If the --use-bare-instructions flag is enabled we will:
* Make call sites load the target directly from the pool (instead of
the code object) - this saves one instruction (and an indirect load)
* Ensure the object pool will have direct entry addresses by:
- Letting the clustered snapshot reader change any StubCode::UnlinkedCall()
in the object pool by it's monomorphic entry
- Change the code patcher to patch SwitchableCalls by writing the
monomorphic entry into the pool (instead of the code object)
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/33274
Change-Id: I4e41fc8e4461bde477cc559a6a4fccaaf3a350b5
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/86160
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Macnak <rmacnak@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Fall back to parallel marking
- on IA32 (barrier unimplemented)
- when write_protect_code is enabled (protection dependency on marking state unimplemented)
Bug: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/34002
Change-Id: If093f24e4dc6bf29f407cc45e95bb2274fc53dcf
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/71389
Commit-Queue: Ryan Macnak <rmacnak@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Relands 165c583d57
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 1
This CL:
* Adds a field to [RawAbstractType] which will always hold a pointer
to the entrypoint of a type testing stub
* Makes this new field be initialized to a default stub whenever a
instances are created (e.g. via Type::New(), snapshot reader, ...)
* Makes the clustered snapshotter write a reference to the
corresponding [RawInstructions] object when writing the field and do
the reverse when reading it.
* Makes us call the type testing stub for performing assert-assignable
checks.
To reduce unnecessary loads on callsites, we store the entrypoint of the
type testing stubs directly in the type objects. This means that the
caller of type testing stubs can simply branch there without populating
a code object first. This also means that the type testing stubs
themselves have no access to a pool and we therefore also don't hold on
to the [Code] object, only the [Instruction] object is necessary.
The type testing stubs do not setup a frame themselves and also have no
safepoint. In the case when the type testing stubs could not determine
a positive answer they will tail-call a general-purpose stub.
The general-purpose stub sets up a stub frame, tries to consult a
[SubtypeTestCache] and bails out to runtime if this was unsuccessful.
This CL is just the the first, for ease of reviewing. The actual
type-specialized type testing stubs will be generated in later CLs.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44787
Relands f226c22424
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 2
This CL starts building type testing stubs specialzed for [Type] objects
we test against.
More specifically, it adds support for:
* Handling obvious fast cases on the call sites (while still having a
call to stub for negative case)
* Handling type tests against type parameters, by loading the value
of the type parameter on the call sites and invoking it's type testing stub.
* Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can
do [CidRange]-based subtype-checks.
==> e.g. String/List<dynamic>
* Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can
do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and
[CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the type arguments.
==> e.g. Widget<State>, where we know [Widget] is only extended and not
implemented.
* Specialzed type testing stubs for certain non-instantiated types where we
can do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and
[CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the instantiated type arguments and
cid based comparisons for type parameters. (Note that this fast-case migth
result in some false-negatives!)
==> e.g. _HashMapEntry<K, V>, where we know [_HashMapEntry] is only
extended and not implemented.
This optimizes cases where the caller uses `new HashMap<A, B>()` and only
uses `A` and `B` as key/values (and not subclasses of it). The false-negative
can occur when subtypes of A or B are used. In such cases we fall back to the
[SubtypeTestCache]-based imlementation.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44788
Relands 25f98bcc75
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 3
The changes include:
* Make AssertAssignableInstr no longer have a call-summary, which
helps methods with several parameter checks by not having to
re-load/re-initialize type arguments registers
* Lazily create SubtypeTestCaches: We already go to runtime to warm up
the caches, so we now also create the caches on the first runtime
call and patch the pool entries.
* No longer load the destination name into a register: We only need
the name when we throw an exception, so it is not on the hot path.
Instead we let the runtime look at the call site, decoding a pool
index from the instructions stream. The destination name will be
available in the pool, at a consecutive index to the subtype cache.
* Remove the fall-through to N=1 case for probing subtypeing tests,
since those will always be handled by the optimized stubs.
* Do not generate optimized stubs for FutureOr<T> (so far it just
falled-through to TTS). We can make optimzed version of that later,
but it requires special subtyping rules.
* Local code quality improvement in the type-testing-stubs: Avoid
extra jump at last case of cid-class-range checks.
There are still a number of optimization opportunities we can do in
future changes.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/46984
Relands 2c52480ec8
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 4
In order to avoid generating type testing stubs for too many types in
the system - and thereby potentially cause an increase in code size -
this change introduces a smarter way to decide for which types we should
generate optimized type testing stubs.
The precompiler creates a [TypeUsageInfo] which we use to collect
information. More specifically:
a) We collect the destination types for all type checks we emit
(we do this inside AssertAssignableInstr::EmitNativeCode).
-> These are types we might want to generate optimized type testing
stubs for.
b) We collect type argument vectors used in instance creations (we do
this inside AllocateObjectInstr::EmitNativeCode) and keep a set of
of used type argument vectors for each class.
After the precompiler has finished compiling normal code we scan the set
of destination types collected in a) for uninstantiated types (or more
specifically, type parameter types).
We then propagate the type argument vectors used on object allocation sites,
which were collected in b), in order to find out what kind of types are flowing
into those type parameters.
This allows us to extend the set of types which we test against, by
adding the types that flow into type parameters.
We use this final augmented set of destination types as a "filter" when
making the decision whether to generate an optimized type testing stub
for a given type.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/48640
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32603
Closes https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32852
Change-Id: Ib79fbe7f043aa88f32bddad62d7656c638914b44
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/50944
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Régis Crelier <regis@google.com>
Relands 165c583d57
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 1
This CL:
* Adds a field to [RawAbstractType] which will always hold a pointer
to the entrypoint of a type testing stub
* Makes this new field be initialized to a default stub whenever a
instances are created (e.g. via Type::New(), snapshot reader, ...)
* Makes the clustered snapshotter write a reference to the
corresponding [RawInstructions] object when writing the field and do
the reverse when reading it.
* Makes us call the type testing stub for performing assert-assignable
checks.
To reduce unnecessary loads on callsites, we store the entrypoint of the
type testing stubs directly in the type objects. This means that the
caller of type testing stubs can simply branch there without populating
a code object first. This also means that the type testing stubs
themselves have no access to a pool and we therefore also don't hold on
to the [Code] object, only the [Instruction] object is necessary.
The type testing stubs do not setup a frame themselves and also have no
safepoint. In the case when the type testing stubs could not determine
a positive answer they will tail-call a general-purpose stub.
The general-purpose stub sets up a stub frame, tries to consult a
[SubtypeTestCache] and bails out to runtime if this was unsuccessful.
This CL is just the the first, for ease of reviewing. The actual
type-specialized type testing stubs will be generated in later CLs.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44787
Relands f226c22424
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 2
This CL starts building type testing stubs specialzed for [Type] objects
we test against.
More specifically, it adds support for:
* Handling obvious fast cases on the call sites (while still having a
call to stub for negative case)
* Handling type tests against type parameters, by loading the value
of the type parameter on the call sites and invoking it's type testing stub.
* Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can
do [CidRange]-based subtype-checks.
==> e.g. String/List<dynamic>
* Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can
do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and
[CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the type arguments.
==> e.g. Widget<State>, where we know [Widget] is only extended and not
implemented.
* Specialzed type testing stubs for certain non-instantiated types where we
can do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and
[CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the instantiated type arguments and
cid based comparisons for type parameters. (Note that this fast-case migth
result in some false-negatives!)
==> e.g. _HashMapEntry<K, V>, where we know [_HashMapEntry] is only
extended and not implemented.
This optimizes cases where the caller uses `new HashMap<A, B>()` and only
uses `A` and `B` as key/values (and not subclasses of it). The false-negative
can occur when subtypes of A or B are used. In such cases we fall back to the
[SubtypeTestCache]-based imlementation.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44788
Relands 25f98bcc75
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 3
The changes include:
* Make AssertAssignableInstr no longer have a call-summary, which
helps methods with several parameter checks by not having to
re-load/re-initialize type arguments registers
* Lazily create SubtypeTestCaches: We already go to runtime to warm up
the caches, so we now also create the caches on the first runtime
call and patch the pool entries.
* No longer load the destination name into a register: We only need
the name when we throw an exception, so it is not on the hot path.
Instead we let the runtime look at the call site, decoding a pool
index from the instructions stream. The destination name will be
available in the pool, at a consecutive index to the subtype cache.
* Remove the fall-through to N=1 case for probing subtypeing tests,
since those will always be handled by the optimized stubs.
* Do not generate optimized stubs for FutureOr<T> (so far it just
falled-through to TTS). We can make optimzed version of that later,
but it requires special subtyping rules.
* Local code quality improvement in the type-testing-stubs: Avoid
extra jump at last case of cid-class-range checks.
There are still a number of optimization opportunities we can do in
future changes.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/46984
Relands 2c52480ec8
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 4
In order to avoid generating type testing stubs for too many types in
the system - and thereby potentially cause an increase in code size -
this change introduces a smarter way to decide for which types we should
generate optimized type testing stubs.
The precompiler creates a [TypeUsageInfo] which we use to collect
information. More specifically:
a) We collect the destination types for all type checks we emit
(we do this inside AssertAssignableInstr::EmitNativeCode).
-> These are types we might want to generate optimized type testing
stubs for.
b) We collect type argument vectors used in instance creations (we do
this inside AllocateObjectInstr::EmitNativeCode) and keep a set of
of used type argument vectors for each class.
After the precompiler has finished compiling normal code we scan the set
of destination types collected in a) for uninstantiated types (or more
specifically, type parameter types).
We then propagate the type argument vectors used on object allocation sites,
which were collected in b), in order to find out what kind of types are flowing
into those type parameters.
This allows us to extend the set of types which we test against, by
adding the types that flow into type parameters.
We use this final augmented set of destination types as a "filter" when
making the decision whether to generate an optimized type testing stub
for a given type.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/48640
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32603
Change-Id: I6d33d4ca3d5187a1eb1664078c003061855f0160
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/50482
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
This reverts commit 8054409a02.
Reason for revert: Potential cause of flakes, not entirely clear yet if it was caused by this CL.
Change-Id: Icb119a107f22245ba2f303c7f2ae11f061f605f5
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/50261
Reviewed-by: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Relands 165c583d57
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 1
This CL:
* Adds a field to [RawAbstractType] which will always hold a pointer
to the entrypoint of a type testing stub
* Makes this new field be initialized to a default stub whenever a
instances are created (e.g. via Type::New(), snapshot reader, ...)
* Makes the clustered snapshotter write a reference to the
corresponding [RawInstructions] object when writing the field and do
the reverse when reading it.
* Makes us call the type testing stub for performing assert-assignable
checks.
To reduce unnecessary loads on callsites, we store the entrypoint of the
type testing stubs directly in the type objects. This means that the
caller of type testing stubs can simply branch there without populating
a code object first. This also means that the type testing stubs
themselves have no access to a pool and we therefore also don't hold on
to the [Code] object, only the [Instruction] object is necessary.
The type testing stubs do not setup a frame themselves and also have no
safepoint. In the case when the type testing stubs could not determine
a positive answer they will tail-call a general-purpose stub.
The general-purpose stub sets up a stub frame, tries to consult a
[SubtypeTestCache] and bails out to runtime if this was unsuccessful.
This CL is just the the first, for ease of reviewing. The actual
type-specialized type testing stubs will be generated in later CLs.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44787
Relands f226c22424
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 2
This CL starts building type testing stubs specialzed for [Type] objects
we test against.
More specifically, it adds support for:
* Handling obvious fast cases on the call sites (while still having a
call to stub for negative case)
* Handling type tests against type parameters, by loading the value
of the type parameter on the call sites and invoking it's type testing stub.
* Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can
do [CidRange]-based subtype-checks.
==> e.g. String/List<dynamic>
* Specialzed type testing stubs for instantiated types where we can
do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and
[CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the type arguments.
==> e.g. Widget<State>, where we know [Widget] is only extended and not
implemented.
* Specialzed type testing stubs for certain non-instantiated types where we
can do [CidRange]-based subclass-checks for the class and
[CidRange]-based subtype-checks for the instantiated type arguments and
cid based comparisons for type parameters. (Note that this fast-case migth
result in some false-negatives!)
==> e.g. _HashMapEntry<K, V>, where we know [_HashMapEntry] is only
extended and not implemented.
This optimizes cases where the caller uses `new HashMap<A, B>()` and only
uses `A` and `B` as key/values (and not subclasses of it). The false-negative
can occur when subtypes of A or B are used. In such cases we fall back to the
[SubtypeTestCache]-based imlementation.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/44788
Relands 25f98bcc75
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 3
The changes include:
* Make AssertAssignableInstr no longer have a call-summary, which
helps methods with several parameter checks by not having to
re-load/re-initialize type arguments registers
* Lazily create SubtypeTestCaches: We already go to runtime to warm up
the caches, so we now also create the caches on the first runtime
call and patch the pool entries.
* No longer load the destination name into a register: We only need
the name when we throw an exception, so it is not on the hot path.
Instead we let the runtime look at the call site, decoding a pool
index from the instructions stream. The destination name will be
available in the pool, at a consecutive index to the subtype cache.
* Remove the fall-through to N=1 case for probing subtypeing tests,
since those will always be handled by the optimized stubs.
* Do not generate optimized stubs for FutureOr<T> (so far it just
falled-through to TTS). We can make optimzed version of that later,
but it requires special subtyping rules.
* Local code quality improvement in the type-testing-stubs: Avoid
extra jump at last case of cid-class-range checks.
There are still a number of optimization opportunities we can do in
future changes.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/46984
Relands 2c52480ec8
[VM] Introduction of type testing stubs - Part 4
In order to avoid generating type testing stubs for too many types in
the system - and thereby potentially cause an increase in code size -
this change introduces a smarter way to decide for which types we should
generate optimized type testing stubs.
The precompiler creates a [TypeUsageInfo] which we use to collect
information. More specifically:
a) We collect the destination types for all type checks we emit
(we do this inside AssertAssignableInstr::EmitNativeCode).
-> These are types we might want to generate optimized type testing
stubs for.
b) We collect type argument vectors used in instance creations (we do
this inside AllocateObjectInstr::EmitNativeCode) and keep a set of
of used type argument vectors for each class.
After the precompiler has finished compiling normal code we scan the set
of destination types collected in a) for uninstantiated types (or more
specifically, type parameter types).
We then propagate the type argument vectors used on object allocation sites,
which were collected in b), in order to find out what kind of types are flowing
into those type parameters.
This allows us to extend the set of types which we test against, by
adding the types that flow into type parameters.
We use this final augmented set of destination types as a "filter" when
making the decision whether to generate an optimized type testing stub
for a given type.
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/48640
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/32603
Change-Id: I44a1d5d4b27454ae026aef2a301aada3dd399ea0
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/49861
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
The changes include:
* Make AssertAssignableInstr no longer have a call-summary, which
helps methods with several parameter checks by not having to
re-load/re-initialize type arguments registers
* Lazily create SubtypeTestCaches: We already go to runtime to warm up
the caches, so we now also create the caches on the first runtime
call and patch the pool entries.
* No longer load the destination name into a register: We only need
the name when we throw an exception, so it is not on the hot path.
Instead we let the runtime look at the call site, decoding a pool
index from the instructions stream. The destination name will be
available in the pool, at a consecutive index to the subtype cache.
* Remove the fall-through to N=1 case for probing subtypeing tests,
since those will always be handled by the optimized stubs.
* Do not generate optimized stubs for FutureOr<T> (so far it just
falled-through to TTS). We can make optimzed version of that later,
but it requires special subtyping rules.
* Local code quality improvement in the type-testing-stubs: Avoid
extra jump at last case of cid-class-range checks.
There are still a number of optimization opportunities we can do in
future changes.
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/31798
Change-Id: I4dc5a8a49f939178fe74d44736ef69e4b9088e46
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/46984
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Régis Crelier <regis@google.com>
Instead of calling code object directly, call indirectly and
pass the code object in a register. The object pool is then loaded from
the code object. This is another preparation step for making generated code
relocatable.
All non-ia32 platforms:
No entry patching.
ARM:
PC marker (now code object) moves to the same place as on x64 (below saved PP, above saved FP).
R9 is now used as PP, R10 as CODE_REG.
BUG=
R=koda@google.com, rmacnak@google.com
Committed: 1d343e5a7b
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org//1192103004 .
Instead of calling code object directly, call indirectly and
pass the code object in a register. The object pool is then loaded from
the code object. This is another preparation step for making generated code
relocatable.
All non-ia32 platforms:
No entry patching.
ARM:
PC marker (now code object) moves to the same place as on x64 (below saved PP, above saved FP).
R9 is now used as PP, R10 as CODE_REG.
BUG=
R=rmacnak@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org//1192103004 .
Change executable pages to be read/execute but not writable by default.
All pages are made temporarily writable just before a full GC, because both
the mark and sweep phases write to the pages. When allocating in a page and
when patching code, the pages are made temporarily writable.
The order of allocation of Code and Instructions objects is changed so that
a GC will not occur after Instructions is allocated. (A full GC would
render the Instructions unwritable.) A scoped object is used to make memory
protection simpler.
Original CL: https://codereview.chromium.org/106593002/
I added a cc test that is expected to crash.
R=srdjan@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org//136563002
git-svn-id: https://dart.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge/dart@32493 260f80e4-7a28-3924-810f-c04153c831b5
The code can be patched if it should not be executed any longer.
The code can be now patched at other location than at entry, the requirement is still that patching code does not overwrite an inlined object.
Intrinsic methods that do not have a fall through cannot be patched.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org//11783066
git-svn-id: https://dart.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge/dart@16897 260f80e4-7a28-3924-810f-c04153c831b5
