From 5bf3c1fa4d92571b8b6dff68b5a1e0cab0452a57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erik Ernst <eernst@google.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 12:30:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fixed erroneously commented-out \end{itemize}

Commit 4cb61407a8bbd6050e876995f149b07cf9299445, CL
https://codereview.chromium.org/2476613002 introduced a spurious `%`
which causes `latex dartLangSpec.tex` to fail. This CL fixes it.

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/2487113003 .
---
 docs/language/dartLangSpec.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/language/dartLangSpec.tex b/docs/language/dartLangSpec.tex
index 5e009e68e58..26c415df817 100644
--- a/docs/language/dartLangSpec.tex
+++ b/docs/language/dartLangSpec.tex
@@ -4163,7 +4163,7 @@ $(r_1, \ldots, r_n, [p_1 = d_1, \ldots , p_k = d_k])$\{
 \}
 \end{dartCode}
 if $f$ is named $m$ and has required parameters $r_1, \ldots, r_n$, and optional positional parameters $p_1, \ldots, p_k$ with defaults $d_1, \ldots, d_k$.
-%\end{itemize}
+\end{itemize}
 
 \LMHash{}
 Except that iff  \code{identical($o_1, o_2$)}  then \cd{$o_1.m$ == $o_2.m$}.