mirror of
https://github.com/git/git
synced 2024-10-30 04:01:21 +00:00
6d63070cac
Earlier in this series, the patch "merge-recursive: add handling for rename/rename/add-dest/add-dest" added code to handle the rename on each side of history also being involved in a rename/add conflict, but only did so in the non-recursive case. Add code for the recursive case, ensuring that the "added" files are not simply deleted. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
776 lines
19 KiB
Bash
Executable file
776 lines
19 KiB
Bash
Executable file
#!/bin/sh
|
|
|
|
test_description='recursive merge corner cases involving criss-cross merges'
|
|
|
|
. ./test-lib.sh
|
|
|
|
get_clean_checkout () {
|
|
git reset --hard &&
|
|
git clean -fdqx &&
|
|
git checkout "$1"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
# L1 L2
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# / \ / \
|
|
# o X ?
|
|
# \ / \ /
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# R1 R2
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'setup basic criss-cross + rename with no modifications' '
|
|
ten="0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9" &&
|
|
for i in $ten
|
|
do
|
|
echo line $i in a sample file
|
|
done >one &&
|
|
for i in $ten
|
|
do
|
|
echo line $i in another sample file
|
|
done >two &&
|
|
git add one two &&
|
|
test_tick && git commit -m initial &&
|
|
|
|
git branch L1 &&
|
|
git checkout -b R1 &&
|
|
git mv one three &&
|
|
test_tick && git commit -m R1 &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout L1 &&
|
|
git mv two three &&
|
|
test_tick && git commit -m L1 &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout L1^0 &&
|
|
test_tick && git merge -s ours R1 &&
|
|
git tag L2 &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout R1^0 &&
|
|
test_tick && git merge -s ours L1 &&
|
|
git tag R2
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'merge simple rename+criss-cross with no modifications' '
|
|
git reset --hard &&
|
|
git checkout L2^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git merge -s recursive R2^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test 2 = $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 2 = $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 2 = $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :2:three) = $(git rev-parse L2:three) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :3:three) = $(git rev-parse R2:three) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse L2:three) = $(git hash-object three~HEAD) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse R2:three) = $(git hash-object three~R2^0)
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
# Same as before, but modify L1 slightly:
|
|
#
|
|
# L1m L2
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# / \ / \
|
|
# o X ?
|
|
# \ / \ /
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# R1 R2
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'setup criss-cross + rename merges with basic modification' '
|
|
git rm -rf . &&
|
|
git clean -fdqx &&
|
|
rm -rf .git &&
|
|
git init &&
|
|
|
|
ten="0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9"
|
|
for i in $ten
|
|
do
|
|
echo line $i in a sample file
|
|
done >one &&
|
|
for i in $ten
|
|
do
|
|
echo line $i in another sample file
|
|
done >two &&
|
|
git add one two &&
|
|
test_tick && git commit -m initial &&
|
|
|
|
git branch L1 &&
|
|
git checkout -b R1 &&
|
|
git mv one three &&
|
|
echo more >>two &&
|
|
git add two &&
|
|
test_tick && git commit -m R1 &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout L1 &&
|
|
git mv two three &&
|
|
test_tick && git commit -m L1 &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout L1^0 &&
|
|
test_tick && git merge -s ours R1 &&
|
|
git tag L2 &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout R1^0 &&
|
|
test_tick && git merge -s ours L1 &&
|
|
git tag R2
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'merge criss-cross + rename merges with basic modification' '
|
|
git reset --hard &&
|
|
git checkout L2^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git merge -s recursive R2^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test 2 = $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 2 = $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 2 = $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :2:three) = $(git rev-parse L2:three) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :3:three) = $(git rev-parse R2:three) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse L2:three) = $(git hash-object three~HEAD) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse R2:three) = $(git hash-object three~R2^0)
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
# For the next test, we start with three commits in two lines of development
|
|
# which setup a rename/add conflict:
|
|
# Commit A: File 'a' exists
|
|
# Commit B: Rename 'a' -> 'new_a'
|
|
# Commit C: Modify 'a', create different 'new_a'
|
|
# Later, two different people merge and resolve differently:
|
|
# Commit D: Merge B & C, ignoring separately created 'new_a'
|
|
# Commit E: Merge B & C making use of some piece of secondary 'new_a'
|
|
# Finally, someone goes to merge D & E. Does git detect the conflict?
|
|
#
|
|
# B D
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# / \ / \
|
|
# A o X ? F
|
|
# \ / \ /
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# C E
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'setup differently handled merges of rename/add conflict' '
|
|
git rm -rf . &&
|
|
git clean -fdqx &&
|
|
rm -rf .git &&
|
|
git init &&
|
|
|
|
printf "0\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n" >a &&
|
|
git add a &&
|
|
test_tick && git commit -m A &&
|
|
|
|
git branch B &&
|
|
git checkout -b C &&
|
|
echo 10 >>a &&
|
|
echo "other content" >>new_a &&
|
|
git add a new_a &&
|
|
test_tick && git commit -m C &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout B &&
|
|
git mv a new_a &&
|
|
test_tick && git commit -m B &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout B^0 &&
|
|
test_must_fail git merge C &&
|
|
git clean -f &&
|
|
test_tick && git commit -m D &&
|
|
git tag D &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout C^0 &&
|
|
test_must_fail git merge B &&
|
|
rm new_a~HEAD new_a &&
|
|
printf "Incorrectly merged content" >>new_a &&
|
|
git add -u &&
|
|
test_tick && git commit -m E &&
|
|
git tag E
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'git detects differently handled merges conflict' '
|
|
git reset --hard &&
|
|
git checkout D^0 &&
|
|
|
|
git merge -s recursive E^0 && {
|
|
echo "BAD: should have conflicted"
|
|
test "Incorrectly merged content" = "$(cat new_a)" &&
|
|
echo "BAD: Silently accepted wrong content"
|
|
return 1
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test 3 = $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 3 = $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 0 = $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :2:new_a) = $(git rev-parse D:new_a) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :3:new_a) = $(git rev-parse E:new_a) &&
|
|
|
|
git cat-file -p B:new_a >>merged &&
|
|
git cat-file -p C:new_a >>merge-me &&
|
|
>empty &&
|
|
test_must_fail git merge-file \
|
|
-L "Temporary merge branch 2" \
|
|
-L "" \
|
|
-L "Temporary merge branch 1" \
|
|
merged empty merge-me &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :1:new_a) = $(git hash-object merged)
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
# criss-cross + modify/delete:
|
|
#
|
|
# B D
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# / \ / \
|
|
# A o X ? F
|
|
# \ / \ /
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# C E
|
|
#
|
|
# Commit A: file with contents 'A\n'
|
|
# Commit B: file with contents 'B\n'
|
|
# Commit C: file not present
|
|
# Commit D: file with contents 'B\n'
|
|
# Commit E: file not present
|
|
#
|
|
# Merging commits D & E should result in modify/delete conflict.
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'setup criss-cross + modify/delete resolved differently' '
|
|
git rm -rf . &&
|
|
git clean -fdqx &&
|
|
rm -rf .git &&
|
|
git init &&
|
|
|
|
echo A >file &&
|
|
git add file &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m A &&
|
|
|
|
git branch B &&
|
|
git checkout -b C &&
|
|
git rm file &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m C &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout B &&
|
|
echo B >file &&
|
|
git add file &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m B &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout B^0 &&
|
|
test_must_fail git merge C &&
|
|
echo B >file &&
|
|
git add file &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m D &&
|
|
git tag D &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout C^0 &&
|
|
test_must_fail git merge B &&
|
|
git rm file &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m E &&
|
|
git tag E
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'git detects conflict merging criss-cross+modify/delete' '
|
|
git checkout D^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git merge -s recursive E^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :1:file) = $(git rev-parse master:file) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :2:file) = $(git rev-parse B:file)
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'git detects conflict merging criss-cross+modify/delete, reverse direction' '
|
|
git reset --hard &&
|
|
git checkout E^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git merge -s recursive D^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :1:file) = $(git rev-parse master:file) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :3:file) = $(git rev-parse B:file)
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
# criss-cross + modify/modify with very contrived file contents:
|
|
#
|
|
# B D
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# / \ / \
|
|
# A o X ? F
|
|
# \ / \ /
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# C E
|
|
#
|
|
# Commit A: file with contents 'A\n'
|
|
# Commit B: file with contents 'B\n'
|
|
# Commit C: file with contents 'C\n'
|
|
# Commit D: file with contents 'D\n'
|
|
# Commit E: file with contents:
|
|
# <<<<<<< Temporary merge branch 1
|
|
# C
|
|
# =======
|
|
# B
|
|
# >>>>>>> Temporary merge branch 2
|
|
#
|
|
# Now, when we merge commits D & E, does git detect the conflict?
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'setup differently handled merges of content conflict' '
|
|
git clean -fdqx &&
|
|
rm -rf .git &&
|
|
git init &&
|
|
|
|
echo A >file &&
|
|
git add file &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m A &&
|
|
|
|
git branch B &&
|
|
git checkout -b C &&
|
|
echo C >file &&
|
|
git add file &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m C &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout B &&
|
|
echo B >file &&
|
|
git add file &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m B &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout B^0 &&
|
|
test_must_fail git merge C &&
|
|
echo D >file &&
|
|
git add file &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m D &&
|
|
git tag D &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout C^0 &&
|
|
test_must_fail git merge B &&
|
|
cat <<EOF >file &&
|
|
<<<<<<< Temporary merge branch 1
|
|
C
|
|
=======
|
|
B
|
|
>>>>>>> Temporary merge branch 2
|
|
EOF
|
|
git add file &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m E &&
|
|
git tag E
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_failure 'git detects conflict w/ criss-cross+contrived resolution' '
|
|
git checkout D^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git merge -s recursive E^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :2:file) = $(git rev-parse D:file) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :3:file) = $(git rev-parse E:file)
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
# criss-cross + d/f conflict via add/add:
|
|
# Commit A: Neither file 'a' nor directory 'a/' exist.
|
|
# Commit B: Introduce 'a'
|
|
# Commit C: Introduce 'a/file'
|
|
# Commit D: Merge B & C, keeping 'a' and deleting 'a/'
|
|
#
|
|
# Two different later cases:
|
|
# Commit E1: Merge B & C, deleting 'a' but keeping 'a/file'
|
|
# Commit E2: Merge B & C, deleting 'a' but keeping a slightly modified 'a/file'
|
|
#
|
|
# B D
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# / \ / \
|
|
# A o X ? F
|
|
# \ / \ /
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# C E1 or E2
|
|
#
|
|
# Merging D & E1 requires we first create a virtual merge base X from
|
|
# merging A & B in memory. Now, if X could keep both 'a' and 'a/file' in
|
|
# the index, then the merge of D & E1 could be resolved cleanly with both
|
|
# 'a' and 'a/file' removed. Since git does not currently allow creating
|
|
# such a tree, the best we can do is have X contain both 'a~<unique>' and
|
|
# 'a/file' resulting in the merge of D and E1 having a rename/delete
|
|
# conflict for 'a'. (Although this merge appears to be unsolvable with git
|
|
# currently, git could do a lot better than it currently does with these
|
|
# d/f conflicts, which is the purpose of this test.)
|
|
#
|
|
# Merge of D & E2 has similar issues for path 'a', but should always result
|
|
# in a modify/delete conflict for path 'a/file'.
|
|
#
|
|
# We run each merge in both directions, to check for directional issues
|
|
# with D/F conflict handling.
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'setup differently handled merges of directory/file conflict' '
|
|
git rm -rf . &&
|
|
git clean -fdqx &&
|
|
rm -rf .git &&
|
|
git init &&
|
|
|
|
>ignore-me &&
|
|
git add ignore-me &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m A &&
|
|
git tag A &&
|
|
|
|
git branch B &&
|
|
git checkout -b C &&
|
|
mkdir a &&
|
|
echo 10 >a/file &&
|
|
git add a/file &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m C &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout B &&
|
|
echo 5 >a &&
|
|
git add a &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m B &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout B^0 &&
|
|
test_must_fail git merge C &&
|
|
git clean -f &&
|
|
rm -rf a/ &&
|
|
echo 5 >a &&
|
|
git add a &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m D &&
|
|
git tag D &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout C^0 &&
|
|
test_must_fail git merge B &&
|
|
git clean -f &&
|
|
git rm --cached a &&
|
|
echo 10 >a/file &&
|
|
git add a/file &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m E1 &&
|
|
git tag E1 &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout C^0 &&
|
|
test_must_fail git merge B &&
|
|
git clean -f &&
|
|
git rm --cached a &&
|
|
printf "10\n11\n" >a/file &&
|
|
git add a/file &&
|
|
test_tick &&
|
|
git commit -m E2 &&
|
|
git tag E2
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'merge of D & E1 fails but has appropriate contents' '
|
|
get_clean_checkout D^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git merge -s recursive E1^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :0:ignore-me) = $(git rev-parse A:ignore-me) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :2:a) = $(git rev-parse B:a)
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'merge of E1 & D fails but has appropriate contents' '
|
|
get_clean_checkout E1^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git merge -s recursive D^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :0:ignore-me) = $(git rev-parse A:ignore-me) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :3:a) = $(git rev-parse B:a)
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'merge of D & E2 fails but has appropriate contents' '
|
|
get_clean_checkout D^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git merge -s recursive E2^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test 4 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :2:a) = $(git rev-parse B:a) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :3:a/file) = $(git rev-parse E2:a/file) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :1:a/file) = $(git rev-parse C:a/file) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :0:ignore-me) = $(git rev-parse A:ignore-me) &&
|
|
|
|
test -f a~HEAD
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'merge of E2 & D fails but has appropriate contents' '
|
|
get_clean_checkout E2^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git merge -s recursive D^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test 4 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :3:a) = $(git rev-parse B:a) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :2:a/file) = $(git rev-parse E2:a/file) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :1:a/file) = $(git rev-parse C:a/file)
|
|
test $(git rev-parse :0:ignore-me) = $(git rev-parse A:ignore-me) &&
|
|
|
|
test -f a~D^0
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
# criss-cross with rename/rename(1to2)/modify followed by
|
|
# rename/rename(2to1)/modify:
|
|
#
|
|
# B D
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# / \ / \
|
|
# A o X ? F
|
|
# \ / \ /
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# C E
|
|
#
|
|
# Commit A: new file: a
|
|
# Commit B: rename a->b, modifying by adding a line
|
|
# Commit C: rename a->c
|
|
# Commit D: merge B&C, resolving conflict by keeping contents in newname
|
|
# Commit E: merge B&C, resolving conflict similar to D but adding another line
|
|
#
|
|
# There is a conflict merging B & C, but one of filename not of file
|
|
# content. Whoever created D and E chose specific resolutions for that
|
|
# conflict resolution. Now, since: (1) there is no content conflict
|
|
# merging B & C, (2) D does not modify that merged content further, and (3)
|
|
# both D & E resolve the name conflict in the same way, the modification to
|
|
# newname in E should not cause any conflicts when it is merged with D.
|
|
# (Note that this can be accomplished by having the virtual merge base have
|
|
# the merged contents of b and c stored in a file named a, which seems like
|
|
# the most logical choice anyway.)
|
|
#
|
|
# Comment from Junio: I do not necessarily agree with the choice "a", but
|
|
# it feels sound to say "B and C do not agree what the final pathname
|
|
# should be, but we know this content was derived from the common A:a so we
|
|
# use one path whose name is arbitrary in the virtual merge base X between
|
|
# D and E" and then further let the rename detection to notice that that
|
|
# arbitrary path gets renamed between X-D to "newname" and X-E also to
|
|
# "newname" to resolve it as both sides renaming it to the same new
|
|
# name. It is akin to what we do at the content level, i.e. "B and C do not
|
|
# agree what the final contents should be, so we leave the conflict marker
|
|
# but that may cancel out at the final merge stage".
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename(1to2)/modify followed by what looks like rename/rename(2to1)/modify' '
|
|
git reset --hard &&
|
|
git rm -rf . &&
|
|
git clean -fdqx &&
|
|
rm -rf .git &&
|
|
git init &&
|
|
|
|
printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n" >a &&
|
|
git add a &&
|
|
git commit -m A &&
|
|
git tag A &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b B A &&
|
|
git mv a b &&
|
|
echo 7 >>b &&
|
|
git add -u &&
|
|
git commit -m B &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b C A &&
|
|
git mv a c &&
|
|
git commit -m C &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -q B^0 &&
|
|
git merge --no-commit -s ours C^0 &&
|
|
git mv b newname &&
|
|
git commit -m "Merge commit C^0 into HEAD" &&
|
|
git tag D &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -q C^0 &&
|
|
git merge --no-commit -s ours B^0 &&
|
|
git mv c newname &&
|
|
printf "7\n8\n" >>newname &&
|
|
git add -u &&
|
|
git commit -m "Merge commit B^0 into HEAD" &&
|
|
git tag E
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'handle rename/rename(1to2)/modify followed by what looks like rename/rename(2to1)/modify' '
|
|
git checkout D^0 &&
|
|
|
|
git merge -s recursive E^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test 1 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse HEAD:newname) = $(git rev-parse E:newname)
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
# criss-cross with rename/rename(1to2)/add-source + resolvable modify/modify:
|
|
#
|
|
# B D
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# / \ / \
|
|
# A o X ? F
|
|
# \ / \ /
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# C E
|
|
#
|
|
# Commit A: new file: a
|
|
# Commit B: rename a->b
|
|
# Commit C: rename a->c, add different a
|
|
# Commit D: merge B&C, keeping b&c and (new) a modified at beginning
|
|
# Commit E: merge B&C, keeping b&c and (new) a modified at end
|
|
#
|
|
# Merging commits D & E should result in no conflict; doing so correctly
|
|
# requires getting the virtual merge base (from merging B&C) right, handling
|
|
# renaming carefully (both in the virtual merge base and later), and getting
|
|
# content merge handled.
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'setup criss-cross + rename/rename/add + modify/modify' '
|
|
git rm -rf . &&
|
|
git clean -fdqx &&
|
|
rm -rf .git &&
|
|
git init &&
|
|
|
|
printf "lots\nof\nwords\nand\ncontent\n" >a &&
|
|
git add a &&
|
|
git commit -m A &&
|
|
git tag A &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b B A &&
|
|
git mv a b &&
|
|
git commit -m B &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b C A &&
|
|
git mv a c &&
|
|
printf "2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n" >a &&
|
|
git add a &&
|
|
git commit -m C &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout B^0 &&
|
|
git merge --no-commit -s ours C^0 &&
|
|
git checkout C -- a c &&
|
|
mv a old_a &&
|
|
echo 1 >a &&
|
|
cat old_a >>a &&
|
|
rm old_a &&
|
|
git add -u &&
|
|
git commit -m "Merge commit C^0 into HEAD" &&
|
|
git tag D &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout C^0 &&
|
|
git merge --no-commit -s ours B^0 &&
|
|
git checkout B -- b &&
|
|
echo 8 >>a &&
|
|
git add -u &&
|
|
git commit -m "Merge commit B^0 into HEAD" &&
|
|
git tag E
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_failure 'detect rename/rename/add-source for virtual merge-base' '
|
|
git checkout D^0 &&
|
|
|
|
git merge -s recursive E^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test 3 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse HEAD:b) = $(git rev-parse A:a) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse HEAD:c) = $(git rev-parse A:a) &&
|
|
test "$(cat a)" = "$(printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n")"
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
# criss-cross with rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest + simple modify:
|
|
#
|
|
# B D
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# / \ / \
|
|
# A o X ? F
|
|
# \ / \ /
|
|
# o---o
|
|
# C E
|
|
#
|
|
# Commit A: new file: a
|
|
# Commit B: rename a->b, add c
|
|
# Commit C: rename a->c
|
|
# Commit D: merge B&C, keeping A:a and B:c
|
|
# Commit E: merge B&C, keeping A:a and slightly modified c from B
|
|
#
|
|
# Merging commits D & E should result in no conflict. The virtual merge
|
|
# base of B & C needs to not delete B:c for that to work, though...
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'setup criss-cross+rename/rename/add-dest + simple modify' '
|
|
git rm -rf . &&
|
|
git clean -fdqx &&
|
|
rm -rf .git &&
|
|
git init &&
|
|
|
|
>a &&
|
|
git add a &&
|
|
git commit -m A &&
|
|
git tag A &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b B A &&
|
|
git mv a b &&
|
|
printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n" >c &&
|
|
git add c &&
|
|
git commit -m B &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b C A &&
|
|
git mv a c &&
|
|
git commit -m C &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout B^0 &&
|
|
git merge --no-commit -s ours C^0 &&
|
|
git mv b a &&
|
|
git commit -m "D is like B but renames b back to a" &&
|
|
git tag D &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout B^0 &&
|
|
git merge --no-commit -s ours C^0 &&
|
|
git mv b a &&
|
|
echo 8 >>c &&
|
|
git add c &&
|
|
git commit -m "E like D but has mod in c" &&
|
|
git tag E
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'virtual merge base handles rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest' '
|
|
git checkout D^0 &&
|
|
|
|
git merge -s recursive E^0 &&
|
|
|
|
test 2 -eq $(git ls-files -s | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) &&
|
|
test 0 -eq $(git ls-files -o | wc -l) &&
|
|
|
|
test $(git rev-parse HEAD:a) = $(git rev-parse A:a) &&
|
|
test $(git rev-parse HEAD:c) = $(git rev-parse E:c)
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
test_done
|