syncache that has an invalid SEQ instead of only doing it when we suceed
in mallocing space for the log message.
MFC after: 1 week
Reviewed by: sam, bz
receiving or transmitting.
With IPv6 raw sockets, read lock rather than write lock the inpcb when
receiving. Unfortunately, IPv6 source address selection appears to
require a write lock on the inpcb for the time being.
MFC after: 3 months
A lot of testing has shown that the problem people were seeing was due
to invalid padding after the end of option list option, which was corrected
in tcp_output.c rev. 1.146.
Thanks to: anders@, s3raphi, Matt Reimer
Thanks to: Doug Hardie and Randy Rose, John Mayer, Susan Guzzardi
Special thanks to: dwhite@ and BitGravity
Discussed with: silby
MFC after: 1 day
when reading credential data from sockets.
Teach pf to unlock the pcbinfo more quickly once it has acquired an
inpcb lock, as the inpcb lock is sufficient to protect the reference.
Assert locks, rather than read locks or write locks, on inpcbs in
subroutines--this is necessary as the inpcb may be passed down with a
write lock from the protocol, or may be passed down with a read lock
from the firewall lookup routine, and either is sufficient.
MFC after: 3 months
move most offload functionality from NIC to TOE
factor out all socket and inpcb direct access
factor out access to locking in incpb, pcbinfo, and sockbuf
explicitly select write locking for all use of the inpcb mutex.
Update some pcbinfo lock assertions to assert locked rather than
write-locked, although in practice almost all uses of the pcbinfo
rwlock main exclusive, and all instances of inpcb lock acquisition
are exclusive.
This change should introduce (ideally) little functional change.
However, it lays the groundwork for significantly increased
parallelism in the TCP/IP code.
MFC after: 3 months
Tested by: kris (superset of committered patch)
done by understandable macros.
Fix the bug that prevented the system from responding on interfaces with
link local addresses assigned.
PR: 120958
Submitted by: James Snow <snow at teardrop.org>
MFC after: 2 weeks
(ECMP) for both IPv4 and IPv6. Previously, multipath route insertion
is disallowed. For example,
route add -net 192.103.54.0/24 10.9.44.1
route add -net 192.103.54.0/24 10.9.44.2
The second route insertion will trigger an error message of
"add net 192.103.54.0/24: gateway 10.2.5.2: route already in table"
Multiple default routes can also be inserted. Here is the netstat
output:
default 10.2.5.1 UGS 0 3074 bge0 =>
default 10.2.5.2 UGS 0 0 bge0
When multipath routes exist, the "route delete" command requires
a specific gateway to be specified or else an error message would
be displayed. For example,
route delete default
would fail and trigger the following error message:
"route: writing to routing socket: No such process"
"delete net default: not in table"
On the other hand,
route delete default 10.2.5.2
would be successful: "delete net default: gateway 10.2.5.2"
One does not have to specify a gateway if there is only a single
route for a particular destination.
I need to perform more testings on address aliases and multiple
interfaces that have the same IP prefixes. This patch as it
stands today is not yet ready for prime time. Therefore, the ECMP
code fragments are fully guarded by the RADIX_MPATH macro.
Include the "options RADIX_MPATH" in the kernel configuration
to enable this feature.
Reviewed by: robert, sam, gnn, julian, kmacy
ICMP unreach, frag needed. Up to now we only looked at the
interface MTU. Make sure to only use the minimum of the two.
In case IPSEC is compiled in, loop the mtu through ip_ipsec_mtu()
to avoid any further conditional maths.
Without this, PMTU was broken in those cases when there was a
route with a lower MTU than the MTU of the outgoing interface.
PR: kern/122338
Tested by: Mark Cammidge mark peralex.com
Reviewed by: silence on net@
MFC after: 2 weeks
was changed in rev. 1.161 of tcp_var.h. All option now test for sufficient
space in TCP header before getting added.
Reported by: Mark Atkinson <atkin901-at-yahoo.com>
Tested by: Mark Atkinson <atkin901-at-yahoo.com>
MFC after: 1 week
Removed dead code that assumed that M_TRYWAIT can return NULL; it's not true
since the advent of MBUMA.
Reviewed by: arch
There are ongoing disputes as to whether we want to switch to directly using
UMA flags M_WAITOK/M_NOWAIT for mbuf(9) allocation.
In that case return an continue processing the packet without IPsec.
PR: 121384
MFC after: 5 days
Reported by: Cyrus Rahman (crahman gmail.com)
Tested by: Cyrus Rahman (crahman gmail.com) [slightly older version]
the NOPs used are 0x01.
While we could simply pad with EOLs (which are 0x00), rather use an
explicit 0x00 constant there to not confuse poeple with 'EOL padding'.
Put in a comment saying just that.
Problem discussed on: src-committers with andre, silby, dwhite as
follow up to the rev. 1.161 commit of tcp_var.h.
MFC after: 11 days
restrict the utilization of direct pointers to the content of
ip packet. These modifications are functionally nop()s thus
can be merged with no side effects.
IPPORT_EPHEMERALFIRST and IPPORT_EPHEMERALLAST with values
10000 and 65535 respectively.
The rationale behind is that it makes the attacker's life more
difficult if he/she wants to guess the ephemeral port range and
also lowers the probability of a port colision (described in
draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-01.txt).
While there, remove code duplication in in_pcbbind_setup().
Submitted by: Fernando Gont <fernando at gont.com.ar>
Approved by: njl (mentor)
Reviewed by: silby, bms
Discussed on: freebsd-net
- Move the assigment of the socket down before we first need it.
No need to do it at the beginning and then drop out the function
by one of the returns before using it 100 lines further down.
- Use t_maxopd which was assigned the "tcp_mssdflt" for the corrrect
AF already instead of another #ifdef ? : #endif block doing the same.
- Remove an unneeded (duplicate) assignment of mss to t_maxseg just before
we possibly change mss and re-do the assignment without using t_maxseg
in between.
Reviewed by: silby
No objections: net@ (silence)
MFC after: 5 days
the limit in bytes) hard coded into both the kernel and userland.
Make both these limits a sysctl, so it is easy to change the limit.
If the userland part of ipfw finds that the sysctls don't exist,
it will just fall back to the traditional limits.
(100 packets is quite a small limit these days. If you want to test
TCP at 100Mbps, 100 packets can only accommodate a DBP of 12ms.)
Note these sysctls in the man page and warn against increasing them
without thinking first.
MFC after: 3 weeks
the same order that FreeBSD 6 and before did. Doug
White and the other bloodhounds at ISC discovered that
while FreeBSD 7's ordering of options was more efficient,
it caused some cable modem routers to ignore the
SYN-ACKs ordered in this fashion.
The placement of sackOK after the timestamp option seems
to be the critical difference:
FreeBSD 6:
<mss 1460,nop,wscale 1,nop,nop,timestamp 3512155768 0,sackOK,eol>
FreeBSD 7.0:
<mss 1460,nop,wscale 3,sackOK,timestamp 1370692577 0>
FreeBSD 7.0 + this change:
<mss 1460,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,timestamp 7371813 0,sackOK,eol>
MFC after: 1 week
