Stabilize `core::ffi:c_*` and rexport in `std::ffi`
This only stabilizes the base types, not the non-zero variants, since
those have their own separate tracking issue and have not gone through
FCP to stabilize.
This only stabilizes the base types, not the non-zero variants, since
those have their own separate tracking issue and have not gone through
FCP to stabilize.
Inline Windows `OsStrExt::encode_wide`
User crates currently produce much more code than necessary because the optimizer fails to make assumptions about this method.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #99045 (improve print styles)
- #99086 (Fix display of search result crate filter dropdown)
- #99100 (Fix binary name in help message for test binaries)
- #99103 (Avoid some `&str` to `String` conversions)
- #99109 (fill new tracking issue for `feature(strict_provenance_atomic_ptr)`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fill new tracking issue for `feature(strict_provenance_atomic_ptr)`
New tracking issue: #99108.
The generic strict provenance issue has a lot of discussions on its own, so I think it's meaningful to have a separate issue for atomic ptr methods.
Fix binary name in help message for test binaries
Currently the help output for a test binary uses the first argument instead of the binary name in the help output:
```
$ cargo test -- --help
...
Usage: --help [OPTIONS] [FILTERS...]
...
```
This fixes it to use the name of the binary (or `...` if there is no binary name passed on argv):
```
$ cargo test -- --help
...
Usage: /tmp/x/target/debug/deps/x-80c11a15ad4e1bf3 [OPTIONS] [FILTERS...]
...
```
Enforce that layout size fits in isize in Layout
As it turns out, enforcing this _in APIs that already enforce `usize` overflow_ is fairly trivial. `Layout::from_size_align_unchecked` continues to "allow" sizes which (when rounded up) would overflow `isize`, but these are now declared as library UB for `Layout`, meaning that consumers of `Layout` no longer have to check this before making an allocation.
(Note that this is "immediate library UB;" IOW it is valid for a future release to make this immediate "language UB," and there is an extant patch to do so, to allow Miri to catch this misuse.)
See also #95252, [Zulip discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Layout.20Isn't.20Enforcing.20The.20isize.3A.3AMAX.20Rule).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95334
Some relevant quotes:
`@eddyb,` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95252#issuecomment-1078513769
> [B]ecause of the non-trivial presence of both of these among code published on e.g. crates.io:
>
> 1. **`Layout` "producers" / `GlobalAlloc` "users"**: smart pointers (including `alloc::rc` copies with small tweaks), collections, etc.
> 2. **`Layout` "consumers" / `GlobalAlloc` "providers"**: perhaps fewer of these, but anything built on top of OS APIs like `mmap` will expose `> isize::MAX` allocations (on 32-bit hosts) if they lack extra checks
>
> IMO the only responsible option is to enforce the `isize::MAX` limit in `Layout`, which:
>
> * makes `Layout` _sound_ in terms of only ever allowing allocations where `(alloc_base_ptr: *mut u8).offset(size)` is never UB
> * frees both "producers" and "consumers" of `Layout` from manually reimplementing the checks
> * manual checks can be risky, e.g. if the final size passed to the allocator isn't the one being checked
> * this applies retroactively, fixing the overall soundness of existing code with zero transition period or _any_ changes required from users (as long as going through `Layout` is mandatory, making a "choke point")
>
>
> Feel free to quote this comment onto any relevant issue, I might not be able to keep track of developments.
`@Gankra,` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95252#issuecomment-1078556371
> As someone who spent way too much time optimizing libcollections checks for this stuff and tried to splatter docs about it everywhere on the belief that it was a reasonable thing for people to manually take care of: I concede the point, it is not reasonable. I am wholy spiritually defeated by the fact that _liballoc_ of all places is getting this stuff wrong. This isn't throwing shade at the folks who implemented these Rc features, but rather a statement of how impractical it is to expect anyone out in the wider ecosystem to enforce them if _some of the most audited rust code in the library that defines the very notion of allocating memory_ can't even reliably do it.
>
> We need the nuclear option of Layout enforcing this rule. Code that breaks this rule is _deeply_ broken and any "regressions" from changing Layout's contract is a _correctness_ fix. Anyone who disagrees and is sufficiently motivated can go around our backs but the standard library should 100% refuse to enable them.
cc also `@RalfJung` `@rust-lang/wg-allocators.` Even though this technically supersedes #95252, those potential failure points should almost certainly still get nicer panics than just "unwrap failed" (which they would get by this PR).
It might additionally be worth recommending to users of the `Layout` API that they should ideally use `.and_then`/`?` to complete the entire layout calculation, and then `panic!` from a single location at the end of `Layout` manipulation, to reduce the overhead of the checks and optimizations preserving the exact location of each `panic` which are conceptually just one failure: allocation too big.
Probably deserves a T-lang and/or T-libs-api FCP (this technically solidifies the [objects must be no larger than `isize::MAX`](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/layout/scalars.html#isize-and-usize) rule further, and the UCG document says this hasn't been RFCd) and a crater run. Ideally, no code exists that will start failing with this addition; if it does, it was _likely_ (but not certainly) causing UB.
Changes the raw_vec allocation path, thus deserves a perf run as well.
I suggest hiding whitespace-only changes in the diff view.
Partially stabilize const_slice_from_raw_parts
This doesn't stabilize methods working on mutable pointers.
This pull request continues from #94946.
Pinging `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval` this because I use `rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable`. I believe this is justifiable as it's already possible to use `slice::from_raw_parts` in stable by abusing `transmute`. The stable alternative to this would be to provide a stable const implementation of `std::ptr::from_raw_parts` (as it can already be implemented in stable).
```rust
use std::mem;
#[repr(C)]
struct Slice<T> {
data: *const T,
len: usize,
}
fn main() {
let data: *const i32 = [1, 2, 3, 4].as_ptr();
let len = 4;
println!("{:?}", unsafe {
mem::transmute::<Slice<i32>, &[i32]>(Slice { data, len })
});
}
```
`@rustbot` modify labels: +T-libs-api
Implement ExitCodeExt for Windows
Fixes#97914
### Motivation:
On Windows it is common for applications to return `HRESULT` (`i32`) or `DWORD` (`u32`) values. These stem from COM based components ([HRESULTS](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/objbase/nf-objbase-coinitialize)), Win32 errors ([GetLastError](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/errhandlingapi/nf-errhandlingapi-getlasterror)), GUI applications ([WM_QUIT](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/winmsg/wm-quit)) and more. The newly stabilized `ExitCode` provides an excellent fit for propagating these values, because `std::process::exit` does not run deconstructors which can result in errors. However, `ExitCode` currently only implements `From<u8> for ExitCode`, which disallows the full range of `i32`/`u32` values. This pull requests attempts to address that shortcoming by providing windows specific extensions that accept a `u32` value (which covers all possible `HRESULTS` and Win32 errors) analog to [ExitStatusExt::from_raw](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/os/windows/process/trait.ExitStatusExt.html#tymethod.from_raw).
This was also intended by the original Stabilization https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93840#issue-1129209143= as pointed out by ``@eggyal`` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97914#issuecomment-1151076755:
> Issues around platform specific representations: We resolved this issue by changing the return type of report from i32 to the opaque type ExitCode. __That way we can change the underlying representation without affecting the API, letting us offer full support for platform specific exit code APIs in the future.__
[Emphasis added]
### API
```rust
/// Windows-specific extensions to [`process::ExitCode`].
///
/// This trait is sealed: it cannot be implemented outside the standard library.
/// This is so that future additional methods are not breaking changes.
#[stable(feature = "windows_process_exit_code_from", since = "1.63.0")]
pub trait ExitCodeExt: Sealed {
/// Creates a new `ExitCode` from the raw underlying `u32` return value of
/// a process.
#[stable(feature = "windows_process_exit_code_from", since = "1.63.0")]
fn from_raw(raw: u32) -> Self;
}
#[stable(feature = "windows_process_exit_code_from", since = "1.63.0")]
impl ExitCodeExt for process::ExitCode {
fn from_raw(raw: u32) -> Self {
process::ExitCode::from_inner(From::from(raw))
}
}
```
### Misc
I apologize in advance if I misplaced any attributes regarding stabilzation, as far as I learned traits are insta-stable so I chose to make them stable. If this is an error, please let me know and I'll correct it. I also added some additional machinery to make it work, analog to [ExitStatus](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/process/struct.ExitStatus.html#).
EDIT: Proposal: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/48
rustdoc: Add more semantic information to impl IDs
Take over of #92745.
I fixed the last remaining issue for the links in the sidebar (mentioned by `@jsha)` and fixed the few links broken in the std/core docs.
cc `@camelid`
r? `@notriddle`
Allow arithmetic and certain bitwise ops on AtomicPtr
This is mainly to support migrating from `AtomicUsize`, for the strict provenance experiment.
This is a pretty dubious set of APIs, but it should be sufficient to allow code that's using `AtomicUsize` to manipulate a tagged pointer atomically. It's under a new feature gate, `#![feature(strict_provenance_atomic_ptr)]`, but I'm not sure if it needs its own tracking issue. I'm happy to make one, but it's not clear that it's needed.
I'm unsure if it needs changes in the various non-LLVM backends. Because we just cast things to integers anyway (and were already doing so), I doubt it.
API change proposal: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/60Fixes#95492
ptr::copy and ptr::swap are doing untyped copies
The consensus in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63159 seemed to be that these operations should be "untyped", i.e., they should treat the data as raw bytes, should work when these bytes violate the validity invariant of `T`, and should exactly preserve the initialization state of the bytes that are being copied. This is already somewhat implied by the description of "copying/swapping size*N bytes" (rather than "N instances of `T`").
The implementations mostly already work that way (well, for LLVM's intrinsics the documentation is not precise enough to say what exactly happens to poison, but if this ever gets clarified to something that would *not* perfectly preserve poison, then I strongly assume there will be some way to make a copy that *does* perfectly preserve poison). However, I had to adjust `swap_nonoverlapping`; after ``@scottmcm's`` [recent changes](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94212), that one (sometimes) made a typed copy. (Note that `mem::swap`, which works on mutable references, is unchanged. It is documented as "swapping the values at two mutable locations", which to me strongly indicates that it is indeed typed. It is also safe and can rely on `&mut T` pointing to a valid `T` as part of its safety invariant.)
On top of adding a test (that will be run by Miri), this PR then also adjusts the documentation to indeed stably promise the untyped semantics. I assume this means the PR has to go through t-libs (and maybe t-lang?) FCP.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63159
Implement `FusedIterator` for `std::net::[Into]Incoming`
They never return `None`, so they trivially fulfill the contract.
What should I put for the stability attribute of `Incoming`?
`impl<T: AsRawFd> AsRawFd for {Arc,Box}<T>`
This allows implementing traits that require a raw FD on Arc and Box.
Previously, you'd have to add the function to the trait itself:
```rust
trait MyTrait {
fn as_raw_fd(&self) -> RawFd;
}
impl<T: MyTrait> MyTrait for Arc<T> {
fn as_raw_fd(&self) -> RawFd {
(**self).as_raw_fd()
}
}
```
In particular, this leads to lots of "multiple applicable items in scope" errors because you have to disambiguate `MyTrait::as_raw_fd` from `AsRawFd::as_raw_fd` at each call site. In generic contexts, when passing the type to a function that takes `impl AsRawFd` it's also sometimes required to use `T: MyTrait + AsRawFd`, which wouldn't be necessary if I could write `MyTrait: AsRawFd`.
After this PR, the code can be simpler:
```rust
trait MyTrait: AsRawFd {}
impl<T: MyTrait> MyTrait for Arc<T> {}
```
Optimize `Vec::insert` for the case where `index == len`.
By skipping the call to `copy` with a zero length. This makes it closer
to `push`.
I did this recently for `SmallVec`
(https://github.com/servo/rust-smallvec/pull/282) and it was a big perf win in
one case. Although I don't have a specific use case in mind, it seems
worth doing it for `Vec` as well.
Things to note:
- In the `index < len` case, the number of conditions checked is
unchanged.
- In the `index == len` case, the number of conditions checked increases
by one, but the more expensive zero-length copy is avoided.
- In the `index > len` case the code now reserves space for the extra
element before panicking. This seems like an unimportant change.
r? `@cuviper`
