Threads in the native or blocked states don't prevent safepoints, so they may run concurrently with a safepoint operation like GC. It is not safe for handles to be allocated while the GC is visiting them, so these threads must not allocate handles. Assert only threads in the VM or generated states, which prevent safepoints until they check in, may allocate handles. (Generated code does not allocate handles, but leaf runtime entries remain in the generated state.)
Bug: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/34883
Change-Id: I1a211778f7ef96b53a2405f0ee9dde7871b122b6
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/81540
Commit-Queue: Ryan Macnak <rmacnak@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Siva Annamalai <asiva@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Remove some dead includes.
Change-Id: I31f3e739e5ee46dcbba5d6a2f091491b46402943
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/60146
Reviewed-by: Zach Anderson <zra@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ryan Macnak <rmacnak@google.com>
Relands 165c583d57
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 1
This CL:
* Adds a field to [RawAbstractType] which will always hold a pointer
to the entrypoint of a type testing stub
* Makes this new field be initialized to a default stub whenever a
instances are created (e.g. via Type::New(), snapshot reader, ...)
* Makes the clustered snapshotter write a reference to the
corresponding [RawInstructions] object when writing the field and do
the reverse when reading it.
* Makes us call the type testing stub for performing assert-assignable
checks.
To reduce unnecessary loads on callsites, we store the entrypoint of the
type testing stubs directly in the type objects. This means that the
caller of type testing stubs can simply branch there without populating
a code object first. This also means that the type testing stubs
themselves have no access to a pool and we therefore also don't hold on
to the [Code] object, only the [Instruction] object is necessary.
The type testing stubs do not setup a frame themselves and also have no
safepoint. In the case when the type testing stubs could not determine
a positive answer they will tail-call a general-purpose stub.
The general-purpose stub sets up a stub frame, tries to consult a
[SubtypeTestCache] and bails out to runtime if this was unsuccessful.
This CL is just the the first, for ease of reviewing. The actual
type-specialized type testing stubs will be generated in later CLs.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44787
Relands f226c22424
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 2
This CL starts building type testing stubs specialzed for [Type] objects
we test against.
More specifically, it adds support for:
* Handling obvious fast cases on the call sites (while still having a
call to stub for negative case)
* Handling type tests against type parameters, by loading the value
of the type parameter on the call sites and invoking it's type testing stub.
* Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can
do [CidRange]-based subtype-checks.
==> e.g. String/List<dynamic>
* Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can
do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and
[CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the type arguments.
==> e.g. Widget<State>, where we know [Widget] is only extended and not
implemented.
* Specialzed type testing stubs for certain non-instantiated types where we
can do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and
[CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the instantiated type arguments and
cid based comparisons for type parameters. (Note that this fast-case migth
result in some false-negatives!)
==> e.g. _HashMapEntry<K, V>, where we know [_HashMapEntry] is only
extended and not implemented.
This optimizes cases where the caller uses `new HashMap<A, B>()` and only
uses `A` and `B` as key/values (and not subclasses of it). The false-negative
can occur when subtypes of A or B are used. In such cases we fall back to the
[SubtypeTestCache]-based imlementation.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44788
Relands 25f98bcc75
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 3
The changes include:
* Make AssertAssignableInstr no longer have a call-summary, which
helps methods with several parameter checks by not having to
re-load/re-initialize type arguments registers
* Lazily create SubtypeTestCaches: We already go to runtime to warm up
the caches, so we now also create the caches on the first runtime
call and patch the pool entries.
* No longer load the destination name into a register: We only need
the name when we throw an exception, so it is not on the hot path.
Instead we let the runtime look at the call site, decoding a pool
index from the instructions stream. The destination name will be
available in the pool, at a consecutive index to the subtype cache.
* Remove the fall-through to N=1 case for probing subtypeing tests,
since those will always be handled by the optimized stubs.
* Do not generate optimized stubs for FutureOr<T> (so far it just
falled-through to TTS). We can make optimzed version of that later,
but it requires special subtyping rules.
* Local code quality improvement in the type-testing-stubs: Avoid
extra jump at last case of cid-class-range checks.
There are still a number of optimization opportunities we can do in
future changes.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/46984
Relands 2c52480ec8
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 4
In order to avoid generating type testing stubs for too many types in
the system - and thereby potentially cause an increase in code size -
this change introduces a smarter way to decide for which types we should
generate optimized type testing stubs.
The precompiler creates a [TypeUsageInfo] which we use to collect
information. More specifically:
a) We collect the destination types for all type checks we emit
(we do this inside AssertAssignableInstr::EmitNativeCode).
-> These are types we might want to generate optimized type testing
stubs for.
b) We collect type argument vectors used in instance creations (we do
this inside AllocateObjectInstr::EmitNativeCode) and keep a set of
of used type argument vectors for each class.
After the precompiler has finished compiling normal code we scan the set
of destination types collected in a) for uninstantiated types (or more
specifically, type parameter types).
We then propagate the type argument vectors used on object allocation sites,
which were collected in b), in order to find out what kind of types are flowing
into those type parameters.
This allows us to extend the set of types which we test against, by
adding the types that flow into type parameters.
We use this final augmented set of destination types as a "filter" when
making the decision whether to generate an optimized type testing stub
for a given type.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/48640
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32603
Closes https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32852
Change-Id: Ib79fbe7f043aa88f32bddad62d7656c638914b44
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/50944
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Régis Crelier <regis@google.com>
Relands 165c583d57
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 1
This CL:
* Adds a field to [RawAbstractType] which will always hold a pointer
to the entrypoint of a type testing stub
* Makes this new field be initialized to a default stub whenever a
instances are created (e.g. via Type::New(), snapshot reader, ...)
* Makes the clustered snapshotter write a reference to the
corresponding [RawInstructions] object when writing the field and do
the reverse when reading it.
* Makes us call the type testing stub for performing assert-assignable
checks.
To reduce unnecessary loads on callsites, we store the entrypoint of the
type testing stubs directly in the type objects. This means that the
caller of type testing stubs can simply branch there without populating
a code object first. This also means that the type testing stubs
themselves have no access to a pool and we therefore also don't hold on
to the [Code] object, only the [Instruction] object is necessary.
The type testing stubs do not setup a frame themselves and also have no
safepoint. In the case when the type testing stubs could not determine
a positive answer they will tail-call a general-purpose stub.
The general-purpose stub sets up a stub frame, tries to consult a
[SubtypeTestCache] and bails out to runtime if this was unsuccessful.
This CL is just the the first, for ease of reviewing. The actual
type-specialized type testing stubs will be generated in later CLs.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44787
Relands f226c22424
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 2
This CL starts building type testing stubs specialzed for [Type] objects
we test against.
More specifically, it adds support for:
* Handling obvious fast cases on the call sites (while still having a
call to stub for negative case)
* Handling type tests against type parameters, by loading the value
of the type parameter on the call sites and invoking it's type testing stub.
* Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can
do [CidRange]-based subtype-checks.
==> e.g. String/List<dynamic>
* Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can
do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and
[CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the type arguments.
==> e.g. Widget<State>, where we know [Widget] is only extended and not
implemented.
* Specialzed type testing stubs for certain non-instantiated types where we
can do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and
[CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the instantiated type arguments and
cid based comparisons for type parameters. (Note that this fast-case migth
result in some false-negatives!)
==> e.g. _HashMapEntry<K, V>, where we know [_HashMapEntry] is only
extended and not implemented.
This optimizes cases where the caller uses `new HashMap<A, B>()` and only
uses `A` and `B` as key/values (and not subclasses of it). The false-negative
can occur when subtypes of A or B are used. In such cases we fall back to the
[SubtypeTestCache]-based imlementation.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44788
Relands 25f98bcc75
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 3
The changes include:
* Make AssertAssignableInstr no longer have a call-summary, which
helps methods with several parameter checks by not having to
re-load/re-initialize type arguments registers
* Lazily create SubtypeTestCaches: We already go to runtime to warm up
the caches, so we now also create the caches on the first runtime
call and patch the pool entries.
* No longer load the destination name into a register: We only need
the name when we throw an exception, so it is not on the hot path.
Instead we let the runtime look at the call site, decoding a pool
index from the instructions stream. The destination name will be
available in the pool, at a consecutive index to the subtype cache.
* Remove the fall-through to N=1 case for probing subtypeing tests,
since those will always be handled by the optimized stubs.
* Do not generate optimized stubs for FutureOr<T> (so far it just
falled-through to TTS). We can make optimzed version of that later,
but it requires special subtyping rules.
* Local code quality improvement in the type-testing-stubs: Avoid
extra jump at last case of cid-class-range checks.
There are still a number of optimization opportunities we can do in
future changes.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/46984
Relands 2c52480ec8
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 4
In order to avoid generating type testing stubs for too many types in
the system - and thereby potentially cause an increase in code size -
this change introduces a smarter way to decide for which types we should
generate optimized type testing stubs.
The precompiler creates a [TypeUsageInfo] which we use to collect
information. More specifically:
a) We collect the destination types for all type checks we emit
(we do this inside AssertAssignableInstr::EmitNativeCode).
-> These are types we might want to generate optimized type testing
stubs for.
b) We collect type argument vectors used in instance creations (we do
this inside AllocateObjectInstr::EmitNativeCode) and keep a set of
of used type argument vectors for each class.
After the precompiler has finished compiling normal code we scan the set
of destination types collected in a) for uninstantiated types (or more
specifically, type parameter types).
We then propagate the type argument vectors used on object allocation sites,
which were collected in b), in order to find out what kind of types are flowing
into those type parameters.
This allows us to extend the set of types which we test against, by
adding the types that flow into type parameters.
We use this final augmented set of destination types as a "filter" when
making the decision whether to generate an optimized type testing stub
for a given type.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/48640
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32603
Change-Id: I6d33d4ca3d5187a1eb1664078c003061855f0160
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/50482
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
This reverts commit 8054409a02.
Reason for revert: Potential cause of flakes, not entirely clear yet if it was caused by this CL.
Change-Id: Icb119a107f22245ba2f303c7f2ae11f061f605f5
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/50261
Reviewed-by: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Relands 165c583d57
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 1
This CL:
* Adds a field to [RawAbstractType] which will always hold a pointer
to the entrypoint of a type testing stub
* Makes this new field be initialized to a default stub whenever a
instances are created (e.g. via Type::New(), snapshot reader, ...)
* Makes the clustered snapshotter write a reference to the
corresponding [RawInstructions] object when writing the field and do
the reverse when reading it.
* Makes us call the type testing stub for performing assert-assignable
checks.
To reduce unnecessary loads on callsites, we store the entrypoint of the
type testing stubs directly in the type objects. This means that the
caller of type testing stubs can simply branch there without populating
a code object first. This also means that the type testing stubs
themselves have no access to a pool and we therefore also don't hold on
to the [Code] object, only the [Instruction] object is necessary.
The type testing stubs do not setup a frame themselves and also have no
safepoint. In the case when the type testing stubs could not determine
a positive answer they will tail-call a general-purpose stub.
The general-purpose stub sets up a stub frame, tries to consult a
[SubtypeTestCache] and bails out to runtime if this was unsuccessful.
This CL is just the the first, for ease of reviewing. The actual
type-specialized type testing stubs will be generated in later CLs.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44787
Relands f226c22424
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 2
This CL starts building type testing stubs specialzed for [Type] objects
we test against.
More specifically, it adds support for:
* Handling obvious fast cases on the call sites (while still having a
call to stub for negative case)
* Handling type tests against type parameters, by loading the value
of the type parameter on the call sites and invoking it's type testing stub.
* Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can
do [CidRange]-based subtype-checks.
==> e.g. String/List<dynamic>
* Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can
do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and
[CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the type arguments.
==> e.g. Widget<State>, where we know [Widget] is only extended and not
implemented.
* Specialzed type testing stubs for certain non-instantiated types where we
can do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and
[CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the instantiated type arguments and
cid based comparisons for type parameters. (Note that this fast-case migth
result in some false-negatives!)
==> e.g. _HashMapEntry<K, V>, where we know [_HashMapEntry] is only
extended and not implemented.
This optimizes cases where the caller uses `new HashMap<A, B>()` and only
uses `A` and `B` as key/values (and not subclasses of it). The false-negative
can occur when subtypes of A or B are used. In such cases we fall back to the
[SubtypeTestCache]-based imlementation.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44788
Relands 25f98bcc75
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 3
The changes include:
* Make AssertAssignableInstr no longer have a call-summary, which
helps methods with several parameter checks by not having to
re-load/re-initialize type arguments registers
* Lazily create SubtypeTestCaches: We already go to runtime to warm up
the caches, so we now also create the caches on the first runtime
call and patch the pool entries.
* No longer load the destination name into a register: We only need
the name when we throw an exception, so it is not on the hot path.
Instead we let the runtime look at the call site, decoding a pool
index from the instructions stream. The destination name will be
available in the pool, at a consecutive index to the subtype cache.
* Remove the fall-through to N=1 case for probing subtypeing tests,
since those will always be handled by the optimized stubs.
* Do not generate optimized stubs for FutureOr<T> (so far it just
falled-through to TTS). We can make optimzed version of that later,
but it requires special subtyping rules.
* Local code quality improvement in the type-testing-stubs: Avoid
extra jump at last case of cid-class-range checks.
There are still a number of optimization opportunities we can do in
future changes.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/46984
Relands 2c52480ec8
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 4
In order to avoid generating type testing stubs for too many types in
the system - and thereby potentially cause an increase in code size -
this change introduces a smarter way to decide for which types we should
generate optimized type testing stubs.
The precompiler creates a [TypeUsageInfo] which we use to collect
information. More specifically:
a) We collect the destination types for all type checks we emit
(we do this inside AssertAssignableInstr::EmitNativeCode).
-> These are types we might want to generate optimized type testing
stubs for.
b) We collect type argument vectors used in instance creations (we do
this inside AllocateObjectInstr::EmitNativeCode) and keep a set of
of used type argument vectors for each class.
After the precompiler has finished compiling normal code we scan the set
of destination types collected in a) for uninstantiated types (or more
specifically, type parameter types).
We then propagate the type argument vectors used on object allocation sites,
which were collected in b), in order to find out what kind of types are flowing
into those type parameters.
This allows us to extend the set of types which we test against, by
adding the types that flow into type parameters.
We use this final augmented set of destination types as a "filter" when
making the decision whether to generate an optimized type testing stub
for a given type.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/48640
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32603
Change-Id: I44a1d5d4b27454ae026aef2a301aada3dd399ea0
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/49861
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
In order to avoid generating type testing stubs for too many types in
the system - and thereby potentially cause an increase in code size -
this change introduces a smarter way to decide for which types we should
generate optimized type testing stubs.
The precompiler creates a [TypeUsageInfo] which we use to collect
information. More specifically:
a) We collect the destination types for all type checks we emit
(we do this inside AssertAssignableInstr::EmitNativeCode).
-> These are types we might want to generate optimized type testing
stubs for.
b) We collect type argument vectors used in instance creations (we do
this inside AllocateObjectInstr::EmitNativeCode) and keep a set of
of used type argument vectors for each class.
After the precompiler has finished compiling normal code we scan the set
of destination types collected in a) for uninstantiated types (or more
specifically, type parameter types).
We then propagate the type argument vectors used on object allocation sites,
which were collected in b), in order to find out what kind of types are flowing
into those type parameters.
This allows us to extend the set of types which we test against, by
adding the types that flow into type parameters.
We use this final augmented set of destination types as a "filter" when
making the decision whether to generate an optimized type testing stub
for a given type.
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32603
Measured impact on flutter HEAD-HEAD-HEAD with TTS Part 1 - 4 applied (2018-04-03):
* stock build benchmark: around 4% improvement
* gallery app.so size: -2.68% (13987348 -> 13612928)
* gallery memory: no sigificant changes:
- SubtypeTestCache: - 10kb
- ObjectPool: + 6 kb
- Type: no change (probably due to wasted alignment slot before)
- TypeParameter: + 4 kb (can get rid of the field here later)
* gallery AOT compile-time: measured +1.3%, inside flakiness range
Change-Id: I12a398d18f970ba2db741913bb47b0f36ae38d58
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/48640
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Régis Crelier <regis@google.com>
i.e. #ifndef VM_WHATEVER -> #ifndef RUNTIME_VM_WHATEVER
This lets us remove a hack from the PRESUBMIT.py script that existed
for reasons that are no longer valid, and sets us up to add some
presubmit checks for the GN build.
R=asiva@google.com, rmacnak@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/2450713004 .
- Add PRODUCT define and build mode to gyp configurations.
- Add product mode to test harness.
- Start to unify list of flags.
- Allow flags to be constant for particular build configurations.
R=fschneider@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1663863002 .
The most substantial change is in Parser and ParsedFunction, which now cache their calling thread. (A similar change was tried unsuccessfully in the past, but can now be safely implemented thanks to the ThreadRegistry state saving.)
Only remaining users are the Object::Handle(Isolate*, [...]) methods. Then, this deprecated interface will be removed.
BUG=
R=asiva@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org//1242343002 .
