go/test/uintptrescapes2.go
Keith Randall 9a8372f8bd cmd/compile,runtime: remove ambiguously live logic
The previous CL introduced stack objects. This CL removes the old
ambiguously live liveness analysis. After this CL we're relying
on stack objects exclusively.

Update a bunch of liveness tests to reflect the new world.

Fixes #22350

Change-Id: I739b26e015882231011ce6bc1a7f426049e59f31
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/134156
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
2018-10-03 19:54:16 +00:00

44 lines
1.6 KiB
Go

// errorcheck -0 -m -live
// Copyright 2016 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
// Test escape analysis and liveness inferred for uintptrescapes functions.
package p
import (
"unsafe"
)
//go:uintptrescapes
//go:noinline
func F1(a uintptr) {} // ERROR "escaping uintptr"
//go:uintptrescapes
//go:noinline
func F2(a ...uintptr) {} // ERROR "escaping ...uintptr" "a does not escape"
//go:uintptrescapes
//go:noinline
func F3(uintptr) {} // ERROR "escaping uintptr"
//go:uintptrescapes
//go:noinline
func F4(...uintptr) {} // ERROR "escaping ...uintptr"
func G() {
var t int // ERROR "moved to heap"
F1(uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(&t))) // ERROR "live at call to F1: .?autotmp" "&t escapes to heap" "stack object .autotmp_[0-9]+ unsafe.Pointer$"
var t2 int // ERROR "moved to heap"
F3(uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(&t2))) // ERROR "live at call to F3: .?autotmp" "&t2 escapes to heap" "stack object .autotmp_[0-9]+ unsafe.Pointer$"
}
func H() {
var v int // ERROR "moved to heap"
F2(0, 1, uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(&v)), 2) // ERROR "live at call to newobject: .?autotmp" "live at call to F2: .?autotmp" "escapes to heap" "stack object .autotmp_[0-9]+ unsafe.Pointer$"
var v2 int // ERROR "moved to heap"
F4(0, 1, uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(&v2)), 2) // ERROR "live at call to newobject: .?autotmp" "live at call to F4: .?autotmp" "escapes to heap" "stack object .autotmp_[0-9]+ unsafe.Pointer$"
}