Summary:
Open file list is currently created as statically allocated array (64 items).
Once this array is filled up, loader will not be able to operate with files.
In most cases, this mechanism is good enough, but the problem appears, when
we have many disks with zfs pool(s). In current loader implementation, all
discovered zfs pool configurations are kept in memory and disk devices open -
consuming the open file array. Rewrite the open file mechanism to use
dynamically allocated list.
Reviewed by: imp
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31364
Summary:
efi loader does not work with static network parameters. It always uses
BOOTP/DHCP and also uses RARP as a fallback. Problems with DHCP servers can
cause the loader to fail to populate network parameters.
Submitted by: Siddharth Tuli <siddharthtuli_gmail.com>
Reviewed by: imp
Sponsored by: Juniper Networks, Inc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20811
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by
little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a
great soul has simply nothing to do. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Current timeout behavior is to progress in timeout values from MINTMO to
MAXTMO in MINTMO steps before finally timing out. This results in a fairly
long time before operations finally timeout, which may not be ideal for some
use-cases.
Add MAXWAIT that may be configured along with MINTMO/MAXTMO. If we attempt
to start our send/recv cycle over again but MAXWAIT > 0 and MAXWAIT seconds
have already passed, then go ahead and timeout.
This is intended for those that just want to say "timeout after 180 seconds"
rather than calculate and tweak MINTMO/MAXTMO to get their desired timeout.
The default is 0, or "progress from MINTMO to MAXTMO with no exception."
This has been modified since review to allow for it to be defined via CFLAGS
and doing appropriate error checking. Future work may add some Makefile foo
to respect LOADER_NET_MAXWAIT if it's specified in the environment and pass
it in as MAXWAIT accordingly.
Reviewed by: imp, sbruno, tsoome (all previous version)
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14389
bootp/arp/rarp/rpc all use the sendrecv implementation in net.c. tftp has
its own implementation because it passes an extra parameter into the recv
callback for the received payload type to be held.
These sendrecv implementations are otherwise equivalent, so consolidate
them. The other users of sendrecv won't be using the extra argument to recv,
but this gives us only one place to worry about respecting timeouts and one
consistent timeout behavior.
Tested by: sbruno
Reviewed by: sbruno, tsoome
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14373
