git/t/t6404-recursive-merge.sh
Abhishek Kumar 8d00d7c3df commit-reach: use corrected commit dates in paint_down_to_common()
091f4cf (commit: don't use generation numbers if not needed,
2018-08-30) changed paint_down_to_common() to use commit dates instead
of generation numbers v1 (topological levels) as the performance
regressed on certain topologies. With generation number v2 (corrected
commit dates) implemented, we no longer have to rely on commit dates and
can use generation numbers.

For example, the command `git merge-base v4.8 v4.9` on the Linux
repository walks 167468 commits, taking 0.135s for committer date and
167496 commits, taking 0.157s for corrected committer date respectively.

While using corrected commit dates, Git walks nearly the same number of
commits as commit date, the process is slower as for each comparision we
have to access a commit-slab (for corrected committer date) instead of
accessing struct member (for committer date).

This change incidentally broke the fragile t6404-recursive-merge test.
t6404-recursive-merge sets up a unique repository where all commits have
the same committer date without a well-defined merge-base.

While running tests with GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH unset, we use committer
date as a heuristic in paint_down_to_common(). 6404.1 'combined merge
conflicts' merges commits in the order:
- Merge C with B to form an intermediate commit.
- Merge the intermediate commit with A.

With GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=1, we write a commit-graph and subsequently
use the corrected committer date, which changes the order in which
commits are merged:
- Merge A with B to form an intermediate commit.
- Merge the intermediate commit with C.

While resulting repositories are equivalent, 6404.4 'virtual trees were
processed' fails with GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=1 as we are selecting
different merge-bases and thus have different object ids for the
intermediate commits.

As this has already causes problems (as noted in 859fdc0 (commit-graph:
define GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH, 2018-08-29)), we disable commit graph
within t6404-recursive-merge.

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18 16:21:18 -08:00

145 lines
3.4 KiB
Bash
Executable file

#!/bin/sh
test_description='Test merge without common ancestors'
. ./test-lib.sh
# This scenario is based on a real-world repository of Shawn Pearce.
# 1 - A - D - F
# \ X /
# B X
# X \
# 2 - C - E - G
GIT_COMMITTER_DATE="2006-12-12 23:28:00 +0100"
export GIT_COMMITTER_DATE
test_expect_success 'setup tests' '
GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=0 &&
export GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH &&
echo 1 >a1 &&
git add a1 &&
GIT_AUTHOR_DATE="2006-12-12 23:00:00" git commit -m 1 a1 &&
git checkout -b A master &&
echo A >a1 &&
GIT_AUTHOR_DATE="2006-12-12 23:00:01" git commit -m A a1 &&
git checkout -b B master &&
echo B >a1 &&
GIT_AUTHOR_DATE="2006-12-12 23:00:02" git commit -m B a1 &&
git checkout -b D A &&
git rev-parse B >.git/MERGE_HEAD &&
echo D >a1 &&
git update-index a1 &&
GIT_AUTHOR_DATE="2006-12-12 23:00:03" git commit -m D &&
git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/other &&
echo 2 >a1 &&
GIT_AUTHOR_DATE="2006-12-12 23:00:04" git commit -m 2 a1 &&
git checkout -b C &&
echo C >a1 &&
GIT_AUTHOR_DATE="2006-12-12 23:00:05" git commit -m C a1 &&
git checkout -b E C &&
git rev-parse B >.git/MERGE_HEAD &&
echo E >a1 &&
git update-index a1 &&
GIT_AUTHOR_DATE="2006-12-12 23:00:06" git commit -m E &&
git checkout -b G E &&
git rev-parse A >.git/MERGE_HEAD &&
echo G >a1 &&
git update-index a1 &&
GIT_AUTHOR_DATE="2006-12-12 23:00:07" git commit -m G &&
git checkout -b F D &&
git rev-parse C >.git/MERGE_HEAD &&
echo F >a1 &&
git update-index a1 &&
GIT_AUTHOR_DATE="2006-12-12 23:00:08" git commit -m F &&
test_oid_cache <<-EOF
idxstage1 sha1:ec3fe2a791706733f2d8fa7ad45d9a9672031f5e
idxstage1 sha256:b3c8488929903aaebdeb22270cb6d36e5b8724b01ae0d4da24632f158c99676f
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'combined merge conflicts' '
test_must_fail git merge -m final G
'
test_expect_success 'result contains a conflict' '
cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
<<<<<<< HEAD
F
=======
G
>>>>>>> G
EOF
test_cmp expect a1
'
test_expect_success 'virtual trees were processed' '
# TODO: fragile test, relies on ambigious merge-base resolution
git ls-files --stage >out &&
cat >expect <<-EOF &&
100644 $(test_oid idxstage1) 1 a1
100644 $(git rev-parse F:a1) 2 a1
100644 $(git rev-parse G:a1) 3 a1
EOF
test_cmp expect out
'
test_expect_success 'refuse to merge binary files' '
git reset --hard &&
printf "\0" >binary-file &&
git add binary-file &&
git commit -m binary &&
git checkout G &&
printf "\0\0" >binary-file &&
git add binary-file &&
git commit -m binary2 &&
test_must_fail git merge F >merge.out 2>merge.err &&
grep "Cannot merge binary files: binary-file (HEAD vs. F)" merge.err
'
test_expect_success 'mark rename/delete as unmerged' '
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -b delete &&
git rm a1 &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m delete &&
git checkout -b rename HEAD^ &&
git mv a1 a2 &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m rename &&
test_must_fail git merge delete &&
if test "$GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM" = ort
then
test 2 = $(git ls-files --unmerged | wc -l)
else
test 1 = $(git ls-files --unmerged | wc -l)
fi &&
git rev-parse --verify :2:a2 &&
test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify :3:a2 &&
git checkout -f delete &&
test_must_fail git merge rename &&
if test "$GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM" = ort
then
test 2 = $(git ls-files --unmerged | wc -l)
else
test 1 = $(git ls-files --unmerged | wc -l)
fi &&
test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify :2:a2 &&
git rev-parse --verify :3:a2
'
test_done