mirror of
https://github.com/git/git
synced 2024-10-28 19:25:47 +00:00
c455c87c5c
The name path_list was correct for the first usage of that data structure, but it really is a general-purpose string list. $ perl -i -pe 's/path-list/string-list/g' $(git grep -l path-list) $ perl -i -pe 's/path_list/string_list/g' $(git grep -l path_list) $ git mv path-list.h string-list.h $ git mv path-list.c string-list.c $ perl -i -pe 's/has_path/has_string/g' $(git grep -l has_path) $ perl -i -pe 's/path/string/g' string-list.[ch] $ git mv Documentation/technical/api-path-list.txt \ Documentation/technical/api-string-list.txt $ perl -i -pe 's/strdup_paths/strdup_strings/g' $(git grep -l strdup_paths) ... and then fix all users of string-list to access the member "string" instead of "path". Documentation/technical/api-string-list.txt needed some rewrapping, too. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
126 lines
4.4 KiB
Text
126 lines
4.4 KiB
Text
Like other projects, we also have some guidelines to keep to the
|
|
code. For git in general, three rough rules are:
|
|
|
|
- Most importantly, we never say "It's in POSIX; we'll happily
|
|
ignore your needs should your system not conform to it."
|
|
We live in the real world.
|
|
|
|
- However, we often say "Let's stay away from that construct,
|
|
it's not even in POSIX".
|
|
|
|
- In spite of the above two rules, we sometimes say "Although
|
|
this is not in POSIX, it (is so convenient | makes the code
|
|
much more readable | has other good characteristics) and
|
|
practically all the platforms we care about support it, so
|
|
let's use it".
|
|
|
|
Again, we live in the real world, and it is sometimes a
|
|
judgement call, the decision based more on real world
|
|
constraints people face than what the paper standard says.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As for more concrete guidelines, just imitate the existing code
|
|
(this is a good guideline, no matter which project you are
|
|
contributing to). But if you must have a list of rules,
|
|
here they are.
|
|
|
|
For shell scripts specifically (not exhaustive):
|
|
|
|
- We prefer $( ... ) for command substitution; unlike ``, it
|
|
properly nests. It should have been the way Bourne spelled
|
|
it from day one, but unfortunately isn't.
|
|
|
|
- We use ${parameter-word} and its [-=?+] siblings, and their
|
|
colon'ed "unset or null" form.
|
|
|
|
- We use ${parameter#word} and its [#%] siblings, and their
|
|
doubled "longest matching" form.
|
|
|
|
- We use Arithmetic Expansion $(( ... )).
|
|
|
|
- No "Substring Expansion" ${parameter:offset:length}.
|
|
|
|
- No shell arrays.
|
|
|
|
- No strlen ${#parameter}.
|
|
|
|
- No regexp ${parameter/pattern/string}.
|
|
|
|
- We do not use Process Substitution <(list) or >(list).
|
|
|
|
- We prefer "test" over "[ ... ]".
|
|
|
|
- We do not write the noiseword "function" in front of shell
|
|
functions.
|
|
|
|
- As to use of grep, stick to a subset of BRE (namely, no \{m,n\},
|
|
[::], [==], nor [..]) for portability.
|
|
|
|
- We do not use \{m,n\};
|
|
|
|
- We do not use -E;
|
|
|
|
- We do not use ? nor + (which are \{0,1\} and \{1,\}
|
|
respectively in BRE) but that goes without saying as these
|
|
are ERE elements not BRE (note that \? and \+ are not even part
|
|
of BRE -- making them accessible from BRE is a GNU extension).
|
|
|
|
For C programs:
|
|
|
|
- We use tabs to indent, and interpret tabs as taking up to
|
|
8 spaces.
|
|
|
|
- We try to keep to at most 80 characters per line.
|
|
|
|
- When declaring pointers, the star sides with the variable
|
|
name, i.e. "char *string", not "char* string" or
|
|
"char * string". This makes it easier to understand code
|
|
like "char *string, c;".
|
|
|
|
- We avoid using braces unnecessarily. I.e.
|
|
|
|
if (bla) {
|
|
x = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
is frowned upon. A gray area is when the statement extends
|
|
over a few lines, and/or you have a lengthy comment atop of
|
|
it. Also, like in the Linux kernel, if there is a long list
|
|
of "else if" statements, it can make sense to add braces to
|
|
single line blocks.
|
|
|
|
- We try to avoid assignments inside if().
|
|
|
|
- Try to make your code understandable. You may put comments
|
|
in, but comments invariably tend to stale out when the code
|
|
they were describing changes. Often splitting a function
|
|
into two makes the intention of the code much clearer.
|
|
|
|
- Double negation is often harder to understand than no negation
|
|
at all.
|
|
|
|
- Some clever tricks, like using the !! operator with arithmetic
|
|
constructs, can be extremely confusing to others. Avoid them,
|
|
unless there is a compelling reason to use them.
|
|
|
|
- Use the API. No, really. We have a strbuf (variable length
|
|
string), several arrays with the ALLOC_GROW() macro, a
|
|
string_list for sorted string lists, a hash map (mapping struct
|
|
objects) named "struct decorate", amongst other things.
|
|
|
|
- When you come up with an API, document it.
|
|
|
|
- The first #include in C files, except in platform specific
|
|
compat/ implementations, should be git-compat-util.h or another
|
|
header file that includes it, such as cache.h or builtin.h.
|
|
|
|
- If you are planning a new command, consider writing it in shell
|
|
or perl first, so that changes in semantics can be easily
|
|
changed and discussed. Many git commands started out like
|
|
that, and a few are still scripts.
|
|
|
|
- Avoid introducing a new dependency into git. This means you
|
|
usually should stay away from scripting languages not already
|
|
used in the git core command set (unless your command is clearly
|
|
separate from it, such as an importer to convert random-scm-X
|
|
repositories to git).
|