dart-sdk/tests/language_2/this_as_covariant_call_checks_test.dart
Vyacheslav Egorov d01d6f454c [vm] Fix a bug in the specialization of implicit setters
CallSpecializer::TryInlineInstanceSetter was using IsReceiver to determine
type check could be skipped. However it is incorrect to use IsReceiver,
because it uses SSA notion of the receiver - rather than a syntactic
notion and all strong mode guarantees apply at syntactic level.

Additionally this CL expands support for exactness tracking to PropertySet
operations and uses it to eliminate checks on setters.

Change-Id: Idce559c4ca4c88f5788d3b6b9955b5af076bd7eb
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/72442
Commit-Queue: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Samir Jindel <sjindel@google.com>
2018-09-03 13:43:41 +00:00

57 lines
1.3 KiB
Dart

// Copyright (c) 2018, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file
// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
//
// VMOptions=--no-background-compilation --enable-inlining-annotations --optimization-counter-threshold=10
import "package:expect/expect.dart";
const NeverInline = "NeverInline";
class A<T> {
T field;
@NeverInline
set property(T v) {}
@NeverInline
void method(T x) {}
@NeverInline
void testMethod(bool violateType) {
A<dynamic> x = this;
x.method(violateType ? 10 : "10");
}
@NeverInline
void testSetter(bool violateType) {
A<dynamic> x = this;
x.property = violateType ? 10 : "10";
}
@NeverInline
void testField(bool violateType) {
A<dynamic> x = this;
x.field = violateType ? 10 : "10";
}
}
@NeverInline
void loop(A<String> obj, bool violateType) {
for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
obj.testMethod(violateType);
obj.testSetter(violateType);
obj.testField(violateType);
}
}
void main() {
A<num>().field = 10;
final obj = A<String>();
loop(obj, false);
loop(obj, false);
Expect.throwsTypeError(() => obj.testMethod(true));
Expect.throwsTypeError(() => obj.testSetter(true));
Expect.throwsTypeError(() => obj.testField(true));
}