- Make some minor rearrangements in the introduction.
- Mention the problem with argument reduction on i386.
- Add recently-implemented functions to the table.
- Un-document the error bounds that only apply to the old 4BSD math
library, and fill in the correct values where I know them. No
attempt has been made to document bounds lower than 1 ulp, although
smaller bounds are usually achievable in round-to-nearest mode.
/lib/{libm,libreadline}
/usr/lib/{libhistory,libopie,libpcap}
in preparation for doing the same thing to RELENG_5. HUGE amounts of
help for determining what to bump provided by kris.
Discussed on: freebsd-current
Approved by: re (not required for commit but something like this should be)
libc. The externally-visible effect of this is to add __isnanl() to
libm, which means that libm.so.2 can once again link against libc.so.4
when LD_BIND_NOW is set. This was broken by the addition of fdiml(),
which calls __isnanl().
- It was added to libc instead of libm. Hopefully no programs rely
on this mistake.
- It didn't work properly on large long doubles because its argument
was converted to type double, resulting in undefined behavior.
- Unlike the builtin relational operators, builtin floating-point
constants were not available until gcc 3.3, so account for this.[1]
- Apparently some versions of the Intel C Compiler fallaciously define
__GNUC__ without actually being compatible with the claimed gcc
version. Account for this, too.[2]
[1] Noticed by: Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at>
[2] Submitted by: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
isnormal() the hard way, rather than relying on fpclassify(). This is
a lose in the sense that we need a total of 12 functions, but it is
necessary for binary compatibility because we have never bumped libm's
major version number. In particular, isinf(), isnan(), and isnanf()
were BSD libc functions before they were C99 macros, so we can't
reimplement them in terms of fpclassify() without adding a dependency
on libc.so.5. I have tried to arrange things so that programs that
could be compiled in FreeBSD 4.X will generate the same external
references when compiled in 5.X. At the same time, the new macros
should remain C99-compliant.
The isinf() and isnan() functions remain in libc for historical
reasons; however, I have moved the functions that implement the macros
isfinite() and isnormal() to libm where they belong. Moreover,
half a dozen MD versions of isinf() and isnan() have been replaced
with MI versions that work equally well.
Prodded by: kris
builtins are available: HUGE_VAL, HUGE_VALF, HUGE_VALL, INFINITY,
and NAN. These macros now expand to floating-point constant
expressions rather than external references, as required by C99.
Other compilers will retain the historical behavior. Note that
it is not possible say, e.g.
#define HUGE_VAL 1.0e9999
because the above may result in diagnostics at translation time
and spurious exceptions at runtime. Hence the need for compiler
support for these features.
Also use builtins to implement the macros isgreater(),
isgreaterequal(), isless(), islessequal(), islessgreater(),
and isunordered() when such builtins are available.
Although the old macros are correct, the builtin versions
are much faster, and they avoid double-expansion problems.
These trivial implementations are about 25 times slower than
rint{,f}() on x86 due to the FP environment save/restore.
They should eventually be redone in terms of fegetround() and
bit fiddling.
These routines are specified in C99 for the sake of
architectures where an int isn't big enough to represent
the full range of floating-point exponents. However,
even the 128-bit long double format has an exponent smaller
than 15 bits, so for all practical purposes, scalbln() and
scalblnf() are aliases for scalbn() and scalbnf(), respectively.
kicking and screaming into the 1980's. This change converts most of
the markup from man(7) to mdoc(7) format, and I believe it removes or
updates everything that was flat out wrong. However, much work is
still needed to sanitize the markup, improve coverage, and reduce
overlap with other manpages. Some of the sections would better belong
in a philosophy_of_w_kahan.3 manpage, but they are informative and
remain at least as reminders of topics to cover.
Reviewed by: doc@, trhodes@
on all inputs of the form x.75, where x is an even integer and
log2(x) = 21. A similar problem occurred when rounding upward.
The bug involves the following snippet copied from rint():
i>>=1;
if((i0&i)!=0) i0 = (i0&(~i))|((0x100000)>>j0);
The constant 0x100000 should be 0x200000. Apparently this case was
never tested.
It turns out that the bit manipulation is completely superfluous
anyway, so remove it. (It tries to simulate 90% of the rounding
process that the FPU does anyway.) Also, the special case of +-0 is
handled twice (in different ways), so remove the second instance.
Throw in some related simplifications from bde:
- Work around a bug where gcc fails to clip to float precision by
declaring two float variables as volatile. Previously, we
tricked gcc into generating correct code by declaring some
float constants as doubles.
- Remove additional superfluous bit manipulation.
- Minor reorganization.
- Include <sys/types.h> explicitly.
Note that some of the equivalent lines in rint() also appear to be
unnecessary, but I'll defer to the numerical analysts who wrote it,
since I can't test all 2^64 cases.
Discussed with: bde
It does not appear to be possible to cross-build arm from i386 at the
moment, and I have no ARM hardware anyway. Thus, I'm sure there are
bugs. I will gladly fix these when the arm port is more mature.
Reviewed by: standards@
features appear to work, subject to the caveat that you tell gcc you
want standard rather than recklessly fast behavior
(-mieee-with-inexact -mfp-rounding-mode=d).
The non-standard feature of delivering a SIGFPE when an application
raises an unmasked exception does not work, presumably due to a kernel
bug. This isn't so bad given that floating-point exceptions on the
Alpha architecture are not precise, so making them useful in userland
requires a significant amount of wizardry.
Reviewed by: standards@
