This CL renames blank functions in the test/ directory so that they
don't rely on the compiler doing anything more than typechecking them.
In particular, I ran this search to find files that used blank
functions and methods:
$ git grep -l '^func.*\b_(' | xargs grep -n '^' | grep '\.go:1:' | grep -v '// errorcheck$'
I then skipped updating a few files:
* blank.go
* fixedbugs/issue11699.go
* fixedbugs/issue29870.go
These tests specifically check that blank functions/methods work.
* interface/fail.go
Not sure the motivation for the blank method here, but it's empty
anyway.
* typeparam/tparam1.go
Type-checking test, but uses "-G" (to use types2 instead of typecheck).
Updates #47446.
Change-Id: I9ec1714f499808768bd0dcd7ae6016fb2b078e5e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/338094
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This CL extends escape analysis to analyze function calls using method
expressions the same as it would a normal method call. That is, it now
analyzes "T.M(recv, args...)" the same as "recv.M(args...)".
This is useful because it means the frontend can eventually stop
supporting both function calls and method calls. We can simply desugar
method calls into function calls, like we already do in the backend to
simplify SSA construction.
Change-Id: I9cd5ec0d534cbcd9860f0014c86e4ae416920c26
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/330331
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
The compiler renames anonymous and blank result parameters to ~rN or
~bN, but the current semantics for computing N are rather annoying and
difficult to reproduce cleanly. They also lead to difficult to read
escape analysis results in tests.
This CL changes N to always be calculated as the parameter's index
within the function's result parameter tuple. E.g., if a function has
a single result, it will now always be named "~r0".
The normative change to this CL is fairly simple, but it requires
updating a lot of test expectations.
Change-Id: I58a3c94de00cb822cb94efe52d115531193c993c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/323010
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
One of escape analysis's responsibilities is to summarize whether/how
each function parameter flows to the heap so we can correctly
incorporate those flows into callers' escape analysis data flow
graphs.
As an optimization, we separately record when parameters flow to
result parameters, so that we can more precisely analyze parameter
flows based on how the results are used at the call site. However, if
a named result parameter itself needs to be heap allocated, this
optimization isn't safe and the parameter needs to be recorded as
flowing to heap rather than flowing to result.
Escape analysis used to get this correct because it conservatively
rewalked the data-flow graph multiple times. So even though it would
incorrectly record the result parameter flow, it would separately find
a flow to the heap. However, CL 196811 (specifically, case 3)
optimized the walking logic to reduce unnecessary rewalks causing us
to stop finding the extra heap flow.
This CL fixes the issue by correcting location.leakTo to be sensitive
to sink.escapes and not record result-flows when the result parameter
escapes to the heap.
Fixes#44614.
Change-Id: I48742ed35a6cab591094e2d23a439e205bd65c50
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/297289
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
In general, a conversion to interface type may require values to be
boxed, which in turn necessitates escape analysis to determine whether
the boxed representation can be stack allocated.
However, esc.go used to unconditionally print escape analysis
decisions about OCONVIFACE, even for conversions that don't require
boxing (e.g., pointers, channels, maps, functions).
For test compatibility with esc.go, escape.go similarly printed these
useless diagnostics. This CL removes the diagnostics, and updates test
expectations accordingly.
Change-Id: I97c57a4a08e44d265bba516c78426ff4f2bf1e12
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/192697
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Prep for subsequent CLs to remove old escape analysis pass.
This CL removes -newescape=true from tests that use it, and deletes
tests that use -newescape=false. (For history, see CL 170447.)
Notably, this removes escape_because.go without any replacement, but
this is being tracked by #31489.
Change-Id: I6f6058d58fff2c5d210cb1d2713200cc9f501ca7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/187617
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The new escape analysis implementation tries to emit debugging
diagnostics that are compatible with the existing implementation, but
there's a handful of cases that are easier to handle by updating the
test expectations instead.
For regress tests that need updating, the original file is copied to
oldescapeXXX.go.go with -newescape=false added to the //errorcheck
line, while the file is updated in place with -newescape=true and new
test requirements.
Notable test changes:
1) escape_because.go looks for a lot of detailed internal debugging
messages that are fairly particular to how esc.go works and that I
haven't attempted to port over to escape.go yet.
2) There are a lot of "leaking param: x to result ~r1 level=-1"
messages for code like
func(p *int) *T { return &T{p} }
that were simply wrong. Here &T must be heap allocated unconditionally
(because it's being returned); and since p is stored into it, p
escapes unconditionally too. esc.go incorrectly reports that p escapes
conditionally only if the returned pointer escaped.
3) esc.go used to print each "leaking param" analysis result as it
discovered them, which could lead to redundant messages (e.g., that a
param leaks at level=0 and level=1). escape.go instead prints
everything at the end, once it knows the shortest path to each sink.
4) esc.go didn't precisely model direct-interface types, resulting in
some values unnecessarily escaping to the heap when stored into
non-escaping interface values.
5) For functions written in assembly, esc.go only printed "does not
escape" messages, whereas escape.go prints "does not escape" or
"leaking param" as appropriate, consistent with the behavior for
functions written in Go.
6) 12 tests included "BAD" annotations identifying cases where esc.go
was unnecessarily heap allocating something. These are all fixed by
escape.go.
Updates #23109.
Change-Id: Iabc9eb14c94c9cadde3b183478d1fd54f013502f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170447
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
For most nodes (e.g., OPTRLIT, OMAKESLICE, OCONVIFACE), escape
analysis prints "escapes to heap" or "does not escape" to indicate
whether that node's allocation can be heap or stack allocated.
These messages are also emitted for OADDR, even though OADDR does not
actually allocate anything itself. Moreover, it's redundant because
escape analysis already prints "moved to heap" diagnostics when an
OADDR node like "&x" causes x to require heap allocation.
Because OADDR nodes don't allocate memory, my escape analysis rewrite
doesn't naturally emit the "escapes to heap" / "does not escape"
diagnostics for them. It's also non-trivial to replicate the exact
semantics esc.go uses for OADDR.
Since there are so many of these messages, I'm disabling them in this
CL by themselves. I modified esc.go to suppress the Warnl calls
without any other behavior changes, and then used a shell script to
automatically remove any ERROR messages mentioned by run.go in
"missing error" or "no match for" lines.
Fixes#16300.
Updates #23109.
Change-Id: I3993e2743c3ff83ccd0893f4e73b366ff8871a57
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170319
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
For recursive functions, the parameters were iterated using
fn.Name.Defn.Func.Dcl, which does not include unnamed/blank
parameters. This results in a mismatch in formal-actual
assignments, for example,
func f(_ T, x T)
f(a, b) should result in { _=a, x=b }, but the escape analysis
currently sees only { x=a } and drops b on the floor. This may
cause b to not escape when it should (or a escape when it should
not).
Fix this by using fntype.Params().FieldSlice() instead, which
does include unnamed parameters.
Also add a sanity check that ensures all the actual parameters
are consumed.
Fixes#29000
Change-Id: Icd86f2b5d71e7ebbab76e375b7702f62efcf59ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/152617
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The escape analysis models the flow of "content" of X with a
level of "indirection" (OIND node) of X. This content can be
pointer dereference, or slice/string element. For the latter
case, the type of the OIND node should be the element type of
the slice/string. This CL fixes this. In particular, this
matters when the element type is pointerless, where the data
flow should not cause any escape.
Fixes#15730.
Change-Id: Iba9f92898681625e7e3ddef76ae65d7cd61c41e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/107597
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
The escape analysis models "loop depth". If the address of an
expression is assigned to something defined at a lower (outer)
loop depth, the escape analysis decides it escapes. However, it
uses the loop depth of the address operator instead of where
the RHS is defined. This causes an unnecessary escape if there is
an assignment inside a loop but the RHS is defined outside the
loop. This CL propagates the loop depth.
Fixes#24730.
Change-Id: I5ff1530688bdfd90561a7b39c8be9bfc009a9dae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105257
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
This was already done for normal parameters, and the same logic
applies for receiver parameters too.
Updates #24305.
Change-Id: Ia2a46f68d14e8fb62004ff0da1db0f065a95a1b7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/99335
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Before this change, the check for too-large arrays (and other large
types) occurred after escape analysis. If the data moved off stack
and onto the heap contained any pointers, it would therefore escape,
but because the too-large check occurred after escape analysis this
would not be recorded and a stack pointer would leak to the heap
(see the modified escape_array.go for an example).
Some of these appear to remain, in calls to typecheck from within walk.
Also corrected a few comments in escape_array.go about "BAD"
analysis that is now done correctly.
Enhanced to move aditional EscNone-but-large-so-heap checks into esc.c.
Change-Id: I770c111baff28a9ed5f8beb601cf09dacc561b83
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10268
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The false positives (var incorrectly escapes) are marked with BAD.
Change-Id: If64fabb6ea96de44a1177d9ab12e2ccc579fe0c4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/5294
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Before, an unnamed return value turned into an ONAME node n with n->sym
named ~anon%d, and n->orig == n.
A blank-named return value turned into an ONAME node n with n->sym
named ~anon%d but n->orig == the original blank n. Code generation and
printing uses n->orig, so that this node formatted as _.
But some code does not use n->orig. In particular the liveness code does
not know about the n->orig convention and so mishandles blank identifiers.
It is possible to fix but seemed better to avoid the confusion entirely.
Now the first kind of node is named ~r%d and the second ~b%d; both have
n->orig == n, so that it doesn't matter whether code uses n or n->orig.
After this change the ->orig field is only used for other kinds of expressions,
not for ONAME nodes.
This requires distinguishing ~b from ~r names in a few places that care.
It fixes a liveness analysis bug without actually changing the liveness code.
TBR=ken2
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/63630043
Individual variables bigger than 10 MB are now
moved to the heap, as if they had escaped on
their own.
This avoids ridiculous stacks for programs that
do things like
x := [1<<30]byte{}
... use x ...
If 10 MB is too small, we can raise the limit.
Fixes#6077.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/12650045
The code assumed that the only choices were EscNone, EscScope, and EscHeap,
so that it makes sense to set EscScope only if the current setting is EscNone.
Now that we have the many variants of EscReturn, this logic is false, and it was
causing important EscScopes to be ignored in favor of EscReturn.
Fixes#4360.
R=ken2
CC=golang-dev, lvd
https://golang.org/cl/6816103
includes step 0: synthesize outparams, from 6600044
includes step 1,2: give outparams loopdepth 0 and verify unchanged results
generate esc:$mask tags, but still tie to sink if a param has mask != 0
from 6610054
adds final steps:
- have esccall generate n->escretval, a list of nodes the function results flow to
- use these in esccall and ORETURN/OAS2FUNC/and f(g())
- only tie parameters to sink if tag is absent, otherwise according to mask, tie them to escretval
R=rsc, bradfitz
CC=dave, gobot, golang-dev, iant, rsc
https://golang.org/cl/6741044
