Use insertion sort instead of bubble sort in TCP LRO.

Replacing the bubble sort with insertion sort gives an 80% reduction
in runtime on average, with randomized keys, for small partitions.

If the keys are pre-sorted, insertion sort runs in linear time, and
even if the keys are reversed, insertion sort is faster than bubble
sort, although not by much.

Update comment describing "tcp_lro_sort()" while at it.

Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6619
Sponsored by:	Mellanox Technologies
Tested by:	Netflix
Suggested by:	Pieter de Goeje <pieter@degoeje.nl>
Reviewed by:	ed, gallatin, gnn, transport
This commit is contained in:
Hans Petter Selasky 2016-06-03 08:35:07 +00:00
parent 8e7b04858c
commit ec6689059d
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-20 02:59:44 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=301249

View file

@ -387,7 +387,8 @@ tcp_lro_msb_64(uint64_t x)
* number of elements to sort and 64 is the number of sequence bits
* available. The algorithm is bit-slicing the 64-bit sequence number,
* sorting one bit at a time from the most significant bit until the
* least significant one, skipping the constant bits.
* least significant one, skipping the constant bits. This is
* typically called a radix sort.
*/
static void
tcp_lro_sort(struct lro_mbuf_sort *parray, uint32_t size)
@ -399,17 +400,13 @@ tcp_lro_sort(struct lro_mbuf_sort *parray, uint32_t size)
uint32_t y;
repeat:
/* for small arrays bubble sort is faster */
/* for small arrays insertion sort is faster */
if (size <= 12) {
for (x = 0; x != size; x++) {
for (y = x + 1; y != size; y++) {
if (parray[x].seq > parray[y].seq) {
/* swap entries */
temp = parray[x];
parray[x] = parray[y];
parray[y] = temp;
}
}
for (x = 1; x < size; x++) {
temp = parray[x];
for (y = x; y > 0 && temp.seq < parray[y - 1].seq; y--)
parray[y] = parray[y - 1];
parray[y] = temp;
}
return;
}