Andrew G. Morgan b9b2bed893 syscall: some containers may fail syscall.TestSetuidEtc ... The test previously had the hardcoded assumption that /proc/self/status files had "Groups:" lines containing numerical IDs in ascending order. Because of the possibility of non-monotonic ordering of GIDs in user namespaces, this assumption was not universally true for all /proc/self/gid_map setups. To ensure this test can pass in those setups, sanity check failed "Groups:" line matches with a string sorted version of the expected values. (For the test cases here, numerical and string sorted order are guaranteed to match.) Fixes #46145 Change-Id: Ia060e80b123604bc394a15c02582fc406f944d36 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/319591 Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Trust: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>		2021-05-17 17:46:08 +00:00
..
android
arm
cgo	syscall: some containers may fail syscall.TestSetuidEtc	2021-05-17 17:46:08 +00:00
chrome/gophertool
ios
linkcheck
reboot
swig
trace
wasm	runtime: rename walltime1 to walltime	2021-04-29 14:15:04 +00:00
editors
go.mod