From a2d31bf665a2cdcedcc105b82adff92d168df2f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "David E. O'Brien" Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 18:28:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Blah, fsck_ifs uses `8' for all errors, including that it cannot check in the background. fsck_ffs uses `5' for when SOFTUPDATES are not set, and thus background cleaning cannot take place. That seems to [semi-]apply here. So I don't know what non-zero value to use. If anyone has an opinion, let me know.