turns out that there's something of a hole in our new fabric name
server stuff. We ask the name server for entities that have
registered as a specific type. That type is FC-SCSI. If the entity
hasn't performed a REGISTER FC4 TYPES, the fabric nameserver won't
return it.
This brings this driver to a bit of a fork in the road as to what
the right thing to do is. For servicing the needs of accessing
FC-SCSI devices, this method is fine, and to be preferred. It is
extremely unlikely we're interested in fabric devices that *don't*
register correctly. If I ever get around to adding an FC-IP stack,
then asking for devices that have registers as FC-IP types is also
the right thing to do.
So- asking the fabric nameserver for a specific type is fine, *as
long as you are only interested in specific types*. If, on the other
hand, you want to create (as for management tool support) a picture
of everything on the fabric, this is *not* so fine. There are a
large class of FC-SCSI *initiators* who *don't* correctly register,
so we never will *see* them.
Is this a problem? Yes, but only a little one. If we want to do such
management tool support, we should probably run a *different* fabric
nameserver query algorithm. Better yet, we should talk to the management
nameserver in Brocade switches instead of the standard FC-GS-2 fabric
nameserver (which can be unwieldy).
Other changes: if we've overrrides marked, don't set some default
values from reading NVRAM. This allows us to override things like
EXEC throttle without having to ignore NVRAM entirely.
MFC after: 1 week
af2d254da9