Use `br` instead of `switch` in more cases.
`codegen_switchint_terminator` already uses `br` instead of `switch`
when there is one normal target plus the `otherwise` target. But there's
another common case with two normal targets and an `otherwise` target
that points to an empty unreachable BB. This comes up a lot when
switching on the tags of enums that use niches.
The pattern looks like this:
```
bb1: ; preds = %bb6
%3 = load i8, ptr %_2, align 1, !range !9, !noundef !4
%4 = sub i8 %3, 2
%5 = icmp eq i8 %4, 0
%_6 = select i1 %5, i64 0, i64 1
switch i64 %_6, label %bb3 [
i64 0, label %bb4
i64 1, label %bb2
]
bb3: ; preds = %bb1
unreachable
```
This commit adds code to convert the `switch` to a `br`:
```
bb1: ; preds = %bb6
%3 = load i8, ptr %_2, align 1, !range !9, !noundef !4
%4 = sub i8 %3, 2
%5 = icmp eq i8 %4, 0
%_6 = select i1 %5, i64 0, i64 1
%6 = icmp eq i64 %_6, 0
br i1 %6, label %bb4, label %bb2
bb3: ; No predecessors!
unreachable
```
This has a surprisingly large effect on compile times, with reductions
of 5% on debug builds of some crates. The reduction is all due to LLVM
taking less time. Maybe LLVM is just much better at handling `br` than
`switch`.
The resulting code is still suboptimal.
- The `icmp`, `select`, `icmp` sequence is silly, converting an `i1` to an `i64`
and back to an `i1`. But with the current code structure it's hard to avoid,
and LLVM will easily clean it up, in opt builds at least.
- `bb3` is usually now truly dead code (though not always, so it can't
be removed universally).
2022-10-20 07:59:07 +00:00
|
|
|
//@ compile-flags: -C no-prepopulate-passes -Copt-level=0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#![crate_type = "lib"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[repr(u16)]
|
|
|
|
|
pub enum E2 {
|
|
|
|
|
A = 13,
|
|
|
|
|
B = 42,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// For unoptimized code we produce a `br` instead of a `switch`. Compare with
|
2023-01-05 08:45:44 +00:00
|
|
|
// `tests/codegen/match-optimized.rs`
|
Use `br` instead of `switch` in more cases.
`codegen_switchint_terminator` already uses `br` instead of `switch`
when there is one normal target plus the `otherwise` target. But there's
another common case with two normal targets and an `otherwise` target
that points to an empty unreachable BB. This comes up a lot when
switching on the tags of enums that use niches.
The pattern looks like this:
```
bb1: ; preds = %bb6
%3 = load i8, ptr %_2, align 1, !range !9, !noundef !4
%4 = sub i8 %3, 2
%5 = icmp eq i8 %4, 0
%_6 = select i1 %5, i64 0, i64 1
switch i64 %_6, label %bb3 [
i64 0, label %bb4
i64 1, label %bb2
]
bb3: ; preds = %bb1
unreachable
```
This commit adds code to convert the `switch` to a `br`:
```
bb1: ; preds = %bb6
%3 = load i8, ptr %_2, align 1, !range !9, !noundef !4
%4 = sub i8 %3, 2
%5 = icmp eq i8 %4, 0
%_6 = select i1 %5, i64 0, i64 1
%6 = icmp eq i64 %_6, 0
br i1 %6, label %bb4, label %bb2
bb3: ; No predecessors!
unreachable
```
This has a surprisingly large effect on compile times, with reductions
of 5% on debug builds of some crates. The reduction is all due to LLVM
taking less time. Maybe LLVM is just much better at handling `br` than
`switch`.
The resulting code is still suboptimal.
- The `icmp`, `select`, `icmp` sequence is silly, converting an `i1` to an `i64`
and back to an `i1`. But with the current code structure it's hard to avoid,
and LLVM will easily clean it up, in opt builds at least.
- `bb3` is usually now truly dead code (though not always, so it can't
be removed universally).
2022-10-20 07:59:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: @exhaustive_match_2
|
|
|
|
|
#[no_mangle]
|
|
|
|
|
pub fn exhaustive_match_2(e: E2) -> u8 {
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: %[[CMP:.+]] = icmp eq i16 %{{.+}}, 13
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %[[CMP:.+]],
|
|
|
|
|
match e {
|
|
|
|
|
E2::A => 0,
|
|
|
|
|
E2::B => 1,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|