go/test/fixedbugs/issue24651a.go
Dmitri Shuralyov b2fd76ab8d test: migrate remaining files to go:build syntax
Most of the test cases in the test directory use the new go:build syntax
already. Convert the rest. In general, try to place the build constraint
line below the test directive comment in more places.

For #41184.
For #60268.

Change-Id: I11c41a0642a8a26dc2eda1406da908645bbc005b
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-386-longtest,gotip-linux-amd64-longtest,gotip-windows-amd64-longtest
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/536236
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
2023-10-19 23:33:25 +00:00

27 lines
881 B
Go

//errorcheck -0 -race -m -m
//go:build (linux && amd64) || (linux && ppc64le) || (darwin && amd64) || (freebsd && amd64) || (netbsd && amd64) || (windows && amd64)
// Copyright 2018 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
package main
//go:norace
func Foo(x int) int { // ERROR "cannot inline Foo: marked go:norace with -race compilation$"
return x * (x + 1) * (x + 2)
}
func Bar(x int) int { // ERROR "can inline Bar with cost .* as: func\(int\) int { return x \* \(x \+ 1\) \* \(x \+ 2\) }$"
return x * (x + 1) * (x + 2)
}
var x = 5
//go:noinline Provide a clean, constant reason for not inlining main
func main() { // ERROR "cannot inline main: marked go:noinline$"
println("Foo(", x, ")=", Foo(x))
println("Bar(", x, ")=", Bar(x)) // ERROR "inlining call to Bar"
}