The SPDX folks have obsoleted the BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier. Catch
up to that fact and revert to their recommended match of BSD-2-Clause.
Discussed with: pfg
MFC After: 3 days
Sponsored by: Netflix
This fixes a compile issue under gcc6 which complains about
legacy style C function declarations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26504
o Enhance dependency loop logging: print full chain instead of the
last link competing the loop;
o Add -g option to generate dependency graph suitable for GraphViz
visualization, loops and other graph generation issues are highlighted
automatically;
o Add -p option that enables grouping items that can be processed in
parallel.
Submitted by: Boris Lytochkin <lytboris at gmail>
Reviewed by: melifaro
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25389
Mainly focus on files that use BSD 2-Clause license, however the tool I
was using misidentified many licenses so this was mostly a manual - error
prone - task.
The Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) group provides a specification
to make it easier for automated tools to detect and summarize well known
opensource licenses. We are gradually adopting the specification, noting
that the tags are considered only advisory and do not, in any way,
superceed or replace the license texts.
No functional change intended.
This self-written compiler warning, which is hopefully going to be
committed into LLVM sources soon, warns about potentially missing
`static' keywords, similar to -Wmissing-prototypes.
- bin/pax: Move external declaration of chdname and s_mask into extern.h.
- bin/setfacl: Move setfacl.c-specific stuff out of setfacl.h.
- sbin/mount_fusefs: Remove char *progname; use getprogname().
- others: add `static' where possible.
The global variables and functions provided by rcorder.c are not used in
the other C files, as the other C files only provide memory allocation
and hash functions. This reduces the binary size by 10%.
These tools declare global variables without using the static keyword,
even though their use is limited to a single C-file, or without placing
an extern declaration of them in the proper header file.
I was considering committing all these patches one by one, but as
discussed with brooks@, there is no need to do this. If we ever
need/want to merge these changes back, it is still possible to do this
per application.
circumstances that include circular dependencies.
PR: bin/91789
PR submitted by: Frank Behrens <frank@pinky.sax.de>
Patch submitted by: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
