languages/cpython
languages/cpython
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/python/cpython synced 2024-09-05 08:17:45 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merged revisions 76300 via svnmerge from

Browse source 
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk

........
  r76300 | mark.dickinson | 2009-11-15 13:12:43 +0000 (Sun, 15 Nov 2009) | 3 lines

  Issue #5792:  Extend short float repr support to x86 platforms using suncc or icc.
  Many thanks Stefan Krah for help and OpenSolaris testing.
........
This commit is contained in:
Mark Dickinson 2009-11-15 13:47:27 +00:00
parent b43dbc26f9
commit f4243f6d1f
3 changed files with 32 additions and 31 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

3
Misc/NEWS
View file

@ -358,6 +358,9 @@ Extension Modules
Build
-----
- Issue #5792: Extend the short float repr support to x86 systems using
icc or suncc.
- Issue #6603: Change READ_TIMESTAMP macro in ceval.c so that it
compiles correctly under gcc on x86-64. This fixes a reported
problem with the --with-tsc build on x86-64.

27
configure vendored
View file

@ -22945,15 +22945,15 @@ fi
# correctly-rounded string <-> double conversion functions from
# Python/dtoa.c, which in turn require that the FPU uses 53-bit
# rounding; this is a problem on x86, where the x87 FPU has a default
# rounding precision of 64 bits. For gcc/x86, we try to fix this by
# rounding precision of 64 bits. For gcc/x86, we can fix this by
# using inline assembler to get and set the x87 FPU control word.
if test "$GCC" = yes && test -n "`$CC -dM -E - </dev/null | grep i386`"
then
# Check that it's okay to use gcc inline assembler to get and set
# x87 control word. It should be, but you never know...
{ echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking whether we can use gcc inline assembler to get and set x87 control word" >&5
# This inline assembler syntax may also work for suncc and icc,
# so we try it on all platforms.
{ echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking whether we can use gcc inline assembler to get and set x87 control word" >&5
echo $ECHO_N "checking whether we can use gcc inline assembler to get and set x87 control word... $ECHO_C" >&6; }
cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
/* confdefs.h. */
_ACEOF
cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext
@ -22964,9 +22964,9 @@ int
main ()
{
unsigned short cw;
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fnstcw %0" : "=m" (cw));
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fldcw %0" : : "m" (cw));
unsigned short cw;
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fnstcw %0" : "=m" (cw));
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fldcw %0" : : "m" (cw));
;
return 0;
@ -22998,16 +22998,15 @@ sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5
fi
rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
{ echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $have_gcc_asm_for_x87" >&5
{ echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $have_gcc_asm_for_x87" >&5
echo "${ECHO_T}$have_gcc_asm_for_x87" >&6; }
if test "$have_gcc_asm_for_x87" = yes
then
if test "$have_gcc_asm_for_x87" = yes
then
cat >>confdefs.h <<\_ACEOF
#define HAVE_GCC_ASM_FOR_X87 1
_ACEOF
fi
fi
# Detect whether system arithmetic is subject to x87-style double

33
configure.in
View file

@ -3191,25 +3191,24 @@ fi
# correctly-rounded string <-> double conversion functions from
# Python/dtoa.c, which in turn require that the FPU uses 53-bit
# rounding; this is a problem on x86, where the x87 FPU has a default
# rounding precision of 64 bits. For gcc/x86, we try to fix this by
# rounding precision of 64 bits. For gcc/x86, we can fix this by
# using inline assembler to get and set the x87 FPU control word.
if test "$GCC" = yes && test -n "`$CC -dM -E - </dev/null | grep i386`"
# This inline assembler syntax may also work for suncc and icc,
# so we try it on all platforms.
AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether we can use gcc inline assembler to get and set x87 control word)
AC_TRY_COMPILE([], [
unsigned short cw;
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fnstcw %0" : "=m" (cw));
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fldcw %0" : : "m" (cw));
],
[have_gcc_asm_for_x87=yes], [have_gcc_asm_for_x87=no])
AC_MSG_RESULT($have_gcc_asm_for_x87)
if test "$have_gcc_asm_for_x87" = yes
then
# Check that it's okay to use gcc inline assembler to get and set
# x87 control word. It should be, but you never know...
AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether we can use gcc inline assembler to get and set x87 control word)
AC_TRY_COMPILE([], [
unsigned short cw;
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fnstcw %0" : "=m" (cw));
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fldcw %0" : : "m" (cw));
],
[have_gcc_asm_for_x87=yes], [have_gcc_asm_for_x87=no])
AC_MSG_RESULT($have_gcc_asm_for_x87)
if test "$have_gcc_asm_for_x87" = yes
then
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_GCC_ASM_FOR_X87, 1,
[Define if we can use gcc inline assembler to get and set x87 control word])
fi
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_GCC_ASM_FOR_X87, 1,
[Define if we can use gcc inline assembler to get and set x87 control word])
fi
# Detect whether system arithmetic is subject to x87-style double