Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jeff King 9dc607f1c2 fast-import: fix file access when run from subdir
In cmd_fast_import(), we ignore the "prefix" argument entirely, even
though it tells us how we may have changed directory to the root of the
repository earlier in the process. Which means that if you run it from a
subdir and point to paths in the filesystem, like:

  cd subdir
  git fast-import --import-marks=foo <dump

then it will look for "foo" in the root of the repository, not the
current directory ("subdir/") which the user would have expected.

We can fix this by recording the prefix and using it as appropriate
whenever we open a file for reading or writing. I found each of these by
looking for cases where we call fopen() within fast-import.c, so this
should cover all cases. The new test triggers each one, as well as
making sure we don't accidentally apply the prefix when --relative-marks
is in use (since that option interprets some paths as relative to a
specific directory).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-03-28 14:11:24 -07:00
Taylor Blau ac8a1db867 Sync with 2.34.5
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-10-06 17:43:37 -04:00
Taylor Blau f4a32a550f t/t9NNN: allow local submodules
To prepare for the default value of `protocol.file.allow` to change to
"user", ensure tests that rely on local submodules can initialize them
over the file protocol.

Tests that interact with submodules a handful of times use
`test_config_global`.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-10-01 00:23:38 -04:00
Eric Sunshine 0c51d6b4ae t6000-t9999: detect and signal failure within loop
Failures within `for` and `while` loops can go unnoticed if not detected
and signaled manually since the loop itself does not abort when a
contained command fails, nor will a failure necessarily be detected when
the loop finishes since the loop returns the exit code of the last
command it ran on the final iteration, which may not be the command
which failed. Therefore, detect and signal failures manually within
loops using the idiom `|| return 1` (or `|| exit 1` within subshells).

Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-12-13 10:29:48 -08:00
Jeff King 3f018ec716 fast-import: fix over-allocation of marks storage
Fast-import stores its marks in a trie-like structure made of mark_set
structs. Each struct has a fixed size (1024). If our id number is too
large to fit in the struct, then we allocate a new struct which shifts
the id number by 10 bits. Our original struct becomes a child node
of this new layer, and the new struct becomes the top level of the trie.

This scheme was broken by ddddf8d7e2 (fast-import: permit reading
multiple marks files, 2020-02-22). Before then, we had a top-level
"marks" pointer, and the push-down worked by assigning the new top-level
struct to "marks". But after that commit, insert_mark() takes a pointer
to the mark_set, rather than using the global "marks". It continued to
assign to the global "marks" variable during the push down, which was
wrong for two reasons:

  - we added a call in option_rewrite_submodules() which uses a separate
    mark set; pushing down on "marks" is outright wrong here. We'd
    corrupt the "marks" set, and we'd fail to correctly store any
    submodule mappings with an id over 1024.

  - the other callers passed "marks", but the push-down was still wrong.
    In read_mark_file(), we take the pointer to the mark_set as a
    parameter. So even though insert_mark() was updating the global
    "marks", the local pointer we had in read_mark_file() was not
    updated. As a result, we'd add a new level when needed, but then the
    next call to insert_mark() wouldn't see it! It would then allocate a
    new layer, which would also not be seen, and so on. Lookups for the
    lost layers obviously wouldn't work, but before we even hit any
    lookup stage, we'd generally run out of memory and die.

Our tests didn't notice either of these cases because they didn't have
enough marks to trigger the push-down behavior. The new tests in t9304
cover both cases (and fail without this patch).

We can solve the problem by having insert_mark() take a pointer-to-pointer
of the top-level of the set. Then our push down can assign to it in a
way that the caller actually sees. Note the subtle reordering in
option_rewrite_submodules(). Our call to read_mark_file() may modify our
top-level set pointer, so we have to wait until after it returns to
assign its value into the string_list.

Reported-by: Sergey Brester <serg.brester@sebres.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-15 10:30:53 -07:00