mirror of
https://github.com/desktop/desktop
synced 2024-08-28 12:40:55 +00:00
Use main
Co-Authored-By: Sergio Padrino <1083228+sergiou87@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8d1e24b355
commit
7f4a21b309
|
@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
|
|||
# Reachable and Unreachable Commits
|
||||
|
||||
In Git, every commit will have at least one parent commit except the very first. Additionally, a repository may have any number of branches that begin at any particular commit. Because of this we can create a graph of the history of a commit by following the path from one commit's parent to the another. Given a branch `development`, whose initial commit is `A`, and we add commit `B` and `C`, the resulting graph would be as follows:
|
||||
In Git, every commit will have at least one parent commit except the very first. Additionally, a repository may have any number of branches that begin at any particular commit. Because of this we can create a graph of the history of a commit by following the path from one commit's parent to the another. Given a branch `main`, whose initial commit is `A`, and we add commit `B` and `C`, the resulting graph would be as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
development
|
||||
main
|
||||
C
|
||||
|
|
||||
B
|
||||
|
@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ A
|
|||
Since we can follow the graph from `C` to `A`, that means that `A` is **reachable** by or from `C`. This as known as following the ancestral path of `C`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Unreachable Commits
|
||||
Now, if we create a new branch called `feature-branch` from `C` and commit `D` and `E` and then return to `development` and commit `F`. We would have the resulting graph:
|
||||
Now, if we create a new branch called `feature-branch` from `C` and commit `D` and `E` and then return to `main` and commit `F`. We would have the resulting graph:
|
||||
```
|
||||
development
|
||||
main
|
||||
F
|
||||
| E
|
||||
| | <-- feature-branch
|
||||
|
@ -35,9 +35,9 @@ In the above example, `B` is reachable by `F` through the ancestral path of `F`-
|
|||
Some Git commands use the ancestral path to determine what to show. One of those is `git diff`, which is used to see the changes between two commits non inclusive of the first commit. If we execute `git diff A..C`, we will receive the set of changes from the commits along the ancestral path from `C` to `A` or `C` -> `B` -> `A`. Thus, we would see changes from `B` and `C`. Likewise, if we executed `git diff B..F`, you will get changes from reachable from `F`; thus, `F` -> `C` -> `B`. But, not changes from `E` and `D` as they are unreachable.
|
||||
|
||||
## Merge Commits
|
||||
Now, let's say that we merge the `feature-branch` into our `development` branch. Our graph becomes:
|
||||
Now, let's say that we merge the `feature-branch` into our `main` branch. Our graph becomes:
|
||||
```
|
||||
development
|
||||
main
|
||||
G
|
||||
| \
|
||||
F |
|
||||
|
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ B
|
|||
A
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Still `E` and `D` are unreachable by `F`. But, you may think "I merged the `feature-branch` into `development`, I should be able to see changes from `E` and `D`." This is true if you start at a commit that has them in its ancestral path. That is `G` and it is known as a **merge commit**, and it is special in that it has two parents. The first is `F` as the last commit of the branch being merged into, and `E` as the last commit of the branch being merged. Now, all the commits in this graph are ancestors of `G`. Thus, if we were to execute `git diff B..G`. We will see changes of all ancestral paths of `G` to `B`. Those paths are `G` -> `F` -> `C` -> `B` and `G`-> `E` -> `D` -> `C` -> `B`. Therefore we will see changes from `G`, `F`, `E`, `D`, and `C`.
|
||||
Still `E` and `D` are unreachable by `F`. But, you may think "I merged the `feature-branch` into `main`, I should be able to see changes from `E` and `D`." This is true if you start at a commit that has them in its ancestral path. That is `G` and it is known as a **merge commit**, and it is special in that it has two parents. The first is `F` as the last commit of the branch being merged into, and `E` as the last commit of the branch being merged. Now, all the commits in this graph are ancestors of `G`. Thus, if we were to execute `git diff B..G`. We will see changes of all ancestral paths of `G` to `B`. Those paths are `G` -> `F` -> `C` -> `B` and `G`-> `E` -> `D` -> `C` -> `B`. Therefore we will see changes from `G`, `F`, `E`, `D`, and `C`.
|
||||
|
||||
# GitHub Desktop
|
||||
In GitHub Desktop, commits are displayed linearly and in chronological order. Thus, the graph from the previous section `Merge Commits` would look like:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue