From 08f9924ec6b3f2b7dea8477fc3f3cd77f799f099 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:28:15 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Properly use SHA1_Final() instead of SHA_Final().

In this case it doesn't really matter, as long as we turn a TTY name
into a set of shuffled bytes. Still, for correctness we should use the
proper function.

MFC after:	2 weeks
---
 lib/libulog/ulog_login.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/libulog/ulog_login.c b/lib/libulog/ulog_login.c
index 3058b9f53399..a053328ac22d 100644
--- a/lib/libulog/ulog_login.c
+++ b/lib/libulog/ulog_login.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ ulog_fill(struct utmpx *utx, const char *line)
 	SHA1_Init(&c);
 	SHA1_Update(&c, "libulog", 7);
 	SHA1_Update(&c, utx->ut_line, sizeof utx->ut_line);
-	SHA_Final(id, &c);
+	SHA1_Final(id, &c);
 
 	memcpy(utx->ut_id, id, MIN(sizeof utx->ut_id, sizeof id));
 }