They're back from the grave, and ready to party!
Change-Id: I088134a9be7ecabf1fbf751c015a656a15cabff9
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/12821
Commit-Queue: Bob Nystrom <rnystrom@google.com>
Reviewed-by: William Hesse <whesse@google.com>
./language[_strong]/class_keyword_test.dart
./language[_strong]/closure_shared_state_test.dart
R=johnniwinther@google.com
NOTE: I had to bypass hooks since the analyser fails on the files that have static compile-time errors. Should I do something else?
Committed: fa59030f18
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/3001433002 .
./language[_strong]/class_keyword_test.dart
./language[_strong]/closure_shared_state_test.dart
R=johnniwinther@google.com
NOTE: I had to bypass hooks since the analyser fails on the files that have static compile-time errors. Should I do something else?
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/3001433002 .
There are far too many files here to review everyone carefully.
Spot checking most of the diffs look good as test code is generally written
with less care than application code so lots of ugly formatting get through.
If people notice files where the automated formatting bothers them feel free
to comment indicating file names and I'll move spaces within comments to make
the formatting cleaner and use comments to force block formatting as I have
done for other case where formatting looked bad.
BUG=
R=efortuna@google.com
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2771453003 .
