git/t/t6111-rev-list-treesame.sh
Kevin Bracey 141efdba57 revision.c: make default history consider bottom commits
Previously, the default history treated bottom commits the same as any
other UNINTERESTING commit, which could force it down side branches.

Consider the following history:

   *A--*B---D--*F         * marks !TREESAME parent paths
     \     /*
      `-C-'

When requesting "B..F", B is UNINTERESTING but TREESAME to D. C is
!UNINTERESTING.

So default following would go from D into the irrelevant side branch C
to A, rather than to B.  Note also that if there had been an extra
!UNINTERESTING commit B1 between B and D, it wouldn't have gone down C.

Change the default following to test relevant_commit() instead of
!UNINTERESTING, so it can proceed straight from D to B, thus finishing
the traversal of that path.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-16 11:51:10 -07:00

197 lines
6.7 KiB
Bash
Executable file

#!/bin/sh
#
# ,---E--. *H----------. * marks !TREESAME parent paths
# / \ / \*
# *A--*B---D--*F-*G---------K-*L-*M
# \ /* \ /
# `-C-' `-*I-*J
#
# A creates "file", B and F change it.
# Odd merge G takes the old version from B.
# I changes it, but J reverts it, so K is TREESAME to both parents.
# H and L both change "file", and M merges those changes.
test_description='TREESAME and limiting'
. ./test-lib.sh
note () {
git tag "$1"
}
unnote () {
git name-rev --tags --stdin | sed -e "s|$_x40 (tags/\([^)]*\))\([ ]\)|\1\2|g"
}
test_expect_success setup '
test_commit "Initial file" file "Hi there" A &&
git branch other-branch &&
test_commit "file=Hello" file "Hello" B &&
git branch third-branch &&
git checkout other-branch &&
test_commit "Added other" other "Hello" C &&
git checkout master &&
test_merge D other-branch &&
git checkout third-branch &&
test_commit "Third file" third "Nothing" E &&
git checkout master &&
test_commit "file=Blah" file "Blah" F &&
test_tick && git merge --no-commit third-branch &&
git checkout third-branch file &&
git commit &&
note G &&
git branch fiddler-branch &&
git checkout -b part2-branch &&
test_commit "file=Part 2" file "Part 2" H &&
git checkout fiddler-branch &&
test_commit "Bad commit" file "Silly" I &&
test_tick && git revert I && note J &&
git checkout master &&
test_tick && git merge --no-ff fiddler-branch &&
note K
test_commit "file=Part 1" file "Part 1" L &&
test_tick && test_must_fail git merge part2-branch &&
test_commit M file "Parts 1+2"
'
check_outcome () {
outcome=$1
shift
case "$1" in
*"("*)
FMT="%P %H | %s"
munge_actual="
s/^\([^ ]*\) \([^ ]*\) .*/(\1)\2/
s/ //g
s/()//
"
;;
*)
FMT="%H | %s"
munge_actual="s/^\([^ ]*\) .*/\1/"
;;
esac &&
printf "%s\n" $1 >expect &&
shift
param="$*" &&
test_expect_$outcome "log $param" '
git log --format="$FMT" $param |
unnote >actual &&
sed -e "$munge_actual" <actual >check &&
test_cmp expect check || {
cat actual
false
}
'
}
check_result () {
check_outcome success "$@"
}
# Odd merge G drops a change in F. Important that G is listed in all
# except the most basic list. Achieving this means normal merge D will also be
# shown in normal full-history, as we can't distinguish unless we do a
# simplification pass. After simplification, D is dropped but G remains.
# Also, merge simplification of G should not drop the parent B that the default
# simple history follows.
check_result 'M L K J I H G F E D C B A'
check_result '(LH)M (K)L (GJ)K (I)J (G)I (G)H (FE)G (D)F (B)E (BC)D (A)C (A)B A'
check_result 'M H L K J I G E F D C B A' --topo-order
check_result 'M L H B A' -- file
check_result '(LH)M (B)L (B)H (A)B A' --parents -- file
check_result 'M L J I H G F D B A' --full-history -- file
check_result '(LH)M (K)L (GJ)K (I)J (G)I (G)H (FB)G (D)F (BA)D (A)B A' --full-history --parents -- file
check_result '(LH)M (G)H (J)L (I)J (G)I (FB)G (B)F (A)B A' --simplify-merges -- file
check_result 'M L K G F D B A' --first-parent
check_result 'M L G F B A' --first-parent -- file
# Check that odd merge G remains shown when F is the bottom.
check_result 'M L K J I H G E' F..M
check_result 'M H L K J I G E' F..M --topo-order
check_result 'M L H' F..M -- file
check_result '(LH)M (B)L (B)H' --parents F..M -- file
check_result 'M L J I H G' F..M --full-history -- file
check_result '(LH)M (K)L (GJ)K (I)J (G)I (G)H (FB)G' F..M --full-history --parents -- file
check_result '(LH)M (G)H (J)L (I)J (G)I (FB)G' F..M --simplify-merges -- file
check_result 'M L K J I H G' F..M --ancestry-path
check_result 'M L J I H G' F..M --ancestry-path -- file
check_result '(LH)M (K)L (GJ)K (I)J (G)I (G)H (FE)G' F..M --ancestry-path --parents -- file
check_result '(LH)M (G)H (J)L (I)J (G)I (FE)G' F..M --ancestry-path --simplify-merges -- file
check_result 'M L K G' F..M --first-parent
check_result 'M L G' F..M --first-parent -- file
# Note that G is pruned when E is the bottom, even if it's the same commit list
# If we want history since E, then we're quite happy to ignore G that took E.
check_result 'M L K J I H G' E..M --ancestry-path
check_result 'M L J I H' E..M --ancestry-path -- file
check_result '(LH)M (K)L (EJ)K (I)J (E)I (E)H' E..M --ancestry-path --parents -- file
check_result '(LH)M (E)H (J)L (I)J (E)I' E..M --ancestry-path --simplify-merges -- file
# Should still be able to ignore I-J branch in simple log, despite limiting
# to G.
check_result 'M L K J I H' G..M
check_result 'M H L K J I' G..M --topo-order
check_result 'M L H' G..M -- file
check_result '(LH)M (G)L (G)H' G..M --parents -- file
check_result 'M L J I H' G..M --full-history -- file
check_result 'M L K J I H' G..M --full-history --parents -- file
check_result 'M H L J I' G..M --simplify-merges -- file
check_result 'M L K J I H' G..M --ancestry-path
check_result 'M L J I H' G..M --ancestry-path -- file
check_result 'M L K J I H' G..M --ancestry-path --parents -- file
check_result 'M H L J I' G..M --ancestry-path --simplify-merges -- file
# B..F should be able to simplify the merge D from irrelevant side branch C.
# Default log should also be free to follow B-D, and ignore C.
# But --full-history shouldn't drop D on its own - without simplification,
# we can't decide if the merge from INTERESTING commit C was sensible.
check_result 'F D C' B..F
check_result 'F' B..F -- file
check_result '(B)F' B..F --parents -- file
check_result 'F D' B..F --full-history -- file
check_result '(D)F (BA)D' B..F --full-history --parents -- file
check_result '(B)F' B..F --simplify-merges -- file
check_result 'F D' B..F --ancestry-path
check_result 'F' B..F --ancestry-path -- file
check_result 'F' B..F --ancestry-path --parents -- file
check_result 'F' B..F --ancestry-path --simplify-merges -- file
check_result 'F D' B..F --first-parent
check_result 'F' B..F --first-parent -- file
# E...F should be equivalent to E F ^B, and be able to drop D as above.
check_result 'F' E F ^B -- file # includes D
check_result 'F' E...F -- file # includes D
# Any sort of full history of C..F should show D, as it's the connection to C,
# and it differs from it.
check_result 'F D B' C..F
check_result 'F B' C..F -- file
check_result '(B)F (A)B' C..F --parents -- file
check_result 'F D B' C..F --full-history -- file
check_result '(D)F (BC)D (A)B' C..F --full-history --parents -- file
check_result '(D)F (BC)D (A)B' C..F --simplify-merges -- file
check_result 'F D' C..F --ancestry-path
check_result 'F D' C..F --ancestry-path -- file
check_result 'F D' C..F --ancestry-path --parents -- file
check_result 'F D' C..F --ancestry-path --simplify-merges -- file
check_result 'F D B' C..F --first-parent
check_result 'F B' C..F --first-parent -- file
test_done