From 82e83c60b31884210cceb76620d2e50d7367d3ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Watson Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 02:26:10 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] o Parallelize the comment on the relationship between privileged un-jailed processes and the actual securelevel check: make the comment use '> 0' instead of inverted '<= 0'. --- sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c b/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c index c108c9004ed0..1b2fffa870d5 100644 --- a/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c +++ b/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c @@ -483,8 +483,8 @@ ufs_setattr(ap) /* * Unprivileged processes and privileged processes in * jail() are not permitted to set system flags. - * Privileged processes not in jail() may only set system - * flags if the securelevel <= 0. + * Privileged non-jail processes may not set system flags + * securelevel > 0. */ if (!suser_xxx(cred, NULL, 0)) { if ((ip->i_flags