go/test/fixedbugs/issue46725.go
Matthew Dempsky 8743198152 test: make issue54343.go robust against the tiny allocator
I structured the test for issue54343.go after issue46725.go, where I
was careful to use `[4]int`, which is a type large enough to avoid the
tiny object allocator (which interferes with finalizer semantics). But
in that test, I didn't note the importance of that type, so I
mistakenly used just `int` in issue54343.go.

This CL switches issue54343.go to use `[4]int` too, and then adds
comments to both pointing out the significance of this type.

Updates #54343.

Change-Id: I699b3e64b844ff6d8438bbcb4d1935615a6d8cc4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/423115
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
2022-08-11 20:13:07 +00:00

48 lines
818 B
Go

// run
// Copyright 2021 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
package main
import "runtime"
type T [4]int // N.B., [4]int avoids runtime's tiny object allocator
//go:noinline
func g(x []*T) ([]*T, []*T) { return x, x }
func main() {
const Jenny = 8675309
s := [10]*T{{Jenny}}
done := make(chan struct{})
runtime.SetFinalizer(s[0], func(p *T) { close(done) })
var h, _ interface{} = g(s[:])
if wait(done) {
panic("GC'd early")
}
if h.([]*T)[0][0] != Jenny {
panic("lost Jenny's number")
}
if !wait(done) {
panic("never GC'd")
}
}
func wait(done <-chan struct{}) bool {
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
runtime.GC()
select {
case <-done:
return true
default:
}
}
return false
}