mirror of
https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk
synced 2024-11-02 12:24:24 +00:00
e05f1fc32d
We should avoid the situation where `class C extends A with M {}` requires generation of noSuchMethod forwarders _in the superclass `A with M`_ when neither `A` nor `M` has an implementation of `foo`, but `A with M` has a non-trivial noSuchMethod. If we _do_ generate those nSM forwarders, that will just obscure that any attempt to invoke `super.foo()` in `C` should be an error. Note that this is about generating forwarders _in the mixin application which is the superclass_, it is not about copy-down of forwards from the class `M` that was used to obtain the mixin in the first place. Also note that it would be inconvenient to require all methods to be implemented in `A with M` as used in `abstract C extends A with M {}`, and it would also be rather funny if we were to say that `A with M` is abstract when `C` is abstract, and concrete when `C` is concrete. So I think the only reasonable choice is to make those superclasses which are mixin applications abstract. Note that dart:mirrors ought to reflect this, in a separate issue, if it is not already the case. Change-Id: If221b2c73b17bd55017d4d5ee4fdb8daf203e195 Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/76640 Reviewed-by: Lasse R.H. Nielsen <lrn@google.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
informal | ||
.gitignore | ||
Dart.g | ||
dart.sty | ||
dartLangSpec.tex | ||
Makefile |