mirror of
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager
synced 2024-10-15 12:34:55 +00:00
std-aux: move NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DISABLE() macro from libnm-glib-aux to libnm-std-aux
Will be used by nm_assert().
This commit is contained in:
parent
025d6898fe
commit
c0338526f3
|
@ -195,48 +195,6 @@ _nm_auto_freev(gpointer ptr)
|
|||
|
||||
/*****************************************************************************/
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(__GNUC__)
|
||||
#define _NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DO(warning) G_STRINGIFY(GCC diagnostic ignored warning)
|
||||
#elif defined(__clang__)
|
||||
#define _NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DO(warning) G_STRINGIFY(clang diagnostic ignored warning)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* you can only suppress a specific warning that the compiler
|
||||
* understands. Otherwise you will get another compiler warning
|
||||
* about invalid pragma option.
|
||||
* It's not that bad however, because gcc and clang often have the
|
||||
* same name for the same warning. */
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ > 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 6))
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_DIAGNOSTICS_PUSH _Pragma("GCC diagnostic push")
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DISABLE(warning) \
|
||||
NM_PRAGMA_DIAGNOSTICS_PUSH _Pragma(_NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DO(warning))
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_REENABLE _Pragma("GCC diagnostic pop")
|
||||
#elif defined(__clang__)
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_DIAGNOSTICS_PUSH _Pragma("clang diagnostic push")
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DISABLE(warning) \
|
||||
NM_PRAGMA_DIAGNOSTICS_PUSH _Pragma(_NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DO("-Wunknown-warning-option")) \
|
||||
_Pragma(_NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DO(warning))
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_REENABLE _Pragma("clang diagnostic pop")
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_DIAGNOSTICS_PUSH
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DISABLE(warning)
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_REENABLE
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*****************************************************************************/
|
||||
|
||||
/* Seems gcc-12 has a tendency for false-positive -Wdangling-pointer warnings with
|
||||
* g_error()'s `for(;;);`. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056613 .
|
||||
* Work around, but only for the affected gcc 12.0.1. */
|
||||
#if defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__ == 12 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 0 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ <= 1
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DISABLE_DANGLING_POINTER NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DISABLE("-Wdangling-pointer")
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DISABLE_DANGLING_POINTER NM_PRAGMA_DIAGNOSTICS_PUSH
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*****************************************************************************/
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* NM_G_ERROR_MSG:
|
||||
* @error: (nullable): the #GError instance
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -214,6 +214,48 @@ typedef uint64_t _nm_bitwise nm_be64_t;
|
|||
|
||||
/*****************************************************************************/
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(__GNUC__)
|
||||
#define _NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DO(warning) NM_STRINGIFY(GCC diagnostic ignored warning)
|
||||
#elif defined(__clang__)
|
||||
#define _NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DO(warning) NM_STRINGIFY(clang diagnostic ignored warning)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* you can only suppress a specific warning that the compiler
|
||||
* understands. Otherwise you will get another compiler warning
|
||||
* about invalid pragma option.
|
||||
* It's not that bad however, because gcc and clang often have the
|
||||
* same name for the same warning. */
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ > 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 6))
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_DIAGNOSTICS_PUSH _Pragma("GCC diagnostic push")
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DISABLE(warning) \
|
||||
NM_PRAGMA_DIAGNOSTICS_PUSH _Pragma(_NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DO(warning))
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_REENABLE _Pragma("GCC diagnostic pop")
|
||||
#elif defined(__clang__)
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_DIAGNOSTICS_PUSH _Pragma("clang diagnostic push")
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DISABLE(warning) \
|
||||
NM_PRAGMA_DIAGNOSTICS_PUSH _Pragma(_NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DO("-Wunknown-warning-option")) \
|
||||
_Pragma(_NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DO(warning))
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_REENABLE _Pragma("clang diagnostic pop")
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_DIAGNOSTICS_PUSH
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DISABLE(warning)
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_REENABLE
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*****************************************************************************/
|
||||
|
||||
/* Seems gcc-12 has a tendency for false-positive -Wdangling-pointer warnings with
|
||||
* g_error()'s `for(;;);`. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056613 .
|
||||
* Work around, but only for the affected gcc 12.0.1. */
|
||||
#if defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__ == 12 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 0 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ <= 1
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DISABLE_DANGLING_POINTER NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DISABLE("-Wdangling-pointer")
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define NM_PRAGMA_WARNING_DISABLE_DANGLING_POINTER NM_PRAGMA_DIAGNOSTICS_PUSH
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*****************************************************************************/
|
||||
|
||||
/* glib/C provides the following kind of assertions:
|
||||
* - assert() -- disable with NDEBUG
|
||||
* - g_return_if_fail() -- disable with G_DISABLE_CHECKS
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue