So it turns out that rack and bbr still will not load without TCP_RATELIMIT. This needs
to be fixed and lets also at the same time bring tcp_ratelimit up to date where we allow
the transports to set a divisor (though still having a default path with the default
divisor of 1000) for setting the burst size.
Reviewed by: tuexen, gallatin
Sponsored by: Netflix Inc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37954
platforms that for whatever reason cannot include the RATELIMIT option
can still work with rack. It adds two dummy functions that rack will
call and find out that the highest hw supported b/w is 0 (which
kinda makes sense and rack is already prepared to handle).
Reviewed by: Michael Tuexen, Warner Losh
Sponsored by: Netflix Inc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30163
This fixes several breakages (panics) since the tcp_lro code was
committed that have been reported. Quite a few new features are
now in rack (prefecting of DGP -- Dynamic Goodput Pacing among the
largest). There is also support for ack-war prevention. Documents
comming soon on rack..
Sponsored by: Netflix
Reviewed by: rscheff, mtuexen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30036
tree that fix the ratelimit code. There were several bugs
in tcp_ratelimit itself and we needed further work to support
the multiple tag format coming for the joint TLS and Ratelimit dances.
Sponsored by: Netflix Inc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28357
like the mlx-c5 and c6 that require a "setup" routine before
the tcp_ratelimit code can declare and use a rate. I add the
setup routine to if_var as well as fix tcp_ratelimit to call it.
I also revisit the rates so that in the case of a mlx card
of type c5/6 we will use about 100 rates concentrated in the range
where the most gain can be had (1-200Mbps). Note that I have
tested these on a c5 and they work and perform well. In fact
in an unloaded system they pace right to the correct rate (great
job mlx!). There will be a further commit here from Hans that
will add the respective changes to the mlx driver to support this
work (which I was testing with).
Sponsored by: Netflix Inc.
Differential Revision: ttps://reviews.freebsd.org/D23647
that instead of functions only being inside the _KERNEL and
the absence of RATELIMIT causing us to have NULL/error returning
interfaces we ended up with non-kernel getting the error path.
opps..
an updated rack depend on having access to the new
ratelimit api in this commit.
Sponsored by: Netflix Inc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20953
