The fix for #35652 did not guarantee that it was using a non-empty
src position to replace an empty one. The new code checks again
and falls back to a more certain position. (The input in question
compiles to a single empty infinite loop, and none of the actual instructions
had any source position at all. That is a bug, but given the pathology
of this input, not one worth dealing with this late in the release cycle,
if ever.)
Literally:
00000 (5) TEXT "".f(SB), ABIInternal
00001 (5) PCDATA $0, $-2
00002 (5) PCDATA $1, $-2
00003 (5) FUNCDATA $0, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
00004 (5) FUNCDATA $1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
00005 (5) FUNCDATA $2, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
b2
00006 (?) XCHGL AX, AX
b6
00007 (+1048575) JMP 6
00008 (?) END
TODO: Add runtime.InfiniteLoop(), replace infinite loops with a call to
that, and use an eco-friendly runtime.gopark instead. (This was Cherry's
excellent idea.)
Updates #35652Fixes#35695
Change-Id: I4b9a841142ee4df0f6b10863cfa0721a7e13b437
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207964
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The old recipe for making an infinite loop not be infinite
in the debugger could create an instruction (Prog) with a
line number not tied to any file (index == 0). This caused
downstream failures in DWARF processing.
So don't do that. Also adds a test, also adds a check+panic
to ensure that the next time this happens the error is less
mystifying.
Fixes#35652
Change-Id: I04f30bc94fdc4aef20dd9130561303ff84fd945e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207613
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
