kde/dolphin
kde/dolphin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://invent.kde.org/system/dolphin synced 2024-09-12 12:54:29 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fixed issue that the close-action for the split view has been applied to the inactive view instead of the active view

Browse source 
BUG: 167209

svn path=/trunk/KDE/kdebase/apps/; revision=836643
This commit is contained in:
Peter Penz 2008-07-22 17:36:52 +00:00
parent b1eca66e8b
commit 5d7de69ae6
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
src/dolphinmainwindow.cpp
View file

@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ void DolphinMainWindow::toggleSplitView()
m_viewTab[m_tabIndex].secondaryView->show();
setActiveViewContainer(m_viewTab[m_tabIndex].secondaryView);
} else if (m_activeViewContainer == m_viewTab[m_tabIndex].primaryView) {
} else if (m_activeViewContainer == m_viewTab[m_tabIndex].secondaryView) {
// remove secondary view
m_viewTab[m_tabIndex].secondaryView->close();
m_viewTab[m_tabIndex].secondaryView->deleteLater();
@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ void DolphinMainWindow::toggleSplitView()
setActiveViewContainer(m_viewTab[m_tabIndex].primaryView);
} else {
// The secondary view is active, hence from a users point of view
// The primary view is active and should be closed. Hence from a users point of view
// the content of the secondary view should be moved to the primary view.
// From an implementation point of view it is more efficient to close
// the primary view and exchange the internal pointers afterwards.
@ -1154,7 +1154,7 @@ void DolphinMainWindow::updateSplitAction()
{
QAction* splitAction = actionCollection()->action("split_view");
if (m_viewTab[m_tabIndex].secondaryView != 0) {
if (m_activeViewContainer == m_viewTab[m_tabIndex].primaryView) {
if (m_activeViewContainer == m_viewTab[m_tabIndex].secondaryView) {
splitAction->setText(i18nc("@action:intoolbar Close right view", "Close"));
splitAction->setIcon(KIcon("view-right-close"));
} else {