mirror of
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src
synced 2024-09-06 17:18:32 +00:00
Fix failures in libm's lround_test after clang 12 import
It turned out that the (type)DTYPE_MAX conversions at the top of s_lround.c are now emitted as cvtsi2sd instructions, at least on SSE capable CPUs. This caused the FE_INEXACT flag to always be set, at least for the double and float variants. Under clang 11, the whole INRANGE() comparisons were still optimized away, but this has "improved" in clang 12, due to stricter adherence to the -ffp-exception-behavior=maytrap compiler flag. To avoid run-time integer to float conversions, use static constants instead, so they are computed at compile time, and the INRANGE() statements are optimized away again, if applicable. While here, use an integer instead of a floating type to store the test results in lround_test.c, as this is more appropriate, and we can also drop the volatile hack. Reported by: arichardson MFC after: 3 days
This commit is contained in:
parent
800e82d124
commit
df3b437c1e
|
@ -49,9 +49,11 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
|
|||
* that everything is in range. At compile time, INRANGE(x) should reduce to
|
||||
* two floating-point comparisons in the former case, or TRUE otherwise.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static const type dtype_min = (type)DTYPE_MIN - 0.5;
|
||||
static const type dtype_max = (type)DTYPE_MAX + 0.5;
|
||||
#define INRANGE(x) (dtype_max - (type)DTYPE_MAX != 0.5 || \
|
||||
static const type type_min = (type)DTYPE_MIN;
|
||||
static const type type_max = (type)DTYPE_MAX;
|
||||
static const type dtype_min = type_min - 0.5;
|
||||
static const type dtype_max = type_max + 0.5;
|
||||
#define INRANGE(x) (dtype_max - type_max != 0.5 || \
|
||||
((x) > dtype_min && (x) < dtype_max))
|
||||
|
||||
dtype
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -40,14 +40,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
|
|||
|
||||
#define IGNORE 0x12345
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* XXX The volatile here is to avoid gcc's bogus constant folding and work
|
||||
* around the lack of support for the FENV_ACCESS pragma.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define test(func, x, result, excepts) do { \
|
||||
volatile double _d = x; \
|
||||
ATF_REQUIRE_EQ(0, feclearexcept(FE_ALL_EXCEPT)); \
|
||||
volatile double _r = (func)(_d); \
|
||||
long long _r = (func)(x); \
|
||||
CHECK_FP_EXCEPTIONS_MSG(excepts, FE_ALL_EXCEPT, "for %s(%s)", \
|
||||
#func, #x); \
|
||||
if ((excepts & FE_INVALID) != 0) { \
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue