The slot DolphinViewContainer::focusView(), introduced in commit
2f0114730d, is actually unnecessary
because DolphinViewContainer::requestFocus() provides the same
functionality already.
Before this change, files were grouped by calendar weeks if they were
modified in the current month and ignoring the "first week day setting",
but by the actual distance measured in multiples of seven days if the
were modified last month.
This not only fixes the "ignores first week day" bug, but also the
problem that the inconsistencies in the algorithm could lead to a broken
grouping in the first days of a month (see screenshot in the review
request).
BUG: 181337
FIXED-IN: 4.11
REVIEW: 108667
This concept is not needed anymore because of the new "determine parents and
expansion levels" approach
Side effect:
Enables treeview for trash, ...
REVIEW: 109191
changes! :)
* Fixed the "Network browser" and "timeline" issues, by using the
KDirLister's itemsAdded(KUrl,KFileItemList) signal -> Use the
given Url to define the parent-child relationship.
* Changed the name of the slot "slotNewItems" to "slotItemsAdded"
for consistency with the signal.
* Use a QHash<KFileItem, ItemData*> instead of a QSet<KFileItem> to
store the filtered data (needed to keep the O(1) lookup for filtered
KFileItems in slotItemsDeleted + needed to fix bug 311912 "After
erasing a filter, some thumbnails randomly disappear")
* Made the determination of the "expandedParentsCount" slightly
simpler - just adding 1 to the parent's level (Also needed to fix the
"Network browser" and "timeline" issues)
FIXED-IN: 4.11.0
REVIEW: 109180
BUG: 304565
BUG: 311912
BUG: 312890
BUG: 315593
Devices can be added and removed while the context menu is open.
Sfter an action has clicked that needs to access a device, we therefore
have to check if its position in the model has changed, and more
importantly, if it is still there at all in order to prevent a crash.
BUG: 315298
FIXED-IN: 4.10.1
REVIEW: 108989
One one machine, I see that changing the global "single click" setting
fails. I don't know why that is the case, but I think we should better
just skip the test in that case and not hang forever.
There was some code in KStandardItemListView::itemSizeHintUpdateRequired
already that was supposed to prevent an expensive re-layouting of all
items when a preview is received. However, it didn't quite work as
intended because also the "iconOverlays" role changed.
The new approach is to only re-layout if text of a visible role changes,
because this is the only way how the space needed by an item might
change (see KStandardItemListWidgetInformant::itemSizeHint()).
BUG: 315315
FIXED-IN: 4.10.1
REVIEW: 108984
The method to make sure that the first item is visible turned out to be
less reliable than I thought. This could make the test hang forever.
Moreover, this commit removes some trailing whitespace that had been
added accidentally.
The opacity of the unhovered pixmap must be gradually reduced while
animating otherwise the alpha channel saturates.
REVIEW: 108858
BUG: 299371
FIXED-IN: 4.10.1
The previous approach, which was based on comparing the URLs as
strings, was not only very complex, but also could lead to
inconsistencies in the model, namely, that not all children were
removed from the model when the dir lister reported the parent as
deleted. Later on, this could even lead to a crash.
BUG: 311947
FIXED-IN: 4.11
REVIEW: 108766
1. It seems that it really can happen that KFileItems that we get from
the dir lister's itemsDeleted signal are not in the model any more,
e.g., if a folder where hidden files are shown is left and a folder
where hidden files are not shown is entered. There is no need to
output warnings then.
2. Remove the emptiness-check for the KFileItemList at the beginning.
Even in the unlikely event that we do get an empty list, we return
just a few lines later in the code.
These crashes were caused by the recent commit
ff3267c6dc. It introduced two problems:
a) A logic error in the code that removes the ItemData pointers from
m_itemData that could cause crashes if multiple item ranges are
removed, and there were un-removed items behind the last one.
b) The implicit assumption that any call of removeItems() will actually
result in items being removed in the model. This is incorrect if
the model is first cleared and then the hidden-files setting is
modified, which happens if "Save view properties for each folder" is
enabled, and a folder where hidden files are shown is left. In that
case, the dir lister emits itemsDeleted for the hidden items after
they have been removed from the model due to the folder change.
I'll add a unit test covering these issues soon.
Many thanks to Romário Rios and Hrvoje Senjan for testing!
BUG: 314046
@info indicates it's rich text and will be added <html> tag by kdelibs,
so just escape the text that will be set to label for KDE/4.10
REVIEW: 108584
BUG: 313992
The performance of this method is improved by:
a) Not removing items one by one, but doing it in a way that minimizes
the number of moves to prevent O(N^2) worst-case complexity.
b) Not sorting the removed items using the potentially extremely slow
KFileItemModel::lessThan. We can get the indexes of the removed items
very easily from the hash m_items, and sorting ints is a lot faster.
c) Preventing repeated rehashing of m_items when removing the deleted
URLs by replacing remove() by erase().
REVIEW: 108540
The benchmark executable must be run manually. It is not run
automatically with the other unit tests to prevent waste of CPU cycles
in the not-so-uncommon situation that only test failures attract
attention.
The Nepomuk ResourceWatcher emits 3 signals - propertyChanged,
propertyAdded and propertyRemoved. We should only listen to either the
propertyChanged signal or the propertyAdded + Removed signals. There is
no point in listening to all 3 signals. That will just result in
unnecessary updates.
Additionally, we do not need to listen to the resourceCreated signal.
That is only emitted when we are watching for a specific types, which we
are not.
REVIEW: 108543
Showing this message in the KMessageWidget above the view, which means
that the view contents are moved down, can be extremely annoying
according to user feedback. Just showing the message in the status bar
is probably enough.
BUG: 313466
REVIEW: 108483
FIXED-IN: 4.10.0
In fact, we could use the sorting functions provided by Qt or the STL.
The reason why we have our own is that we want to support parallel
sorting because sorting many items naturally by name can be expensive.
