rust/tests/ui/issues/issue-87199.rs
2023-01-11 09:32:08 +00:00

21 lines
820 B
Rust

// Regression test for issue #87199, where attempting to relax a bound
// other than the only supported `?Sized` would still cause the compiler
// to assume that the `Sized` bound was relaxed.
// check-fail
// Check that these function definitions only emit warnings, not errors
fn arg<T: ?Send>(_: T) {}
//~^ warning: default bound relaxed for a type parameter, but this does nothing
fn ref_arg<T: ?Send>(_: &T) {}
//~^ warning: default bound relaxed for a type parameter, but this does nothing
fn ret() -> impl Iterator<Item = ()> + ?Send { std::iter::empty() }
//~^ warning: default bound relaxed for a type parameter, but this does nothing
// Check that there's no `?Sized` relaxation!
fn main() {
ref_arg::<i32>(&5);
ref_arg::<[i32]>(&[5]);
//~^ the size for values of type `[i32]` cannot be known
}