Reducing "/+./" strings to "/"
Reducing "/[^/]+/../" to "/"
o Don't send an OACK when the result of the [RW]RQ is an error.
These changes allow tftpd to interact with pxelinux.bin from the syslinux
package.
Whilst the path reducing code doesn't properly handle situations where the
path component before the "/../" is a symlink to (say) ".", I would suggest
that it does the right thing in terms of the clients perception of what
their path string actually represents. This seems better than using
realpath() and breaking environments where symlinks point outside of the
directory hierarchy that tftpd is configured to allow.
(and that is for now being worked around by a binutils patch).
The rtld code tested &_DYNAMIC against 0 to see whether rtld itself
was built as PIC or not. While the sparc64 MD code did not rely
on the preset value of the GOT slot for _DYNAMIC any more due
to previous binutils changes, it still used to not be 0, so
that this check did work. The new binutils do however initialize
this slot with 0. As a consequence, rtld would not properly initialize
itself and crash.
Fix that by introducing a new macro, RTLD_IS_DYNAMIC, to take the role
of this test. For sparc64, it is implemented using the rtld_dynamic()
code that was already there. If an architecture does not provide its
own implementation, we default to the old check.
While being there, mark _DYNAMIC as a weak symbol in the sparc64
rtld_start.S. This is needed in the LDSCRIPT case, which is however
not currently supported for want of an actual ldscript.
Sanity checked with md5 on alpha, amd64, i386 and ia64.
stable ld.so. We need to revisit the rtld-elf/sparc64/rtld_start.S
rev. 1.5 and rtld-elf/sparc64/rtld_machdep.h rev. 1.5, which was
suppose to allow stock Binutils 2.13 (and later) to be used.
eg:
[foo]
...
matches any executable 'foo'
[/usr/bin/foo/]
...
matches any executable under the directory /usr/bin/foo/
Exact matches continue to function as before.
PR: bin/66769
Submitted-by: Dan Nelson
with the correct alignment. This is important because this calls to
library static constructors are made from here. The bug in the old crt*.s
files hid this because in this case, two wrongs do indeed make a right.
Also, call _rtld_bind() with the correct alignment, because it calls back
into the pthread library locking functions. If things happen just
the wrong way, we get a SIG10 due to the broken stack alignment.
This adds the former ports registered groups: proxy and authpf as well as
the proxy user. Make sure to run mergemaster -p in oder to complete make
installworld without errors.
This also provides the passive OS fingerprints from OpenBSD (pf.os) and an
example pf.conf.
For those who want to go without pf; it provides a NO_PF knob to make.conf.
__FreeBSD_version will be bumped soon to reflect this and to be able to
change ports accordingly.
Approved by: bms(mentor)
that this provokes. "Wherever possible" means "In the kernel OR NOT
C++" (implying C).
There are places where (void *) pointers are not valid, such as for
function pointers, but in the special case of (void *)0, agreement
settles on it being OK.
Most of the fixes were NULL where an integer zero was needed; many
of the fixes were NULL where ascii <nul> ('\0') was needed, and a
few were just "other".
Tested on: i386 sparc64
libexec/ftp-proxy - ftp proxy for pf
sbin/pfctl - equivalent to sbin/ipf
sbin/pflogd - deamon logging packets via if_pflog in pcap format
usr.sbin/authpf - authentification shell to modify pf rulesets
Bring along some altq headers used to satisfy pfctl/authpf compile. This
helps to keep the diff down and will make it easy to have a altq-patchset
use the full powers of pf.
Also make sure that the pf headers are installed.
This does not link anything to the build. There will be a NO_PF switch for
make.conf once pf userland is linked.
Approved by: bms(mentor)
While I'm here, sync the usage() synopsis with the manual page synopsis:
make the [-i | -s] explicit and sort the options alphabetically.
Reminded by: ru
MFC after: 3 days
ever since rev. 1.1 of bootpd.c.
While I'm here, rearrange the synopsis a bit: sort the options and
clarify that -i and -s are mutually exclusive.
Reported by: Atanas Buchvarov <nasko@nove.bg>
MFC after: 3 days
says they may not modify existing files through FTP.
Renaming a file is effectively a way to modify it.
For instance, if a malicious party is unable to delete or overwrite
a sensitive file, they can nevertheless rename it to a hidden name
and then upload a troyan horse under the guise of the old file name.
contents in reply to a RETR command. Such clients consider RETR
as a way to tell a file from a directory. Mozilla is an example.
PR: bin/62232
Submitted by: Bob Finch <bob+freebsd <at> nas <dot> com>
MFC after: 1 week
