Instead of just printing the value, print the original node to make the
error more human-friendly. Also print the value if its string form is
different than the original node, to make sure it's obvious what value
was duplicated.
This means that "case '@', '@':", which used to print:
duplicate case 64 in switch
Will now print:
duplicate case '@' (value 64) in switch
Factor this logic out into its own function to reuse it in range cases
and any other place where we might want to print a node and its value in
the future.
Also needed to split the errorcheck files because expression switch case
duplicates are now detected earlier, so they stop the compiler before it
gets to generating the AST and detecting the type switch case
duplicates.
Fixes#20112.
Change-Id: I9009b50dec0d0e705e5de9c9ccb08f1dce8a5a99
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41852
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The gcCompat mode was introduced to match the new parser's node position
setup exactly with the positions used by the original parser. Some of the
gcCompat adjustments were required to satisfy syntax error test cases,
and the rest were required to make toolstash cmp pass.
This change removes the former gcCompat adjustments and instead adjusts
the respective test cases as necessary. In some cases this makes the error
lines consistent with the ones reported by gccgo.
Where it has changed, the position associated with a given syntactic construct
is the position (line/col number) of the left-most token belonging to the
construct.
Change-Id: I5b60c00c5999a895c4d6d6e9b383c6405ccf725c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36695
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Previously, the check to make sure we only considered constant cases
for duplicates was skipping past integer ranges, because those use
n.List instead of n.Left. Thanks to Emmanuel Odeke for investigating
and helping to identify the root cause.
Fixes#17517.
Change-Id: I46fcda8ed9c346ff3a9647d50b83f1555587b740
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31716
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This is simpler than the sorting technique.
It also allows us to simplify or eliminate
some of the sorting decisions.
Most important, sorting will not work when case clauses
represent ranges of integers: There is no correct
sort order that allows overlap detection by comparing
neighbors. Using a map allows of a cheap, simple
approach to ranges, namely to insert every int
in the map. The equivalent approach for sorting
means juggling temporary Nodes for every int,
which is a lot more expensive.
Change-Id: I84df3cb805992a1b04d14e0e4b2334f943e0ce05
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/26766
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This is a bit simpler than playing sorting games,
and it is clearer that it generates errors
in the correct (source) order.
It also allows us to simplify sorting.
It also prevents quadratic error messages for
(pathological) inputs with many duplicate type cases.
While we’re here, refactoring deduping into separate functions.
Negligible compilebench impact.
Fixes#15912.
Change-Id: I6cc19edd38875389a70ccbdbdf0d9b7d5ac5946f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/26762
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Some of these errors are reported in the wrong places.
That’s issue #15911 and #15912.
Change-Id: Ia09d7f89be4d15f05217a542a61b6ac08090dd87
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23588
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
