This option has the same functionality as the flag
"--build-summary-exclude-informative", except it is an option rather
than a flag. This makes it possible to get both a "full" summary and a
"semantic" summary by specifying both "--build-summary-output" and
"--build-summary-output-semantic".
The flag "--build-summary-exclude-informative" is kept around to ease in
transitioning tools, but it is deprecated.
R=brianwilkerson@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/2104003004 .
Addresses the issue seen in https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/26448.
Ultimately we want a better story for summaries in the presence of embedded SDKs; in the short-term this simply disables them.
The trick (and reason for all of the changes here) is that there is *a lot* of temporal coupling in the initiailization of contexts, sdks, resolvers, etc. With this change, embedder processing is pulled out to where it can be done before the SDK is configured. Hopefully this even makes this a bit more clear as resolver setup is less complex.
Open question: I think the logic that calls `pub list-dirs` is dead and can safely be removed. Comments there welcome.
Thanks!
BUG=
R=brianwilkerson@google.com, scheglov@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1984733003 .
Fixes: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/26129
The issue was that we were creating the SDK and populating its options (notably `strong-mode`) *before* options processors were called. The result was that client code analysis contexts and SDK contexts were getting configured differently causing confusion when client code was getting analyzed with a non-strong-mode SDK.
BUG=
R=paulberry@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1962403002 .
This simplifies the integration with build systems such as Bazel, in
which it is sometimes convenient to have a build unit which depends on
other build units but doesn't introduce any additional source files of
its own.
R=pquitslund@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1960263003 .
When summaries are built in fallback mode, the only information stored
in the package bundle is (a) which libraries appear in the bundle, and
(b) where the source files can be found on disk. This is enough
information so that DDC will still be able to tell how libraries are
grouped into build units, but otherwise summary functionality is
disabled.
This is intended to be availadle as a temporary workaround so that if
a bug is found in the summary infrastructure, it won't prevent DDC
compilation from working (it will just make it slower).
R=scheglov@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1826353002 .
Build mode differs from package mode in the following ways:
- The analyzer no longer guesses the relationship between paths and
URIs based on directory structure. Instead, each input file is
specified in the form "$uri|$path".
- The analyzer does not read any files from disk that are not
specified on the command line.
- There are no restrictions on the relationship between summaries and
packages. In particular: (a) multiple input summaries may summarize
parts of the same package, and (b) part of a package may be
specified with an input summary while an output summary is being
generated for other parts of the same package.
- Output may be redirected to a file.
- The analyzer may be told to exit with success even in the event that
an error is found during analysis.
This should ease the integration with Bazel, and provide a starting
point for integrating with other build systems.
R=scheglov@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1830463002 .
This is similar to --package-warnings, except that diagnostics will
only be reported for Dart packages matching the given prefix.
Also added the number of source files analyzed and the number of
errors generated to performance report.
Cleanup: simplified code for triggering diet parsing.
BUG=
R=paulberry@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1806263004 .
When --package-mode is specified, this turns ON the single package
analysis mode. My initial idea was to accept a single path - the root
folder of the package and analyze the package completely as Dart
Analysis Server does. But later I decided to accept a list of files
to analyze, at least for now.
We still need the --package-mode-path option with the path to the root
folder of the package because we need to know which libraries are in
the 'lib' folder and write these libraries into the output summary.
The option --package-name is used to write the same URIs into
summary as the clients are going to use to refer the package
libraries, and also as the package references itself.
Multiple --package-summary-input=pkg,summary options can be specified,
one for each package. Every referenced package (except itself) must
be listed.
If --package-summary-output is specified, the output summary of
the package is written to the specified file. It is up to the client
to specify the correct X.spec.sum or X.strong.sum names.
R=brianwilkerson@google.com, paulberry@google.com
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1720963003 .
1.13 stable builds of the SDK contain a version of server that fails catastrophically when analyzing source that imports packages that define embedded libraries. Since we can't pragmatically require more recent SDKs for flutter development we have been prevented from landing embedded libs in the flutter engine. By renaming the key we use to identify contributed libraries, this change avoids the issue. Old versions of server will simply ignore the new key and new ones will process it properly. Win-win!
BUG=
R=danrubel@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1643023002 .
Another stab. The rub, I *think*, to our failures are unexpected calls to `exit()` on the bots (that are not reproducing locally). These fixes should address that (and fix error stream handling along the way).
* fixes test setup and teardown to ensure exit handling is properly managed.
* fixes driver source to use the `exitHandler` and `errorSink` consistently
BUG=
R=keertip@google.com, scheglov@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1525623003 .
