dart-sdk/runtime/vm/hash_map_test.cc
Vyacheslav Egorov a2ab7ccea4 [vm] Avoid UB in FinalizeHash(hash)
FinalizeHash(hash) was trying to avoid UB in expression 1 << 32
by casting 1 to uintptr_t. This type however is not wide enough
on 32-bit platforms.

Instead just use explicit comparison hashbits < kBitsPerInt32 to
avoid overflow in left shift.

This bug went unnoticed for a while because it the only place
where we call FinalizeHash(hash) is in the snapshot profile
writer code and it only triggers when gen_snapshot is a
32-bit binary - which is only true on Windows, as Mac and Linux
seem to use simarm_x64 configuration instead.

This UB was explicitly affecting the code behavior because C++
compiler would either optimize out or change behavior of any
code that consumed value produced by FinalizeHash(hash).

Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/97764

TEST=vm/cc/DirectChainedHashMap

Change-Id: I39f2b09e7516c875b765e5a065d1c1331f89fa33
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/250741
Commit-Queue: Slava Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daco Harkes <dacoharkes@google.com>
2022-07-06 12:48:16 +00:00

392 lines
11 KiB
C++

// Copyright (c) 2012, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file
// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
#include "vm/hash_map.h"
#include "platform/assert.h"
#include "vm/unit_test.h"
namespace dart {
class TestValue {
public:
explicit TestValue(intptr_t x) : x_(x) {}
// FinalizeHash is used here to provide coverage for FinalizeHash(...)
// function.
uword Hash() const { return FinalizeHash(static_cast<uint32_t>(x_) & 1); }
bool Equals(const TestValue& other) { return x_ == other.x_; }
private:
intptr_t x_;
};
TEST_CASE(DirectChainedHashMap) {
DirectChainedHashMap<PointerSetKeyValueTrait<TestValue>> map;
EXPECT(map.IsEmpty());
TestValue v1(0);
TestValue v2(1);
TestValue v3(0);
map.Insert(&v1);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v1) == &v1);
map.Insert(&v2);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v1) == &v1);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v2) == &v2);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v3) == &v1);
EXPECT(map.Remove(&v1));
EXPECT(map.Lookup(&v1) == NULL);
map.Insert(&v1);
DirectChainedHashMap<PointerSetKeyValueTrait<TestValue>> map2(map);
EXPECT(map2.LookupValue(&v1) == &v1);
EXPECT(map2.LookupValue(&v2) == &v2);
EXPECT(map2.LookupValue(&v3) == &v1);
}
TEST_CASE(DirectChainedHashMapInsertRemove) {
DirectChainedHashMap<PointerSetKeyValueTrait<TestValue>> map;
EXPECT(map.IsEmpty());
TestValue v1(1);
TestValue v2(3); // Note: v1, v2, v3 should have the same hash.
TestValue v3(5);
// Start with adding and removing the same element.
map.Insert(&v1);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v1) == &v1);
EXPECT(map.Remove(&v1));
EXPECT(map.Lookup(&v1) == NULL);
// Inserting v2 first should put it at the head of the list.
map.Insert(&v2);
map.Insert(&v1);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v2) == &v2);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v1) == &v1);
// Check to see if removing the head of the list causes issues.
EXPECT(map.Remove(&v2));
EXPECT(map.Lookup(&v2) == NULL);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v1) == &v1);
// Reinsert v2, which will place it at the back of the hash map list.
map.Insert(&v2);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v2) == &v2);
// Remove from the back of the hash map list.
EXPECT(map.Remove(&v2));
EXPECT(map.Lookup(&v2) == NULL);
EXPECT(map.Remove(&v1));
EXPECT(map.Lookup(&v1) == NULL);
// Check to see that removing an invalid element returns false.
EXPECT(!map.Remove(&v1));
// One last case: remove from the middle of a hash map list.
map.Insert(&v1);
map.Insert(&v2);
map.Insert(&v3);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v1) == &v1);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v2) == &v2);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v3) == &v3);
EXPECT(map.Remove(&v2));
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v1) == &v1);
EXPECT(map.Lookup(&v2) == NULL);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v3) == &v3);
EXPECT(map.Remove(&v1));
EXPECT(map.Remove(&v3));
EXPECT(map.IsEmpty());
}
TEST_CASE(MallocDirectChainedHashMap) {
MallocDirectChainedHashMap<PointerSetKeyValueTrait<TestValue>> map;
EXPECT(map.IsEmpty());
TestValue v1(0);
TestValue v2(1);
TestValue v3(0);
map.Insert(&v1);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v1) == &v1);
map.Insert(&v2);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v1) == &v1);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v2) == &v2);
EXPECT(map.LookupValue(&v3) == &v1);
MallocDirectChainedHashMap<PointerSetKeyValueTrait<TestValue>> map2(map);
EXPECT(map2.LookupValue(&v1) == &v1);
EXPECT(map2.LookupValue(&v2) == &v2);
EXPECT(map2.LookupValue(&v3) == &v1);
}
TEST_CASE(ZoneDirectChainedHashMap) {
auto zone = thread->zone();
auto const map = new (zone)
ZoneDirectChainedHashMap<PointerSetKeyValueTrait<TestValue>>(zone);
EXPECT(map->IsEmpty());
TestValue v1(0);
TestValue v2(1);
TestValue v3(0);
map->Insert(&v1);
EXPECT(map->LookupValue(&v1) == &v1);
map->Insert(&v2);
EXPECT(map->LookupValue(&v1) == &v1);
EXPECT(map->LookupValue(&v2) == &v2);
EXPECT(map->LookupValue(&v3) == &v1);
}
class IntptrPair {
public:
IntptrPair() : first_(-1), second_(-1) {}
IntptrPair(intptr_t first, intptr_t second)
: first_(first), second_(second) {}
intptr_t first() const { return first_; }
intptr_t second() const { return second_; }
bool operator==(const IntptrPair& other) {
return (first_ == other.first_) && (second_ == other.second_);
}
bool operator!=(const IntptrPair& other) {
return (first_ != other.first_) || (second_ != other.second_);
}
private:
intptr_t first_;
intptr_t second_;
};
TEST_CASE(DirectChainedHashMapIterator) {
IntptrPair p1(1, 1);
IntptrPair p2(2, 2);
IntptrPair p3(3, 3);
IntptrPair p4(4, 4);
IntptrPair p5(5, 5);
DirectChainedHashMap<NumbersKeyValueTrait<IntptrPair> > map;
EXPECT(map.IsEmpty());
DirectChainedHashMap<NumbersKeyValueTrait<IntptrPair> >::Iterator it =
map.GetIterator();
EXPECT(it.Next() == NULL);
it.Reset();
map.Insert(p1);
EXPECT(*it.Next() == p1);
it.Reset();
map.Insert(p2);
map.Insert(p3);
map.Insert(p4);
map.Insert(p5);
intptr_t count = 0;
intptr_t sum = 0;
while (true) {
IntptrPair* p = it.Next();
if (p == NULL) {
break;
}
count++;
sum += p->second();
}
EXPECT(count == 5);
EXPECT(sum == 15);
}
TEST_CASE(DirectChainedHashMapIteratorWithCollisionInLastBucket) {
intptr_t values[] = {65, 325, 329, 73, 396, 207, 215, 93, 227, 39,
431, 112, 176, 313, 188, 317, 61, 127, 447};
IntMap<intptr_t> map;
for (intptr_t value : values) {
map.Insert(value, value);
}
bool visited[ARRAY_SIZE(values)] = {};
intptr_t count = 0;
auto it = map.GetIterator();
for (auto* p = it.Next(); p != nullptr; p = it.Next()) {
++count;
bool found = false;
intptr_t i = 0;
for (intptr_t v : values) {
if (v == p->key) {
EXPECT(v == p->value);
EXPECT(!visited[i]);
visited[i] = true;
found = true;
break;
}
++i;
}
EXPECT(found);
}
EXPECT(count == ARRAY_SIZE(values));
for (bool is_visited : visited) {
EXPECT(is_visited);
}
}
TEST_CASE(ZoneCStringSet) {
auto zone = thread->zone();
const char* const kConst1 = "test";
const char* const kConst2 = "test 2";
char* const str1 = OS::SCreate(zone, "%s", kConst1);
char* const str2 = OS::SCreate(zone, "%s", kConst2);
char* const str3 = OS::SCreate(zone, "%s", kConst1);
// Make sure these strings are pointer-distinct, but C-string-equal.
EXPECT_NE(str1, str3);
EXPECT_STREQ(str1, str3);
auto const set = new (zone) ZoneCStringSet(zone);
EXPECT(set->IsEmpty());
set->Insert(str1);
EXPECT_NOTNULL(set->Lookup(str1));
EXPECT_NULLPTR(set->Lookup(str2));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(set->Lookup(str3));
set->Insert(str2);
EXPECT_NOTNULL(set->Lookup(str1));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(set->Lookup(str2));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(set->Lookup(str3));
EXPECT(set->Remove(str3));
EXPECT_NULLPTR(set->Lookup(str1));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(set->Lookup(str2));
EXPECT_NULLPTR(set->Lookup(str3));
EXPECT(!set->Remove(str3));
EXPECT(set->Remove(str2));
EXPECT(set->IsEmpty());
}
TEST_CASE(CStringIntMap) {
const char* const kConst1 = "test";
const char* const kConst2 = "test 2";
char* const str1 = OS::SCreate(nullptr, "%s", kConst1);
char* const str2 = OS::SCreate(nullptr, "%s", kConst2);
char* const str3 = OS::SCreate(nullptr, "%s", kConst1);
// Make sure these strings are pointer-distinct, but C-string-equal.
EXPECT_NE(str1, str3);
EXPECT_STREQ(str1, str3);
const intptr_t i1 = 1;
const intptr_t i2 = 2;
CStringIntMap map;
EXPECT(map.IsEmpty());
map.Insert({str1, i1});
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str1));
EXPECT_EQ(i1, map.LookupValue(str1));
EXPECT_NULLPTR(map.Lookup(str2));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str3));
EXPECT_EQ(i1, map.LookupValue(str3));
map.Insert({str2, i2});
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str1));
EXPECT_EQ(i1, map.LookupValue(str1));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str2));
EXPECT_EQ(i2, map.LookupValue(str2));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str3));
EXPECT_EQ(i1, map.LookupValue(str3));
EXPECT(map.Remove(str3));
EXPECT_NULLPTR(map.Lookup(str1));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str2));
EXPECT_EQ(i2, map.LookupValue(str2));
EXPECT_NULLPTR(map.Lookup(str3));
EXPECT(!map.Remove(str3));
EXPECT(map.Remove(str2));
EXPECT(map.IsEmpty());
free(str3);
free(str2);
free(str1);
}
TEST_CASE(CStringIntMapUpdate) {
const char* const kConst1 = "test";
const char* const kConst2 = "test 2";
char* str1 = OS::SCreate(nullptr, "%s", kConst1);
char* str2 = OS::SCreate(nullptr, "%s", kConst2);
char* str3 = OS::SCreate(nullptr, "%s", kConst1);
char* str4 = OS::SCreate(nullptr, "%s", kConst1); // Only used for lookup.
// Make sure these strings are pointer-distinct, but C-string-equal.
EXPECT_NE(str1, str3);
EXPECT_NE(str1, str4);
EXPECT_NE(str3, str4);
EXPECT_STREQ(str1, str3);
EXPECT_STREQ(str1, str4);
CStringIntMapKeyValueTrait::Pair p1{str1, 1};
CStringIntMapKeyValueTrait::Pair p2{str2, 2};
CStringIntMapKeyValueTrait::Pair p3{str3, 3};
CStringIntMap map;
EXPECT(map.IsEmpty());
map.Update(p1);
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str1));
EXPECT_EQ(p1.value, map.LookupValue(str1));
EXPECT_NULLPTR(map.Lookup(str2));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str3));
EXPECT_EQ(p1.value, map.LookupValue(str3));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str4));
EXPECT_EQ(p1.value, map.LookupValue(str4));
map.Update(p2);
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str1));
EXPECT_EQ(p1.value, map.LookupValue(str1));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str2));
EXPECT_EQ(p2.value, map.LookupValue(str2));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str3));
EXPECT_EQ(p1.value, map.LookupValue(str3));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str4));
EXPECT_EQ(p1.value, map.LookupValue(str4));
// Check Lookup after Update.
map.Update(p3);
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str1));
EXPECT_EQ(p3.value, map.LookupValue(str1));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str2));
EXPECT_EQ(p2.value, map.LookupValue(str2));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str3));
EXPECT_EQ(p3.value, map.LookupValue(str3));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str4));
EXPECT_EQ(p3.value, map.LookupValue(str4));
// Check that single Remove after only Updates ensures Lookup fails after.
EXPECT(map.Remove(str3));
EXPECT_NULLPTR(map.Lookup(str1));
EXPECT_NOTNULL(map.Lookup(str2));
EXPECT_EQ(p2.value, map.LookupValue(str2));
EXPECT_NULLPTR(map.Lookup(str3));
EXPECT_NULLPTR(map.Lookup(str4));
EXPECT(!map.Remove(str3));
EXPECT(map.Remove(str2));
EXPECT(map.IsEmpty());
// Quick double-check that these weren't side-effected by the implementation
// of hash maps (p1 especially).
EXPECT_EQ(str1, p1.key);
EXPECT_EQ(1, p1.value);
EXPECT_EQ(str2, p2.key);
EXPECT_EQ(2, p2.value);
EXPECT_EQ(str3, p3.key);
EXPECT_EQ(3, p3.value);
free(str4);
free(str3);
free(str2);
free(str1);
}
} // namespace dart