mci->start_time = jiffies;
if (edac_create_sysfs_mci_device(mci)) {
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
"failed to create sysfs device\n");
goto fail1;
}
/* If there IS a check routine, then we are running POLLED */
if (mci->edac_check != NULL) {
/* This instance is NOW RUNNING */
mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_POLL;
edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec());
} else {
mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_INTERRUPT;
}
/* Report action taken */
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_INFO, "Giving out device to '%s' '%s':"
" DEV %s\n", mci->mod_name, mci->ctl_name, edac_dev_name(mci));
edac_mc_owner = mci->mod_name;
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
return 0;
fail1:
del_mc_from_global_list(mci);
fail0:
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_add_mc);
/**
* edac_mc_del_mc: Remove sysfs entries for specified mci structure and
* remove mci structure from global list
* @pdev: Pointer to 'struct device' representing mci structure to remove.
*
* Return pointer to removed mci structure, or NULL if device not found.
*/
struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_del_mc(struct device *dev)
{
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
edac_dbg(0, "\n");
mutex_lock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
/* find the requested mci struct in the global list */
mci = find_mci_by_dev(dev);
if (mci == NULL) {
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
return NULL;
}
if (!del_mc_from_global_list(mci))
edac_mc_owner = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
/* flush workq processes */
edac_mc_workq_teardown(mci);
/* marking MCI offline */
mci->op_state = OP_OFFLINE;
/* remove from sysfs */
edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device(mci);
edac_printk(KERN_INFO, EDAC_MC,
"Removed device %d for %s %s: DEV %s\n", mci->mc_idx,
mci->mod_name, mci->ctl_name, edac_dev_name(mci));
return mci;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_del_mc);
static void edac_mc_scrub_block(unsigned long page, unsigned long offset,
u32 size)
{
struct page *pg;
void *virt_addr;
unsigned long flags = 0;
edac_dbg(3, "\n");
/* ECC error page was not in our memory. Ignore it. */
if (!pfn_valid(page))
return;
/* Find the actual page structure then map it and fix */
pg = pfn_to_page(page);
if (PageHighMem(pg))
local_irq_save(flags);
virt_addr = kmap_atomic(pg);
/* Perform architecture specific atomic scrub operation */
atomic_scrub(virt_addr + offset, size);
/* Unmap and complete */
kunmap_atomic(virt_addr);
if (PageHighMem(pg))
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/* FIXME - should return -1 */
int edac_mc_find_csrow_by_page(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned long page)
{
struct csrow_info **csrows = mci->csrows;
int row, i, j, n;
edac_dbg(1, "MC%d: 0x%lx\n", mci->mc_idx, page);
row = -1;
for (i = 0; i < mci->nr_csrows; i++) {
struct csrow_info *csrow = csrows[i];
n = 0;
for (j = 0; j < csrow->nr_channels; j++) {
struct dimm_info *dimm = csrow->channels[j]->dimm;
n += dimm->nr_pages;
}
if (n == 0)
continue;
edac_dbg(3, "MC%d: first(0x%lx) page(0x%lx) last(0x%lx) mask(0x%lx)\n",
mci->mc_idx,
csrow->first_page, page, csrow->last_page,
csrow->page_mask);
if ((page >= csrow->first_page) &&
(page <= csrow->last_page) &&
((page & csrow->page_mask) ==
(csrow->first_page & csrow->page_mask))) {
row = i;
break;
}
}
if (row == -1)
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
"could not look up page error address %lx\n",
(unsigned long)page);
return row;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_find_csrow_by_page);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
const char *edac_layer_name[] = {
[EDAC_MC_LAYER_BRANCH] = "branch",
[EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHANNEL] = "channel",
[EDAC_MC_LAYER_SLOT] = "slot",
[EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT] = "csrow",
[EDAC_MC_LAYER_ALL_MEM] = "memory",
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_layer_name);
static void edac_inc_ce_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
bool enable_per_layer_report,
const int pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS],
const u16 count)
{
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
int i, index = 0;
mci->ce_mc += count;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
if (!enable_per_layer_report) {
mci->ce_noinfo_count += count;
return;
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < mci->n_layers; i++) {
if (pos[i] < 0)
break;
index += pos[i];
mci->ce_per_layer[i][index] += count;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
if (i < mci->n_layers - 1)
index *= mci->layers[i + 1].size;
}
}
static void edac_inc_ue_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
bool enable_per_layer_report,
const int pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS],
const u16 count)
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
{
int i, index = 0;
mci->ue_mc += count;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
if (!enable_per_layer_report) {
mci->ce_noinfo_count += count;
return;
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < mci->n_layers; i++) {
if (pos[i] < 0)
break;
index += pos[i];
mci->ue_per_layer[i][index] += count;
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-27 17:12:32 +00:00
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
if (i < mci->n_layers - 1)
index *= mci->layers[i + 1].size;
}
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
static void edac_ce_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
const u16 error_count,
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
const int pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS],
const char *msg,
const char *location,
const char *label,
const char *detail,
const char *other_detail,
const bool enable_per_layer_report,
const unsigned long page_frame_number,
const unsigned long offset_in_page,
RAS: Add a tracepoint for reporting memory controller events Add a new tracepoint-based hardware events report method for reporting Memory Controller events. Part of the description bellow is shamelessly copied from Tony Luck's notes about the Hardware Error BoF during LPC 2010 [1]. Tony, thanks for your notes and discussions to generate the h/w error reporting requirements. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/416669/ We have several subsystems & methods for reporting hardware errors: 1) EDAC ("Error Detection and Correction"). In its original form this consisted of a platform specific driver that read topology information and error counts from chipset registers and reported the results via a sysfs interface. 2) mcelog - x86 specific decoding of machine check bank registers reporting in binary form via /dev/mcelog. Recent additions make use of the APEI extensions that were documented in version 4.0a of the ACPI specification to acquire more information about errors without having to rely reading chipset registers directly. A user level programs decodes into somewhat human readable format. 3) drivers/edac/mce_amd.c - this driver hooks into the mcelog path and decodes errors reported via machine check bank registers in AMD processors to the console log using printk(); Each of these mechanisms has a band of followers ... and none of them appear to meet all the needs of all users. As part of a RAS subsystem, let's encapsulate the memory error hardware events into a trace facility. The tracepoint printk will be displayed like: mc_event: [quant] (Corrected|Uncorrected|Fatal) error:[error msg] on [label] ([location] [edac_mc detail] [driver_detail] Where: [quant] is the quantity of errors [error msg] is the driver-specific error message (e. g. "memory read", "bus error", ...); [location] is the location in terms of memory controller and branch/channel/slot, channel/slot or csrow/channel; [label] is the memory stick label; [edac_mc detail] describes the address location of the error and the syndrome; [driver detail] is driver-specifig error message details, when needed/provided (e. g. "area:DMA", ...) For example: mc_event: 1 Corrected error:memory read on memory stick DIMM_1A (mc:0 location:0:0:0 page:0x586b6e offset:0xa66 grain:32 syndrome:0x0 area:DMA) Of course, any userspace tools meant to handle errors should not parse the above data. They should, instead, use the binary fields provided by the tracepoint, mapping them directly into their Management Information Base. NOTE: The original patch was providing an additional mechanism for MCA-based trace events that also contained MCA error register data. However, as no agreement was reached so far for the MCA-based trace events, for now, let's add events only for memory errors. A latter patch is planned to change the tracepoint, for those types of event. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-23 11:10:34 +00:00
long grain)
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
{
unsigned long remapped_page;
char *msg_aux = "";
if (*msg)
msg_aux = " ";
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
if (edac_mc_get_log_ce()) {
if (other_detail && *other_detail)
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
"%d CE %s%son %s (%s %s - %s)\n",
error_count, msg, msg_aux, label,
location, detail, other_detail);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
else
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
"%d CE %s%son %s (%s %s)\n",
error_count, msg, msg_aux, label,
location, detail);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
}
edac_inc_ce_error(mci, enable_per_layer_report, pos, error_count);
if (mci->scrub_mode & SCRUB_SW_SRC) {
/*
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
* Some memory controllers (called MCs below) can remap
* memory so that it is still available at a different
* address when PCI devices map into memory.
* MC's that can't do this, lose the memory where PCI
* devices are mapped. This mapping is MC-dependent
* and so we call back into the MC driver for it to
* map the MC page to a physical (CPU) page which can
* then be mapped to a virtual page - which can then
* be scrubbed.
*/
remapped_page = mci->ctl_page_to_phys ?
mci->ctl_page_to_phys(mci, page_frame_number) :
page_frame_number;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
edac_mc_scrub_block(remapped_page,
offset_in_page, grain);
}
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
static void edac_ue_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
const u16 error_count,
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
const int pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS],
const char *msg,
const char *location,
const char *label,
const char *detail,
const char *other_detail,
const bool enable_per_layer_report)
{
char *msg_aux = "";
if (*msg)
msg_aux = " ";
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
if (edac_mc_get_log_ue()) {
if (other_detail && *other_detail)
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
"%d UE %s%son %s (%s %s - %s)\n",
error_count, msg, msg_aux, label,
location, detail, other_detail);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
else
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
"%d UE %s%son %s (%s %s)\n",
error_count, msg, msg_aux, label,
location, detail);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
if (edac_mc_get_panic_on_ue()) {
if (other_detail && *other_detail)
panic("UE %s%son %s (%s%s - %s)\n",
msg, msg_aux, label, location, detail, other_detail);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
else
panic("UE %s%son %s (%s%s)\n",
msg, msg_aux, label, location, detail);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
}
edac_inc_ue_error(mci, enable_per_layer_report, pos, error_count);
}
/**
* edac_raw_mc_handle_error - reports a memory event to userspace without doing
* anything to discover the error location
*
* @type: severity of the error (CE/UE/Fatal)
* @mci: a struct mem_ctl_info pointer
* @e: error description
*
* This raw function is used internally by edac_mc_handle_error(). It should
* only be called directly when the hardware error come directly from BIOS,
* like in the case of APEI GHES driver.
*/
void edac_raw_mc_handle_error(const enum hw_event_mc_err_type type,
struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
struct edac_raw_error_desc *e)
{
char detail[80];
int pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS] = { e->top_layer, e->mid_layer, e->low_layer };
/* Memory type dependent details about the error */
if (type == HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED) {
snprintf(detail, sizeof(detail),
"page:0x%lx offset:0x%lx grain:%ld syndrome:0x%lx",
e->page_frame_number, e->offset_in_page,
e->grain, e->syndrome);
edac_ce_error(mci, e->error_count, pos, e->msg, e->location, e->label,
detail, e->other_detail, e->enable_per_layer_report,
e->page_frame_number, e->offset_in_page, e->grain);
} else {
snprintf(detail, sizeof(detail),
"page:0x%lx offset:0x%lx grain:%ld",
e->page_frame_number, e->offset_in_page, e->grain);
edac_ue_error(mci, e->error_count, pos, e->msg, e->location, e->label,
detail, e->other_detail, e->enable_per_layer_report);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_raw_mc_handle_error);
RAS: Add a tracepoint for reporting memory controller events Add a new tracepoint-based hardware events report method for reporting Memory Controller events. Part of the description bellow is shamelessly copied from Tony Luck's notes about the Hardware Error BoF during LPC 2010 [1]. Tony, thanks for your notes and discussions to generate the h/w error reporting requirements. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/416669/ We have several subsystems & methods for reporting hardware errors: 1) EDAC ("Error Detection and Correction"). In its original form this consisted of a platform specific driver that read topology information and error counts from chipset registers and reported the results via a sysfs interface. 2) mcelog - x86 specific decoding of machine check bank registers reporting in binary form via /dev/mcelog. Recent additions make use of the APEI extensions that were documented in version 4.0a of the ACPI specification to acquire more information about errors without having to rely reading chipset registers directly. A user level programs decodes into somewhat human readable format. 3) drivers/edac/mce_amd.c - this driver hooks into the mcelog path and decodes errors reported via machine check bank registers in AMD processors to the console log using printk(); Each of these mechanisms has a band of followers ... and none of them appear to meet all the needs of all users. As part of a RAS subsystem, let's encapsulate the memory error hardware events into a trace facility. The tracepoint printk will be displayed like: mc_event: [quant] (Corrected|Uncorrected|Fatal) error:[error msg] on [label] ([location] [edac_mc detail] [driver_detail] Where: [quant] is the quantity of errors [error msg] is the driver-specific error message (e. g. "memory read", "bus error", ...); [location] is the location in terms of memory controller and branch/channel/slot, channel/slot or csrow/channel; [label] is the memory stick label; [edac_mc detail] describes the address location of the error and the syndrome; [driver detail] is driver-specifig error message details, when needed/provided (e. g. "area:DMA", ...) For example: mc_event: 1 Corrected error:memory read on memory stick DIMM_1A (mc:0 location:0:0:0 page:0x586b6e offset:0xa66 grain:32 syndrome:0x0 area:DMA) Of course, any userspace tools meant to handle errors should not parse the above data. They should, instead, use the binary fields provided by the tracepoint, mapping them directly into their Management Information Base. NOTE: The original patch was providing an additional mechanism for MCA-based trace events that also contained MCA error register data. However, as no agreement was reached so far for the MCA-based trace events, for now, let's add events only for memory errors. A latter patch is planned to change the tracepoint, for those types of event. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-23 11:10:34 +00:00
/**
* edac_mc_handle_error - reports a memory event to userspace
*
* @type: severity of the error (CE/UE/Fatal)
* @mci: a struct mem_ctl_info pointer
* @error_count: Number of errors of the same type
RAS: Add a tracepoint for reporting memory controller events Add a new tracepoint-based hardware events report method for reporting Memory Controller events. Part of the description bellow is shamelessly copied from Tony Luck's notes about the Hardware Error BoF during LPC 2010 [1]. Tony, thanks for your notes and discussions to generate the h/w error reporting requirements. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/416669/ We have several subsystems & methods for reporting hardware errors: 1) EDAC ("Error Detection and Correction"). In its original form this consisted of a platform specific driver that read topology information and error counts from chipset registers and reported the results via a sysfs interface. 2) mcelog - x86 specific decoding of machine check bank registers reporting in binary form via /dev/mcelog. Recent additions make use of the APEI extensions that were documented in version 4.0a of the ACPI specification to acquire more information about errors without having to rely reading chipset registers directly. A user level programs decodes into somewhat human readable format. 3) drivers/edac/mce_amd.c - this driver hooks into the mcelog path and decodes errors reported via machine check bank registers in AMD processors to the console log using printk(); Each of these mechanisms has a band of followers ... and none of them appear to meet all the needs of all users. As part of a RAS subsystem, let's encapsulate the memory error hardware events into a trace facility. The tracepoint printk will be displayed like: mc_event: [quant] (Corrected|Uncorrected|Fatal) error:[error msg] on [label] ([location] [edac_mc detail] [driver_detail] Where: [quant] is the quantity of errors [error msg] is the driver-specific error message (e. g. "memory read", "bus error", ...); [location] is the location in terms of memory controller and branch/channel/slot, channel/slot or csrow/channel; [label] is the memory stick label; [edac_mc detail] describes the address location of the error and the syndrome; [driver detail] is driver-specifig error message details, when needed/provided (e. g. "area:DMA", ...) For example: mc_event: 1 Corrected error:memory read on memory stick DIMM_1A (mc:0 location:0:0:0 page:0x586b6e offset:0xa66 grain:32 syndrome:0x0 area:DMA) Of course, any userspace tools meant to handle errors should not parse the above data. They should, instead, use the binary fields provided by the tracepoint, mapping them directly into their Management Information Base. NOTE: The original patch was providing an additional mechanism for MCA-based trace events that also contained MCA error register data. However, as no agreement was reached so far for the MCA-based trace events, for now, let's add events only for memory errors. A latter patch is planned to change the tracepoint, for those types of event. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-23 11:10:34 +00:00
* @page_frame_number: mem page where the error occurred
* @offset_in_page: offset of the error inside the page
* @syndrome: ECC syndrome
* @top_layer: Memory layer[0] position
* @mid_layer: Memory layer[1] position
* @low_layer: Memory layer[2] position
* @msg: Message meaningful to the end users that
* explains the event
* @other_detail: Technical details about the event that
* may help hardware manufacturers and
* EDAC developers to analyse the event
*/
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
void edac_mc_handle_error(const enum hw_event_mc_err_type type,
struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
const u16 error_count,
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
const unsigned long page_frame_number,
const unsigned long offset_in_page,
const unsigned long syndrome,
RAS: Add a tracepoint for reporting memory controller events Add a new tracepoint-based hardware events report method for reporting Memory Controller events. Part of the description bellow is shamelessly copied from Tony Luck's notes about the Hardware Error BoF during LPC 2010 [1]. Tony, thanks for your notes and discussions to generate the h/w error reporting requirements. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/416669/ We have several subsystems & methods for reporting hardware errors: 1) EDAC ("Error Detection and Correction"). In its original form this consisted of a platform specific driver that read topology information and error counts from chipset registers and reported the results via a sysfs interface. 2) mcelog - x86 specific decoding of machine check bank registers reporting in binary form via /dev/mcelog. Recent additions make use of the APEI extensions that were documented in version 4.0a of the ACPI specification to acquire more information about errors without having to rely reading chipset registers directly. A user level programs decodes into somewhat human readable format. 3) drivers/edac/mce_amd.c - this driver hooks into the mcelog path and decodes errors reported via machine check bank registers in AMD processors to the console log using printk(); Each of these mechanisms has a band of followers ... and none of them appear to meet all the needs of all users. As part of a RAS subsystem, let's encapsulate the memory error hardware events into a trace facility. The tracepoint printk will be displayed like: mc_event: [quant] (Corrected|Uncorrected|Fatal) error:[error msg] on [label] ([location] [edac_mc detail] [driver_detail] Where: [quant] is the quantity of errors [error msg] is the driver-specific error message (e. g. "memory read", "bus error", ...); [location] is the location in terms of memory controller and branch/channel/slot, channel/slot or csrow/channel; [label] is the memory stick label; [edac_mc detail] describes the address location of the error and the syndrome; [driver detail] is driver-specifig error message details, when needed/provided (e. g. "area:DMA", ...) For example: mc_event: 1 Corrected error:memory read on memory stick DIMM_1A (mc:0 location:0:0:0 page:0x586b6e offset:0xa66 grain:32 syndrome:0x0 area:DMA) Of course, any userspace tools meant to handle errors should not parse the above data. They should, instead, use the binary fields provided by the tracepoint, mapping them directly into their Management Information Base. NOTE: The original patch was providing an additional mechanism for MCA-based trace events that also contained MCA error register data. However, as no agreement was reached so far for the MCA-based trace events, for now, let's add events only for memory errors. A latter patch is planned to change the tracepoint, for those types of event. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-23 11:10:34 +00:00
const int top_layer,
const int mid_layer,
const int low_layer,
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
const char *msg,
const char *other_detail)
{
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
char *p;
int row = -1, chan = -1;
RAS: Add a tracepoint for reporting memory controller events Add a new tracepoint-based hardware events report method for reporting Memory Controller events. Part of the description bellow is shamelessly copied from Tony Luck's notes about the Hardware Error BoF during LPC 2010 [1]. Tony, thanks for your notes and discussions to generate the h/w error reporting requirements. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/416669/ We have several subsystems & methods for reporting hardware errors: 1) EDAC ("Error Detection and Correction"). In its original form this consisted of a platform specific driver that read topology information and error counts from chipset registers and reported the results via a sysfs interface. 2) mcelog - x86 specific decoding of machine check bank registers reporting in binary form via /dev/mcelog. Recent additions make use of the APEI extensions that were documented in version 4.0a of the ACPI specification to acquire more information about errors without having to rely reading chipset registers directly. A user level programs decodes into somewhat human readable format. 3) drivers/edac/mce_amd.c - this driver hooks into the mcelog path and decodes errors reported via machine check bank registers in AMD processors to the console log using printk(); Each of these mechanisms has a band of followers ... and none of them appear to meet all the needs of all users. As part of a RAS subsystem, let's encapsulate the memory error hardware events into a trace facility. The tracepoint printk will be displayed like: mc_event: [quant] (Corrected|Uncorrected|Fatal) error:[error msg] on [label] ([location] [edac_mc detail] [driver_detail] Where: [quant] is the quantity of errors [error msg] is the driver-specific error message (e. g. "memory read", "bus error", ...); [location] is the location in terms of memory controller and branch/channel/slot, channel/slot or csrow/channel; [label] is the memory stick label; [edac_mc detail] describes the address location of the error and the syndrome; [driver detail] is driver-specifig error message details, when needed/provided (e. g. "area:DMA", ...) For example: mc_event: 1 Corrected error:memory read on memory stick DIMM_1A (mc:0 location:0:0:0 page:0x586b6e offset:0xa66 grain:32 syndrome:0x0 area:DMA) Of course, any userspace tools meant to handle errors should not parse the above data. They should, instead, use the binary fields provided by the tracepoint, mapping them directly into their Management Information Base. NOTE: The original patch was providing an additional mechanism for MCA-based trace events that also contained MCA error register data. However, as no agreement was reached so far for the MCA-based trace events, for now, let's add events only for memory errors. A latter patch is planned to change the tracepoint, for those types of event. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-23 11:10:34 +00:00
int pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS] = { top_layer, mid_layer, low_layer };
int i, n_labels = 0;
RAS: Add a tracepoint for reporting memory controller events Add a new tracepoint-based hardware events report method for reporting Memory Controller events. Part of the description bellow is shamelessly copied from Tony Luck's notes about the Hardware Error BoF during LPC 2010 [1]. Tony, thanks for your notes and discussions to generate the h/w error reporting requirements. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/416669/ We have several subsystems & methods for reporting hardware errors: 1) EDAC ("Error Detection and Correction"). In its original form this consisted of a platform specific driver that read topology information and error counts from chipset registers and reported the results via a sysfs interface. 2) mcelog - x86 specific decoding of machine check bank registers reporting in binary form via /dev/mcelog. Recent additions make use of the APEI extensions that were documented in version 4.0a of the ACPI specification to acquire more information about errors without having to rely reading chipset registers directly. A user level programs decodes into somewhat human readable format. 3) drivers/edac/mce_amd.c - this driver hooks into the mcelog path and decodes errors reported via machine check bank registers in AMD processors to the console log using printk(); Each of these mechanisms has a band of followers ... and none of them appear to meet all the needs of all users. As part of a RAS subsystem, let's encapsulate the memory error hardware events into a trace facility. The tracepoint printk will be displayed like: mc_event: [quant] (Corrected|Uncorrected|Fatal) error:[error msg] on [label] ([location] [edac_mc detail] [driver_detail] Where: [quant] is the quantity of errors [error msg] is the driver-specific error message (e. g. "memory read", "bus error", ...); [location] is the location in terms of memory controller and branch/channel/slot, channel/slot or csrow/channel; [label] is the memory stick label; [edac_mc detail] describes the address location of the error and the syndrome; [driver detail] is driver-specifig error message details, when needed/provided (e. g. "area:DMA", ...) For example: mc_event: 1 Corrected error:memory read on memory stick DIMM_1A (mc:0 location:0:0:0 page:0x586b6e offset:0xa66 grain:32 syndrome:0x0 area:DMA) Of course, any userspace tools meant to handle errors should not parse the above data. They should, instead, use the binary fields provided by the tracepoint, mapping them directly into their Management Information Base. NOTE: The original patch was providing an additional mechanism for MCA-based trace events that also contained MCA error register data. However, as no agreement was reached so far for the MCA-based trace events, for now, let's add events only for memory errors. A latter patch is planned to change the tracepoint, for those types of event. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-23 11:10:34 +00:00
u8 grain_bits;
struct edac_raw_error_desc *e = &mci->error_desc;
edac_dbg(3, "MC%d\n", mci->mc_idx);
/* Fills the error report buffer */
memset(e, 0, sizeof (*e));
e->error_count = error_count;
e->top_layer = top_layer;
e->mid_layer = mid_layer;
e->low_layer = low_layer;
e->page_frame_number = page_frame_number;
e->offset_in_page = offset_in_page;
e->syndrome = syndrome;
e->msg = msg;
e->other_detail = other_detail;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
/*
* Check if the event report is consistent and if the memory
* location is known. If it is known, enable_per_layer_report will be
* true, the DIMM(s) label info will be filled and the per-layer
* error counters will be incremented.
*/
for (i = 0; i < mci->n_layers; i++) {
if (pos[i] >= (int)mci->layers[i].size) {
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
"INTERNAL ERROR: %s value is out of range (%d >= %d)\n",
edac_layer_name[mci->layers[i].type],
pos[i], mci->layers[i].size);
/*
* Instead of just returning it, let's use what's
* known about the error. The increment routines and
* the DIMM filter logic will do the right thing by
* pointing the likely damaged DIMMs.
*/
pos[i] = -1;
}
if (pos[i] >= 0)
e->enable_per_layer_report = true;
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
/*
* Get the dimm label/grain that applies to the match criteria.
* As the error algorithm may not be able to point to just one memory
* stick, the logic here will get all possible labels that could
* pottentially be affected by the error.
* On FB-DIMM memory controllers, for uncorrected errors, it is common
* to have only the MC channel and the MC dimm (also called "branch")
* but the channel is not known, as the memory is arranged in pairs,
* where each memory belongs to a separate channel within the same
* branch.
*/
p = e->label;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
*p = '\0';
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < mci->tot_dimms; i++) {
struct dimm_info *dimm = mci->dimms[i];
RAS: Add a tracepoint for reporting memory controller events Add a new tracepoint-based hardware events report method for reporting Memory Controller events. Part of the description bellow is shamelessly copied from Tony Luck's notes about the Hardware Error BoF during LPC 2010 [1]. Tony, thanks for your notes and discussions to generate the h/w error reporting requirements. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/416669/ We have several subsystems & methods for reporting hardware errors: 1) EDAC ("Error Detection and Correction"). In its original form this consisted of a platform specific driver that read topology information and error counts from chipset registers and reported the results via a sysfs interface. 2) mcelog - x86 specific decoding of machine check bank registers reporting in binary form via /dev/mcelog. Recent additions make use of the APEI extensions that were documented in version 4.0a of the ACPI specification to acquire more information about errors without having to rely reading chipset registers directly. A user level programs decodes into somewhat human readable format. 3) drivers/edac/mce_amd.c - this driver hooks into the mcelog path and decodes errors reported via machine check bank registers in AMD processors to the console log using printk(); Each of these mechanisms has a band of followers ... and none of them appear to meet all the needs of all users. As part of a RAS subsystem, let's encapsulate the memory error hardware events into a trace facility. The tracepoint printk will be displayed like: mc_event: [quant] (Corrected|Uncorrected|Fatal) error:[error msg] on [label] ([location] [edac_mc detail] [driver_detail] Where: [quant] is the quantity of errors [error msg] is the driver-specific error message (e. g. "memory read", "bus error", ...); [location] is the location in terms of memory controller and branch/channel/slot, channel/slot or csrow/channel; [label] is the memory stick label; [edac_mc detail] describes the address location of the error and the syndrome; [driver detail] is driver-specifig error message details, when needed/provided (e. g. "area:DMA", ...) For example: mc_event: 1 Corrected error:memory read on memory stick DIMM_1A (mc:0 location:0:0:0 page:0x586b6e offset:0xa66 grain:32 syndrome:0x0 area:DMA) Of course, any userspace tools meant to handle errors should not parse the above data. They should, instead, use the binary fields provided by the tracepoint, mapping them directly into their Management Information Base. NOTE: The original patch was providing an additional mechanism for MCA-based trace events that also contained MCA error register data. However, as no agreement was reached so far for the MCA-based trace events, for now, let's add events only for memory errors. A latter patch is planned to change the tracepoint, for those types of event. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-23 11:10:34 +00:00
if (top_layer >= 0 && top_layer != dimm->location[0])
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
continue;
RAS: Add a tracepoint for reporting memory controller events Add a new tracepoint-based hardware events report method for reporting Memory Controller events. Part of the description bellow is shamelessly copied from Tony Luck's notes about the Hardware Error BoF during LPC 2010 [1]. Tony, thanks for your notes and discussions to generate the h/w error reporting requirements. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/416669/ We have several subsystems & methods for reporting hardware errors: 1) EDAC ("Error Detection and Correction"). In its original form this consisted of a platform specific driver that read topology information and error counts from chipset registers and reported the results via a sysfs interface. 2) mcelog - x86 specific decoding of machine check bank registers reporting in binary form via /dev/mcelog. Recent additions make use of the APEI extensions that were documented in version 4.0a of the ACPI specification to acquire more information about errors without having to rely reading chipset registers directly. A user level programs decodes into somewhat human readable format. 3) drivers/edac/mce_amd.c - this driver hooks into the mcelog path and decodes errors reported via machine check bank registers in AMD processors to the console log using printk(); Each of these mechanisms has a band of followers ... and none of them appear to meet all the needs of all users. As part of a RAS subsystem, let's encapsulate the memory error hardware events into a trace facility. The tracepoint printk will be displayed like: mc_event: [quant] (Corrected|Uncorrected|Fatal) error:[error msg] on [label] ([location] [edac_mc detail] [driver_detail] Where: [quant] is the quantity of errors [error msg] is the driver-specific error message (e. g. "memory read", "bus error", ...); [location] is the location in terms of memory controller and branch/channel/slot, channel/slot or csrow/channel; [label] is the memory stick label; [edac_mc detail] describes the address location of the error and the syndrome; [driver detail] is driver-specifig error message details, when needed/provided (e. g. "area:DMA", ...) For example: mc_event: 1 Corrected error:memory read on memory stick DIMM_1A (mc:0 location:0:0:0 page:0x586b6e offset:0xa66 grain:32 syndrome:0x0 area:DMA) Of course, any userspace tools meant to handle errors should not parse the above data. They should, instead, use the binary fields provided by the tracepoint, mapping them directly into their Management Information Base. NOTE: The original patch was providing an additional mechanism for MCA-based trace events that also contained MCA error register data. However, as no agreement was reached so far for the MCA-based trace events, for now, let's add events only for memory errors. A latter patch is planned to change the tracepoint, for those types of event. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-23 11:10:34 +00:00
if (mid_layer >= 0 && mid_layer != dimm->location[1])
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
continue;
RAS: Add a tracepoint for reporting memory controller events Add a new tracepoint-based hardware events report method for reporting Memory Controller events. Part of the description bellow is shamelessly copied from Tony Luck's notes about the Hardware Error BoF during LPC 2010 [1]. Tony, thanks for your notes and discussions to generate the h/w error reporting requirements. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/416669/ We have several subsystems & methods for reporting hardware errors: 1) EDAC ("Error Detection and Correction"). In its original form this consisted of a platform specific driver that read topology information and error counts from chipset registers and reported the results via a sysfs interface. 2) mcelog - x86 specific decoding of machine check bank registers reporting in binary form via /dev/mcelog. Recent additions make use of the APEI extensions that were documented in version 4.0a of the ACPI specification to acquire more information about errors without having to rely reading chipset registers directly. A user level programs decodes into somewhat human readable format. 3) drivers/edac/mce_amd.c - this driver hooks into the mcelog path and decodes errors reported via machine check bank registers in AMD processors to the console log using printk(); Each of these mechanisms has a band of followers ... and none of them appear to meet all the needs of all users. As part of a RAS subsystem, let's encapsulate the memory error hardware events into a trace facility. The tracepoint printk will be displayed like: mc_event: [quant] (Corrected|Uncorrected|Fatal) error:[error msg] on [label] ([location] [edac_mc detail] [driver_detail] Where: [quant] is the quantity of errors [error msg] is the driver-specific error message (e. g. "memory read", "bus error", ...); [location] is the location in terms of memory controller and branch/channel/slot, channel/slot or csrow/channel; [label] is the memory stick label; [edac_mc detail] describes the address location of the error and the syndrome; [driver detail] is driver-specifig error message details, when needed/provided (e. g. "area:DMA", ...) For example: mc_event: 1 Corrected error:memory read on memory stick DIMM_1A (mc:0 location:0:0:0 page:0x586b6e offset:0xa66 grain:32 syndrome:0x0 area:DMA) Of course, any userspace tools meant to handle errors should not parse the above data. They should, instead, use the binary fields provided by the tracepoint, mapping them directly into their Management Information Base. NOTE: The original patch was providing an additional mechanism for MCA-based trace events that also contained MCA error register data. However, as no agreement was reached so far for the MCA-based trace events, for now, let's add events only for memory errors. A latter patch is planned to change the tracepoint, for those types of event. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-23 11:10:34 +00:00
if (low_layer >= 0 && low_layer != dimm->location[2])
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
continue;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
/* get the max grain, over the error match range */
if (dimm->grain > e->grain)
e->grain = dimm->grain;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
/*
* If the error is memory-controller wide, there's no need to
* seek for the affected DIMMs because the whole
* channel/memory controller/... may be affected.
* Also, don't show errors for empty DIMM slots.
*/
if (e->enable_per_layer_report && dimm->nr_pages) {
if (n_labels >= EDAC_MAX_LABELS) {
e->enable_per_layer_report = false;
break;
}
n_labels++;
if (p != e->label) {
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
strcpy(p, OTHER_LABEL);
p += strlen(OTHER_LABEL);
}
strcpy(p, dimm->label);
p += strlen(p);
*p = '\0';
/*
* get csrow/channel of the DIMM, in order to allow
* incrementing the compat API counters
*/
edac_dbg(4, "%s csrows map: (%d,%d)\n",
mci->csbased ? "rank" : "dimm",
dimm->csrow, dimm->cschannel);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
if (row == -1)
row = dimm->csrow;
else if (row >= 0 && row != dimm->csrow)
row = -2;
if (chan == -1)
chan = dimm->cschannel;
else if (chan >= 0 && chan != dimm->cschannel)
chan = -2;
}
}
if (!e->enable_per_layer_report) {
strcpy(e->label, "any memory");
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
} else {
edac_dbg(4, "csrow/channel to increment: (%d,%d)\n", row, chan);
if (p == e->label)
strcpy(e->label, "unknown memory");
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
if (type == HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED) {
if (row >= 0) {
mci->csrows[row]->ce_count += error_count;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
if (chan >= 0)
mci->csrows[row]->channels[chan]->ce_count += error_count;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
}
} else
if (row >= 0)
mci->csrows[row]->ue_count += error_count;
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
/* Fill the RAM location data */
p = e->location;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < mci->n_layers; i++) {
if (pos[i] < 0)
continue;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
p += sprintf(p, "%s:%d ",
edac_layer_name[mci->layers[i].type],
pos[i]);
}
if (p > e->location)
RAS: Add a tracepoint for reporting memory controller events Add a new tracepoint-based hardware events report method for reporting Memory Controller events. Part of the description bellow is shamelessly copied from Tony Luck's notes about the Hardware Error BoF during LPC 2010 [1]. Tony, thanks for your notes and discussions to generate the h/w error reporting requirements. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/416669/ We have several subsystems & methods for reporting hardware errors: 1) EDAC ("Error Detection and Correction"). In its original form this consisted of a platform specific driver that read topology information and error counts from chipset registers and reported the results via a sysfs interface. 2) mcelog - x86 specific decoding of machine check bank registers reporting in binary form via /dev/mcelog. Recent additions make use of the APEI extensions that were documented in version 4.0a of the ACPI specification to acquire more information about errors without having to rely reading chipset registers directly. A user level programs decodes into somewhat human readable format. 3) drivers/edac/mce_amd.c - this driver hooks into the mcelog path and decodes errors reported via machine check bank registers in AMD processors to the console log using printk(); Each of these mechanisms has a band of followers ... and none of them appear to meet all the needs of all users. As part of a RAS subsystem, let's encapsulate the memory error hardware events into a trace facility. The tracepoint printk will be displayed like: mc_event: [quant] (Corrected|Uncorrected|Fatal) error:[error msg] on [label] ([location] [edac_mc detail] [driver_detail] Where: [quant] is the quantity of errors [error msg] is the driver-specific error message (e. g. "memory read", "bus error", ...); [location] is the location in terms of memory controller and branch/channel/slot, channel/slot or csrow/channel; [label] is the memory stick label; [edac_mc detail] describes the address location of the error and the syndrome; [driver detail] is driver-specifig error message details, when needed/provided (e. g. "area:DMA", ...) For example: mc_event: 1 Corrected error:memory read on memory stick DIMM_1A (mc:0 location:0:0:0 page:0x586b6e offset:0xa66 grain:32 syndrome:0x0 area:DMA) Of course, any userspace tools meant to handle errors should not parse the above data. They should, instead, use the binary fields provided by the tracepoint, mapping them directly into their Management Information Base. NOTE: The original patch was providing an additional mechanism for MCA-based trace events that also contained MCA error register data. However, as no agreement was reached so far for the MCA-based trace events, for now, let's add events only for memory errors. A latter patch is planned to change the tracepoint, for those types of event. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-02-23 11:10:34 +00:00
*(p - 1) = '\0';
/* Report the error via the trace interface */
grain_bits = fls_long(e->grain) + 1;
trace_mc_event(type, e->msg, e->label, e->error_count,
mci->mc_idx, e->top_layer, e->mid_layer, e->low_layer,
PAGES_TO_MiB(e->page_frame_number) | e->offset_in_page,
grain_bits, e->syndrome, e->other_detail);
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-27 17:12:32 +00:00
edac_raw_mc_handle_error(type, mci, e);
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-18 18:20:50 +00:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_handle_error);